from the national coalition for alarm management safety a
play

From the National Coalition for Alarm Management Safety A case - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

April 17, 2017 12pm to 1pm From the National Coalition for Alarm Management Safety A case study from Rush Medical Center Obtaining Baseline Alarm Data and Reducing Non- Actionable Alarms Stephanie Orr DNP, RN, CCRN Rush University


  1. April 17, 2017 12pm to 1pm From the National Coalition for Alarm Management Safety A case study from Rush Medical Center Obtaining Baseline Alarm Data and Reducing Non- Actionable Alarms Stephanie Orr DNP, RN, CCRN Rush University Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit Rush University Medical Center

  2. AAMI Foundation Vision: To drive the safe adoption and safe use of healthcare technology Complimentary Resources: www.aami.org/thefoundation • National Coalition for Infusion Therapy Safety • National Coalition to Promote Continuous Monitoring of Patients on Opioids • Compendium: Opioid Safety & Patient Monitoring • National Coalition for Alarm Management Safety • Compendium: AAMI Foundation Management of Clinical Alarm

  3. A Special Thanks

  4. Thank You to Our Industry Partners! DIAMOND 9/25/2013 4

  5. Thank You to Our Industry Partners! Platinum Gold 9/25/2013 5

  6. LinkedIn Questions Please post questions on the AAMI Foundation’s LinkedIn page. OR Type a question into the question box on the webinar dashboard.

  7. Speaker Introduction Stephanie Orr DNP, RN, CCRN Rush University Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit Rush University Medical Center

  8. Obtaining Baseline Alar m Data and R educ ing Non- Ac tionable Alar ms ST E PHANI E ORR DNP, RN, CCRN RUSH UNI VE RSI T Y NE UROSCI E NCE I NT E NSI VE CARE UNI T RUSH UNI VE RSI T Y ME DI CAL CE NT E R

  9. Ob je c tive s  Re vie w b e nc hma rks a nd re c o mme nda tio ns fo r a la rm sa fe ty surve illa nc e pro g ra m  De sc rib e me tho ds o f o b ta ining b a se line a la rm da ta in a b se nc e o f middle wa re te c hno lo g y  Disc uss e le me nts o f a la rm sa fe ty surve illa nc e  De sc rib e Sta ff e duc a tio n: utilizing E BP to re duc e e xc e ssive a la rms  Disc uss e va lua tio n o f a la rm sa fe ty pro je c t

  10. L ite ra ture Re vie w  E xpo sing c linic ia ns to a n e xc e ssive a la rms de se nsitize s the m to the a la rms a nd c a n c a use the m to miss a la rms. (Se nde lb a c h, 2013)  Curre nt e vide nc e suppo rts spe c ific nursing pra c tic e s to impro ve a la rm sa fe ty a nd re duc e a la rm b urde n. (AACN, pra c tic e a le rt 2013)  Ala rm sa fe ty e xpe rts re po rt tha t da ily le a d c ha ng e s re duc e a la rm b urde n in I CUs b y 46%. (Cva c h, 2012)  Ala rm re po rts a nd sta ff e duc a tio n a re funda me nta l to q ua lity impro ve me nt re la te d to a la rm sa fe ty. (Co spe r, 2017)

  11. llino is Chic a g o , I

  12. E nviro nme nta l surve y  Rush Unive rsity Me dic a l Ce nte r  Sta ke ho lde rs  Pilo t pro je c t a re a  Stre ng ths  We a kne sse s  I nte rdisc iplina ry c o mmitte e  Co mpe ting pro je c ts

  13. Sta ke ho lde rs in a la rm sa fe ty  Pa tie nts  Nursing le a de rship  Clinic ia ns  Clinic a l E ng ine e ring  I nfo rma tio n Se rvic e s/ T e c hno lo g y  Risk Ma na g e me nt  T e c hno lo g y re pre se nta tive s/ E q uipme nt ve ndo rs

  14. Ba se line da ta  2014 a g g re g a te a la rm da ta wa s c o lle c te d fro m se rve rs via o ne time middle wa re c o nsult  Ala rm b urde n in the pilo t I CU wa s 80a la rms/ pa tie nt/ da y  T he mo st fre q ue nt a la rms we re ar tifac t a nd leads off  De fa ult se tting s fo r a rrhythmia a nd b a sic pa ra me te rs de te rmine d b y ho spita l le a de rship  Po lic y de fine s te rmino lo g y, re spo nsib ilitie s, a nd e xpe c ta tio ns fo r a la rm sa fe ty.  Nursing Sta nda rds o f Ca re

  15. Ala rms in the a dult I CUs, 2014 Ala rms pe r b e d pe r 24hr 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

  16. 2014 RUMC a la rm da ta 2500 PVC a pne a T o p a la rms pe r unit le a ds o ff a rtifa c t 866 351 2000 1500 1000 6977 500 5995 0 PVC Apne a L e a ds o ff a rtifa c t

  17. Wha t is o ur c urre nt a la rm b urde n?  T his Jo int Co mmissio n e duc a tio na l po ste r (2013) a sse rts tha t a la rm b urde ns in e xc e ss o f 100 pe r pa tie nt/ da y c o ntrib ute to pa tie nt sa fe ty e ve nts. Ala rms sho uld b e me a ning ful a nd sig na l a n a ppro pria te re spo nse .

