identifying and prioritizing needs
play

Identifying and Prioritizing Needs Bond Issue Task Force - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Identifying and Prioritizing Needs Bond Issue Task Force Presentations Voting Process Recommendations to JPS Board of Education Consult with Bond Advisors Identifying and Prioritizing Needs Ongoing discussions


  1. Identifying and Prioritizing Needs • Bond Issue Task Force • Presentations • Voting Process • Recommendations to JPS Board of Education • Consult with Bond Advisors

  2. Identifying and Prioritizing Needs • Ongoing discussions between board members and administration • Modify list based on available funding and projecting future needs • JPS Board of Education calls the election • Community members vote and work begins

  3. Annual Need Items • District-Wide Safety Improvements • Technology Equipment/Improvements • Textbooks/Media Equipment • Facilities/Maintenance Improvements • Transportation Equipment • District-Wide Equipment • District – Wide Copiers * District-Wide Child Nutrition Equipment

  4. Lease Revenue Items • Elementary Classroom Space • Intermediate Classroom Space • Renovation of HS Buildings 5 & 6 • Parking Improvements at East Elementary • Central Campus Cafeteria Expansion & Kitchen Remodel • District Agricultural Research Facility *Hunter-Dwelley Stadium Press Box *Middle School Athletic Fields *West Elementary ½ Mile Exercise Path

  5. This PowerPoint does not represent all of the details associated with the needs of our growing school district. No decisions have been made and your input is important. We encourage you to attend a future Bond Election Information meeting to hear more detailed information. Dates for these meetings will be made available soon.

  6. Student Enrollment Projection 2014 – 2024 and Attendance Zone Reconfiguration 2014 research report and analysis

  7. Long-Range Planning Committee Stacey Butterfield Debbie Burchfield Lisa Muller Ben Ferem Cody Way Roger Wright Jenks Public Schools’ Long-Range Planning Process

  8. University of Tulsa Student Growth Study 1986 – 2006 FinCo GeoDemographics, L.L.C. Dr. Jon Comer and Dr. Allen Finchum Oklahoma State University Population and Enrollment Projection 2007 – 2022 Population and Enrollment Projection 2012 – 2022 Population and Enrollment Projection 2014 – 2024 Attendance Zone Reconfiguration 2014

  9. 2014 District Commissioned Studies

  10. Enrollment Projections 2014 - 2024

  11. Option 1 – Grade Levels Remain the Same • Option 2 – Fourth Grade Moved to Intermediate • Sites Option 3 – Build New Pre-K/K Center • Option 4 – Build New Fourth Elementary School (N) • Option 5 – Convert SEE into a Pre-K/K Center • Serving All Students East of the River Options 6(A) – 6(D) – Assigns Student North of 81 st • and East of the River to the West Attendance Zone

  12. • Option 1 – Grade Levels Remain the Same • Option 2 – Fourth Grade Moved to Intermediate Sites • Option 3 – Build New Pre-K/K Center

  13. Options 1, 2 & 3 A – Adjusted EE and SEE (not feasible with limited available construction space at SEE campus) Option A B – No change Option B

  14. This option includes the addition of a fourth elementary school (North Elementary School).

  15. Option 4

  16. Each option includes five and ten year classroom need projections

  17. • Option 5A converts Southeast Elementary to a Pre- K/K Center for the entire east side of the District, and East Elementary to a 1 - 4 Elementary School. (No Pre-K/K change for West Elementary since classroom space exists to meet needs.) • Option 5B also follows the concept in 5A and adds a new Elementary School.

  18. Option 5A

  19. Option 5B

  20. • These options are focused on expansion of the current West Elementary attendance zone to include areas east of the river and north of 81 st Street. The various options allow for differing levels of reduction to the enrollment at East Elementary. • These options would be only temporary solutions during the construction of the fourth elementary school.

  21. Option 6A

  22. Option 6B

  23. Option 6C and 6D Not Feasible Options 6C and 6D mirror 6A and 6B but include the proposed boundary change between East Elementary and Southeast Option 6C Elementary. These options are not feasible because of the limited construction space available at Southeast Elementary. Option 6D

  24. N/A N/A

  25. Proposed North Elementary and Intermediate Boundary

  26. 24” Explorer Fuel Pipeline

Recommend


More recommend