free theorems about monadic code
play

Free Theorems about Monadic Code Janis Voigtl ander University of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oct 06, 2022 •146 likes •1.65k views

Free Theorems about Monadic Code Janis Voigtl ander University of Bonn EWCE11 Functional Programming and Reasoning Goodies of (pure) FP: declarative abstraction/modularity referential transparency 1 Functional Programming

  1. A Slightly More Simple Example Assume m 1 , m 2 are pure. That is, m 1 = ( return u ) and m 2 = ( return v ) for some u , v . Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do return v b ← return u c ← return v return b ( return u ) > > = ( λ a → m ) = m [ u / a ] 7

  2. A Slightly More Simple Example Assume m 1 , m 2 are pure. That is, m 1 = ( return u ) and m 2 = ( return v ) for some u , v . Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do return v b ← return u c ← return v return b ( return v ) > > m = m 7

  3. A Slightly More Simple Example Assume m 1 , m 2 are pure. That is, m 1 = ( return u ) and m 2 = ( return v ) for some u , v . Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do b ← return u c ← return v return b ( return v ) > > m = m 7

  4. A Slightly More Simple Example Assume m 1 , m 2 are pure. That is, m 1 = ( return u ) and m 2 = ( return v ) for some u , v . Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do b ← return u c ← return v return b ( return u ) > > = ( λ b → m ) = m [ u / b ] 7

  5. A Slightly More Simple Example Assume m 1 , m 2 are pure. That is, m 1 = ( return u ) and m 2 = ( return v ) for some u , v . Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do c ← return v return u ( return u ) > > = ( λ b → m ) = m [ u / b ] 7

  6. A Slightly More Simple Example Assume m 1 , m 2 are pure. That is, m 1 = ( return u ) and m 2 = ( return v ) for some u , v . Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do c ← return v return u ( return v ) > > = ( λ c → m ) = m [ v / c ] 7

  7. A Slightly More Simple Example Assume m 1 , m 2 are pure. That is, m 1 = ( return u ) and m 2 = ( return v ) for some u , v . Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do return u ( return v ) > > = ( λ c → m ) = m [ v / c ] 7

  8. A Slightly More Simple Example Assume m 1 , m 2 are pure. That is, m 1 = ( return u ) and m 2 = ( return v ) for some u , v . Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do return u Purity is propagated! 7

  9. A Slightly More Simple Example Assume m 1 , m 2 are pure. That is, m 1 = ( return u ) and m 2 = ( return v ) for some u , v . Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do return u Purity is propagated! What about other “invariants”? 7

  10. Propagating Invariants f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  11. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  12. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  13. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  14. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  15. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  16. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 s a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  17. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 s s a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  18. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 s s a ← m 1 s m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  19. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 s s a ← m 1 s s m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  20. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 s s a ← m 1 s s m 2 s b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  21. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 s s a ← m 1 s s m 2 s s b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  22. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 s s a ← m 1 s s m 2 s s b ← m 1 s c ← m 2 return b 8

  23. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 s s a ← m 1 s s m 2 s s b ← m 1 s s c ← m 2 return b 8

  24. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 s s a ← m 1 s s m 2 s s b ← m 1 s s c ← m 2 s return b 8

  25. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a s s f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 s s a ← m 1 s s m 2 s s b ← m 1 s s c ← m 2 s s return b 8

  26. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 8

  27. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 State ( λ s → ( b , s )) 8

  28. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) State ( λ s → ( b , s )) 8

  29. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) State ( λ s → ( b , s )) (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) > > = ( λ c → State ( λ s → ( b , s ))) = ? 8

  30. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 State ( λ s → ( b , s )) (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) > > = ( λ c → State ( λ s → ( b , s ))) = ? 8

  31. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 State ( λ s → ( b , s )) 8

  32. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) State ( λ s → ( b , s )) 8

  33. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) State ( λ s → ( b , s )) (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) > > = ( λ b → State ( λ s → ( b , s ))) = ? 8

  34. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) > > = ( λ b → State ( λ s → ( b , s ))) = ? 8

  35. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) 8

  36. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) 8

  37. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) > > (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) = ? 8

  38. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) > > (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) = ? 8

  39. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) 8

  40. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) 8

  41. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) > > = ( λ a → State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) = ? 8

  42. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) > > = ( λ a → State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) = ? 8

  43. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) 8

  44. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) 8

  45. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) > > (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) = ? 8

  46. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) > > (State ( λ s → ( · · · , s ))) = ? 8

