h517 visualization design analysis evaluation
play

H517 Visualization Design, Analysis, & Evaluation Week 9: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

H517 Visualization Design, Analysis, & Evaluation Week 9: Multiple views + Interaction Khairi Reda | redak@iu.edu School of Informa5cs & Compu5ng, IUPUI http://www.ufoera.com/images/ufo/ufo-hotspots-map_117.png http://popvssoda.com


  1. H517 Visualization Design, Analysis, & Evaluation Week 9: Multiple views + Interaction Khairi Reda | redak@iu.edu School of Informa5cs & Compu5ng, IUPUI

  2. http://www.ufoera.com/images/ufo/ufo-hotspots-map_117.png http://popvssoda.com

  3. Con-nuous maps

  4. Maps • Landmarks • Discrete data • Choropleth • Con5nuous data • Projec5on • Cartograms

  5. Cartogram A map in which areas are scaled and distorted rela5ve to a data aFribute Land Area Emile Levasseur, 1868

  6. Rectangular cartogram Wikipedia

  7. Brush vs Kerry, 2004

  8. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/cartograms/

  9. Popula-on http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/cartograms/

  10. GDP http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/cartograms/

  11. people living with HIV/AIDS http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/cartograms/

  12. spending on healthcare http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/cartograms/

  13. Multiple views

  14. Views Varia-on: show the data in different ways Eye over memory: use display space instead of working memory

  15. One form, multiple views Par55on data into subsets and distribute among different views Visual Encoding is the same in all views Small Multiples Nick Elprin, Domino

  16. Small-Multiples Spark Lines Viz Wiz

  17. Small-Multiples Drought, 1898-2012 Mike Bostock

  18. Small-Multiples ScaFerplot Matrix w z y x Par55on aFributes (or x variables) and distribute them among different views y Example: dataset with z four variables: X, Y, Z, W w Mike Bostock

  19. Multi form Show mul5ple representa5ons of the data Usually the views share the same data Views have different visual encoding (and oVen depict different aFributes) Ra-onale: it is difficult to show all aFributes in a single monolithic view. Mul5form views give us freedom to use different visual encodings for different aFributes.

  20. Multi form Based on a slide by Miriam Meyer and Alex Lex

  21. Multi form MizBee Same data, but different scales Meyer, 2009

  22. View Linking Views cab be linked implicitly through interac5ons Changes in one view are coordinated to all other views

  23. Brushing and Linking Mike Bostock

  24. Brushing and Linking

  25. Explicit Linking Views can be linked explicitly through visual links Links typically connect the same (or similar) data items in different views Limita-ons: can occlude and lead to visual cluFer, although smart algorithms can route links to minimize side effects Steinberger et al., 2011 Geymayer et al, 2014

  26. Details on Demand Showing addi5onal informa5on with popup views

  27. Layering Embedding Views in the same space NodeTrix , Henry abd Fekete, 2007

  28. Layering: Treemap http://ukdataexplorer.com/co2/

  29. Layering: Treemap https://finviz.com/map.ashx

  30. Layering: Treemap Disk Inventory X

  31. Domino Dynamic View creation and linking Graz et al, 2014

  32. Interaction

  33. Why interact with visualizations? • Explore data that is big / complex • Won’t fit within the visualiza5on • Look at different representa5ons of the same data • Interac-on engages our cogni-on • We understand things beFer when we “play” with them • Allows us to observe cause-and-effect rela5onships beFer Based on a slide by Alex Lex

  34. Types of Interaction Single View Mul-ple Views • Naviga5on • Brushing & Linking • Focus+Context • Details on Demand • Filtering and Querying Based on a slide by Alex Lex

  35. Navigation

  36. Navigation Pan and Zoom

  37. Navigation Pan, Zoom, Rotate

  38. Semantic Zoom • Content updates as you zoom in • More detail as more space becomes available [McLachlan 2008] Via Alex Lex

  39. Overview+Detail

  40. Overview+Detail

  41. Limitations of Pan and Zoom Navigation • Pros • Intui5ve and familiar • Fast to use if you know the target • Cons • Can get lost in the details and loose track of context • Visually disrup5ve to the “mental map”

  42. Focus+Context

  43. Fisheye lenses

  44. Fisheye lenses

  45. Fisheye lenses

  46. Distortion • Pros • Context plus Focus • Less disrup5ons to the “mental map” • Cons • Not suitable for rela5ve spa5al judgments • Target Acquisi5on problem • Not intui5ve compared to pan-and-zoom interfaces Based on a slide by Alex Lex

  47. Information Seeking Mantra Ben Shneiderman Overview first, zoom and filter, then details on demand Overview first, zoom and filter, then details on demand Overview first, zoom and filter, then details on demand Overview first, zoom and filter, then details on demand Overview first, zoom and filter, then details on demand Overview first, zoom and filter, then details on demand

  48. Information Seeking Mantra Ben Shneiderman

Recommend


More recommend