general assembly meeting
play

General Assembly Meeting Overall update of Project Status Roy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

General Assembly Meeting Overall update of Project Status Roy Pennings, Project Coordinator Raquel Costa, Project Manager BrightnESS is funded by the European Union Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020, under grant


  1. General Assembly Meeting Overall update of Project Status Roy Pennings, Project Coordinator Raquel Costa, Project Manager BrightnESS is funded by the European Union Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020, under grant agreement 676548

  2. GA meeting agenda

  3. GA responsibilities For year 1, we hope to show you that brightnESS is: • …on technical schedule • …on deliverables target • …on milestones target • …below spending target • …no changes in consortium • …no disputes related to CA (yet ;>) For year 2, brightnESS will: • …have a major Amendment • …have its 1 st periodic report • …have its mid-term review GA decision points!

  4. Transfer VAT Knowledge Of Transfer Ownership Innovation Creation Posted & Procurement Monitoring seconded staff tracking ERIC New Member & taxation Countries Management TTO Enlargement IK accounting IKC National €20 M Field ESS Horizon funding Coordinators Best Large 2020 Practice Area brightnESS Platform Detector Algorithm 70% targeted Development to innovation Higher Resolution Technical Detectors Response Innovation to ESFRI 17 Partners Industrial National interest for Moderator Hub Streaming Testing & future Managers Beamline of 11 Countries operations Development Metadata

  5. Success in delivery of BrightnESS: - Technical : contribution toESS construction & future operations - Political : ESS as an applied research centre = competition, jobs, leadership - Political : ESS as an ERIC = success as international collaboration model between members - Political : ESS is possible blueprint for future ERICs, as In-Kind Collaboration for new large RIs. Failure in delivery of BrightnESS: - Financial damage to ESS - Reputation / political damage to ESS (EC + partners & wider science community) - Possible damage to future ESS funding proposals

  6. Timeline Milestone 2 15 milestones Milestone 13 Milestone 6 Milestone 3 Milestone 17 Milestone 7 14 approved Milestone 1 Milestone 36 Milestone 37 Milestone 15 Milestone 14 Milestone 16 Milestone 38 1 part of the Milestone 12 Milestone 39 amendment month month month month month month month month month month month month month 13 deliverables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 6 approved 2 part of the Deliverable 3.1 Deliverable 4.1 Deliverable 2.4 Deliverable 2.1 amendment Deliverable 4.5 3 submitted Deliverable 4.2 Deliverable 1.2 Deliverable 6.1 Deliverable 5.1. 1 delayed Deliverable 2.2 Deliverable 1.1 Deliverable2.3 Deliverable 6.2 1 sent to the StB Deliverable 4.4 Deliverable 4.3

  7. Milestones and Deliverables Milestones Deliverables 6 Accomplished ERIC transfer D1.1 Agenda and minutes of the General Assembly / Kick-off meeting Setting-up of a Technology Transfer Office at ESS 7 D6.1 BrigthnESS section on www.europeanspallationsource.se Issuing of Corporate Identity guide 36 D2.1 Risk assessment and mitigation plan Establishment of Regional Hubs 1 Establishment of Regional Hubs for Collaboration building & D3.1 "ERIC Risk and Opportunity Plan" 37 Outreach D1.2 Data Management Plan Improvement of the Multi-Blade designs (MSGC and no- D2.2 Launch of IKC Best practice online platform amplification) to create prototypes. 12 Definition of workflows 2 D6.2 Results of target group online survey 1st Organisation of annual IKC conferences 3 D4.1 Integration plan for readout Optimisation for bispectral instrument 14 D4.2 Counting rate capability BrightnESS information materials 38 1st Outreach Activity Plans for each Cluster 39 D4.3 Natural and enriched Gadolinium converters design General design for multi-grid. 15 Report on the engineering design of the BRR low dimensional Improvement of the counting rate capability 16 D4.4 moderator Modelling and experimental verification of the new moderator D2.3 Deployment of Management Information System concept 13 Detailed plan for detector system integration 17 D5.1 Design report data aggregator software

  8. ECAS

  9. Communication: Project Meetings Main Items for Discussion Visited partners ESS Bilbao Cost Eligibility BNC Wigner IEAP - CTU Participation in other Work Packages TUD FZJ Technical Progress INFN …

  10. Communication Tools in WP1 Project Wiki/ FAQ Cost Monitoring Tool Vademecum Newsletter

  11. Main items requiring attention 1. Amendment : administrative correction in ECAS + modification opportunity 2. Underspend : checking cost allocations with partners – modifying activities for year 2 3. Reporting : planning and justification. Data to be used by mid-term reviewers

  12. Amendment Why? Change of “AB”-status to “ERIC” in EC administrative systems When? End of 2016 (expected, depends on ‘certificate of AB-liquidation’) How? Single amendment, incorporating all desired changes in the project EC will manage and guide the process. What is added to the amendment? • Transfer of funds between categories and partners (example: ESS subcontracting to Elettra for XRM- development) • Description of 2 optimisations for XRM as part of deliverable in M12 • Addition of some partners to other Work Packages (examples: BNC to WP2, TUD to WP4?) • Change in some Deliverable and Milestone dates (M3, D3.1, D6.2) • Better definition of some eligible costs (travel to certain technical meetings for Risk Mitigation) • Inclusion of descriptions on some new costs inside existing WPs (example: ESS on-site visitor centre) • …

  13. Periodic report and mid-term review Period report • Month 18 (Feb-March 2017) • Description of technical progress • Detailed financial expenditure per partner thus far Mid-term review • Month 18 • External review of technical progress and deliverables • Financial expenditure and control

  14. Summary status Risks Financial Technical • Cost Monitoring Tool in place • Arrival of Certificate of • 9 out of 13 deliverables and checked with partners Liquidation of “AB” submitted (Year 1) • Underspend (all partners) • Recruitment • Planning is on target • Continued underspend • ACTIONS: ACTIONS: ACTIONS: • Improve monitoring tool (add • Submit Amendment • Close contact through ESS 6-month forecast) • Prepare for periodic report with company liquidator • Track Partners costs • Prepare for mid-term review • Close contact with WP- • Verify partner entries in leaders (re. delivery) periodic reporting • Revision of budgets after approved periodic report

  15. Budget and expenditure figures are next…

  16. Thank you! Any questions or comments thus far? BrightnESS is funded by the European Union Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020, under grant agreement 676548

Recommend


More recommend