geoproof a user interface for formal proofs in geometry
play

GeoProof: A user interface for formal proofs in geometry. Julien - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GeoProof: A user interface for formal proofs in geometry. Julien Narboux under the supervision of Hugo Herbelin INRIA-Futurs, LIX, Ecole Polytechnique UITP 2006, Seattle Plan 1 Related work and motivations 2 A general presentation of


  1. GeoProof: A user interface for formal proofs in geometry. Julien Narboux under the supervision of Hugo Herbelin INRIA-Futurs, LIX, ´ Ecole Polytechnique UITP 2006, Seattle

  2. Plan 1 Related work and motivations 2 A general presentation of GeoProof 3 Proof related features 4 Future work

  3. Dynamic Geometry. There are quite many dynamic geometry software :

  4. Dynamic Geometry. There are quite many dynamic geometry software : Baghera, Cabri Euclide, Cabri Geometer, CaR, Chypre, Cinderella, D´ eclic, D´ efi, Dr. Geo, Euclid, Euklid DynaGeo, Eukleides, Gava, GCLC, GeoExp, GeoFlash, GeoLabo, Geometria, Geometrix, Geometry Explorer, Geometry Tutor, GeoPlanW, GeoSpaceW, GEUP, GeoView, GEX, GRACE, KGeo, KIG, Non-Euclid, Sketchpad, XCas . . .

  5. Dynamic Geometry. But few can deal with proofs : Baghera, Cabri Euclide, Cabri Geometer, CaR, Chypre, Cinderella, D´ eclic, D´ efi, Dr. Geo, Euclid, Euklid DynaGeo, Eukleides, Gava, GCLC, GeoExp, GeoFlash, GeoLabo, Geometria, Geometrix, Geometry Explorer, Geometry Tutor, GeoPlanW, GeoSpaceW, GEUP, GeoView, GEX, GRACE, KGeo, KIG, Non-Euclid, Sketchpad, XCas . . .

  6. 1 - Interactive proof systems using a base of lemmas • Baghera, • Cabri-Euclide, • Chypre, • D´ efi, • Geometrix, • Geometry Tutor

  7. 1 - Interactive proof systems using a base of lemmas 2 - Interfaces for an ATP Cinderella Probalistic method, no proof shown. GCLC Implementation of the area method. Geometry Explorer Implementation of the full angle method using prolog, and visualization of the proofs in a diagrammatic way. GEX/Geometer Implementation of the area method, of Wu’s method and of deductive database methods, visualization of statements only.

  8. 1 - Interactive proof systems using a base of lemmas 2 - Interfaces for an ATP Cinderella Probalistic method, no proof shown. GCLC Implementation of the area method. Geometry Explorer Implementation of the full angle method using prolog, and visualization of the proofs in a diagrammatic way. GEX/Geometer Implementation of the area method, of Wu’s method and of deductive database methods, visualization of statements only. GeoView Uses GeoPlan and Pcoq to visualize statements .

  9. GeoProof combines these features: • dynamic geometry • automatic theorem proving • interactive theorem proving (using Coq)

  10. Motivations • The use of a proof assistant provides a way to combine geometrical proofs with larger proofs (involving induction for instance).

  11. Motivations • The use of a proof assistant provides a way to combine geometrical proofs with larger proofs (involving induction for instance). • There are facts than can not be visualized graphically and there are facts that are difficult to understand without being visualized.

  12. Motivations • The use of a proof assistant provides a way to combine geometrical proofs with larger proofs (involving induction for instance). • There are facts than can not be visualized graphically and there are facts that are difficult to understand without being visualized. • We should have both the ability to make arbitrarily complex proofs and use a base of known lemmas.

  13. Motivations • The use of a proof assistant provides a way to combine geometrical proofs with larger proofs (involving induction for instance). • There are facts than can not be visualized graphically and there are facts that are difficult to understand without being visualized. • We should have both the ability to make arbitrarily complex proofs and use a base of known lemmas. • The verification of the proofs by the proof assistant provides a very high level of confidence.

  14. A quick overview of GeoProof • Written using ocaml and lablgtk2 . • Distributed under the GPL2 licence. • Multi- platform. http://home.gna.org/geoproof/

  15. Dynamic geometry features • points, lines, circles, vectors, • layers segments, intersections, • Computations use arbitrary perpendicular lines, precision perpendicular bisectors,angle • Input: XML bisectors. . . • Output: XML, natural • central symmetry, translation language, SVG, PNG, BMP, and axial symmetry Eukleides (latex), Coq • traces • text labels with dynamic Missing features: parts: • measures of angles, • loci and conics distances and areas • macros • properties tests (collinear- ity,orthogonality,. . . ) • animations

  16. Proof related features 1 Automatic proof using an embedded ATP 2 Automatic proof using Coq 3 Interactive proof using Coq

  17. Automatic proof using the embedded ATP We need to perform a translation from a theory based on circles, lines and points to a theory based only on points.

