how to prepare an authorisation application for 2019
play

How to Prepare an Authorisation application for 2019 Some Notes It - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

November 16 th , 2017 | Webinar How to Prepare an Authorisation application for 2019 Some Notes It is assumed that attendees have basic knowledge about REACH. Let us make this webinar interactive, please send questions We try to


  1. November 16 th , 2017 | Webinar How to Prepare an Authorisation application for 2019

  2. Some Notes • It is assumed that attendees have basic knowledge about REACH. • Let us make this webinar interactive, please send questions – We try to answer during the webinar, if not possible, we will use email and may also include some in our Q&A on our website: http://www.reachlaw.fi/services/market-access- services/reach-authorisation-services/ 2

  3. Content Introduction Analysis of Alternatives Socio-Economic Analysis Chemical Safety Report Application Strategy with past REACHLaw examples

  4. REACHLaw in a nutshell What we do? We provide global regulatory compliance and environmental sustainability services to ensure market access and operational sustainability for global businesses KEY FACTS ABOUT US SERVICE AREAS OUR CLIENTS  Established in Helsinki  Global chemicals  More than 350 customers  Offices in Brussels, New regulatory compliance, e.g. from 40+ countries, from Delhi and Istanbul Fortune 100 companies to  30+ toxicologists, SMEs. REACH CLP chemists, lawyers, socio-  Major industries served: econ. analysts, business and China Biocides Oil, chemicals, specialty REACH environmental specialists chemicals, metals, space  20+ local partners in TCCA-Korea Turkey sector and other Europe, Asia, Latin-America downstream users (DU) and the USA  We prepare the required industries  500+ REACH registrations  Our customers are dossiers to authorities, SDSs,  Language support in 10+ manufacturers, importers, labels and provide related different languages traders, DU ´ s, industry business strategy, legal and  more info about Us: associations and monitoring support. www.reachlaw.fi governmental organizations.  www.compliantsuppliers.com 4

  5. REACHLaw’s Authorisation Experiences Substance Type Industry Sector Triton X 100 Upstream In Vitro Diagnostics Diarsenic trioxide Single DU Mining Diarsenic trioxide Single DU Mining Sodium dichromate Multi-site DU Mining Professional and Consumer electrical Sodium chromate Group DU products Chromium trioxide Group DU Multiple Chromium trioxide Single DU Professional and Consumer products Sodium chromate Upstream Textiles Chromium trioxide Single DU Aerospace and Defence Chromium trioxide Sector Specific Aerospace and Defence 2,2'-dichloro-4,4'-methylenedianiline Upstream Polyurethane Chromium trioxide Upstream Multiple

  6. Entry Nr Substance Intrinsic property(ies) Latest Sunset date referred to in Article 57 application date 32 1-Bromopropane (n-propyl bromide) Toxic for reproduction 4 January 2019 4 July 2020 EC No: 203-445-0 CAS No: 106-94-5 (category 1B) 33 Diisopentylphthalate Toxic for reproduction 4 January 2019 4 July 2020 EC No: 210-088-4 (category 1B) CAS No: 605-50-5 34 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, di-C6-8- Toxic for reproduction 4 January 2019 4 July 2020 branched alkyl esters, C7 rich (category 1B) EC No: 276-158-1 CAS No: 71888-89-6 35 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, di-C7-11- Toxic for reproduction 4 January 2019 4 July 2020 branched and linear alkyl esters (category 1B) EC No: 271-084-6 CAS No: 68515-42-4 36 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, Toxic for reproduction 4 January 2019 4 July 2020 dipentylester, branched and linear (category 1B) EC No: 284-032-2 CAS No: 84777-06-0 37 Bis(2-methoxyethyl) phthalate Toxic for reproduction 4 January 2019 4 July 2020 EC No: 204-212-6 (category 1B) CAS No: 117-82-8

