Impact of surface floats on commercial mussel yields in high-energy sites Offshore Aquaculture Conf Barcelona 6 Apr 2016 John C Bonardelli; Shellfish Solutions AS
What makes $$ for offshore shellfish growers? -Stable longlines -Low maintenance costs -Boats match production objectives -Socking strategies for short time-to-market High commercial yields John C Bonardelli; Shellfish Solutions A Offshore Aquaculture Conf Barcelona 6 Apr 2016
Evaluation: 5 farms using JFC & other floats Outer Killary Pat Lydon Dec 2009 Sep 2010 Muskerry Bay Finnbar Daly Dec 2009 Facebook: ’Mussel talk’ Shellfish Solutions AS
Evaluation of farms Roaring Waters Dec 2009 • AMC mussels • Turkhead • Colin Whooley Facebook: ’Mussel talk’ Shellfish Solutions AS
They float, so what’s the difference? Float type has different structural characteristics impacting line stability ROM Blue-barrel JFC GEM What are the best indicators to show that one float type outperforms another ? Every float company sells the best product. Growers use them wrong! Facebook: ’Mussel talk’ Shellfish Solutions AS
Let the mussels do the talking! We use standardized sampling protocols to identify the impact of floats on commercial yields and quality Facebook: ’Mussel talk’ Shellfish Solutions AS
Standardized samples for depths 1,4, 9m below mainline
Declump & clean shells in bucket
From dirty to clean Code sample bag, Clean shells, Ready to measure
Compare cooked meat & shell mass by 5mm size-class Meat content : Strong indicator of food availability in last 3-5 weeks Shell mass : Great indicator of past seasonal conditions; currents, sediment, stress due to waves, socking...
Objectives To compare benefits of JFC ribbed floats to other mainstream products in Ireland To use measurable biological factors for unbiased comparison of commercial yields Confirm Float performance (to grower) -Highest yields /m/line -Consistent size range -Lowest upkeep costs -Shortest time to market Facebook: ’Mussel talk’ Shellfish Solutions AS
Comparing sample mass ROM Wet mass (Kg/m) for mussel samples taken on ROM float lines- Killary 8 Sep'10 12,0 ROM ROM 9,0 Total wet mass (Kg) ROM 14,5mo ROM- 01 ‘inconsistent’ 25,6mo Varied wet weights: 6,0 ROM 1 & 9m & east to west lite 400 14,5mo lite 400 3,0 between 6 & 12 kg/m ROM 12,4mo 25,6mo - ROM-06 west varied: Inner-01-C Inner-01-C Mid-01-B Mid-01-B Outer-01-A Outer-01-A Outer-06-A Outer-06-A Outer-01-A Inner-01-C For simplicity, we compare and show ROM (east)- ROM (east)- ROM -1m ROM -9m (west ROM) (west ROM) (west ROM) (west ROM) spat'10 west- spat'10 east- at 1 & 9m (3 & 9kg/m). 1m 9m 1m 9m 1m 9m JFC) 1m JFC 1m results for ROM & JFC floats JFC ROM JFC Wet mass for (Kg/m) for mussel samples taken on JFC float lines- Killary 8Sep'10 12,0 JFC JFC ‘consistent’ 14,5mo 9,0 JFC Total wet mass (Kg) JFC JFC JFC JFC All samples 1,4, 9 m 15,5mo 14,5mo 14,5mo 6,0 weighed over 9kg/m All tripled mass since 3,0 Dec’09 - JFC always among highest Inner-02-C Inner-02-C Inner-02-C Mid-02-C (mid Mid-02-C (mid Mid-02-C (mid Outer-02-A Outer-02-A (east-JFC) 1m (east-JFC) 4m (east-JFC) 9m JFC) 1m JFC) 4m JFC) 9m west-JFC) 1m west-JFC) 9m mass at each site Facebook: ’Mussel talk’ Shellfish Solutions AS
Commercial volumes between ROM & JFC ROM-01 JFC-02 Wet mussel mass from Outer Killary within 20hrs 8Sep'10 JFC avg g 1m 18,0 JFC avg g 4m JFC avg g 9m 15,0 mean total wet mass g ROM avg g 1m ROM avg g 9m 12,0 Linear (Best avg) 9,0 6,0 >5- >10- >15- >20- >25- >30- >35- >40- >45- >50- >55- >60- >65- >70 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Density: (890/m) 4m Pergolini 8mm JFC MeanSize: (50,1 mm) 3,0 >35-40 >40-45 >45-50 >50-55 >55-60 >60-65 size class (mm) avg yield: 7,8 kg/m avg yield: 9,2 kg/m 5200m socks 5200m socks +20% 40Tm 48Tm Facebook: ’Mussel talk’ Shellfish Solutions AS
