increased neutrino yield with the new nova target design
play

Increased Neutrino Yield with the new NOvA Target Design Simulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Increased Neutrino Yield with the new NOvA Target Design Simulation Study Daisy Kalra Panjab University, India Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA On behalf of NOvA Collaboration HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017 Fermilab May 31, 2017


  1. Increased Neutrino Yield with the new NOvA Target Design Simulation Study Daisy Kalra Panjab University, India Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA On behalf of NOvA Collaboration HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017 Fermilab May 31, 2017 Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 1

  2. NOvA (NuMI Off-Axis ν e Appearance) NOvA looks primarily for the ν e appearance and ν µ disappearance using two detectors: the Near Detector (ND) & the Far Detector (FD). Using ν e appearance and ν µ disappearance 
 Determine the ν mass hierarchy. 
 Measure 𝜄 13 . 
 Search for CP violation. 
 Determine the 𝜄 23 octant (muon-tau asymmetry in neutrino mixing). 
 Precise measurement of atmospheric parameters 𝜄 23 and 2 ⎢ Δ m atm ⎢ . Also… 
 Neutrino cross sections at the NOvA ND 
 Sterile neutrinos 
 Supernova neutrinos 
 other exotica 
 Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 2

  3. The NuMI (Neutrinos at the Main Injector) Beam Line NOvA Far Detector NO A Simulation ν CC / 6E20 POT / kton / 0.1 GeV On-Axis FLUKA11 14.6 mrad Off-Axis (NO A) ν 15 10 NuMI Beamline 5 120 GeV proton beam from the Main Injector collides with µ ν a graphite target, resulting in the production of many 0 5 10 15 E [GeV] ν secondary (short-lived) particles (e.g pions and kaons). The NOvA off-axis position selects quasi mono energetic neutrino beam of 2 GeV where it gives the highest probability of These particles are focused by a set of two magnetic horns: oscillation. The Horn2 is 19.18m away from the Horn1. They afterwards decay to neutrinos in a decay pipe filled with He. At the end of the NuMI beam line, we get an almost pure ν µ beam. Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 3

  4. Motivation NOvA Preliminary 20 NO A 6.05 10 POT-equiv. ν × 120 Best fit prediction 100 Events / 0.25 GeV NOvA FD observed few events with exposure of Unoscillated prediction Data 80 6.05 e20 POTs. 60 We need more events, more POTs. 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Reconstructed neutrino energy (GeV) Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 4

  5. Event yield for NOvA The Event yield for the NuMI off-axis NOvA neutrino experiment is : Upgraded to 700kW for NOvA Off-Axis Running time Detector mass Event Yield (N) ∝ (Beam Power)(time) ( ν per proton) * M( ε ) Detector efficiency We focus on the efficiency ( ν per proton ) of the NuMI Target and Horn system to produce useful neutrinos (in energy range 1-3 GeV) in the NOvA detector. Getting 10% more ν per proton means 10% more event yield as if the experiment had a detector of 10% larger mass or 10% more beam power (770kW) : Interesting! So, we investigate different ways to optimize the neutrino yield per proton on the target, hence the event yield (N) of the experiment. Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 5

  6. NuMI Target & Horn system for NOvA The NOvA target consists of 48 graphite fins (+2 budal monitors) with a total target length of 122.5 cm. Downstream End Upstream End @ -20cm Horn1 @0m The NOvA Target Beam Horn2 @19.18m ME Horn2 Y-Z View of the target configuration Medium Energy Horn2 configuration (ME): The Horn2 is at Horn2 @10.00m 19.18m w.r.t the Horn1: s tandard configuration for NOvA. LE Horn2 configuration Low Energy Horn2 configuration (LE): The Horn2 is at 10.0m w.r.t the Horn1: used in past by MINOS On-Axis Experiment . Beam Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 6

  7. Study of neutrino yield NOvA FHC ν µ Events 90 Longer targets & targets with gaps : observed few ν µ events. 80 Reduce the number of fins from the upstream part of the NOvA 70 target, making a shorter target : observed maximum ν µ yield with 60 36-fins target. 50 40 Flugg ND,FHC, ν Using half of the target (24 fins), neutrino flux is reduced by µ 30 Flugg FD,FHC, 10^6 ν µ just 5% at the FD as compared to the whole 48 fins target. g4numi ND ν µ 20 g4numi FD 10^6 ν µ 10 The number of protons surviving a 24 fins target ( ƛ ~1.25) is 0 10 20 30 40 50 Number of fins ~30% : WASTE of protons! Events are in 1-3 GeV Energy Range FLUGG & G4NuMI Simulations We have investigated if we can use these protons elsewhere to get the increased neutrino yield!! Idea is to extend the target inside the Horn1! Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 7

