ICANN Policy Update Webinar Policy Department, October 2011 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ICANN Policy Update Webinar Policy Department, October 2011

Introduction David Olive 2

Goals for this session • Update you on current Policy work and encourage you to participate • Review issues to be discussed at the ICANN Meeting in Dakar • Inform you of upcoming initiatives and opportunities to provide input • Answer any questions you might have 3

ICANN Meeting in Dakar • Highlights include: • Newcomers Track Day • New gTLDs Developments • Abuse of the DNS Forum • Consumer Choice, Competition and Trust • DNS S EC Workshop • AFRALO S howcase • Further information http:/ / dakar42.icann.org/ and http:/ / dakar42.icann.org/ full-schedule to see different tracks 4

Policy Developed at ICANN by: ICANN S upporting Organizations • GNS O – Generic Names S upporting Organization • ccNS O – Country-code Names S upporting Organization • AS O – Address S upporting Organization Advice provided by Advisory Committee – ALAC – At-Large Advisory Committee – S S AC – S ecurity & S tability Advisory Committee – RS S AC – Root S erver S ystem Advisory Committee – GAC – Governmental Advisory Committee 5

Topics covered in this session • Geographic Regions (Rob Hoggarth) Generic Names • New Policy Development Process S upporting (Marika Konings) Organisation (GNS O) • Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (Marika) • Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery (Marika) • Discussion Paper on Best Practices (Marika) • UDRP Final Issue Report (Margie Milam) • WHOIS Update (Liz Gasster) • WHOIS IRD WG (S teve S heng) 6

Topics covered in this session • Framework of Interpretation WG (Bart Country Code Boswinkel) S upporting Organisation • Other maj or activities (ccNS O) • Joint Working Groups (DS S A, S tudy Group on use of Country Names) Address • Recovered IPv4 Post Exhaustion (Olof S upporting Organisation Nordling) (AS O) 7

GNSO Policy Issues 8

Current issues being discussed in GNS O • Geographic Regions Review • New GNS O Policy Development Process • Registration Abuse Policies (RAP) • Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) • Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery • Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) • WHOIS • Others – currently there are over 20 proj ects underway 9

Geographic Regions Review Rob Hoggarth 10

Geographic Regions Review - What • Geographic diversity is a fundamental component of the ICANN organization. • The ICANN Bylaws currently define five geographic regions as Africa, North America, Latin America/ Caribbean, Asia/ Australia/ Pacific and Europe. 11

Geographic Regions Review – Why? • Review anticipated in Bylaws • ccNS O Council requested review (2007) • Board agreed and approved community-wide working group concept (2008) and charter (2009) • WG has produced two reports • Third (and final) report being prepared – with recommendations for potential changes. 12

Geographic Regions Review – Next S teps • Public Comment Forum Open on WG Draft Final Report • Comment s Due 19 December • WG will review comment s and publish Final Report in early 2012 • Communit y (S O-AC) formal review opport unit y • Present at ion To Board – mid 2012 • Board Review and Act ion – lat e 2012. 13

New GNS O Policy Development Process (PDP) Marika Konings 14

New GNS O Policy Development Process (PDP) • Board-mandated by GNS O Improvements effort • Goal -- A new PDP that incorporates a working group approach and makes process more effective and responsive to ICANN ’ s policy development needs. 15

New GNS O Policy Development Process - Recs The Updated Final Report includes 48 recommendations, a new Annex A of the Bylaws and a proposed PDP Manual – examples : • S tandardized "Request for an Issue Report Template” • Use of "Preliminary Issue Report” • Required public comment period of no less than 30 days on a PDP Working Group ’ s Initial Report and a minimum of 21 days for any non-required public comment periods the PDP WG initiates • Requirement that all reports presented to the Board are reviewed by either the PDP Working Group or the GNS O Council and made publicly available. • The use of Implementation Review Teams 16

New GNS O Policy Development Process – Next S teps • The GNS O Council is expected to consider the Updated Final Report in Dakar. • S ubsequent Community Comment opportunity • Board Review 17

