indirect expropriation
play

Indirect expropriation: The role of national institutions and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Indirect expropriation: The role of national institutions and domestic elites in the Mozambican farmland grab Madeleine Fairbairn International Conference on Global Land Grabbing Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex 6-8


  1. Indirect expropriation: The role of national institutions and domestic elites in the Mozambican farmland grab Madeleine Fairbairn International Conference on Global Land Grabbing Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex 6-8 April 2011

  2. The Mozambican “Land Grab” • Who: Mostly private firms based in Europe and South Africa. – Biggest participants: Sweden, Norway, Portugal, UK and South Africa. – Other participants: US, Canada, Zimbabwe, Italy, Germany, and India. • What: Mostly biofuels (jatropha and sugarcane) and timber (eucalyptus and pine). • Where: Zambezi Valley and Beira Corridor.

  3. Timber plantations Zambezi valley Beira corridor Jatropha plantations

  4. The insertion of domestic elites into foreign land acquisitions • Although the major land concessions are going to foreign firms, domestic elites are key to shaping the acquisition process. • Facilitation of land acquisitions seems to be concentrated at the lowest and highest levels of government. • Passive role: shaping the broader institutional framework to serve own interests. • Active role: opportunism catalyzed by foreign demand for land.

  5. Actions by Mozambican elites Create a national Allow foreign project on National legislative framework land for which you hold which marginalizes rights in exchange for existing land claims. annual percentage. Serve as a board Use political power to member or other demand facilitation or functionary for foreign obstruction of a project investment. by subordinate. Provincial Foreign interest Actually existing In Mozambican “foreign” land farmland grabs Use admin post to gain inside information about District Use admin post proposed deals. to demand “facilitation fee”. Manipulate consultation in return for bribes/jobs. Community

  6. Conclusions • Focus on land grabs as “neo-colonialism” only captures one aspect of the phenomenon. • Need for further research on how international capital articulates with domestic institutions and class structure. • The importance of domestic institutions/actors also has positive implications; recently there have been positive developments thanks to domestic actors.

Recommend


More recommend