history
play

HISTORY In 1988, PCC and ECU develop MOU for ECU students in need of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HISTORY In 1988, PCC and ECU develop MOU for ECU students in need of Developmental Math instruction (Math 045 course). Dual enrollment at PCC and ECU . FTEs reported by PCC. PCC covers salaries and instructional costs. Classes held both


  1. HISTORY In 1988, PCC and ECU develop MOU for ECU students in need of Developmental Math instruction (Math 045 course). Dual enrollment at PCC and ECU . FTE’s reported by PCC. PCC covers salaries and instructional costs. Classes held both online and on ECU campus. Self-paced learning in computer lab. Credit hours reflected on transcripts at both PCC and ECU . ECU charges “remediation fee”.

  2. Business Model ECU receives “fee” to support overhead (facilities and academic support). PCC receives tuition and FTE credit to support instructor costs. Registrars coordinate enrollment . PCC registers students as Special Credit students . PCC transfers balance of student accounts to 3 rd party sponsor account (ECU). PCC invoices ECU for this amount. ECU sends payment for tuition to PCC.

  3. INSTRUCTION , PERSONNEL AND ENROLLMENT Instruction Personnel Enrollment • Self-paced lab • Two full-time • In 2016, 38 sections sections (instructor/ instructors and five (spring, summer, fall). assistants). part-time instructors • In 2014-15, 800 • ECU Pirate Academic students enrolled in Success Center. program. • Fall 2016, 530 students enrolled. • 15% of Freshman ECU students in cohort.

  4. PARTNERSHIP BENEFITS Course PCC faculty ECU does produces Supplied able to better not provide better- and Faculty and prepare or pay for prepared maintained institutional transfer instructors students to computer collaboration students to or succeed in lab enhanced. succeed after instructional college- provided. matriculation. materials. level classes.

  5. STUDENT BENEFITS  • Continue with other classes while improving Math skills.  • Convenient online and campus classes-University experience.  • Small class learning environment/individual attention. • Increased scores in post-course Placement Test and prepared  to succeed in college-level Math. • Comparable success rates as students who placed directly into  college-level Math.

  6. STUDENT SUCCESS Math 1045 completion Success rate of students Since 2014, success rate rate: placing directly into of Math 1045 completers Math 1065: in Math 1065: 67% 70%-75% 77% Since 2014, success rate Success rate of students of Math 1045 completers placing directly into in Math 1066: Math 1066: 82% 80%

  7. QUESTIONS?

Recommend


More recommend