  18. Ala rm Sa fe ty Surve illa nc e Me tric s  Ala rm b urde n: o b ta in # a la rms/ pa tie nt/ da y  % o f mo nito re d pa tie nts with ide ntifie rs  F re q ue nc y a nd type s o f c usto mize d limits  F re q ue nc y o f type s o f disa b le d a la rms  % o f a la rm sa fe ty do c ume nta tio n o f le a ds c ha ng e d q 24hr  % mo nito ring ide ntifie d in E HR

  19. Org a niza tio na l po lic y

  20. Da ta c o lle c tio n  8 Ra ndo m shifts inc luding nig hts a nd we e ke nds  Re vie we d c e ntra l sta tio n mo nito r e ve nt re po rts a nd E HR do c ume nta tio n fo r e ve ry pa tie nt o n the unit during the da ta c o lle c tio n pe rio d  Da ta po ints fo c use d o n me a suring o rg a niza tio na l po lic y po ints a nd b a sic a la rm me tric s  Ave ra g e c e nsus 25  Avg time 12 hr pe r 100 c a se s  Da ta c o lle c tio n o c c urre d 1x/ we e kly o ve r c o urse 2 mo nths

  21. Me tho d o f o b ta ining a la rm da ta  Ce ntra l sta tio n  E a c h pa tie nt file re vie we d fo r e le me nts o f a la rm sa fe ty pe rta ining to o rg a niza tio na l po lic y a nd pro c e dure  Custo mize d limits a re no te d b y le ve l a nd type  Surve illa nc e inc lude d a ny disa b le d a la rms  Re vie w numb e r o f a la rms/ pa tie nt/ da y via the sto re d a la rm e ve nts fo r pre vio us 24 ho urs to de te rmine a la rm b urde n  E MR wa s a udite d fo r do c ume nta tio n o f mo nito ring , a la rms o n, a nd le a d c ha ng e s

  22. Ala rm sa fe ty surve illa nc e to o l

  23. Ala rm sa fe ty pra c tic e tre nds

  24. Sta ff E duc a tio n: K e y Po ints  I ntro duc e e vide nc e b a se d pra c tic e  Hig hlig ht o rg a niza tio na l po lic y  T ime a nd c o nte nt fo r sta ff e duc a tio n is ke pt b rie f  Utilize visua l re minde rs o f a la rm sa fe ty in sta ff a re a s  E vide nc e o f le a rning is e va lua te d b y q uiz a nd a la rm sa fe ty surve illa nc e da ta

  25. AACN Alar m Management Guidelines  Collec t alar m data inc luding : a la rm type , fre q ue nc y, a nd re a so ns why a la rm so unde d  Co nduc t o b se rva tio ns o f ho w a la rms a re ma na g e d o n a individua l units , identify tr ends and safety c onc er ns.  I de ntify the g o a l o r o utc o me me a sure s tha t will g uide q ua lity impro ve me nt.  Implement pr oac tive str ategies that inc lude: pr oper skin pr ep & lead plac ement, daily lead c hanges, c ustomize limits for individual patient par ameter s as deter mined by patient c ondition and tr eatment goals.  Pro vide o ng o ing sta ff e duc a tio n a nd suppo rt a b o ut a la rm e na b le d pa tie nt c a re e q uipme nt a nd a la rm sa fe ty.  De ve lo p pa tie nt c a re unit po lic ie s a nd pro to c o ls tha t a ddre ss a c c e pta b le a la rm sa fe ty stra te g ie s fo r c linic a l mo nito rs.

  26. Ala rm Sa fe ty Sta ff duc a tio n E

  27. E va lua tio n: pilo t pro je c t pra c tic e me tric s Metr ic pr e post Ala rm b urde n 80 59 % pa tie nt ide ntifie rs 94% 92% % c o rre c t se tting 96% 98% % c usto mize d limits 84% 89% % disa b le d a la rms 91% 71% % le a ds c ha ng e d 10% 40%

  28. Pilo t pro je c t o utc o me s a nd c o nc lusio ns  T he pilo t pro je c t impro ve d a la rm sa fe ty pra c tic e tre nds.  97% o f c a se s ha d the c o rre c t se tting  84% o f c a se s ha d c usto mize d limits.  20% de c re a se in disa b le d a la rms.  27% de c re a se in a la rm b urde n.  30% inc re a se in do c ume nta tio n fo r c ha ng ing le a ds  T he pilo t pro je c t ide ntifie d pra c tic e tre nds tha t inspire d furthe r disc ussio n a nd future q ua lity initia tive s.

  29. Re c o mme nda tio ns  I nc lude a la rm b urde n a nd surve illa nc e o f pra c tic e tre nds a s pa rt o f the o rg a niza tio na l a la rm sa fe ty stra te g y.  I nc lude re vie w o f a la rm sa fe ty po lic y a nd pra c tic e e xpe c ta tio ns in a nnua l sta ff tra ining re q uire me nts.  I nc lude b a sic a la rm sa fe ty me tric s in unit b a se d q ua lity re po rts a s fe e db a c k to sta ff.  Pro mo te a la rm sa fe ty a s pa rt o f the g e ne ra l c ulture o f sa fe ty a nd re info rc e with visua l re minde rs.

  30. I mplic a tio ns fo r a dva nc ing a la rm sa fe ty  Po lic y & de fa ult pa ra me te rs  De fining c usto miza tio n  Ana lyzing a la rm flo o ds  E sta b lishing a n a la rm sa fe ty ro utine fo r QI  E nha nc ing c ulture o f sa fe ty: ro unds a nd b e dside re po rt  No ise le ve ls a nd the e vide nc e fo r “q uie t time ”

Recommend


More recommend