high field dipoles for accelerators
play

High Field Dipoles for accelerators Etienne Rochepault PhD student - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CEA Saclay - Irfu High Field Dipoles for accelerators Etienne Rochepault PhD student Etienne Rochepault Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 1 Background 2009: Graduated from Ecole Normale Suprieure French famous school for


  1. CEA Saclay - Irfu High Field Dipoles for accelerators Etienne Rochepault PhD student Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 1

  2. Background • 2009: Graduated from “ Ecole Normale Supérieure ”  French famous school for higher education and research. • 2009: Master degree in Electrical Engineering, University of Paris-Sud • PhD thesis at CEA Saclay  Center for Atomic Energy, great research institution  Paris area  My department, IRFU, involved in many CERN projects • 2012, September: PhD defense • Teaching charge at university, during the PhD Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 2

  3. Outline I. Some issues in high field magnets 1. High field magnets for LHC 2. Innovative insulations II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 1. 2D cross-section design 2. 3D coil-ends design III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation Developments 1. Critical current measurements 2. Improvement outlooks IV. Conclusion 1. Contribution to high field magnet 2. Interests in LARP Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 3

  4. I. Some issues in high field magnets Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 4

  5. I. Some issues in high field magnets 1. High field magnets for LHC • LHC upgrades  Increase energy: HE-LHC  Increase luminosity: HiLumi • Increase the bending field: NbTi limited, use Nb3Sn Cross- section designs • Beam stability  Good field homogeneity • Avoid magnet quenching  Operational margins • Nb3Sn very sensitive to stress  Manage forces • Connect the straight parts  end-parts Coil-ends • Respect the bending limits of the cable design • Keep field homogeneity and margin Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 5

  6. I. Some issues in high field magnets 2. Innovative insulations • Ceramic insulation developed at CEA [2 patents, 2001 & 2003] - Porous material  excellent heat evacuation  [S. Pietrowicz, B. Baudouy, ICMC 2011] - Ceramic  withstands the 650 °C heat treatment   good resistance to irradiation   good electrical resistance  - Wind, Impregnate & React Drying  less risks  Thickness control tube by laser - Tests on small solenoids OK • Issues: Ceramic Is the mechanical strength solution sufficient ?  Magnetic Desized Impregnated agitation What is the electrical behavior tape roller tape roller of insulated cables ? Impregnation process Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 6

  7. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 7

  8. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 1. 2D cross-section design • 2D model for the computation of field, harmonics and forces  Analytic formulas for infinite rectangular blocks [G. Aubert, forthcoming book]  Suitable for block design, Rutherford cables, ribbons • Method to optimize cross-sections [E. Rochepault et al., IEEE 2011]  4 degrees of freedom/block  Minimization of volume, forces…  Easy to implement, fast, precise   No need for Fourier decomposition   No analytical form for saturated iron  Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 8

  9. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 1. 2D cross-section design FRESCA2 specifications: [HFM Magnet Design Working Group] • Nb3Sn • 100 mm aperture • 13 T bore field Conductor section minimization: • 13 % margin • harmonics < 1 unit • stress < 100 Mpa Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 9

  10. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 1. 2D cross-section design HE-LHC specifications: [Rossi, Todesco] • Bi2212, Nb3Sn, NbTi • Grading • 40 mm aperture • 20 T bore field Financial cost Nb3Sn high J minimization: Nb3Sn low J • 20 % margin Bi2212 • aligned blocks NbTi Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 10

  11. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 2. 3D coil-ends design • 3D model for the computation of field in space  Analytic formulas for blocks & arcs [G. Aubert, forthcoming book]  Suitable for a block design + “pancake model” + = Straight part • Method to optimize dipole ends [E. Rochepault et al., Numelec 2012]  6 degrees of freedom/block  Minimization of the harmonic integrals along the tube  Need for Fourier decomposition  Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 11

