harish chandra characters and the local langlands
play

Harish-Chandra characters and the local Langlands correspondence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 01, 2023 •327 likes •1.98k views

Harish-Chandra characters and the local Langlands correspondence Tasho Kaletha University of Michigan 16. November 2018 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence Global Langlands correspondence Galois representations Tasho Kaletha Local

  1. Local Langlands correspondence Decomposition groups Γ p = Gal (¯ Q p / Q p ) ⊂ Γ , p = ∞ , 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , . . . Γ ∞ = Z / 2 Z , generated by complex conjugation Γ p infinite, compact, ( p < ∞ ) Local correspondence ϕ p ↔ π p π p irreducible (admissible) representation of G ( Q p ) Results GL N : Harris-Taylor, Henniart Sp N , SO N , U N , Arthur, Mok, KMSW Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  2. Local Langlands correspondence Decomposition groups Γ p = Gal (¯ Q p / Q p ) ⊂ Γ , p = ∞ , 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , . . . Γ ∞ = Z / 2 Z , generated by complex conjugation Γ p infinite, compact, ( p < ∞ ) Local correspondence ϕ p ↔ π p π p irreducible (admissible) representation of G ( Q p ) Results GL N : Harris-Taylor, Henniart Sp N , SO N , U N , Arthur, Mok, KMSW General G ? Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  3. Local Langlands correspondence Decomposition groups Γ p = Gal (¯ Q p / Q p ) ⊂ Γ , p = ∞ , 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , . . . Γ ∞ = Z / 2 Z , generated by complex conjugation Γ p infinite, compact, ( p < ∞ ) Local correspondence ϕ p ↔ π p π p irreducible (admissible) representation of G ( Q p ) Results GL N : Harris-Taylor, Henniart Sp N , SO N , U N , Arthur, Mok, KMSW General G ? partial results in positive characteristic Lafforgue-Genestier Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  4. Local representation theory The groups Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  5. Local representation theory The groups G ( R ) : locally connected Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  6. Local representation theory The groups G ( R ) : locally connected, analytic methods Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  7. Local representation theory The groups G ( R ) : locally connected, analytic methods G ( Q p ) : totally disconnected, little analysis Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  8. Local representation theory The groups G ( R ) : locally connected, analytic methods G ( Q p ) : totally disconnected, little analysis Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  9. Local representation theory The groups G ( R ) : locally connected, analytic methods G ( Q p ) : totally disconnected, little analysis Harish-Chandra’s Lefschetz Principle G ( R ) and G ( Q p ) ought to behave similarly Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  10. Local representation theory The groups G ( R ) : locally connected, analytic methods G ( Q p ) : totally disconnected, little analysis Harish-Chandra’s Lefschetz Principle G ( R ) and G ( Q p ) ought to behave similarly Langlands classification π admissible ↔ ( M , σ, ν ) , M ⊂ G Levi, σ ∈ Irr ( M ) tempered Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  11. Local representation theory The groups G ( R ) : locally connected, analytic methods G ( Q p ) : totally disconnected, little analysis Harish-Chandra’s Lefschetz Principle G ( R ) and G ( Q p ) ought to behave similarly Langlands classification π admissible ↔ ( M , σ, ν ) , M ⊂ G Levi, σ ∈ Irr ( M ) tempered R -groups π tempered ↔ ( M , σ, τ ) , M ⊂ G Levi, σ ∈ Irr ( M ) discrete Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  12. Local representation theory The groups G ( R ) : locally connected, analytic methods G ( Q p ) : totally disconnected, little analysis Harish-Chandra’s Lefschetz Principle G ( R ) and G ( Q p ) ought to behave similarly Langlands classification π admissible ↔ ( M , σ, ν ) , M ⊂ G Levi, σ ∈ Irr ( M ) tempered R -groups π tempered ↔ ( M , σ, τ ) , M ⊂ G Levi, σ ∈ Irr ( M ) discrete I n : I G P ( σ ) → I G P ( σ ) , n ∈ W ( M , G )( F ) σ Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  13. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series π discrete series: Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  14. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  15. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: p -adic case Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  16. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: p -adic case Many discrete series are supercuspidal 1 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  17. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: p -adic case Many discrete series are supercuspidal 1 π supercuspidal: 2 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  18. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: p -adic case Many discrete series are supercuspidal 1 π supercuspidal: a ij ( g ) compact modulo center 2 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  19. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: p -adic case Many discrete series are supercuspidal 1 π supercuspidal: a ij ( g ) compact modulo center 2 π does not appear in any parabolic induction 3 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  20. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: p -adic case Many discrete series are supercuspidal 1 π supercuspidal: a ij ( g ) compact modulo center 2 π does not appear in any parabolic induction 3 π induced from a compact open subgroup 4 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  21. