2014 Transitional Colorado Assessment Program (TCAP) Student Achievement Results (Grade 3 – 10) and Colorado ACT (Grade 11) Learning Services Team
District’s Five Year Trend – Grades 3-10 Writing Reading Grades 3-10 Grades 3-10 80% 75% 75% 70% 74% 73% 72% 70% 70% 69% 69% 69% 60% 60% 58% 56% 56% 56% 56% 55% 55% 50% 54% 54% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% STATE DISTRICT STATE DISTRICT 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TSD Continues to outperform State in Reading and Writing
District’s Five Year Trend – Grades 3-10 Math 80% Grades 3-10 70% 60% 60% 60% 59% 58% 57% 57% 56% 56% 56% 56% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% STATE DISTRICT 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TSD Continues to outperform State in Math
District 5 year trend Content 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Area P+% P+% P+% P+% P+% Reading 74 75 75 73 72 Writing 56 60 58 56 56 Math 60 59 60 58 57 Reading, Writing and Math performance stable over 5 years.
Benchmarked Grades 3-10 Reading TCAP Results at a Glance TSD outperforming state in the % of Advanced Unsatisfactory, Partially Proficient, Proficient Proficient & Partially Proficient Advanced Unsatisfactory No Score -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 2014 2013 District % performance levels relative to state Partially No Score Unsatisfactory Proficient Proficient Advanced State 2013 1% 9% 20% 62% 8% State 2014 1% 10% 20% 62% 7% District 2013 1% 7% 18% 65% 9% District 2014 1% 8% 19% 64% 8%
Benchmarked Grades 3-10 Writing TCAP Results at a Glance TSD outperforming Advanced state in the % of Proficient Unsatisfactory, Partially Proficient, Partially Proficient and Proficient Unsatisfactory No Score -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 2014 2013 District % performance levels relative to state Partially No Score Unsatisfactory Proficient Proficient Advanced State 2013 1% 5% 39% 46% 9% State 2014 1% 5% 40% 45% 9% District 2013 2% 4% 38% 48% 8% District 2014 1% 4% 39% 47% 9%
Benchmarked Grades 3-10 Math TCAP Results at a Glance Advanced TSD outperforming Proficient state in the % of Unsatisfactory and Partially Proficient Proficient Unsatisfactory No Score -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2014 2013 Partially No Score Unsatisfactory Proficient Proficient Advanced State 2013 1% 16% 27% 33% 23% State 2014 1% 16% 26% 33% 24% District 2013 2% 14% 26% 34% 24% District 2014 1% 15% 27% 34% 23%
2014 Reading - Percent of Schools At or Above and Below State Proficiency Levels 100% 90% 80% 57% 59% 57% 70% 60% Dec 67% Inc 64% 73% Inc Inc 60% 86% 50% 40% 30% 43% 43% 41% 20% 40% 36% 33% 27% 10% 14% 0% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade % of Schools Below State % of Schools Above State
2014 Writing - Percent of Schools At or Above and Below State Proficiency Levels 100% 90% 33% Dec 80% 43% 55% 57% 57% Dec 70% 60% Dec 68% 68% Inc Inc 60% 50% 40% 67% 30% 57% 45% 43% 43% 20% 40% 32% 32% 10% 0% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade % of Schools Below State % of Schools Above State
2014 Math - Percent of Schools At or Above and Below State Proficiency Levels 100% 90% 33% Dec 40% 80% 50% 59% 57% 57% 70% Dec 73% 71% Inc 60% 50% 40% 67% 30% 60% 50% 43% 43% 41% 20% 29% 27% 10% 0% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade % of Schools Below State % of Schools Above State
2013-2014 Elementary Systemic Changes & Results • Additional support (fte, professional development, coaching) to targeted schools • Effective use of district literacy experts to provide professional development, provide principal and teacher coaching, conduct literacy audit, establish extended learning opportunities, and initiate literacy core program pilots
2013-2014 Systemic Changes & Results Intentional District Support Results 3 rd Grade Reading 50% of schools saw an increase in • the percent of proficient students 1% increase in 3 rd grade district • reading scores 5 th Grade Writing • 40% of schools saw an increase in the percent of proficient students 4 th to 5 th Cohort - 60% of schools • saw an increase in the percent of proficient students 4 th to 5 th Cohort - 2% increase in 5 th • grade district reading scores
