g rades 3 8
play

G RADES 3-8 English Language Arts 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jul 30, 2023 •269 likes •660 views

R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOLS 2013-14 R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC SCHOOLS TEST DATA PRESENTATION NJASK B ACKGROUND Standardized test given to New Jersey students in grades 3- 8 in Language Arts and Math and also in Science in grades 4 and 8. NJASK is

  1. R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOLS 2013-14 R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC SCHOOLS TEST DATA PRESENTATION

  2. NJASK B ACKGROUND Standardized test given to New Jersey students in grades 3- 8 in Language Arts and Math and also in Science in grades 4 and 8. NJASK is based on a scoring range of 100 – 300. • 100 – 199 is considered partially proficient (not passing) • 200-249 is considered proficient • 250-300 is considered advanced proficient  Goals of the assessment: – To measure and promote student achievement of challenging state curriculum standards – To give a glimpse of student performance at a given time using a valid and reliable tool – To meet state and federal accountability requirements

  3. S CORE R EPORTS  Statewide scores by grade level  District Factor Group (DFG) scores by grade level – Criteria for establishing a district’s DFG • Percent of adults with no high school diploma • Percent of adults with some college education • Occupational status • Unemployment rate • Percent of individuals in poverty • Median family income  District scores by grade level  Demographic group breakdowns by grade level

  4. C HANGES TO T ESTING Spring 2012 Spring 2013 Legend Old NJCCCS Items Old NJCCCS Items Realigned Spring 2014 Spring 2015 New Common Core Items

  5. G RADE 3 E NGLISH L ANGUAGE A RTS Grade 3 English Language Arts 79.3 75.3 74.1 73.6 80 68.4 65.5 70 60 54.7 60 50 46.4 50 38.8 38.5 40 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  6. G RADE 3 M ATHEMATICS Grade 3 Mathematics 91.7 100 88.5 88.5 83.4 82.4 81.4 90 77.4 75.5 80 60.4 70 56.6 56.1 54.8 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  7. G RADE 4 E NGLISH L ANGUAGE A RTS Grade 4 English Language Arts 67.2 67.1 70 62 59.9 59.8 59.8 58.8 57.7 60 44.6 50 38.9 40 31.9 29.1 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  8. G RADE 4 M ATHEMATICS Grade 4 Mathematics 97.1 93.5 100 88.2 84.6 82.4 80.9 90 76.9 74.9 80 65.6 70 59.1 54 52.6 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  9. G RADE 5 E NGLISH L ANGUAGE A RTS Grade 5 English Language Arts 80 70.4 67.6 67.2 62.7 70 62.3 59.2 60 50 48.3 50 40.8 40 29.5 27 23.8 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  10. G RADE 5 M ATHEMATICS Grade 5 Mathematics 91.1 100 87.9 86.2 83.2 83.3 81.2 90 79.8 72 80 65.9 70 53.6 52.4 60 42.9 50 40 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  11. G RADE 6 E NGLISH L ANGUAGE A RTS Grade 6 English Language Arts 79.1 76.7 75.7 80 71.4 70.6 67.5 66.9 70 60 52.4 46.5 50 42.1 40 29 26.7 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  12. G RADE 6 M ATHEMATICS Grade 6 Mathematics 92.3 100 89.2 88.3 87.5 86.8 81.6 90 79.3 72 80 65.1 63.1 70 60 47.3 46.7 50 40 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  13. G RADE 7 E NGLISH L ANGUAGE A RTS Grade 7 English Language Arts 73.8 73.4 72.9 80 72.2 67.6 64.6 64 70 56.3 60 49.8 50 42.4 40 31.3 24.8 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  14. G RADE 7 M ATHEMATICS Grade 7 Mathematics 83.2 90 79.4 76.4 76 75.2 80 68 66.8 62.6 70 55.2 60 47.5 50 40 30.2 29.4 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  15. G RADE 8 E NGLISH L ANGUAGE A RTS Grade 8 English Language Arts 93.9 100 89.6 88.3 86.5 86.1 81.3 90 79.8 70.7 80 64 70 60 46.2 42.8 43 50 40 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  16. G RADE 8 M ATHEMATICS Grade 8 Mathematics 84.4 90 80.8 80.1 78.7 72.3 72.3 71.5 80 70 60.2 53.5 60 50 32.6 31.6 40 30.8 30 20 10 0 Total Students General Education Special Education Econ. Disadvantaged School DFG Statewide

  17. T OTAL S TUDENTS P ROFICIENT G RADES 3-8 English Language Arts 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade School DFG Statewide

  18. T OTAL S TUDENTS P ROFICIENT G RADES 3-8 Mathematics 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade School DFG Statewide

  19. 2 YEAR PROGRESS INDICATORS 3 RD – 4 TH GRADES * Grade 4 English Language Arts Grade 4 Mathematics 100 120 90 100 80 70 80 60 50 60 40 40 30 20 20 10 0 0 Special Econ. General Total Students Special Econ. General Total Students Education Disadvantaged Education Education Disadvantaged Education 2013 2014 2013 2014 *Same students over a two year period.