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: p -adic case Many discrete series are supercuspidal 1 π supercuspidal: a ij ( g ) compact modulo center 2 π does not appear in any parabolic induction 3 π induced from a compact open subgroup 4 real case Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  22. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: p -adic case Many discrete series are supercuspidal 1 π supercuspidal: a ij ( g ) compact modulo center 2 π does not appear in any parabolic induction 3 π induced from a compact open subgroup 4 real case There are no supercuspidal representations 1 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  23. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: p -adic case Many discrete series are supercuspidal 1 π supercuspidal: a ij ( g ) compact modulo center 2 π does not appear in any parabolic induction 3 π induced from a compact open subgroup 4 real case There are no supercuspidal representations 1 Casselman: Every irreducible representation appears in 2 parabolic induction Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  24. Discrete series dissonance Discrete series a ij ( g ) ∈ L 2 ( G / Z ) π discrete series: p -adic case Many discrete series are supercuspidal 1 π supercuspidal: a ij ( g ) compact modulo center 2 π does not appear in any parabolic induction 3 π induced from a compact open subgroup 4 real case There are no supercuspidal representations 1 Casselman: Every irreducible representation appears in 2 parabolic induction There are no compact open subgroups 3 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  25. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  26. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  27. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  28. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  29. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  30. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Highest weight theory Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  31. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Highest weight theory π algebraic irrep of G ( C ) ↔ { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( C ) 1 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  32. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Highest weight theory π algebraic irrep of G ( C ) ↔ { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( C ) 1 � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = 2 α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) � w ∈ N ( S , G )( C ) / S ( C ) Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  33. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Highest weight theory π algebraic irrep of G ( C ) ↔ { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( C ) 1 � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = 2 α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) � w ∈ N ( S , G )( C ) / S ( C ) Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  34. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Highest weight theory π algebraic irrep of G ( C ) ↔ { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( C ) 1 � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = 2 α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) � w ∈ N ( S , G )( C ) / S ( C ) Local Langlands correspondence Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  35. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Highest weight theory π algebraic irrep of G ( C ) ↔ { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( C ) 1 � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = 2 α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) � w ∈ N ( S , G )( C ) / S ( C ) Local Langlands correspondence Langlands: ϕ Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  36. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Highest weight theory π algebraic irrep of G ( C ) ↔ { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( C ) 1 � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = 2 α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) � w ∈ N ( S , G )( C ) / S ( C ) Local Langlands correspondence Langlands: ϕ → ( S , B , θ ) / G ( C ) Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  37. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Highest weight theory π algebraic irrep of G ( C ) ↔ { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( C ) 1 � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = 2 α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) � w ∈ N ( S , G )( C ) / S ( C ) Local Langlands correspondence Langlands: ϕ → ( S , B , θ ) / G ( C ) → { π 1 , . . . , π k } Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  38. Real discrete series Harish-Chandra parameterization { π discrete } H − C ← → { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( R ) 1 S ⊂ G elliptic max torus, S ⊂ B complex Borel subgroup, 2 θ : S ( R ) → C × , d θ is B -dominant � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = ( − 1 ) q ( G ) 3 � α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) w ∈ N ( S , G )( R ) / S ( R ) Highest weight theory π algebraic irrep of G ( C ) ↔ { ( S , B , θ ) } / G ( C ) 1 � θ ( γ w ) Θ π ( s ) = 2 α> 0 ( 1 − α ( γ w ) − 1 ) � w ∈ N ( S , G )( C ) / S ( C ) Local Langlands correspondence Langlands: ϕ → ( S , B , θ ) / G ( C ) → { π 1 , . . . , π k } Θ π 1 + · · · + Θ π k conjugation invariant under G ( C ) Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  39. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  40. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  41. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , 1 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  42. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , 1 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  43. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  44. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  45. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , 3 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  46. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  47. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , 4 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  48. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � O κ G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , γ, G ( f ) = ∆( γ κ , γ ) SO γ κ , G κ ( f κ ) 4 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  49. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � O κ G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , γ, G ( f ) = ∆( γ κ , γ ) SO γ κ , G κ ( f κ ) 4 Spectral side Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  50. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � O κ G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , γ, G ( f ) = ∆( γ κ , γ ) SO γ κ , G κ ( f κ ) 4 Spectral side ϕ : Γ p → � G , 1 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  51. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � O κ G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , γ, G ( f ) = ∆( γ κ , γ ) SO γ κ , G κ ( f κ ) 4 Spectral side ϕ : Γ p → � G , Π ϕ ( G ) = { π 1 , . . . , π k } 1 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  52. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � O κ G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , γ, G ( f ) = ∆( γ κ , γ ) SO γ κ , G κ ( f κ ) 4 Spectral side ϕ : Γ p → � G , Π ϕ ( G ) = { π 1 , . . . , π k } ↔ Irr ( S ϕ ) 1 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  53. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � O κ G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , γ, G ( f ) = ∆( γ κ , γ ) SO γ κ , G κ ( f κ ) 4 Spectral side ϕ : Γ p → � G , Π ϕ ( G ) = { π 1 , . . . , π k } ↔ Irr ( S ϕ ) 1 S Θ ϕ = � π ∈ Π ϕ ( G ) Θ π , 2 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  54. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � O κ G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , γ, G ( f ) = ∆( γ κ , γ ) SO γ κ , G κ ( f κ ) 4 Spectral side ϕ : Γ p → � G , Π ϕ ( G ) = { π 1 , . . . , π k } ↔ Irr ( S ϕ ) 1 S Θ ϕ = � invariant under G (¯ π ∈ Π ϕ ( G ) Θ π , F ) 2 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  55. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � O κ G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , γ, G ( f ) = ∆( γ κ , γ ) SO γ κ , G κ ( f κ ) 4 Spectral side ϕ : Γ p → � G , Π ϕ ( G ) = { π 1 , . . . , π k } ↔ Irr ( S ϕ ) 1 S Θ ϕ = � invariant under G (¯ π ∈ Π ϕ ( G ) Θ π , F ) 2 ϕ = � Fourier inversion: s ∈ S ϕ , Θ s π ∈ Π ϕ ( G ) ρ π ( s )Θ π 3 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  56. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � O κ G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , γ, G ( f ) = ∆( γ κ , γ ) SO γ κ , G κ ( f κ ) 4 Spectral side ϕ : Γ p → � G , Π ϕ ( G ) = { π 1 , . . . , π k } ↔ Irr ( S ϕ ) 1 S Θ ϕ = � invariant under G (¯ π ∈ Π ϕ ( G ) Θ π , F ) 2 ϕ = � Fourier inversion: s ∈ S ϕ , Θ s π ∈ Π ϕ ( G ) ρ π ( s )Θ π 3 G s ⊂ � � G , 4 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  57. Endoscopy: G (¯ F ) -conjugacy vs. G ( F ) -conjugacy Geometric side � � γ ∈ G ( F ) rs , O γ ( f ) = γ G ( F ) f , SO γ ( f ) = F ) ∩ G ( F ) f 1 γ G (¯ F ) ∩ G ( F ) = � γ G (¯ a ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) a γ G ( F ) 2 γ = � Fourier inversion: κ ∈ H 1 (Γ , T γ ) ∗ , O κ a κ ( a ) O a γ 3 G κ ⊂ � � O κ G , γ κ ∈ G κ ( F ) , γ, G ( f ) = ∆( γ κ , γ ) SO γ κ , G κ ( f κ ) 4 Spectral side ϕ : Γ p → � G , Π ϕ ( G ) = { π 1 , . . . , π k } ↔ Irr ( S ϕ ) 1 S Θ ϕ = � invariant under G (¯ π ∈ Π ϕ ( G ) Θ π , F ) 2 ϕ = � Fourier inversion: s ∈ S ϕ , Θ s π ∈ Π ϕ ( G ) ρ π ( s )Θ π 3 G s ⊂ � � Θ s G , ϕ, G ( f ) = S Θ ϕ, G s ( f s ) 4 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  58. Supercuspidal representations Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  59. Supercuspidal representations Yu’s construction 2001   ( G 0 ⊂ G 1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ G d = G )   J.K.Yu π − 1 − − − → { irred. s.c reps of G ( F ) }   ( φ 0 , φ 1 , . . . , φ d ) Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  60. Supercuspidal representations Yu’s construction 2001   ( G 0 ⊂ G 1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ G d = G )   J.K.Yu π − 1 − − − → { irred. s.c reps of G ( F ) }   ( φ 0 , φ 1 , . . . , φ d ) Properties Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  61. Supercuspidal representations Yu’s construction 2001   ( G 0 ⊂ G 1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ G d = G )   J.K.Yu π − 1 − − − → { irred. s.c reps of G ( F ) }   ( φ 0 , φ 1 , . . . , φ d ) Properties Kim 2007: Surjective for p >> 0 1 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  62. Supercuspidal representations Yu’s construction 2001   ( G 0 ⊂ G 1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ G d = G )   J.K.Yu π − 1 − − − → { irred. s.c reps of G ( F ) }   ( φ 0 , φ 1 , . . . , φ d ) Properties Kim 2007: Surjective for p >> 0 1 Hakim-Murnaghan 2008: Fibers as equivalence classes. 2 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