  7. Entry Nr Substance Intrinsic property(ies) Latest Sunset date referred to in Article 57 application date 38 Dipentylphthalate Toxic for reproduction 4 January 2019 4 July 2020 EC No: 205-017-9 (category 1B) CAS No: 131-18-0 39 N-pentyl-isopentylphthalate Toxic for reproduction 4 January 2019 4 July 2020 EC No: — (category 1B) CAS No: 776297-69-9 40 Anthracene oil Carcinogenic (category 4 April 2019 4 October 2020 EC No: 292-602-7 1B, PBT, vPvB CAS No: 90640-80-5 41 Pitch, coal tar, high temp. Carcinogenic (category 4 April 2019 4 October 2020 EC No: 266-028-2 1B, PBT, vPvB CAS No: 65996-93-2 42 4-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl) phenol, ethoxylated Endocrine disrupting 4 July 2019 4 January 2021 properties (Article 57(f) — (covering well-defined substances and UVCB substances, polymers and homologues) EC No: environment) — CAS No: — 43 4-Nonylphenol, branched and linear, ethoxylated Endocrine disrupting 4 July 2019 4 January 2021 properties (Article 57(f) — (substances with a linear and/or branched alkyl chain with a carbon number of 9 covalently environment) bound in position 4 to phenol, ethoxylated covering UVCB- and well-defined substances, polymers and homologues, which include any of the individual isomers and/or combinations thereof) EC No: — CAS No: —

  8. Content Introduction Analysis of Alternatives Socio-Economic Analysis Chemical Safety Report Application Strategy with past REACHLaw examples

  9. Analysis of Alternatives Define Define Define Actions use function alternative Analysis of feasibility: Alternatives that Technical, Economic, remove the need of Availability the function Risk reduction The use of 4-tert- Use of 4-tert-OPnEO OPnEO as a in IVD industry surfactant Analysis of feasibility: Alternatives that can Technical, Economic, perform the same Availability, function Risk reduction

  10. General Approach to the Analysis of Alternatives Risk Technical Economic Availability reduction feasibility feasibility  Alternative  Yes/No Yes/No/Partial 1 Alternative    To be Yes/No/Partial Yes/No 2 analysed Alternative    To be  Yes/No/Partial Yes/No Risk profiling 3 analysed The conclusion has to be that there is NO alternative.

  11. Analysis of Alternatives Are there differences with the approach for PBTs, vPvB, etc. • – Not really! • The AoA should still : – Define alternatives – Explain reasoning behind continued use e.g. standards, etc. – Elaborate on R&D and feasibility of alternatives » Technical feasibility » Economic feasibility – Explain any actions required & time-lines to change – Assess the availability

  12. Analysis of Alternatives • If you have already identified an alternative? – Possible to implement before the Sunset Date? • No Authorisation required – Possible to substitute in part by the Sunset Date? • Authorisation required for that part/tonnage where substitution is not possible • Remaining tonnage should be substituted • Substitution Plan required – Not possible to implement alternative in any way before the Sunset Date? • Authorisation required for the full tonnage • Substitution Plan required

  13. Content REACHLaw in a nutshell Analysis of Alternatives Socio-Economic Analysis Chemical Safety Report Application Strategy with past REACHLaw examples

  14. Socio-economic analysis (SEA) Risks Benefits

  15. Impacts: SEA process and information needs • Human health/ environment • Economic • Social • Wider economic To define To define To define To define the relevant Why? the in-use the non-use Analysis Conclusion the impacts the supply scenario scenarios chain Use, company, Implications of Material flow, Difference between the in- and market info: the non-use Suppliers, Reactions of the use and non-use scenarios Business, scenario for the Distribution relevant supply production, relevant supply in monetary terms with channels, What? chain to the non- salary, investments, chain: health/ Customers, uncertainty analysis for the use scenario raw material cost, environ., econ., Consumers historical and future social and wider relevant supply chain. trends econ. impacts Questionnaires How? Meetings Expertise Research

  16. Impacts: • SEA process and information needs Human health/ environment • Economic • Social What changes? • Wider economic To define To define To define To define the relevant Why? the in-use the non-use Analysis Conclusion the impacts the supply scenario scenarios chain Use, company, Implications of Material flow, Difference between the in- and market info: the non-use Suppliers, Reactions of the use and non-use scenarios Business, scenario for the Distribution relevant supply production, relevant supply in monetary terms with channels, What? chain to the non- salary, investments, chain: health/ Customers, uncertainty analysis for the use scenario raw material cost, environ., econ., Consumers historical and future social and wider relevant supply chain. trends econ. impacts Questionnaires How? Meetings Expertise Research

  17. Defining impacts – Human health & Environmental • Before – Quantitative estimates of the relationship between individual exposure and the incidence of a defined health effect, – Assessment of exposure, – A measure of actual impact of the health effect, – An estimate of the total population exposed, – Monetisation of CMR- substance’s exposure via willingness -to-pay estimate. After • – Quantification of impacts is not currently possible for most PBT/vPvB substances, which makes the evaluation whether the socio-economic benefits of use of the substance outweigh the risks for an application for authorisation challenging.

Recommend


More recommend