  20. 3 YEAR PROGRESS INDICATORS 3 RD – 5 TH GRADES * Grade 5 English Language Arts Grade 5 Mathematics 90 100 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 Special Econ. General Total Students Special Econ. General Total Students Education Disadvantaged Education Education Disadvantaged Education 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 *Same students over a three year period.

  21. 3 YEAR PROGRESS INDICATORS 4 TH – 6 TH GRADES * Grade 6 English Language Arts Grade 6 Mathematics 90 100 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 Special Econ. General Total Students Special Econ. General Total Students Education Disadvantaged Education Education Disadvantaged Education 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 *Same students over a three year period.

  22. 3 YEAR PROGRESS INDICATORS 5 TH – 7 TH GRADES * Grade 7 English Language Arts Grade 7 Mathematics 90 100 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 Special Econ. General Total Students Special Econ. General Total Students Education Disadvantaged Education Education Disadvantaged Education 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 *Same students over a three year period.

  23. 3 YEAR PROGRESS INDICATORS 6 TH – 8 TH GRADES * Grade 8 English Language Arts Grade 8 Mathematics 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 Special Econ. General Total Students Special Econ. General Total Students Education Disadvantaged Education Education Disadvantaged Education 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 *Same students over a three year period.

  24. H SPA FACTS • The HSPA (High School Proficiency Assessment) is given in March to all 11 th grade students attending a public high school in the state of NJ • HSPA is scored on a range from 100 – 300 • 100 – 199 is considered partially proficient (not passing) • 200-249 is considered proficient • 250-300 is considered advanced proficient • March, 2014 was the last large scale administration of the HSPA. NJ has transitioned to the PARCC assessment.

  25. MARCH 2014 MATHEMATICS PROFICIENCY HSPA COMPARISONS Ridgefield DFG State Total Student 88.5% 79.2% 78.9% Population General Education 93.4% 88.2% 87% Special Education 50% 36.3% 39.3% LEP 100% 29.8% 33.3% Economically 75.8% 67.7% 62.6% Disadvantaged 100% 80% Ridgefield 60% DFG 40% State 20% 0% Total Gen Ed Spec Ed LEP Econ Dis

  26. MARCH 2014 LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY PROFICIENCY HSPA COMPARISONS Ridgefield DFG State Total Student 95.1% 94.3% 93.3% Population General Education 100% 98.7% 98.2% Special Education 64.3% 73.3% 72% LEP 50% 53.7% 45.4% Economically 89.7% 89.9% 86.4% Disadvantaged 100% 80% Ridgefield 60% DFG 40% State 20% 0% Total Gen Ed Spec Ed LEP Econ Dis

  27. 3 YEAR HSPA HISTORY MATHEMATICS – GENERAL EDUCATION PROFICIENCY RATES Year Ridgefield DFG State 2012 90.0% 87.6% 87.6% 2013 84.0% 88.2% 88.3% 2014 93.4% 88.2% 87% Mathematics 100.00% Ridgefield 90.00% DFG 80.00% State 70.00% 2012 2013 2014

  28. 3 YEAR HSPA HISTORY LAL – GENERAL EDUCATION PROFICIENCY RATES Year Ridgefield DFG State 2012 98.1% 97.9% 97.3% 2013 97.4% 98.0% 97.2% 2014 100% 98.7% 98.2% Language Arts Literacy 100.00% Ridgefield DFG 95.00% State 90.00% 2012 2013 2014

  29. AP SCORES Mean 2014 % 3 2013 % 3 5 4 3 2 1 Total Score or higher or higher Biology 1 2 7 0 0 10 3.40 100% 33.3% Calculus 3 1 6 0 0 10 3.70 100% 90% AB English Lit 3 5 3 0 0 11 4.00 100% 75% European 0 1 5 0 1 7 2.86 86% 25% History Psychology 1 4 1 2 1 9 3.22 67% 80% Statistics 4 6 6 0 0 16 3.88 100% 66.7% US History 5 2 1 0 0 8 4.50 100% 93.8% Total 17 21 29 2 2 71 3.69 94.4% 67.4% 23.9% 29.5% 40.8% 2.8% 2.8%

