Houghton Everest Neighborhood Center 6 th Street Corridor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Houghton Everest Neighborhood Center 6 th Street Corridor Transportation Commission Meeting January 25, 201 7

AGENDA • Introduction • Updates • Comments from Transportation Commission • Comments from Staff • Comments from City Council • Evaluation Criteria • 6 th Street Corridor Potential Solutions • Evaluation • Wrap Up

UPDATES • Timing • Staff • Protected crossing of 6 th at • City Council Kirkland Ave • Bold ideas • Project Status NE 53rd, Fire station • East‐West Connectors Signal, left‐turn protection • Neighborhood Center Kirkland Way, Park and Ride access • Transportation Commission • H/E Neighborhood Center Connections • Fire station driveway • 9 th Ave Signal • Drop 60 th New Road • Park and Ride coordination with • North of Central Bellevue • Consider U‐Turns as part of transit signal priority

EVALUATION Connects Communities Cost 3 – New or improved connectivity $ < $1 Million 2 – No Impact and No Improvement $$ $1‐ $5 Million 1 – Impacts Connectivity $$$ $5 – 10 Million $$$$ > $10 Million Movement for the Future Movement of People 3 – Capacity = TMP 3 ‐ Increases person throughput of People w/o Impacts 2 – Conflicts nor Aligns TMP 2 – Increases person throughput w/ 1 – Conflicts with TMP Impacts 1 – No increase of throughput Recommend

NE 6 TH STREET CORRIDOR POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS Evaluation • Timing • How long to implement? • Cost • People Moving • How much does it improve mobility? • Connecting Communities • Capacity for the Future Houghton Everest Neighborhood Center

NE 6 TH STREET CORRIDOR – LOCATION 1 • 6 th Street and Kirkland Way Intersection Improvements • 1A: Transit Signal Priority • 1B: Signal Coordination • 1C: Crosswalk Improvements

Project 1A: Transit Signal Priority at 6 th St / Kirkland Way • Metro’s heavily used route 255 turns northbound left at this intersection and eastbound right. Conceptual Design ‐ Transit Signal Priority: Transit signal priority at this intersection for the northbound lefts could provide a short travel time advantage for transit. Timeline Cost Movement Connections Capacity Recommend? of People for Future 1‐5 Years $ 2 2 2 • Benefits • Better Transit throughput (255, 245 and future Frequent Service) • Works with current signal and requires minimal changes • Efficient use of Green • Challenges • Long queues and only short benefit • Recommendation • Look at existing stop • Coordination with Metro

Project 1B: Signal Coordination along 6 th St • To better and more efficiently travel along the 6th Street 6 th Street Signal Coordination: corridor between Central Way and Kirkland Way. Interconnecting the signals (including the signal at 4th) could improve the efficiency, reduce stops and delays. Timeline Cost Movement Connections Capacity Recommend? of People for Future 1‐5 years $$ 3 1 3 • Benefits • Better Transit throughput (245, 255) • Reduce red time arrivals • Improve speed and reliability • Challenges • Cost for interconnection • Recommendations • Implement • Coordination with Metro

Project 1C: 6 th St / Kirkland Ave Crosswalk Improvements • To improve access across 6th Street for pedestrians, RRFB Intersection Improvements: put in place RRFB crossing. Timeline Cost Movement Connections Capacity Recommend? of People for Future 1‐5 Years $ 3 3 2 • Benefits • Improve safety and neighborhood connectivity • Challenges • Visibility (angled intersection) • Recommendations • Implement

NE 6 TH STREET CORRIDOR – LOCATION 2 • Kirkland Way and Railroad Avenue Intersection Improvements • 2A: Intersection Improvements and Speed Radar

Project 2A: Kirkland Way / Railroad Ave Improvements • There may be the opportunity to add a westbound left turn pocket at railroad Avenue to Conceptual Design – Intersection Improvements: improve turning movements. Radar speed signs may help reduce speeds and improve safety for accessing Kirkland Way. Timeline Cost Movement Connections Capacity Recommend? of People for Future 1‐5 Years $ 1 2 2 • Benefits • Anticipated reduction in crashes • Improved sight distance • Challenges • Drainage ditches • Recommendations • City is planning to implement

NE 6 TH STREET CORRIDOR – LOCATION 3 • Transit Access at Cross Kirkland Corridor • 3A: Bus Rapid Transit on CKC bypass 108 th to S Kirkland Park and Ride • 3B: Bus Intersection at 6 th Street and the CKC