  47. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) Yes! 8

  48. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do State ( λ s → ( · · · , s )) Yes! What about other invariants, other monads, . . . ? 8

  49. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b What about other invariants, other monads, . . . ? 8

  50. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 “induction over normal form” b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b What about other invariants, other monads, . . . ? 8

  51. Propagating Invariants Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . Can we show that execState ( f m 1 m 2 ) = id ? Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 “induction over normal form” b ← m 1 [Prehofer ’99] c ← m 2 return b What about other invariants, other monads, . . . ? 8

  52. Consider a More Specific Type Instead of f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a now f :: Monad m ⇒ m Int → m Int → m Int 9

  53. Consider a More Specific Type Instead of f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a now f :: Monad m ⇒ m Int → m Int → m Int Then more possible behaviours of f are possible: f :: Monad m ⇒ m Int → m Int → m Int f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 9

  54. Consider a More Specific Type Instead of f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a now f :: Monad m ⇒ m Int → m Int → m Int Then more possible behaviours of f are possible: f :: Monad m ⇒ m Int → m Int → m Int f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 if b > 0 then return ( a + b ) else do c ← m 2 return b 9

  55. Reasoning via Monad Embedding Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 10

  56. Reasoning via Monad Embedding Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . An m has this property iff it is an h -image for h :: Reader σ a → State σ a h (Reader g ) = State ( λ s → ( g s , s )) f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f m 1 m 2 = do m 1 a ← m 1 m 2 b ← m 1 c ← m 2 return b 10

  57. Reasoning via Monad Embedding Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . An m has this property iff it is an h -image for h :: Reader σ a → State σ a h (Reader g ) = State ( λ s → ( g s , s )) Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f ( h m ′ 1 ) ( h m ′ 2 ) = do h m ′ f m ′ 1 m ′ 2 = do m ′ 1 1 a ← h m ′ a ← m ′ 1 1 h m ′ m ′ 2 2 b ← h m ′ b ← m ′ 1 1 c ← h m ′ c ← m ′ 2 2 return b return b 10

  58. Reasoning via Monad Embedding Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . An m has this property iff it is an h -image for h :: Reader σ a → State σ a h (Reader g ) = State ( λ s → ( g s , s )) Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f ( h m ′ 1 ) ( h m ′ 2 ) = do h m ′ f m ′ 1 m ′ 2 = do m ′ 1 1 a ← h m ′ a ← m ′ 1 1 h m ′ m ′ 2 2 b ← h m ′ b ← m ′ 1 1 c ← h m ′ c ← m ′ 2 2 return b return b 10

  59. Reasoning via Monad Embedding Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . An m has this property iff it is an h -image for h :: Reader σ a → State σ a h (Reader g ) = State ( λ s → ( g s , s )) Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f ( h m ′ 1 ) ( h m ′ 2 ) = do h m ′ f m ′ 1 m ′ 2 = do m ′ 1 1 a ← h m ′ a ← m ′ 1 1 h m ′ m ′ 2 2 b ← h m ′ b ← m ′ 1 1 c ← h m ′ c ← m ′ 2 2 return b return b return b = h ( return b ) 10

  60. Reasoning via Monad Embedding Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . An m has this property iff it is an h -image for h :: Reader σ a → State σ a h (Reader g ) = State ( λ s → ( g s , s )) Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f ( h m ′ 1 ) ( h m ′ 2 ) = do h m ′ f m ′ 1 m ′ 2 = do m ′ 1 1 a ← h m ′ a ← m ′ 1 1 h m ′ m ′ 2 2 b ← h m ′ b ← m ′ 1 1 c ← h m ′ c ← m ′ 2 2 h ( return b ) return b 10

  61. Reasoning via Monad Embedding Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . An m has this property iff it is an h -image for h :: Reader σ a → State σ a h (Reader g ) = State ( λ s → ( g s , s )) Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f ( h m ′ 1 ) ( h m ′ 2 ) = do h m ′ f m ′ 1 m ′ 2 = do m ′ 1 1 a ← h m ′ a ← m ′ 1 1 h m ′ m ′ 2 2 b ← h m ′ b ← m ′ 1 1 c ← h m ′ c ← m ′ 2 2 h ( return b ) return b 10