  63. Supercuspidal representations Yu’s construction 2001   ( G 0 ⊂ G 1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ G d = G )   J.K.Yu π − 1 − − − → { irred. s.c reps of G ( F ) }   ( φ 0 , φ 1 , . . . , φ d ) Properties Kim 2007: Surjective for p >> 0 1 Hakim-Murnaghan 2008: Fibers as equivalence classes. 2 Adler-DeBacker-Spice 2008++: Character formula. 3 Tasho Kaletha Local Langlands Correspondence

Recommend

Matrices almost of order two Langlands philosophy Local Langlands for R David Vogan Cartan

Matrices almost of order two Langlands philosophy Local Langlands for R David Vogan Cartan

Matrices almost of order two David Vogan Matrices almost of order two Langlands philosophy Local Langlands for R David Vogan Cartan classification of real forms Department of Mathematics Local Langlands Massachusetts Institute of

572 views • 25 slides
The Friends of Langlands Moss LNR, East Kilbride Aerial View of Langlands Moss Local Nature

The Friends of Langlands Moss LNR, East Kilbride Aerial View of Langlands Moss Local Nature

The Friends of Langlands Moss LNR, East Kilbride Aerial View of Langlands Moss Local Nature Reserve. East Kilbride Who are the Friends of Langlands Moss LNR? We are local people who live in the East Kilbride area. In 2006, we formed a

475 views • 24 slides
Some non-standard signals of vector-like quarks at LHC Santosh Kumar Rai RECAPP Harish-Chandra

Some non-standard signals of vector-like quarks at LHC Santosh Kumar Rai RECAPP Harish-Chandra

Some non-standard signals of vector-like quarks at LHC Santosh Kumar Rai RECAPP Harish-Chandra Research Institute Allahabad, India IMHEP-2019 Jan 17-22, 2019 IOP Bhubaneswar LHC is doing great ! History made with Higgs boson discovery !