Project 3A: High Capacity Transit on CKC to S Kirkland P&R • To reduce transit delays incurred on 6th Street and 108th Avenue, especially northbound during PM peak periods, HCT on Cross Kirkland Corridor: constructing HCT lanes within the CKC, similar to the Master Plan. Transit on the CKC, especially in this segment could still connect to local neighborhoods but would dramatically improve overall transit travel times. Timeline Cost Movement Connections Capacity Recommend? of People for Future 10 + Years $$$$ 3 3 3 • Benefits • Substantial travel time savings (5‐10 Minutes) for transit (255, 540) Could attract other routes Reduced delays by buses on 6 th /108 th Avenue • • Consistent phasing of CKC Master Plan • Challenges • Reduces access to transit on 6 th /108 th • Substantial permitting/design costs • Advanced Technology for stations and vehicles • Recommendations • Pursue opportunities for implementation • Coordination with Agency Partners

Project 3B: Bus Intersection at 6 th St / CKC • Another opportunity for transit signal priority would be at the CKC trail intersection on 6th Street. This Conceptual Design of Bus Intersection: would require a new signal, removal of on‐street parking to give transit a bypass of northbound queues that can be over 200 feet long. Timeline Cost Movement Connections Capacity Recommend? of People for Future 10 + Years $$$$ 3 3 3 • Benefits • Better transit throughput (245, 255, 540) • Improves access for neighborhood (Moss Bay) • Protected (Signal Controlled) Crossing • Challenges • May impact queue • May not satisfy warrants • Recommendations • Consider for implementation and coordination with Metro

NE 6 TH STREET CORRIDOR – LOCATION 4 • 6 th Street and 9 th Avenue Intersection • 4A: Re‐Assess the installation of a traffic signal at 6 th Street and 9 th Avenue

Project 4A: Reassess Traffic Signal at 6 th Street / 9 th Avenue • The City is in the process of designing and constructing a new traffic signal at the intersection of 6th Street and 9th. This signal could provide 6 th Street & 9 th Avenue Intersection: a shortcut for cut through traffic and may impact the adjacent intersection at NE 68th Street and 108th Avenue. Deferral and delay of this signal might be helpful as a consideration of future development and rezone consideration. Timeline Cost Movement Connections Capacity Recommend? of People for Future 1‐5 Years $ 1 2 3 • Benefits • Provides Access to Everest Neighborhood • Consolidates driveways • Challenges • Volumes are low Close to 6 th /108 th /68 th Intersection • • Could encourage cut through • Recommendations • Funded through Mitigation • Designed • Monitor • Move forward with construction

NE 6 TH STREET CORRIDOR – LOCATION 5 • 70 th Street overpass of I‐405 • 5A: Improve / expand overpass • 5B: BRT Planning near 85 th / 70 th Streets and Houghton Park and Ride

Project 5A: Improve and Expand 70 th Street Overpass • Better organization and improvements in this corridor, could provide better and protected space for pedestrians and add 70 th Street Overpass: space for cyclists which does not exist today. There is also a need to improve operations and access for transit and reduce delay for vehicles in the vicinity of I‐405. Timeline Cost Movement Connections Capacity Recommend? of People for Future 10+ Years $$$$ 3 3 2 • Benefits • Key east west connection for all modes • Linkage to transit (Houghton PR and future I‐405 BRT) • Challenges • Grade limitations • Challenging Ped and bike connections from Flyer • Recommendations • Consider operations as part of future I‐405 BRT implementation • Improve connectivity for all modes

Project 5B: BRT Planning near 85 th / 70 th / Houghton P&R • Passage of ST 3 includes development of Bus Rapid Transit on I‐405 and potential station development within the Future BRT Planning: freeway right of way near 85th. City transit planning would support coordination and integration with the local street system to most effectively connect these new stations to the local communities and other transit sources. Timeline Cost Movement Connections Capacity Recommend? of People for Future 5‐10 Years $ 3 3 2 • Benefits • I‐405 BRT Implementation 2024 • Linkage for several Kirkland Neighborhoods • Challenges • Existing infrastructure and interchanges • Connection for all modes • Recommendations • Look for opportunities to improve as part of I‐405 BRT • Coordination with agency partners • Recommend planning study

NE 6 TH STREET CORRIDOR – LOCATION 6 • Houghton Park and Ride • 6A: Houghton Park and Ride lease for private shuttles