how to construct deep recurrent neural
play

How to Construct Deep Recurrent Neural Networks AUTHORS: R. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How to Construct Deep Recurrent Neural Networks AUTHORS: R. PASCANU, C. GULCEHRE, K. CHO, Y. BENGIO PRESENTATION: HAROUN HABEEB PAPER: HTTPS://ARXIV.ORG/ABS/1312.6026 This presentation Motivation Formal RNN paradigm Deep RNN designs


  1. How to Construct Deep Recurrent Neural Networks AUTHORS: R. PASCANU, C. GULCEHRE, K. CHO, Y. BENGIO PRESENTATION: HAROUN HABEEB PAPER: HTTPS://ARXIV.ORG/ABS/1312.6026

  2. This presentation Motivation Formal RNN paradigm Deep RNN designs Experiments Note on training Takeaways

  3. Motivation: Better RNNs? Depth makes feedforward neural networks more expressive What about RNNS? How do you make them deep? Does depth help?

  4. ๐’Š ๐‘ข = ๐‘” โ„Ž (๐’š ๐‘ข , ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 ) Conventional ๐’› ๐‘ข = ๐‘” ๐‘ ๐’Š ๐‘ข RNNs Specifically: โ„Ž ๐’š ๐‘ข , ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 ; ๐‘ฟ, ๐‘ฝ = ๐œš โ„Ž ๐‘ฟ ๐‘ˆ ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 + ๐‘ฝ ๐‘ผ ๐’š ๐‘ข ๐‘” ๐‘ ๐’Š ๐‘ข ; ๐‘พ = ๐œš ๐‘ (๐‘พ ๐‘ˆ ๐’Š ๐‘ข ) ๐‘” โ–ช How general is this? โ–ช How easy is it to represent an LSTM/GRU in this form? โ–ช What about bias terms? โ–ช How would you make an LSTM deep?

  5. THE DEEPENING

  6. ๐’› ๐‘ข = ๐‘” ๐‘ ๐’Š ๐‘ข DT(S)-RNN ๐’Š ๐‘ข = ๐‘” โ„Ž (๐‘• ๐’š ๐‘ข , ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 , ๐’š ๐‘ข , ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 ) Specifically: ๐‘ง ๐‘ข = ๐œ”(๐‘‹โ„Ž ๐‘ข ) โ„Ž ๐‘ข = ๐œš ๐‘€ ( ๐‘ˆ ๐œš ๐‘€โˆ’1 โ€ฆ ๐‘Š ๐‘ˆ ๐œš 1 ๐‘Š ๐‘ˆ โ„Ž ๐‘ขโˆ’1 + ๐‘‰๐‘ฆ ๐‘ข ๐‘Š ๐‘€ 2 1 + เดฅ ๐‘‹ ๐‘ˆ โ„Ž ๐‘ขโˆ’1 +เดฅ ๐‘‰ ๐‘ˆ ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ข )

  7. ๐’› ๐‘ข = ๐‘” ๐‘ ๐’Š ๐‘ข DOT(S)-RNN ๐’Š ๐‘ข = ๐‘” โ„Ž (๐‘• ๐’š ๐‘ข , ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 , ๐’š ๐‘ข , ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 ) Specifically: ๐‘ˆ ๐œ” ๐‘€ (โ€ฆ ๐‘‹ ๐‘ˆ ๐œ” 1 ๐‘‹ ๐‘ˆ โ„Ž ๐‘ข ) ๐‘ง ๐‘ข = ๐œ” 0 (๐‘‹ ๐‘€ 1 โ„Ž ๐‘ข = ๐œš ๐‘€ ( ๐‘ˆ ๐œš ๐‘€โˆ’1 โ€ฆ ๐‘Š ๐‘ˆ ๐œš 1 ๐‘Š ๐‘ˆ โ„Ž ๐‘ขโˆ’1 + ๐‘‰๐‘ฆ ๐‘ข ๐‘Š ๐‘€ 2 1 + เดฅ ๐‘‹ ๐‘ˆ โ„Ž ๐‘ขโˆ’1 +เดฅ ๐‘‰ ๐‘ˆ ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ข )

  8. 0 = ๐’ˆ โ„Ž 0 (๐’š ๐‘ข , ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 0 ๐’Š ๐‘ข ) sRNN (๐‘š) = ๐‘” (๐‘š) (๐’Š ๐‘ข ๐‘šโˆ’1 , ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 ๐‘š โˆ€๐‘š โˆถ ๐’Š ๐‘ข ) โ„Ž (๐‘€) ๐’› ๐‘ข = ๐‘” ๐‘ ๐’Š ๐‘ข Specifically: (๐‘€) ๐’› ๐‘ข = ๐œ” ๐‘‹ ๐‘ˆ ๐’Š ๐‘ข (0) = ๐œš 0 (0) ๐‘ˆ ๐’š ๐‘ข + ๐‘‹ ๐‘ˆ ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 โ„Ž ๐‘ข ๐‘‰ 0 0 ๐‘š = ๐œš ๐‘š ๐‘šโˆ’1 + ๐‘‹ (๐‘š) ๐‘ˆ ๐’Š ๐‘ข ๐‘ˆ ๐’Š ๐‘ขโˆ’1 โˆ€๐‘š: ๐’Š ๐‘ข ๐‘‰ ๐‘š ๐‘š

  9. Experiment 0: Parameter count Food for thought: Not clear which one has most number of parameters โ€“ sRNN or DOT(S)-RNN.

  10. Experiment 1: Polyphonic Music Prediction Next Task: note(s) Sequence of musical notes Food for thought: Sure, depth helps, but * helps a lot more in this case. What about RNN* and other models with *?

  11. Experiment 2: Language Modelling Next Task : Sequence of characters/words character/word (LM on PTB) Food for thought: Deepening LSTMs? Stack them or DOT(S) them?

  12. Note on training โ–ช Training RNNs can be hard because of vanishing/exploding gradients. โ–ช Authors did a bunch of things: โ–ช Clipped gradients, threshold = 1 โ–ช Sparse weight matrices ( ๐‘‹ 0 = 20 ) โ–ช โ‡’ max ๐‘—,๐‘˜ ๐‘‹ ๐‘—,๐‘˜ = 1 Normalized weight matrices โ–ช Add gaussian noise to gradients โ–ช Used dropout, maxout, ๐‘€ ๐‘ž units

  13. Takeaways โ–ช Plain, shallow RNNs are not great. โ–ช DOT-RNNs do well. Following should be deep networks โ–ช ๐‘ง = ๐‘”(โ„Ž, ๐‘ฆ) โ–ช โ„Ž ๐‘ข = ๐‘” ๐‘• ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ข , โ„Ž ๐‘ขโˆ’1 , ๐‘ฆ ๐‘ข , โ„Ž ๐‘ขโˆ’1 - both ๐‘” and ๐‘• โ–ช Training can be really hard. โ–ช Thresholding gradients, Dropout, maxout units are helpful/needed โ–ช LSTMs are good Questions?

Recommend


More recommend