Impact of Mining on Primary Producers Dr Emily Roberts Scientific - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Impact of Mining on Primary Producers Dr Emily Roberts Scientific Officer Marine Ecologist Taranaki Regional Council Primary Producers Introduction Euphotic zone Benthic microalgae Phytoplankton Concerns Scale Nutrient
Impact of Mining on Primary Producers Dr Emily Roberts Scientific Officer – Marine Ecologist Taranaki Regional Council
Primary Producers Introduction • Euphotic zone • Benthic microalgae • Phytoplankton Concerns • Scale • Nutrient versus light limitation Suggestions • Scale of risk assessment • Adaptive management • Monitoring
Intro: Euphotic Zone Definition: • Euphotic Zone Depth: light declined to 1% of surface value • Compensation depth: o 24h mean photosynthesis = 24h mean respiration Pinkerton (2014) Predicting the effects of ironsand mining on optical properties of the STB
Intro: Euphotic Zone Pinkerton (2014) Predicting the effects of ironsand mining on optical properties of the STB
Intro: Euphotic Zone Natural Mining
Intro: Phytoplankton Relative average (2 year) light in water column: (% of surface?) Natural Compensation irradiance: ~1% Mining: Site A Pinkerton (2014) Mining: Site B
Intro: Benthic Microalgae Average (2 year) light @ seabed: mol photons m -2 d -1 Natural Compensation irradiance: 0.4 mol photons m -2 d -1 Mining: Site A Pinkerton (2014) Mining: Site B
Intro: % Decrease over South Taranaki Bight Average Mining Site A Mining Site B Benthic microalgae: Light @ seabed 51% 59% Phytoplankton: Light in water column 8% 15% Pinkerton (2014) Phytoplankton primary production 4% 8% Total (B+P) primary production 5% 12% Energy flow to benthos 9% 16%
Concern 1: Scale STB: 12,500 km 2 Plume: ~800 km 2 Plume = <7% STB
Concern 1: Scale Consent Condition (April 2014): 9 (f) vii. No more than minor impact on STB phytoplankton abundance and distribution attributable to optical property changes arising from TTR’s operations.
Concern 1: Scale • Plume shifting • Operations • Water masses • Seasonal • Nutrient limitation • High uncertainty • More variable pulses of phytoplankton Require: Conditions minimize knock on food web effects
Concern 2: Nutrient vrs Light Discussion: Nutrient limitation, e.g.: • McClary, Statement of Evidence, p33, Point 168 • Pinkerton, Optical Properties Report, Point 14 • Huber, Hearing Transcripts, p637 • Venus, Hearing Transcripts, p1883 Clarify: Nutrient and light limitation of phytoplankton growth
Concern 2: Nutrient vrs Light Some of year: Phytoplankton growth N limited When phytoplankton N limited: decrease light without effecting growth Do not know: • Extent: phytoplankton growth limited by N? + ? • Extent: phytoplankton rely on NH 4 • Point: growth switch from nutrient to light limitation? • Area of plume: nutrient to light limitation?
Concern 2: Nutrient vrs Light N limitation of phytoplankton growth: important Current lack of info: Cannot use to imply plume minor impact on primary productivity Requires robust approach: assess impacts of plume: • Risk assessment • Consent conditions • Adaptive management • Monitoring
Suggestion 1: Scale of Risk Assessment Provide comparative estimates of primary productivity values over median footprint of plume: mining vrs non-mining • Required: assess/manage potential foodweb impacts • Values: inform monitoring effort & design
Suggestion 2: Adaptive Management Use adaptive management approach: manage potential impacts mining on PP • Model: management tool • Validated: appropriate monitoring • Model output: development trigger values (SSC & optical) • Spatial scale
Suggestion 3: Monitoring Develop robust monitoring programme: enable management risk in relation to primary producers • Currently: plan proposed monitoring phytoplankton & benthic microalgae = limited: • Benthic microalgae chlorophyll a: Condition 79 • Primary productivity (incl. light) – Conditions 83 & 131 (Venus, p1884 : only light?) • Joint Expert Reports ‘Optical’ & ‘Benthic 2’: Macrofauna: o Valuable: detecting when impact occurred o Limited: confirms impact in hindsight
Suggestion 3: Monitoring Develop predictive model: • Forecast risk • Inform implementation of appropriate trigger values • Validated during baseline monitoring • Monitoring: determine: o Effects of SSC on primary productivity o Switch nutrient to light limitation of phytoplankton growth • Phytoplankton physiologist/modeller on TPRG
Thank You Dr Emily Roberts Scientific Officer – Marine Ecologist Taranaki Regional Council
Recommend
More recommend
Explore More Topics
Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.