1.08k views • 38 slides
Mass Renormalization and Vacuum Shift in String Theory Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research

Mass Renormalization and Vacuum Shift in String Theory Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research

Mass Renormalization and Vacuum Shift in String Theory Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Based on Roji Pius, Arnab Rudra, A.S., 1311.1257, 1401.7014, 1404.6254 Princeton, June 2014 Motivation Conventional

535 views • 25 slides
Soft Theorem and its Classical Limit Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad,

Soft Theorem and its Classical Limit Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad,

Soft Theorem and its Classical Limit Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Florence, April 2019 1 A partial preview of the results Alok Laddha, A.S. arXiv:1806.01872 Biswajit Sahoo, A.S. arXiv:1808.03288 + earlier

778 views • 23 slides
Ultraviolet and Infrared Divergences in Superstring Theory Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research

Ultraviolet and Infrared Divergences in Superstring Theory Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research

Ultraviolet and Infrared Divergences in Superstring Theory Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Florence, May 2016 1. Summary of this talk 2. Review of ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) divergences in quantum field

548 views • 31 slides
Global Analysis of Neutrino Oscillation Srubabati Goswami Harish-Chandra Research Institute,

Global Analysis of Neutrino Oscillation Srubabati Goswami Harish-Chandra Research Institute,

Global Analysis of Neutrino Oscillation Srubabati Goswami Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Acknowledgment: A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Choubey, S.T. Petcov, D.P.Roy S.Goswami, Neutrino2004 p.1/43

869 views • 71 slides
Extremal Black Hole Entropy Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India

Extremal Black Hole Entropy Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India

Introduction Proposal for d macro Degeneracy vs index Comparison with microscopic index Final comments Appendix Extremal Black Hole Entropy Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Collaborators: Nabamita Banerjee,

874 views • 33 slides
Superstring Perturbation Theory Using Picture Changing Operators (PCO) Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra

Superstring Perturbation Theory Using Picture Changing Operators (PCO) Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra

Superstring Perturbation Theory Using Picture Changing Operators (PCO) Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Florence, April 2019 1 At present superstring perturbation theory can be described using two different but

392 views • 25 slides
From Higher Spins to Strings Rajesh Gopakumar Harish-Chandra Research Institute Strings 2014,

From Higher Spins to Strings Rajesh Gopakumar Harish-Chandra Research Institute Strings 2014,

From Higher Spins to Strings Rajesh Gopakumar Harish-Chandra Research Institute Strings 2014, Princeton, June 24th, 2014 Based on: M. R. Gaberdiel and R. G. (arXiv:1406.tmrw and also 1305.4181) Why are We Studying Higher Spin Theories? Free

541 views • 23 slides
Black Hole Microstate Counting and Their Macroscopic Counterpart Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra

Black Hole Microstate Counting and Their Macroscopic Counterpart Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra

Introduction Microscopic counting Macroscopic analysis Twisted index Conclusion Black Hole Microstate Counting and Their Macroscopic Counterpart Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Introduction Microscopic

416 views • 30 slides
Some Applications of String Field Theory Dealing with Infrared Issues Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra

Some Applications of String Field Theory Dealing with Infrared Issues Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra

Some Applications of String Field Theory Dealing with Infrared Issues Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Kyoto, August 2016 1 Plan 1. Review of divergences in string theory 2. Use of string field theory in

863 views • 45 slides
String Field Theory and its Applications Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad,

String Field Theory and its Applications Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad,

String Field Theory and its Applications Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Florence, April 2019 1 What is string field theory? 2 In the conventional world-sheet approach to string theory, the scattering

1.24k views • 54 slides
String Field Theory and its Applications Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad,

String Field Theory and its Applications Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad,

String Field Theory and its Applications Ashoke Sen Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India Trieste, June 2019 1 PLAN 1. Why do we need string field theory? 2. Formulation of string field theory 2 In the conventional world-sheet

553 views • 43 slides
Universal Phenomena at Strong Coupling and Gravity Ayan Mukhopadhyay Harish-Chandra Research

Universal Phenomena at Strong Coupling and Gravity Ayan Mukhopadhyay Harish-Chandra Research

