grid based genetic algorithm approach to colour image
play

Grid-Based Genetic Algorithm Approach to Colour Image Segmentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Grid-Based Genetic Algorithm Approach to Colour Image Segmentation Marco Gallotta Keri Woods Supervised by Audrey Mbogho Image Segmentation Identifying and extracting distinct, homogeneous regions from an image Simplifies the image


  1. Grid-Based Genetic Algorithm Approach to Colour Image Segmentation Marco Gallotta Keri Woods Supervised by Audrey Mbogho

  2. Image Segmentation  Identifying and extracting distinct, homogeneous regions from an image  Simplifies the image for further processing: − shape recognition, medical imaging, face detection

  3. Image Segmentation  Problem: How do we segment the following? − Each petal as a region? − Stigma as a region? − Group flowers as single region? − Segment the background?

  4. Human Segmentation  Segmentation by human candidates  Results confirm no single solution

  5. Genetic Algorithms  Optimisation technique that works on large search spaces  Biological evolution

  6. Genetic Algorithms: Chromosome  Chromosome encodes a potential solution  Contains parameters  The chromosome is optimised using: − mutation crossover

  7. Genetic Algorithms: Fitness  Fitness function evaluates an individual and assigns a numerical value  Used to select fittest individuals for next iteration  Crucial in producing good results

  8. Grid Computing  A system that coordinates resources that are not subject to centralized control  Dedicated and non-dedicated resources  Multiple organisations pooling their unused resources  Lots of computing power

  9. Grid Computing

  10. Problem: Segmentation  Segmentation of great importance  No general method of image segmentation  Wide variety of images  Parameters need to be tuned to get optimal results

  11. Problem: Genetic Algorithms  Segmentation involves much uncertainty  GA cope well with uncertainty  Alter parameters to optimise segmentation results

  12. Problem: Computating Requirements  Image segmentation and genetic algorithms computationally intensive  Combined VERY computationally expensive  Solution? − Work harder − Work smarter − Get help

  13. Problem: GA For The Grid  Genetic algorithms easily parallelisable  Grid supplies “free” computational resources

  14. Problem: Research Existing Techniques  Edge detection  Histogram thresholding  Watershed  Region based techniques  Clustering techniques  Model based techniques  Many others

  15. Segmentation Method Implemented  Chose to implement: − Watershed − Region Growing − Region Merging

  16. Watershed Transformation  Calculate a gradient magnitude image  Consider this as a topographic surface  Consider dropping water at each pixel and observing where the trickle ends  Pixels with the same end point form a region

  17. Watershed Transformation  (a) Example gradient magnitude image  (b) The two regions that are identified

  18. Watershed Transformation: Example

  19. Region Growing  Start off with small regions and grow them  Each iteration considers all pixels neighbouring the regions  Pixel with the minimum δ is added to the region  This continues until all pixels are assigned to a region

  20. Region Growing  The above method requires manual seeds  To automate we introduce a threshold T  If the minimum δ exceeds T then a new region is created  Start with an arbitrary pixel as the first region and iterate as above

  21. Region Growing: Example

  22. Region Merging  Initially each pixel a region  Adjacent regions merged if criteria met  Continue until no regions meet criteria

  23. Merging Criterion  Merge if fusion factor less than scale parameter  Fusion factor: change in heterogeneity if regions merged  Heterogeneity: colour, compactness, smoothness  Scale parameter controls size of resulting regions

  24. Region Merging: Example

  25. Segmentation Results • Berkeley Segmentation Dataset • Watershed fastest • Performance results: Segmentation Time (seconds) Region Growing 71.806 Watershed 2.106 Transformation Region Merging 58.059

  26. Segmentation Results

  27. Segmentation Results

  28. Segmentation Results  All successful but different results  Effect of scale parameter on region merging − Large scale parameter => large regions

  29. Segmentation Results: Effect of Scale Parameter

  30. Segmentation Results  [Can get some results off website at http://people.cs.uct.ac.za/~mgallott/honsproj/]

  31. Genetic Algorithm • Modify parameters of region merging algorithm • Scale parameter, weights of components of heterogeneity

  32. GA: Fitness Function  Drives evolution of chromosomes  Evaluate quality of segmentation  Unsupervised segmentation − No external information − Properties of image itself  How much colour within each region varies  Low fitness = good segmentation

  33. GA: Fitness Function  For each region standard deviation multiplied by area  Sum all regions  Add 1  Multiply by number of regions

  34. Genetic Algorithm Results • Inconclusive • Sometimes improvement

  35. Genetic Algorithm Results  GA with segmentation very computationally intensive  Unable to explore full potential  Extremely slow  Therefore grid

  36. Parallel Genetic Algorithms  Two common models: − master-slave (left) − Island model (right)

  37. Grid Computing + Genetic Algorithms  With the Grid, communication between nodes is expensive (“impossible” in a true Grid)  Even with communication, building a topology for the Island model is difficult  All existing research has used the master-slave model

  38. Grid Model  Our model uses ideas from both master-slave and Island models  Root node (dedicated resource) stores a super population  No direct communication between sub-nodes

  39. Grid Model: Results  We were heavily restricted in testing and could only test with eight nodes  Tests showed the communication overhead had negligible impact as fitness function increased in complexity  Results were positive when testing on simple problems  Unsuccessful at migrating the segmentation algorithm to the Grid

  40. Conclusion  Experimented with 3 segmentation algorithms  Selected region merging for our genetic algorithm solution  Genetic algorithm provides potential for improvement but results inconclusive  Grid computing showed positive results however limited resources did not allow for thorough testing

  41. Future Work: Grid  As we only tested on  The next stage is to a small Grid, we test out a hierarchical never had scalability model issues  Most Grids are very large and having a single root node is a bottleneck

  42. Future Work: GA  Watershed with genetic algorithm  Investigate different fitness functions  Genetic programming to evolve fitness function − Train for each desired application

  43. Questions ? http://people.cs.uct.ac.za/~mgallott/honsproj/

Recommend


More recommend