2013-2014 Systemic Changes & Results Intentional District Support in 4 th Results Grade Reading & Writing in Specific Schools Namaqua Elementary School • 16% increase in the percent of proficient students in reading • 13% increase in the percent of proficient students in writing 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 11% increase in the • percent of proficient students in reading 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 15% increase in the • percent of proficient students in writing Ponderosa Elementary School • 10% increase in the percent of proficient students in reading • 4% increase in the percent of proficient students in writing 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 11% increase in the • percent of proficient students in reading 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 10% increase in the • percent of proficient students in writing
2013-2014 Systemic Changes & Results Intentional District Support in 5 th Results Grade Reading & Writing in Specific Schools Cottonwood Plains Elementary School • 14% increase in the percent of proficient students in reading 12% increase in the percent of proficient • students in writing 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 3% increase in the • percent of proficient students in reading 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 3% increase in the • percent of proficient students in writing 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 3% increase in the Truscott Elementary School • percent of proficient students in reading 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 16% increase in the • percent of proficient students in writing
2013-2014 Systemic Changes & Results Intentional District Support in Results 4 th & 5 th Grade Reading & Writing in Specific Schools Ivy Stockwell Elementary School • 14% increase in the percent of proficient students in 4 th grade reading • 9% increase in the percent of proficient students in 5 th grade reading • 5% increase in the percent of proficient students in 4 th grade writing 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 9% increase in the • percent of proficient students in reading 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 6% increase in the • percent of proficient students in writing 4 th to 5 th Cohort – 17% increase in the • percent of proficient students in reading 4 th to 5 th Cohort – 7% increase in the • percent of proficient students in writing
2013-2014 Systemic Changes & Results Intentional District Support in Results 4 th & 5 th Grade Reading & Writing in Specific Schools Coyote Ridge Elementary School • 11% increase in the percent of proficient students in 4 th grade reading • 9% increase in the percent of proficient students in 4 th grade writing 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 3% increase in the • percent of proficient students in reading 3 rd to 4 th Cohort – 14% increase in the • percent of proficient students in writing 4 th to 5 th Cohort – 8% increase in the • percent of proficient students in reading 4 th to 5 th Cohort – 8% increase in the • percent of proficient students in writing
2013-2014 Secondary Systemic Changes & Results • Continued Implementation of the Literacy Design Collaborative • Continued Implementation of the Math Design Collaborative • Targeted interventions driven by data • Integrate literacy across all content areas • PLC Work
2013-2014 Secondary Systemic Changes & Results Intentional District Support Results th grade saw an increase in extended • 7th – 10 LDC - Writing writing: th (+6%); 8 th (+11%); - 7 th (+4%); 10 th (+47%) 9 - Quasi Cohort th to 8 th (+19%); 8 th to 9 th (+18%); 7 th to 10 th (+7%) 9 th to 7 th grade cohort • 80% of the Middle Schools 6 saw an increase in writing • 60% of the Middle Schools saw an increase in th grade the percent of proficient students in 8 • 80% of the High Schools saw an increase in the th grade percent of proficient students in 10
2013-2014 Secondary Systemic Changes & Results Intentional District Support Results th to 8 th grade MDC - Math • 60% of the Middle Schools 7 cohort saw an increase in math • 80% of the Middle Schools saw an increase in the percent of proficient th grade students in 6 • 80% of the Middle Schools saw an increase in the percent of proficient th grade students in 8 • TMS saw an increase in math for all 3 th (+3%); 7 th (+7%); grade levels 6 th (+10%) 8
Instructional Implications • Data Transparency supports Professional Learning Communities, Collaboration and student growth. • Data supports schools and teachers to meet Thompson to Life goals. • Quality Foundation of Learning • Personal Learning Pathways • Post Secondary Access for All • The District will provide data and resources to schools and teachers in order to support them in formative learning, progress monitoring, goal setting and academic growth for all students.
Recommend
More recommend