Additional Information • Geographic Regions Review Public Comment Forum - http:/ / http:/ / www.icann.org/ en/ public-comment/ geo-regions- draft-final-report-30sep11-en.htm • PDP Updated Final Report- http:/ / gnso.icann.org/ improveme nts/ updated-final-report-pdpwt- 28sep11.pdf • GNS O Improvements Info Page - http:/ / gnso.icann.org/ en/ improv ements/ 18

Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Marika Konings 19

Why is it important? • Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) • S traightforward process for registrants to transfer domain names between registrars • Currently under review to ensure improvements and clarification – nr 1. area of complaint according to data from ICANN Compliance 20

IRTP Part B PDP – S tatus Update • Working Group completed its report in May 2011, GNS O Council adopted recommendations in June 2011 • Board consideration and adoption in August 2011 • Request for staff proposals for two issues (WHOIS status messages & new provision to lock / unlock domain names) • Implementation of adopted recommendations underway, incl. Transfer Emergency Action Contact 21

IRTP Part C • GNS O Council initiated a PDP on IRTP Part C at its meeting in S eptember • Call for volunteers launched (see https:/ / community.icann.org/ display/ gn soirtppdpwg/ Home) • IRTP Part C to address three issues: a) ‘ Change of Control ’ , b) Time-limiting FOAs, c) IANA IDs for registrars 22

‘ Thick ’ WHOIS Issue Report • GNS O Council adopted recommendation of IRTP Part B WG to request Issue Report on the requirement of ‘ thick’ WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs • ICANN S taff to prepare Preliminary Issue Report for Public Comment (timing to be confirmed) 23

How do I get involved? • Join the IRTP Part C Working Group (see https:/ / community.icann.org/ display/ gns oirtppdpwg/ Home) • Attend the IRTP Update at the ICANN meeting in S enegal - Thursday 27 October from 10.00 – 11.30 local time (see http:/ / dakar42.icann.org/ node/ 27007) 24

Background Information • IRTP Part B PDP Final Report - http:/ / gnso.icann.org/ issues/ t ransfers/ ir tp-b-final-report -30may11-en.pdf • IRTP Part C Final Issue Report - http:/ / gnso.icann.org/ issues/ issue- report-irtp-c-29aug11-en.pdf • Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy - http:/ / www.icann.org/ en/ transfers/ 25

Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Marika Konings 26

Why is it important? • To what extent should registrants be able to reclaim their domain names after they expire? • Issue brought to the GNS O by ALAC • PEDNR WG examined five questions relating to expiration and renewal practices and policies • Final Report delivered to the GNS O Council in June 2011 27

Recent Developments • GNS O Council adopt ed t he Final Report and it s recommendat ions in July 2011 • Public comment forum was opened t o allow for communit y input prior t o Board Considerat ion (see ht t p:/ / forum.icann.org/ list s/ pednr- board-recommendat ions/ ) • ICANN Board expect ed t o consider recommendat ions at it s meet ing in Dakar 28

Recommendations The WG believes that the recommendations: • will provide additional guarantees to registrants; • will improve registrant education and comprehension; • are in line with current registrar practices and will have minimal impact on most registrars and other affected stakeholders. 29

Recommendations Tot al of 17 recommendat ions, including amongst ot hers: • Provide a minimum of 8 days after expiration for renewal by registrant • All gTLDs and registrars must offer Redemption Grace Period (RGP), with the exception of sponsored gTLDs • Fees charged for renewal must be posted • At least two notices prior to expiration at set times, one after expiration 30

Recommendations - continued • Website must explicitly say that registration has expired and instructions on how to redeem • Development of education materials about how to prevent unintentional loss • Best practices recommendations • Regular updates on the effectiveness and status of implementation of the recommendations 31

Next S teps • ICANN Board consideration of recommendations • If adopted, creation of a PEDNR Implementation Review Team to assist ICANN S taff in developing the implementation plan 32

Further Information • Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Final Report - http:/ / gnso.icann.org/ issues/ pednr- final-report-14j un11-en.pdf 33

Discussion Paper on the creation of non-binding best practices to address the abusive registrations of domain names Marika Konings 34