i 77
play

I-77 EXPRESS LANES Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 January 24, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 28, 2022 •442 likes •854 views

ANALYSIS OF THE MERCATOR POLICY OPTIONS I-77 EXPRESS LANES Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 January 24, 2018 Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018 Welcome and Introductions James H. Trogdon - NCDOT Secretary

  1. ANALYSIS OF THE MERCATOR POLICY OPTIONS I-77 EXPRESS LANES Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 January 24, 2018 Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  2. Welcome and Introductions James H. Trogdon - NCDOT Secretary Beau Memory - NCTA Executive Director Carly Olexik, Rodger Rochelle, David Roy - NCTA and NCDOT Staff Jim Taylor - Mercator Advisors Adam Gosselin, Radha Krishna, Phil Schwab - RS&H Project Team Peg Carlson and John Stephens - UNC School of Government Facilitators Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 2 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  3. Local Advisory Group: Introductions Please share your: ▪ Name ▪ Position/who you represent ▪ Response to this statement: “One thing that will help this advisory group work effectively is ….” Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 3 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  4. Group Purpose Advise and Provide Input for the NCDOT Secretary a) Analyze Mercator Report ‘Options to Consider’ b) Assess potential changes for the I- 77 Express Lanes Project’s Scope and P3 Contract Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 4 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  5. Roles Local Advisory Group Provides input; analyzes pros and cons of various options NCTA staff Liaison with NCDOT; point of contact for LAG information requests Mercator / RS&H team Researches and presents options; brings expertise with projects of this size and scope Facilitators Helps group have productive discussion and use its time effectively Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 5 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  6. Process: Six Meetings* Provide information on the project’s ▪ scope and contract Review and evaluate proposed options ▪ Identify additional analysis needed ▪ Suggest modifications of options ▪ Finalize advice/input for NCDOT ▪ *Subject to change Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 6 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  7. Ground Rules “Share the air” ▪ Listen to others’ perspectives ▪ Focus on interests before taking ▪ positions Seek common ground and action ▪ Anything you would like to change or add to this list? Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 7 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  8. Today’s Agenda I-77 Project Timeline Overview of Public Private Partnerships (P3) Mercator Report overview and options Preparation for Meeting #2 Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 8 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  9. I-77 Express Project Timeline Fast Lanes Study I-77 Express Lanes Project Feasibility Study NCDOT First Application for TIGER Grant Funding P3 Procurement Started February 2012 EA and FONSI Completed CINTRA Award (April) Commercial Close (June) Financial Close (May) Construction Begins (Nov) Anticipated Opening (Fall) 2007 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 9 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  10. I-77 Express Project Timeline Secretary Announces In-Depth, Outside Review of Contract Public Involvement Begins Draft Mercator Report Final Mercator Report Construction Begins (Nov) Anticipated Opening (Fall) 2015 2016 2017 FEB APR JUN AUG SEPT DEC 2018 Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 10 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  11. PROJECT OVERVIEW I-77 EXPRESS Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  12. High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)Lanes Project Scope LEGEND High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lane Direct Connector (DC) DC DC DC DC DC Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 12 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  13. High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)Lanes Project Scope LEGEND High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lane Direct Connector (DC) DC DC DC DC DC SOUTH: 2 HOT Lanes + 3/4 GP Lanes NORTH: CENTRAL: in each direction 1 HOT Lanes + 2 GP Lanes 2 HOT Lanes + 2/3 GP Lanes in each direction in each direction Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 13 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  14. Southern Section Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 14 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  15. Direct Connectors at I-277 Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 15 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  16. Central Section Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 16 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  17. Central Section Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 17 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  18. Northern Section Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 18 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  19. P3 OVERVIEW Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  20. Public-Private Partnerships Contractual Agreements Formed Between a Public Agency and a Private Sector Entity that Allow for Greater Private Sector Participation in the Delivery and Financing of Transportation Projects. – FHWA Office of Innovative Program Delivery Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 20 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  21. Project Delivery Method Considerations FINANCIAL RISK INTEGRATION SPECIFICATION COMPLEXITY INCENTIVES MANAGEMENT INPUT Contracts are Most RISKS are specification, MULTIPLE PAY AS YOU GO , Conventional STANDARDIZED retained by the contracts, PUBLIC determining design typically progress Delivery and relatively entity is integrator payments PUBLIC entity and engineering SIMPLE solutions in detail OUTPUT PAYMENTS are Contracts are COMPLEX specification, RISK transfer is typically tied to ONE contracts, and require financial, allowing for creative P3 Delivery PRIVATE entity milestones or much greater to the legal, and technical is integrator AVAILABILITY or solutions and life PRIVATE entity expertise based on REVENUE cycle costing Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 21 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  22. P3 Potential Benefits Access to Private Capital Can Payments Tied to Performance Accelerate Project Delivery Maximize Potential for Life Transfer of Risk Cycle Cost Efficiencies Secure Unique or Specialized Long Term Setting Services/Expertise of Public Funding Spurs Innovation Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 22 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  23. There Are Also Challenges… Limit or Restrict Difficult to Contemplate All Future Improvements Situations in a Long Term Contract Increase Cost of Changes/ Potential Cost to Change More Levels on Developer in HOV Restrictions Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 23 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  24. Traditional Delivery Team Structure Oversight North Carolina Department Debt Support of Transportation TIFIA/Bonds Operations & Toll Systems Design Construction Maintenance Contractor Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 24 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  25. I-77 P3 Team Structure Oversight North Carolina Department Support of Transportation Proposer Developer Debt and Equity I-77 Mobility Partners TIFIA/Bonds Operations & Toll Systems Contractor Maintenance Integrator Designer Local Advisory Group Workshop #1 25 I-77 Express Lanes | January 24, 2018

  26. Review of the Comprehensive Agreement between the North Carolina Department of Transportation and I-77 Mobility Partners LLC Overview of the Mercator Report January 2018

  27. Presentation Outline  Purpose of the Mercator Review  Organization of the Final Report and Addendum  Key Findings and Observations  Policy Options Identified in the Report 27

  28. Purpose of the Mercator Review Mercator Advisors LLC (Mercator) was retained to review the Comprehensive Agreement between the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and I-77 Mobility Partners LLC. The objective was to identify and evaluate potential policy options that might address concerns expressed by members of the public regarding the implementation of the managed toll lanes concept and various provisions in the agreement. 28

  29. Organization of the Final Report A draft of the Mercator report was posted for public review in August 2017. The report included • a review of the project development process, • an assessment of the allocation of project risk under the P3 agreement, • a discussion of frequently expressed questions and concerns about the Express Lanes and the P3 Agreement, and • a description of potential policy options for for NCDOT consideration. 29

  30. Report Addendum Comments submitted to NCDOT after the draft report was posted were primarily brief statements of opposition to tolls and/or the P3 agreement and expressions of support for an option proposed by the Widen I-77 organization that involves completing the widening of I-77 without installing the electronic toll collection system. Instead of making changes to the draft report posted in August, Mercator prepared an Addendum to the Final Report to highlight the “complete and delete” option and other topics raised in the public comments. 30

  31. Key Findings and Observations  The planning process did not provide sufficient opportunities for the public to evaluate the relative merits of express lanes and alternatives without tolls. • Focus on “immediate travel time reliability along I -77 from Uptown Charlotte to the Lake Norman area” precluded the examination of additional general purposes lanes in the environmental assessment. 31

Recommend

More recommend