graphical perception
play

Graphical Perception Nam Wook Kim Mini-Courses January @ GSAS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Graphical Perception Nam Wook Kim Mini-Courses January @ GSAS 2018 What is graphical perception? The visual decoding of information encoded on graphs Why? Visualization is really about external cognition, that is, how resources


  1. Graphical Perception Nam Wook Kim Mini-Courses — January @ GSAS 2018

  2. What is graphical perception? The visual decoding of information encoded on graphs

  3. Why?

  4. “Visualization is really about external cognition, that is, how resources outside the mind can be used to boost the cognitive capabilities of the mind” — Stuart Card

  5. “Graphical excellence is that which gives to the viewer the greatest number of ideas in the shortest time with the least ink in the smallest space” — Edward Tufte

  6. Goal To understand how humans perceive visualization

  7. Topics Signal Detection • Magnitude Estimation • Pre-Attentive Processing • Using Multiple Visual Encodings • Gestalt Grouping • Change Blindness •

  8. Detection

  9. Detecting Brightness A Which is brighter? B

  10. Detecting Brightness (128,128,128) (144,144,144) A B

  11. Detecting Brightness A Which is brighter? B

  12. Detecting Brightness (134,134,134) (138,138,138) A B

  13. Just Noticeable Difference (JND) — Weber’s Law dS dp = k S Physical Intensity

  14. Just Noticeable Difference (JND) — Weber’s Law dS Change of Intensity dp = k S Physical Intensity

  15. Just Noticeable Difference (JND) — Weber’s Law dS Change of Intensity dp = k Perceived Change S Physical Intensity

  16. Just Noticeable Difference (JND) — Weber’s Law Weber constant (Empirically determined) dS Change of Intensity dp = k Perceived Change S Physical Intensity

  17. Just Noticeable Difference (JND) — Weber’s Law Weber constant (Empirically determined) dS Change of Intensity dp = k Perceived Change S Physical Intensity For detecting JND, ratios more important than magnitude Most continuous variation in stimuli are perceived in discrete steps

  18. Ranking visualizations for depicting correlation [Harrison et al 2014]

  19. Ranking visualizations for depicting correlation Which of the two appeared to be more highly correlated? r = 0.7 r = 0.6 [Harrison et al 2014]

  20. Ranking visualizations for depicting correlation Which of the two appeared to be more highly correlated? r = 0.7 r = 0.65 [Harrison et al 2014]

  21. Ranking visualizations for depicting correlation Overall, scatterplots are the best for both positive and negative correlations. Parallel coordinates are only good for negative correlations . [Harrison et al 2014]

  22. Magnitude Estimation

  23. A Quick Experiment…

  24. A B

  25. B A

  26. A B

  27. B A

  28. [Graph from T. Munzner 2014] Steven’s Power Law Models the relationship between the magnitude of a physical stimulus and its perceived intensity. Exponent (Empirically Determined) S = I p Perceived Physical Sensation Intensity Predicts bias, not necessarily accuracy!

  29. [Graph from T. Munzner 2014] Steven’s Power Law Overestimate Unbiased Underestimate

  30. Apparent Magnitude Scaling To compensate for human error in interpreting scale because people tend to underestimate area Cartography: Thematic Map Design, Figure 8.6, p. 170, Dent, 96

  31. Graphical Perception [Cleveland & McGill 84] What percentage of the smaller was of the larger?

  32. Graphical Perception [Cleveland & McGill 84] What percentage of the smaller was of the larger? Compare positions 
 Compare lengths (along common scale)

  33. What percentage each value was of the maximum? Comare angles Compare positions

  34. Bar chart won!

  35. Effectiveness Ranking of Visual Encoding Variables for comparing numerical quantities [T. Munzer 2014]

  36. Pre-Attentive Processing

  37. How Many 3’s? 1281768756138976546984506985604982826762 9809858458224509856458945098450980943585 9091030209905959595772564675050678904567 8845789809821677654876364908560912949686 [based on a slide from J. Stasko]

  38. How Many 3’s? 1281768756138976546984506985604982826762 9809858458224509856458945098450980943585 9091030209905959595772564675050678904567 8845789809821677654876364908560912949686 [based on a slide from J. Stasko]

  39. Pre-attentive processing The ability of the low-level human visual system to rapidly and effortlessly identify certain basic visual properties.

