future of community safety work group update
play

Future of Community Safety Work Group Update Presentation to City - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Future of Community Safety Work Group Update Presentation to City Council Policy & Government Oversight Committee Thursday, August 6, 2020 City of Minneapolis Fut utur ure o e of Engage in a year long process of community


  1. Future of Community Safety Work Group Update Presentation to City Council – Policy & Government Oversight Committee Thursday, August 6, 2020 City of Minneapolis

  2. Fut utur ure o e of Engage in a year long process of community engagement, research, Co Communi unity and structural change to create a Safet ety transformative new model for Wor orkgroup cultivating safety in our city.

  3. • Follow a public health approach to ending violence by reducing the factors that put people at risk for being Minneapolis 2040 involved with violence. • Expand the use of non-enforcement, community-driven public safety strategies and responses such as Public Safety goal: restorative practices that can address and repair the harm caused by a crime. Prioritize collaborative, multisector, • Proactively build trust between first responders and the community. community-inclusive • Ensure that first responders reflect the diversity of the city’s approaches to ensuring residents. safety for all members • Maintain and enhance a public safety infrastructure of our community. that improves response times to police and fire calls, implements new technologies, provides operation and training opportunities, and improves communication among public safety agencies. • Maintain the City’s Emergency Operations Plan.

  4. Future of Community Safety Workgroup Goals Process Goal Using a Human Centered Design approach that centers Black, Indigenous, and People of color communities, engage residents who are disproportionately impacted by police and community violence and victim survivors of community, domestic, and sexual violence to co-design new systems of public safety. End Goal Solutions and strategies to build a multidisciplinary, comprehensive system of public safety rooted in public health, community, and justice that keeps all Minneapolis residents and communities safe.

  5. Workgroup Structure CM Future of • CM Cunningham Cunningham Community • Brian Smith Safety Core re • Sasha Cotton Te Team • Joy Marsh Stephens Future of • City Councilmembers Community • City Staff Safety Workgr group Subcommittee: Subcommittee: Subcommittee: Reimagining Policing Subcommittee: Community Policy & Research & Alternatives to Violence Prevention Engagement Policing

  6. • Community Engagement Plan • Community “Vision of Success” adopted • Co-created policy, practices, and Workg kgroup p budget recommendations Deliver erables es • Establish community oversight committee • Implementation Plan & Timeline

  7. Work already underway Police Conduct Oversight Minnesota Department 911 / MPD workgroup Commission/Office of OVP strategic planning of Human Rights Police Conduct Review Pathways to Freedom (Human Trafficking & YCB's Children and Youth Minneapolis 2040 Public Law Diversion program Exploitation Prevention Master Plan Safety Goal Initiative) Blueprint Strategic & Racial Equity Action Plan Public Safety Priority

  8. Public H Health F Framework

  9. Project LIFE (Group Violence Intervention)

  10. Community Engagement City of Minneapolis

  11. Engagement Goals • Appreciative Inquiry: Engagement activities facilitate co-creation of new systems of public safety built on community strengths and vision of success. • Connection: People feel connected to one another. It’s not just about the City hearing from community, but about us being in relationship with community. • Meaningful and Relevant Dialogue : The community feels that the dialogue has been meaningful and relevant to their interests and daily lives. The City has clarified appropriate expectations with residents on where they can influence and where they can’t influence Council action. • Additive Inquiry: Engagement activities build upon previous engagements and reflect what the public has already told us on these topics • Access to Information and Opportunities : The public has the information they need to participate in ways that are appropriate to their experiences and lifestyles. Engagement strategies are varied and designed to accessible and meet people where they are. • Contributions Have Impact : The public feels their input has been thoughtfully considered and sees their contributions reflected in the plan. Residents feel a sense of pride in a system of public safety that reflects their vision and values. • Empowering Experience : Community leadership and capacity has been built through the process. Participants in the process develop a shared language around a public health approach to community safety • Delight and Surprise : The process centers on curiosity and co-creation resulting in outcomes we couldn’t predict from the beginning • Inclusive Representation : The perspectives and participation of a broad range of community members is equitably represented, particularly those from marginalized communities.

  12. Centering racial healing in the process Research & Healing Planning Engagement

  13. Phases of the work Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 5: Phase 3: Phase 4: Pre-Engagement Research Long-Term Recommendations Solution & Planning Engagement Development

  14. Short Term: Phase 1 & 2 z PHASE ACTVITIES OUTCOME • Launch virtual opportunities to co-create long-term PHASE 1 Community engagement plan is co-created Pre-engagement engagement plan. and developed with residents. • Digital survey launched. • Establish research teams. Shared understanding of what we know • Research Gather existing data and information. and what community has already told us • Conduct literature review. about their experience. • Sort existing data into themes categorized by specific PHASE 2 problems or pain points experienced by residents. Thematic challenge areas are identified Synthesis • Engage community stakeholders and staff to create and verified with community. and validate themes. • Identify key audiences to engage for each challenge area. Deeper dive engagements are designed for • Planning Develop engagement objectives, tactics, and each thematic challenge area. questions. • Build partnerships to lead and guide engagement.

  15. Long-Term: Phases 3-5 z PHASE ACTVITIES OUTCOME • Capture resident experiences. Solutions to community safety that center PHASE 3 • Collaborate with residents on developing ideas and Long-Term Engagement resident experiences are captured and exploring solutions within each thematic challenge prioritized. area. PHASE 4 • Vetting and feasibility of ideas Determine the ideas and solutions to be Solution Development • Testing and prototyping solutions considered for implementation PHASE 5 • Core Team presents recommendations to community, Recommendations Guiding policy document created Council, and Mayor

  16. Audiences • Accessibility Population Key Stakeholder Groups Response Networks • Black, Indigenous and People • Business Associations • Domestic Abuse/Sexual of Color Violence Survivors • Property Owners • LGBTQIA+ Communities • Youth and Families Additional Stakeholder Groups • Sex Workers and Those in the • Seniors and Aging Populations • City of Minneapolis Residents Informal Economy • Small Business Owners • Cultural Organizations • Public Agencies • Renters • Immigrants and Refugees • Media Outlets • Crime Victims • Public Safety Policy Advocates • College Students • Residents with Criminal • Relevant Appointed Boards • Institutions Records and Commissions • Tourists and Visitors • Residents/Families with • Neighborhood Organizations • The General Public mental health issues • Limited-English Populations • Religious Community • Homeless Populations • Alternative Public Safety

  17. Potential Engagement Strategies • Artist-designed engagements • Meeting in a Box • Civic Engagement Phase Summaries • Town Halls • Handouts • Ward Meetings • Topical Presentations • Focus groups • Study Sessions • Website • Survey

  18. Next Steps City of Minneapolis

  19. After Engagement Prototyping Implementation Policy changes recommendations Plan

  20. Community Engagement Plan Community-defined “vision of success” City y Counci cil Key Deci cision Recommendations to prototype & test Points A s Ahe head Implementation Plan Budget investments

  21. Next Steps for Community VIRTUAL AND IN-PERSON (PHYSICALLY ONLINE SURVEY FOR PRELIMINARY DATA ON PROVIDE INPUT ON SPECIFIC CHALLENGE DISTANT) OPPORTUNITIES TO CO-CREATE VISION OF SUCCESS AREAS AND SIGN UP FOR COMMUNITY LONG-TERM ENGAGEMENT PLAN COMMITTEES WORK

  22. Questions? City of Minneapolis

Recommend


More recommend