Size-distribution differences between ROM & JFC ROM-01 JFC-02 Mid-01-B ROM -1m, OnlineMus, DIS: 01-jul-09 Sampled: 08-sep-10 (14,5 mon.-start)" JFC-02-C (mid) 9m, Online Mussel, DIS: 01-jul-09 Sampled: 08-sep-10 (14,5 mon.- 40 start)" 40 30 30 % frequency % frequency 20 20 10 10 0 0 0-5 >5-10 >10- >15- >20- >25- >30- >35- >40- >45- >50- >55- >60- >65- >70 0-5 >5- >10- >15- >20- >25- >30- >35- >40- >45- >50- >55- >60- >65- >70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Density: (725/m) 1m Pergolini 8mm JFC MeanSize: (43,5 mm) Density: (849/m) 9m Pergolini 8mm JFC MeanSize: (51,7 mm) Outer-01-A (west ROM) 1m, OnlineMus, DIS: 01-aug-08 Sampled: 08-sep-10 (25,6 mon.- start)" JFC-02-C (mid) 4m, Online Mussel, DIS: 01-jul-09 Sampled: 08-sep-10 (14,5 mon.- 40 start)" 40 30 30 % frequency % frequency 20 20 10 10 0 0 0-5 >5-10 >10- >15- >20- >25- >30- >35- >40- >45- >50- >55- >60- >65- >70 0-5 >5- >10- >15- >20- >25- >30- >35- >40- >45- >50- >55- >60- >65- >70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Density: (2490/m) 1m Pergolini 8mm ROM MeanSize: (35,5 mm) Density: (1252/m) 4m Pergolini 8mm JFC MeanSize: (47,6 mm) Avg yield: 9,2 kg/m Avg yield: 7,8 kg/m Same everywhere Big variations JFC Produce larger mussels FASTER! More even density Slower time to market Facebook: ’Mussel talk’ Shellfish Solutions AS
Compare commercial sizes to 2 nd set spat ROM-01 JFC-02 Number of 2010 2nd set spat by depth for east, mid & west sections JFC-02 Number of 2010 2nd set spat by depth for east, mid & west sections ROM-01, & ROM 700 2 100 Spat JFC -02- 1m spat 2 078 ROM -01- 1m spt 603 600 1 800 JFC -02- 4m spat ROM -01- 9m spt 1 532 JFC -02- 9m spat 500 1 500 1 255 1 200 400 900 300 600 200 163 342 108 99 219 300 100 68 53 46 69 38 - - east 10-38mm mid 10-38mm west 10-38mm R east 10-38mm mid 10-38mm west 10-38mm The 2nd set at 1m was 20x greater at east end, and 2-3x higher on west end, than on JFC line Mid-01-B ROM -1m, OnlineMus, DIS: 01-jul-09 Sampled: 08-sep-10 (14,5 mon.-start)" Mid-01-B ROM -1m, OnlineMus, DIS: 01-jul-09 Sampled: 08-sep-10 (14,5 mon.-start)" JFC-02-C (mid) 4m, Online Mussel, DIS: 01-jul-09 Sampled: 08-sep-10 (14,5 mon.- JFC-02-C (mid) 4m, Online Mussel, DIS: 01-jul-09 Sampled: 08-sep-10 (14,5 mon.- Number of commercial mussels by depth for east, mid & west sections JFC-02 40 Number of commercial mussels by depth for east, mid & west sections ROM-01, & ROM 40 start)" start)" 1 200 1 200 40 40 Commercial JFC -02- 1m ROM -01- 1m 960 JFC -02- 4m 1 000 1 000 947 ROM -01- 9m 30 30 JFC -02- 9m 30 30 791 800 % frequency 800 % frequency 731 % frequency % frequency 710 704 681 639 20 20 582 20 20 600 600 519 466 416 410 400 400 10 10 10 10 165 200 200 0 0 0 0 0-5 0-5 >5- >5- >10- >10- >15- >15- >20- >20- >25- >25- >30- >30- >35- >35- >40- >40- >45- >45- >50- >50- >55- >55- >60- >60- >65- >65- >70 >70 - - 0-5 >5-10 >10- >15- >20- >25- >30- >35- >40- >45- >50- >55- >60- >65- >70 0-5 >5-10 >10- >15- >20- >25- >30- >35- >40- >45- >50- >55- >60- >65- >70 10 10 15 15 20 20 25 25 30 30 35 35 40 40 45 45 50 50 55 55 60 60 65 65 70 70 east 45-65mm mid 45-65mm west 45-65mm 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 east 45-65mm mid 45-65mm west 45-65mm Density: (1252/m) 4m Pergolini 8mm JFC MeanSize: (47,6 mm) Density: (1252/m) 4m Pergolini 8mm JFC MeanSize: (47,6 mm) Density: (725/m) 1m Pergolini 8mm JFC MeanSize: (43,5 mm) Density: (725/m) 1m Pergolini 8mm JFC MeanSize: (43,5 mm) -Commercial density VARIABLE, decreasing westward -Commercial density on JFC is HIGH >700/m -LOSS of larger mussels typical at many sites (floats) -Densities CONSISTENT from east to west and depth Facebook: ’Mussel talk’ Shellfish Solutions AS
Differences in meat content for same size mussels 55-60mm 40-45mm Comparison of standard cooked meat with depth for JFC & ROM lines, 8 Sep'10 4,5 4,0 3,5 Avg cooked meat mass g 3,0 1m 9m 2,5 1m jfc-02-1m jfc-02-9m ROM-01-1m ROM-01-9m 9m 2,0 1,5 1m 1m 9m 9m 1,0 0,5 - >40-45 >55-60 size class (mm) Small : no difference in meat Commercial : JFC meat was 7% heavier at 1m, 4% heavier than ROM at 9m: content with depth or less stress & more time to feed between ROM & JFC lines Facebook: ’Mussel talk’ Shellfish Solutions AS
Recommend
More recommend