gaussian light field estimation of viewpoint dependent
play

Gaussian Light Field: Estimation of Viewpoint-Dependent Blur for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Gaussian Light Field: Estimation of Viewpoint-Dependent Blur for Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays Yuta Itoh, Toshiyuki Amano, Daisuke Iwai, and Gudrun Klinker IEEE ISMAR 2016, Tue. 20th Sep. 2016 Gaussian Light Field: Estimation of


  1. Gaussian Light Field: Estimation of Viewpoint-Dependent Blur for Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays Yuta Itoh, Toshiyuki Amano, Daisuke Iwai, and Gudrun Klinker IEEE ISMAR 2016, Tue. 20th Sep. 2016

  2. Gaussian Light Field: Estimation of Viewpoint-Dependent Blur for Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays Yuta Itoh, Toshiyuki Amano, Daisuke Iwai, and Gudrun Klinker IEEE ISMAR 2016, Tue. 20th Sep. 2016

  3. Blur artifacts in HMDs

  4. 4/28 Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs) Non Optical See-Through Optical See-Through ( OST -HMD)

  5. We want make AR with HMD real Magic Leap, 2016

  6. Realism in AR (with OST HMDs) Temporal Visual [Zheng ’14] [Lincoln ’16] [Kiyokawa ’01] [Liu ’08] [Lee ’09] Spatial [Azuma ’95] [Tuceryan ’00] [Genc ’02] [Grubert ‘08]

  7. Realism in AR (with OST HMDs) Temporal Visual [Zheng ’14] [Lincoln ’16] [Kiyokawa ’01] [Liu ’08] [Lee ’09] Spatial [Azuma ’95] [Tuceryan ’00] [Genc ’02] [Grubert ‘08]

  8. Image blur in (OST-)HMDs Ideal Output

  9. Image blur in (OST-)HMDs Actual observation

  10. Image blur in (OST-)HMDs Ideal Output

  11. Image blur in (OST-)HMDs Actual observation

  12. Image blur  Impulse Responses Impulse responses

  13. Image blur  Impulse Responses Impulse responses

  14. Why do we care about ?

  15. Related Work: SharpView SharpView: Improved Clarity of Defocused Content on Optical See- Through Head-Mounted Displays, Oshima et al. 2015

  16. Related Work: Pinlight Displays “ Pinlight Displays: Wide Field of View Augmented Reality Eyeglasses using Defocused Point Light Sources ” Maimone et al., TOG’14

  17. Related Work: Pinlight Displays “ Pinlight Displays: Wide Field of View Augmented Reality Eyeglasses using Defocused Point Light Sources ” Maimone et al., TOG’14

  18. Related Work: Light field displays The Light Field Stereoscope, Huan et al., SIGGRPAH 2015

  19. Optics Designs of OST-HMDs Half-mirror Prism-based (Free-form) Half-mirror prism Point source Eye Waveguide-based Retinal Scanning Waveguide Laser source Based on: Hainich and Bimber, Displays Fundamentals and Applications , 2011

  20. Image blur in HMDs  View-dependent  Non-linear (and RGB-wise)

  21. Image Undistortion for OST-HMDs Image Undistortion for OST-HMDs Itoh et al. IEEE TVCG ‘15 (VR ’15) & IEEE ISMAR ‘15

  22. How to model? 4D Light Field model + Point Spread Function ( PSF ) Itoh et al. IEEE TVCG ‘15 (VR ’15) & IEEE ISMAR ‘15

  23. origin �

  24. origin �

  25. origin �

  26. origin � PSF

  27. origin �

  28. origin �

  29. origin �

  30. origin �

  31. origin � Gaussian � � �u � � � 1/���� � � ��

  32. NVIS ST60 Lumus DK32

  33. NVIS ST60 Lumus DK32 A cubic prism Holographic gratings

  34. NVIS ST60 Lumus DK32

  35. Data collection Input Raw image Filtered ( Raw PSF ) Training PSF

  36. Data collection Training Baseline PSF (Avg. PSF) Raw PSF Ideal view Observed PSF (filtered) Estimated PSF Baseline PSF Raw Image

  37. Learning Training data  Regression 

  38. Testing  ST60 Better Better Better

  39. Testing  DK32 We failed to get enough # of data for the red channel Better Better

  40. Future work  Best PSF model? … … … ?  Eye orientation+model e.g., Jones et al., IEEE 3DUI 2016  Real-time processing

  41. Summary  Spatio-Visual Realism in AR  Image blur in HMDs  View-dep. blur model  4D light field + Point Spread Functions  Evaluation on two HMDs  Cubic prism & Waveguides Contact: itoh@in.tum.de

  42. Appendix

  43. Related Work: Multi-focus HMDs Liu et al. 2008 Konrad et al. 2016

  44. O M M’ C

  45. Testing Estimated Baseline PSF (Avg. PSF) Raw PSF Simulated view ฀ Simulated view ฀ Simulated view ฀ Observed view with Observed PSF with Estimated PSF with Baseline PSF No difference???

  46. Local v.s. Global sampling

  47. - Global: 80,000 points + Local: <150 points/grid

Recommend


More recommend