  12. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 2. 3D coil-ends design 2D optimization : 3D optimization : • 4 layers • 5 pancakes • 100 mm aperture • ∫B 3 dz = 0 • 13 T bore field • ∫B 5 dz = 0.145 T.m • 13 % margin • B 3 = B 5 = B 7 = B 9 = B 11 = 0 500 mm end  Tricky cutting Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 12

  13. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 2. 3D coil-ends design • 3D model for the computation of harmonic integrals  Analytic formulas for geodesic strips [G. Aubert, forthcoming book]  Suitable for ribbons, approximation of Rutherford cables Radial Horizontal  Sector coils  Block design • Method to optimize dipole ends  1 degree of freedom/strip  Formulas for integrated harmonics  Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 13

  14. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 2. 3D coil-ends design 2D optimization : 3D optimization : • 1 angular sector • 2 parts • 100 mm aperture • minimum length • 1.15 T bore field • ∫B 3 dz = 0 • B 3 = 0 350 mm end Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 14

  15. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 15

  16. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation 1. Critical current measurements Are quenches stable when the pressure is applied ? Does cooling has a beneficial effect on quenches ? • CEA experiment: design of a new sample holder  U shape, adjustable force on the cable  Current measurement on a strand  Background field: up to 11 T  Ceramic insulation FEM Modeling Drawing Assembly Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 16

  17. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation 1. Critical current measurements • Collaboration with CERN: FRESCA experiment  2 cables, soldered at the bottom  Adjustable pressure  Quench measurement on the cable  Background field: up to 9 T  3 types of insulation Ceramic Epoxy impregnated Wrapped Impregnation Strand Tape Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 17

  18. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation 1. Critical current measurements • No degradation Quenches at high fields Vs applied pressure 1,2 at very low pressure 1,0 • Unacceptable degradation Impregnated at low pressure Wrapped 0,8 0,75 Ceramic Iq/Ic0 • Irreversible degradation Ceramic strand 0,6 when pressure released 0,4 50-130 10-50 0,2 0,0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Pressure sensitive films after 40 MPa P (MPa) [E. Rochepault et al., IEEE 2012], [S. Le Naour, CERN report, 2012]  Non-impregnated cables cannot withstand even a small pressure consistent with observations reported in literature Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 18

  19. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation 2. Improvement outlooks Sintered ceramics can resist potentially up to 5 GPa pressures ! How to increase the mechanical strength of a ceramic insulation ? • Improve the sintering  650°C too low for ceramic sintering  maybe applicable to other superconductors (Nb3Al, MgB2, HTS…) ? • Fill the inter-strand interstices Strand Tape Ceramic Old process Aim • The more mechanical strength, the less porosity  heat evacuation   but thermal conductivity still 10-20x higher than resins ! Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 19

  20. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation 2. Improvement outlooks • Tests on different materials, different processes  Mechanical characterizations on cable stacks and mini-racetracks Cable stack Deformation under the press  Presently no ceramic insulation withstands pressures > 40 MPa Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 20

  21. IV. Conclusion Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 21

  22. IV. Conclusion 1. Contribution to high field magnets • Theoretical work:  Development of a 2D code and two 3D codes for magnet optimization  Proposition of 2D designs for actual projects  Proposition of 3D designs for Nb3Sn dipoles • Experimental work:  Design of an experiment to measure critical current of Nb3Sn cables  Experimental testing of Nb3Sn cables  Research on new insulation methods Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 22

  23. IV. Conclusion 2. Interests in LARP • Skills acquired in high field magnets design, both theoretical…  Mastering of field computation formulas  Computation of high field magnet configurations  Good knowledge of optimization programming … and experimental  Design of an experiment  Preparation & testing of superconducting cables (with all the issues !) • A good experience (and a lot of interest) in high field magnets:  I already worked with CERN  I followed an high field dipole project • LARP is a great opportunity:  High field magnets projects  Strong CERN partnership  4 laboratories of excellence with famous records in magnet technology Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 23

  24. Thanks for your attention ! Some questions ? Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 24

Recommend


More recommend