  40. Visual Pop-Out: Color Christopher Healey, https://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/healey/PP/index.html

  41. Visual Pop-Out: Shape Christopher Healey, https://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/healey/PP/index.html

  42. and more… Christopher Healey, https://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/healey/PP/index.html

  43. Feature Conjunctions No unique visual property of the target Christopher Healey, https://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/healey/PP/index.html

  44. Pre-attentive Conjunctions Most conjunctions are not pre-attentive. Some spatial conjunctions are pre-attentive. • Motion and 3D disparity • Motion and color • Motion and shape • 3D disparity and color • 3D disparity and shape

  45. Multiple Attributes

  46. One-Dimensional: Lightness Classify objects based on lightness White White White Black or Black Black White White Black White

  47. One-Dimensional: Shape Classify objects based on shape Square Circle Circle Circle or Circle Square Square Circle Circle Circle

  48. Redundant: Shape & Lightness Classify objects based on shape. Easier? Circle Circle Square Square or Square Square Circle Square Square Circle

  49. Redundant: Shape & Lightness Classify objects based on shape . Easier? Circle Circle Square Square or Square Square Circle Square Square Circle

  50. Orthogonal: Shape & Lightness Classify objects based on shape . Difficult? Circle Square Square Circle Circle

  51. Speeded Classification Redundancy Gain Facilitation in reading one dimension when the other provides redundant information. Filtering Interference Difficulty in ignoring one dimension while attending to the other.

  52. Speeded Classification Interference Gain R: Redundant Encoding 1: One-dimensional O: Orthogonal Encoding

  53. Speeded Classification White Black Stable White Black White R: Redundant Encoding 1: One-dimensional O: Orthogonal Encoding

  54. Types of Perceptual Dimensions Integral Filtering interference and redundancy gain Separable No interference or gain Asymmetric One dimension separable from other, not vice versa e.g., Lightness was not really influenced by shape

  55. Separability vs. Integrality Position Hue (Color) Fully separable What we perceive: 2 groups each [Tamara Munzner 14]

  56. Separability vs. Integrality Position Size Hue (Color) Hue (Color) Fully separable Some interference What we perceive: 2 groups each 2 groups each [Tamara Munzner 14]

  57. Separability vs. Integrality Position Size Width Hue (Color) Hue (Color) Height Fully separable Some interference Some/signi fj cant interference What we perceive: 2 groups each 2 groups each 3 groups total: integral area [Tamara Munzner 14]

  58. Separability vs. Integrality Position Size Width Red Hue (Color) Hue (Color) Height Green Fully separable Some interference Some/signi fj cant Major interference interference What we perceive: 2 groups each 2 groups each 3 groups total: 4 groups total: integral area integral hue [Tamara Munzner 14]

  59. Not about good or bad Match the characteristics of the channels to the information that is encoded. For a single data attribute with three categories, this may work just fine: small, flattened, and large. [Tamara Munzner 14]

  60. Gestalt Grouping

  61. Principles of Perceptual Organization Similarity Proximity Uniformed Connectedness Connection Enclosure Continuity Symmetry and there are more not covered here…

  62. Proximity Columns Rows

  63. Similarity Rows stand out due to similarity.

  64. Scatter Plot Matrix Clusters and outliers

  65. Uniformed Connectedness: Connection Similarity (row) Proximity (column) vs connection (column) vs connection (row) Connectedness dominates proximity and similarity

  66. Uniformed Connectedness: Enclosure

  67. Chart Annotations Connection Enclosure [ https://chartaccent.github.io/ ]

  68. Visualizing Sets Bubble Sets Line Sets Kelp Diagrams [ Slides from A. Lex ]

  69. Treemap and Circle Packing https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/4063582 https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/4063530 Proximity, Similarity, Enclosure

  70. Continuity We prefer smooth not Connections are clearer with abrupt changes smooth contours [from Ware 04] [from Ware 04]

  71. Hierarchical Edge Bundling [ Holten 06 ]

  72. Symmetry Elements that are symmetrical to each other tend to be grouped together. https://www.populationpyramid.net/united-states-of-america/2017/

  73. Population Pyramid (or tornado chart?) Korean War? https://www.populationpyramid.net/united-states-of-america/2017/

  74. Change Blindness

  75. Change Detection Test http://www.psych.ubc.ca/~rensink/flicker/download/

  76. Change Detection Test https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA

  77. “To see an object change, it is necessary to attend to it.” — Ronald A. Rensink

Recommend


More recommend