  18. l passing through A and B P 1 ( l ) = A P 2 ( l ) = B l parallel line to m passing through A P 1 ( l ) = A P 2 ( l ) = P 2 l l perpendicular to m passing through A P 1 ( l ) = A P 2 ( l ) = P 2 l l perpendicular bisector of A and B P 1 ( l ) = P 1 l P 2 ( l ) = P 2 l c circle of center O passing through A O ( c ) = O P ( c ) = A c circle passing through A , B and C O ( c ) = O c P ( c ) = A c circle whose diameter is A B O ( c ) = O c P ( c ) = A

  19. Point P on line l collinear ( P , P 1 ( l ) , P 2 ( l )) I intersection of l 1 and l 2 collinear ( I , P 1 ( l 1 ) , P 2 ( l 1 )) ∧ collinear ( I , P 1 ( l 2 ) , P 2 ( l 2 )) ∧ ¬ parallel ( P 1 ( l 1 ) , P 2 ( l 1 ) , P 1 ( l 2 ) , P 2 ( l 2 )) l perpendicular bisector of AB P 1 ( l ) A = P 1 ( l ) B ∧ P 2 ( l ) A = P 2 ( l ) B ∧ P 1 ( l ) � = P 2 ( l ) ∧ A � = B

  20. Dealing with non-degeneracy conditions • Non degeneracy conditions play a crucial role in formal geometry. • GeoProof allows to build a formula not a model of this formula. • The user can define impossible figures.

  21. Automatic proof using Coq • Based on our formalization of the area method in Coq. • Constructive theorems in affine plane geometry.

  22. � � � Interactive proof using Coq Goal Init Construction Proof Definition

  23. � � � Interactive proof using Coq Goal Init Construction Proof Definition • GeoProof loads the library (Guilhot or Narboux) and updates the interface.

  24. � � � Interactive proof using Coq Goal Init Construction Proof Definition • GeoProof loads the library (Guilhot or Narboux) and updates the interface. • It translates each construction as an hypothesis in Coq syntax.

  25. � � � Interactive proof using Coq Goal Init Construction Proof Definition • GeoProof loads the library (Guilhot or Narboux) and updates the interface. • It translates each construction as an hypothesis in Coq syntax. • It translates the conjecture into Coq syntax.

  26. � � � Interactive proof using Coq Goal Init Construction Proof Definition • GeoProof loads the library (Guilhot or Narboux) and updates the interface. • It translates each construction as an hypothesis in Coq syntax. • It translates the conjecture into Coq syntax. • It translates each construction into the application of a tactic to prove the existence of the newly introduced object.

  27. � � � � � � � � � � Future work • Synchronization between GUIs Coq GeoProof � �������������� � � � � � � PGIP PGIP � � � � � � � � � PG PGIP PGIP PCoq Isabelle Broker � � � ���������������� � PGIP � PGIP � � � � � � � � � � � CoqIDE . . .

  28. Future work • Synchronization between GUIs • Diagrammatic proofs • in geometry • in abstract term rewriting [Nar06]

  29. Future work • Synchronization between GUIs • Diagrammatic proofs • in geometry • in abstract term rewriting [Nar06] • Integration with GeoThms

  30. Give it a try ! http://home.gna.org/geoproof/ Thank you!

  31. Yves Bertot, Fr´ ed´ erique Guilhot, and Lo¨ ıc Pottier. Visualizing geometrical statements with GeoView. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 103:49–65, September 2003. Xian-Shan Gao and Qiang Lin. MMP/Geometer - a software package for automated geometry reasoning. In F. Winkler, editor, Proceedings of ADG 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 44–46. Springer-Verlag, 2002. Ulrich Kortenkamp. Foundations of Dynamic Geometry. PhD thesis, ETH Z¨ urich, 1999. Ulrich Kortenkamp and J¨ urgen Richter-Gebert. Using automatic theorem proving to improve the usability of geometry software. In Mathematical User Interface, 2004.

  32. Julien Narboux. A formalization of diagrammatic proofs in abstract rewriting. 2006. J¨ urgen Richter-Gebert and Ulrich Kortenkamp. Die interaktive geometrie software cinderella book and cd-rom. German school-edition of the Cinderella software, 1999. http://cinderella.de . Jacob T. Schwartz. Probabilistic algorithms for verification of polynomial identities. In Symbolic and algebraic computation, volume 72 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 200–215, Marseille, 1979. Springer-Verlag.

Recommend


More recommend