Recommend

REPORT CARDS G RADES K-4 Dr. Michele R. Pillari Superintendent of Schools W HY ? W HAT S O UR

REPORT CARDS G RADES K-4 Dr. Michele R. Pillari Superintendent of Schools W HY ? W HAT S O UR

REPORT CARDS G RADES K-4 Dr. Michele R. Pillari Superintendent of Schools W HY ? W HAT S O UR S TORY ? Over the last 3 years: Rewrote every curriculum in the district: Language Arts Mathematics Social Studies Science

399 views • 12 slides
G RADES 4 TO 9 C ONNECTING W ITH F AMILIES o Email is the first means of reaching families, so

G RADES 4 TO 9 C ONNECTING W ITH F AMILIES o Email is the first means of reaching families, so

H OME S TUDY P ROGRAM G RADES 4 TO 9 C ONNECTING W ITH F AMILIES o Email is the first means of reaching families, so please let the office know when an email address changes. o Phone. We call periodically, including when classes are cancelled on

460 views • 17 slides
G RADES 4 TO 9 1 C ONNECTING W ITH F AMILIES o Email is the first means of reaching families, so

G RADES 4 TO 9 1 C ONNECTING W ITH F AMILIES o Email is the first means of reaching families, so

H OME S TUDY P ROGRAM G RADES 4 TO 9 1 C ONNECTING W ITH F AMILIES o Email is the first means of reaching families, so please let the office know when an email address changes. o Phone. We call periodically, including when classes are cancelled

361 views • 15 slides
= LEITER f Students 2884 : 4- RADES = 12 DOMAIN = Z CODOWUAIN = 9. } 16,25 4

= LEITER f Students 2884 : 4- RADES = 12 DOMAIN = Z CODOWUAIN = 9. } 16,25 4

= = = LEITER f Students 2884 : 4- RADES = 12 DOMAIN = Z CODOWUAIN = 9. } 16,25 4 Ii { 01 - . RANGE , - Dyoma ' cobomain f R R { o } : - : R Codomaln = - { 0 } R I Range ints ) ( all pairs 21 of xz

705 views • 52 slides
W eaponizing the W eb More Attacks on User Generated Content Saturday, August 1, 2009 Co m rades

W eaponizing the W eb More Attacks on User Generated Content Saturday, August 1, 2009 Co m rades

W eaponizing the W eb More Attacks on User Generated Content Saturday, August 1, 2009 Co m rades Citizen: Nathan Ha m iel Senior Consultant - Idea InfoSec Associate Prof @UAT, Hexagon Security Group 23 rd Degree Mason, LavaRolling Enthusiast

940 views • 35 slides
Digital Upg pgra rades des and nd Cyber Security An Industry Perspective John Connelly

Digital Upg pgra rades des and nd Cyber Security An Industry Perspective John Connelly

Digital Upg pgra rades des and nd Cyber Security An Industry Perspective John Connelly Engineering Manager Capital Projects Exelon Generation Company December 17, 2015 1 Industry Pe Perspec ecti tive Our shared goal is safe and

223 views • 9 slides
x 10 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 T HE J OHN F ISHER S CHOOL C HANGING G RADE B OUNDARIES x 10

x 10 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 T HE J OHN F ISHER S CHOOL C HANGING G RADE B OUNDARIES x 10

OOL HER S CHOO PPE 2 R ESULTS D AY OHN F ISHER T UESDAY 27 TH M ARCH 2017 HE J OH T HE T HE MAJORITY OF YOUR SON S SUBJECTS ARE NOW GRADED USING G RADES - N UMBERS OR L ETTERS NUMBERS RATHER THAN LETTERS . E NGLISH AND M ATHS MADE THESE

401 views • 6 slides
WELCOME SLBC of Andhra Pradesh

WELCOME SLBC of Andhra Pradesh

rd Mee 173 173 rd Meeti ting ng of of SL SLBC C of of An Andh dhra ra Pra rades desh WELCOME SLBC of Andhra Pradesh Andhra Bank Performance

641 views • 46 slides
co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by co-milling Korbinian Lbmann,

co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by co-milling Korbinian Lbmann,

Improved physical stability for co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by co-milling Korbinian Lbmann, Clare Strachan, Holger Grohganz, Thomas Rades, Ossi Korhonen and Riikka Laitinen* *corresponding author Aim of the

288 views • 10 slides

More recommend