Universal Phenomena at Strong Coupling and Gravity Ayan Mukhopadhyay Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Chhatnag Road, Jhusi Allahabad, India 211019 ayan@mri.ernet.in September 28, 2009 Universal Phenomena at Strong Coupling and Gravity Ayan

1.21k views • 107 slides
On Combinatorial Aspects of Abelian Groups Rameez Raja Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI),

On Combinatorial Aspects of Abelian Groups Rameez Raja Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI),

On Combinatorial Aspects of Abelian Groups Rameez Raja Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI), India August, 2017 Rameez Raja Groups St Andrews 2017, Birmingham August 5-13, 2017 1 / 27 Overview 1 Introduction 2 Graphs arising from Rings

837 views • 27 slides
Factoring integers, Producing primes and the RSA cryptosystem Harish-Chandra Research Institute

Factoring integers, Producing primes and the RSA cryptosystem Harish-Chandra Research Institute

HRI, Allahabad, February, 2005 0 RSA cryptosystem Factoring integers, Producing primes and the RSA cryptosystem Harish-Chandra Research Institute Allahabad (UP), INDIA February, 2005 Universit` a Roma Tre HRI, Allahabad, February, 2005 1

1.92k views • 170 slides
q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP

q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP

q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 1 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands

546 views • 17 slides
Magnetic Monopoles, t Hooft Lines, and the Geometric Langlands Correspondence Alexander B.

Magnetic Monopoles, t Hooft Lines, and the Geometric Langlands Correspondence Alexander B.

Overview of the Langlands Program S -duality in the twisted 4D N = 4 theory Instantons and Monopoles in Gauge Theory Hooft Magnetic Monopoles, t Hooft Lines, and the Geometric Langlands Correspondence Alexander B. Atanasov 1 1 Dept. of

1.02k views • 73 slides
Branding The Jewellery &amp; Gold Business By Harish Bijoor, Founder, Harish Bijoor Consults

Branding The Jewellery &amp; Gold Business By Harish Bijoor, Founder, Harish Bijoor Consults

Branding The Jewellery &amp; Gold Business By Harish Bijoor, Founder, Harish Bijoor Consults Inc. 2 nd India Gold &amp; Jewellery Summit, New Delhi, India 23 November, 2018 For a start.. Lets define a brand . What is a

740 views • 21 slides
Recognizing Handwritten Characters with Local Descriptors and Bags of Visual Words Presentation

Recognizing Handwritten Characters with Local Descriptors and Bags of Visual Words Presentation

Recognizing Handwritten Characters with Local Descriptors and Bags of Visual Words Presentation at EANN2015, Island of Rhodes O. Surinta, M.F. Karaaba, T.K. Mishra, L.R.B. Schomaker, and M.A. Wiering Institute of Artificial Intelligence and

349 views • 31 slides
Functorial Construction E := a ring (in fact field) of p -adic power series in X 1

Functorial Construction E := a ring (in fact field) of p -adic power series in X 1

Fourier Transformation in the p -adic Langlands program p -ADICS 2015 Enno Nagel http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~nagel Belgrade, 7 September 2015 p -adic Langlands program 1 From Characteristic 0 to p 2 Fourier Transform 3 Number Theory

628 views • 18 slides
MILLENNIALS ARE EVERYW HERE THESE DAYS But just who are these mysterious characters that

MILLENNIALS ARE EVERYW HERE THESE DAYS But just who are these mysterious characters that

MILLENNIALS ARE EVERYW HERE THESE DAYS But just who are these mysterious characters that (supposedly) frequent the local coffee shop eating up all the avocado toast? They're everyone born between roughly 1983 and 1995 - and, it's true, you're

316 views • 14 slides
Chinese Characters Ling 203 Languages of the World Overview Most Chinese characters bear no

Chinese Characters Ling 203 Languages of the World Overview Most Chinese characters bear no

Chinese Characters Ling 203 Languages of the World Overview Most Chinese characters bear no resemblance to the object/idea they represents, though many of them did historically. Most Chinese characters are such that they give clues

204 views • 16 slides

More recommend