  8. Various Targets In this study, various targets are simulated to see the effect on neutrino yield. 1. Standard NOvA target (63 mm high Fins) ➞ Real 2. MINOS tall fins target (18 mm high Fins, 
 120cm long, longer than the default MINOS target ~97cm ) ➞ Almost Real 3. MINOS short fins target (7.4 mm high Fins) ➞ Concept 4. Miniaturized NOvA target (9.5 mm high Fins) ➞ Concept 5. Minimal NOvA target (17 mm high Fins) ➞ Concept 6. Simple rod (7.4 mm high fins) ➞ Idealized Concept All targets are ~122cm long. Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 8

  9. X-Y View (Beam View Of the Targets) All Targets are shown at the same scale Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 9

  10. Y-Z View of the Targets NOvA NOvA NOvA Rod Miniaturized Minimal Standard All targets (~122cm) ending @40cm Std. NOvA Rod is the idealized concept @ -20cm s o t h e r e i s n o t a n y supporting structure, cooling tubes, Be window… z Details of the targets are in backup slides. y Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 10

  11. Strategy Using FLUGG software • Simulate targets at target position -20 cm. • Simulate various targets at different positions to find the best possible target position. • Simulate targets at the best target position. Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 11

  12. Simulation Results with different Targets (Targets Length ~122cm) Target Downstream end @ -20 cm 93.1 91.4 90.8 ν µ Event yield (Un-oscillated ν µ ) for FD in 1-3 GeV energy range 86.4 83.9 81.1 At -20cm, Standard NOvA target is the best target.. 
 (Rod is the ideal one…). Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 12

  13. Choosing the best target position and configuration Simulate Minos short target of different lengths at various target positions. FD Events (1-3 GeV energy range) ν µ Magenta: 24 fins ~64cm long POTs/kton 48 fins target (~122cm 100 Blue: 36 fins long) configuration ~93cm long 90 20 @40cm position seems CC+NC events/6X10 Red: 48 fins 80 to be the best one. ~122 cm long 70 Black: 60 fins ~147cm long 60 µ 50 ν -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Target Position [cm] We checked this further using different targets and they all showed maximum yield with target positioned @+40cm (inside the Horn1). Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 13

  14. Simulation Results with different Targets (Targets Length ~122cm) Target Downstream end @ +40cm Std. NOvA is always @-20cm 107.2 ν µ Event yield (Un-oscillated ν µ ) for FD in 1-3 GeV energy range 101.8 100.1 98.2 : E T O N 95.6 We are back to 48 fins target 91.4 configuration and are not wasting protons. At +40cm, NOvA Minimal target proves to be the best target configuration. Event gain with Minimal NOvA is 11.4% as compare to the Std. NOvA. Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 14

  15. Minimal NOvA Target simulation Minimal NOvA target @+40 cm inside the Horn1 Beryllium fins Graphite fins ME Horn2 Configuration (Horn2 @19.18m) 
 ME Horn2 Configuration (Horn2 @19.18m) 
 *FHC & RHC 
 *FHC & RHC 
 LE Horn2 Configuration (Horn2 @10.0m) 
 LE Horn2 Configuration (Horn2 @10.0m) 
 *FHC & RHC *FHC & RHC Compare these results with the Std. NOvA target *FHC: Forward Horn Current, 200kA (focussing 𝜌 + ) *RHC: Reverse Horn Current, -200kA (focussing 𝜌 - ) Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 15

  16. Results (Std. NOvA & graphite fins Minimal NOvA target: FHC) (FHC) NOvA Simulation 12 Std. NOvA(ME:C): FD ME Horn2 configuration 
 FD Events are in 1-3 GeV POT 10 Minimal NOvA(ME:C): FD Energy range (Horn2 @19.18m) 20 CC+NC/6x10 8 11.4 % gain with 6 106.0 Minimal NOvA Target 4 µ 101.8 ν 2 LE 0 ME 0 2 4 6 8 10 Energy[GeV] NOvA Simulation 91.4 LE Horn2 configuration 
 12 (Horn2 @10.0m) Std. NOvA(ME:C): FD 10 POT Minimal NOvA(LE:C): FD 8 20 15.9 % gain with CC+NC/6x10 6 Red: Standard NOvA Minimal NOvA Target 4 Blue: Graphite (C) Fins µ ν 2 Minimal NOvA Target % is w.r.t Std.NOvA 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Energy[GeV] Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 16

  17. On-axis behavior is very different from Off-axis behavior NOvA Simulation 30 NOvA (ME) OnAxis FD NOvA (ME) OffAxis FD 25 POT Minimal NOvA:C (ME) OnAxis FD Minimal NOvA:C (ME) OffAxis FD 20 20 CC+NC/6x10 15 10 µ ν 5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Energy[GeV] Off-axis spectra is fairly constant (no shift in the peak), just the number of events changes. On-axis spectra for Standard NOvA shifts towards higher energy as compare to the on-axis spectra for Minimal NOvA because we have removed the fins from upstream part in Minimal NOvA which leads to higher energies. Daisy Kalra Fermilab/P.U. HPT R&D RoadMap Workshop-2017, Fermilab 17

Recommend


More recommend