co amorphous simvastatin and
play

co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Improved physical stability for co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by co-milling Korbinian Lbmann, Clare Strachan, Holger Grohganz, Thomas Rades, Ossi Korhonen and Riikka Laitinen* *corresponding author Aim of the


  1. Improved physical stability for co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations prepared by co-milling Korbinian Löbmann, Clare Strachan, Holger Grohganz, Thomas Rades, Ossi Korhonen and Riikka Laitinen* *corresponding author

  2. Aim of the study  In this study, the drug pair simvastatin-glipizide (SVS- GPZ) in different molar ratios was processed by mechanical activation (ball milling (BM) or cryomilling (CM)).  The aim was to prepare molecularly mixed co- amorphous systems of the two drugs, which would have improved physical stability. Glipizide Simvastatin

  3. Preparation of the mixtures  Cryomilling was able to produce co-amorphous mixtures with all SVS-GPZ ratios (2:1, 1:1 and 1:2).  In contrast, ball milling was successful only for 2:1 and 1:1 mixtures. 18.6 (GPZ) 21.8 (GPZ) 15.6 (GPZ) SVS-GPZ 1:2 BM Intensity SVS-GPZ 1:1 BM SVS-GPZ 2-1 BM 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2theta/

  4. Glass transition temperature  All co-amorphous mixtures were found to have one composition-dependent T g value between the individual T g values of the pure drugs, indicating formation of a one-phase system.  The higher the amount of GPZ in the mixture was, the higher was the observed T g . Observed T g [  C] Theroretical T g [  C] 1 Material 32.6±0.2 2 SVS nd 3 GPZ SVS CM 31.5±2.4 GPZ CM 69.9±0.3 SVS-GPZ 2:1 BM 41.1±6.2 42.3 SVS-GPZ 1:1 BM 46.3±6.6 48.4 SVS-GPZ 2:1 CM 41.5±5.1 42.3 SVS-GPZ 1:1 CM 46.7±5.2 48.4 SVS-GPZ 1:2 CM 53.6±5.3 54.9 1 Form Gordon-Taylor equation; 2 by quench cooling in DSC ; 3 GPZ degraded after melting

  5. Interaction between SVS and GPZ  However, the calculated Flory-Huggins interaction parameter ( χ = 5.5 ± 2.0) suggested that favourable interactions were not likely between SVS and GPZ and that these two molecules might not be miscible with each other in the equilibrium state.  This was confirmed by FTIR measurements which showed that there were no interactions between SVS and GPZ in the co-amorphous mixtures.

  6. PCA - score plot  A PCA analysis of the IR data showed a clear difference between the crystalline mixtures and the processed (amorphous) formulations.  SVS CM and GPZ CM form their own clusters in the score plot, with the 2:1, 1:1 and 1:2 samples (amorphous physical mixture (APM), BM, CM) placed in between, independent of the production technique.  Thus, no interactions exist 20 1:1 PM 2:1 PM between SVS and GPZ in the 15 1:2 PM co-amorphous mixtures since 10 PC-2 (30%) the PCA model classifies 5 APMs similar to the co- SVS CM 0 SVS CM 2:1 APM 1:1 BM amorphous mixtures. 1:1 APM 2:1 BM 1:2 APM -5 2:1 CM 1:1 CM GPZ CM 1:2 CM GPZ CM -10 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 PC-1 (65%)

  7. PCA – loading plot  The loading plot shows that PC1 explains the difference in composition and PC2 explains the difference between crystalline and amorphous state. GPZ CM - SVS CM PC-1 Loading SVS/GPZ 1:1 PM- 1:1 CM PC-2 4000 3500 3000 1500 1000 500 Wavenumber (cm -1 )

  8. Storage stability  For the evaluation of physical stability, the amorphous samples were stored at 4  C/0% RH, 25  C/0% RH and 25  C/60% RH.  Stability studies revealed a higher storage stability for the co-amorphous mixtures compared to the corresponding amorphous physical mixtures.  The stability of the co-amorphous mixtures increased as a function of increasing GPZ content.  The most stable mixtures (1:1 and 1:2 CM) were stable for over two months at all storage conditions.

  9. Conclusions I  Mechanical activation was successfully applied to obtain co-amorphous mixtures of two BCS class II drugs, simvastatin (SVS) and glipizide (GPZ).  Increased storage stability was observed despite the lack of stabilizing interactions between SVS and GPZ.

  10. Conclusions II  The most stable mixtures were stable for over two months at all storage conditions.  The improved stability can be attributed to the formation of SVS-GPZ molecular mixture where GPZ acts as a stabilizing component (anti-plasticizer), which is beneficial for stability even in the absence of molecular interactions. The full work has been published: Korbinian Löbmann, Clare Strachan, Holger Grohganz, Thomas Rades, Ossi Korhonen, Riikka Laitinen: Co-amorphous simvastatin and glipizide combinations show improved physical stability without evidence of intermolecular interactions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, in press. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.02.004

Recommend


More recommend