  62. Reasoning via Monad Embedding Assume m 1 , m 2 :: State σ τ , but execState m i = id . An m has this property iff it is an h -image for h :: Reader σ a → State σ a h (Reader g ) = State ( λ s → ( g s , s )) Then: f :: Monad m ⇒ m a → m a → m a f ( h m ′ 1 ) ( h m ′ 2 ) = do h m ′ f m ′ 1 m ′ 2 = do m ′ 1 1 a ← h m ′ a ← m ′ 1 1 h m ′ m ′ 2 2 b ← h m ′ b ← m ′ 1 1 c ← h m ′ c ← m ′ 2 2 h ( return b ) return b ( h m ′ 2 ) > > = ( λ c → h ( return b )) = ? 10

Recommend

Theorems for free! (Philip Wadler) Afonso Arriaga HASLab - INESC TEC, University of Minho June

Theorems for free! (Philip Wadler) Afonso Arriaga HASLab - INESC TEC, University of Minho June

Outline Introduction Basic concepts Examples of theorems from types Generalization of theorems for free Conclusions Theorems for free! (Philip Wadler) Afonso Arriaga HASLab - INESC TEC, University of Minho June 22, 2012 Afonso Arriaga

121 views • 11 slides
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTP2RUD_cL0 Theorems for Free Blame for All Philip Wadler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTP2RUD_cL0 Theorems for Free Blame for All Philip Wadler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTP2RUD_cL0 Theorems for Free Blame for All Philip Wadler University of Edinburgh QCon S ao Paulo 25 April 2017 Part I Theorems for Free A magic trick r :: a . [ a ] [ a ] :: a b . ( a b

419 views • 40 slides
arXiv:2007.10928v1 [cs.LG] 21 Jul 2020 Abstract The No Free Lunch theorems prove that under a

arXiv:2007.10928v1 [cs.LG] 21 Jul 2020 Abstract The No Free Lunch theorems prove that under a

What is important about the No Free Lunch theorems? David H. Wolpert arXiv:2007.10928v1 [cs.LG] 21 Jul 2020 Abstract The No Free Lunch theorems prove that under a uniform distribution over induction problems (search problems or learning

619 views • 15 slides
Monadic I/O in Haskell Jim Royer CIS 352 March 5, 2019 Jim Royer Monadic I/O in [1ex]

Monadic I/O in Haskell Jim Royer CIS 352 March 5, 2019 Jim Royer Monadic I/O in [1ex]

Monadic I/O in Haskell Jim Royer CIS 352 March 5, 2019 Jim Royer Monadic I/O in [1ex] Haskell 1 / 33 References Chapter 18 of Haskell: the Craft of Functional Programming by Simon Thompson, Addison-Wesley, 2011. Chapter 9 of Learn you a

620 views • 39 slides
De Finetti theorems for a Boolean analogue of easy quantum groups 1 / 27 De Finetti theorems for

De Finetti theorems for a Boolean analogue of easy quantum groups 1 / 27 De Finetti theorems for

De Finetti theorems for a Boolean analogue of easy quantum groups 1 / 27 De Finetti theorems for a Boolean analogue of easy quantum groups Tomohiro Hayase Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences, the University of Tokyo March, 2016 Free

293 views • 28 slides
The Impact of seq on Free Theorems-Based Program Transformations Janis Voigtl ander

The Impact of seq on Free Theorems-Based Program Transformations Janis Voigtl ander

October 22, 2004 The Impact of seq on Free Theorems-Based Program Transformations Janis Voigtl ander Dresden University of Technology http://wwwtcs.inf.tu-dresden.de/ voigt (joint work with Patricia Johann ) Supported by the

364 views • 17 slides
Free Theorems The Basics Janis Voigtl ander Technische Universit at Dresden January 6,

Free Theorems The Basics Janis Voigtl ander Technische Universit at Dresden January 6,

Free Theorems The Basics Janis Voigtl ander Technische Universit at Dresden January 6, 2006 Outline Example in Haskell Parametric polymorphism Polymorphic lambda calculus Parametricity theorem Back to Haskell 2 Haskell Example:

1.01k views • 75 slides
Many Theorems and a Few Stories John Garnett Seoul 5/12/17 1 OUTLINE I. Extension Theorems.

Many Theorems and a Few Stories John Garnett Seoul 5/12/17 1 OUTLINE I. Extension Theorems.

Many Theorems and a Few Stories John Garnett Seoul 5/12/17 1 OUTLINE I. Extension Theorems. II. BMO and A p Weights. III. Constructions with H Interpolation, , and BMO. IV. Corona Theorems and Problems. V. Harmonic Measure and

892 views • 35 slides
Low-Level Code and High-Level Theorems Sascha Bhme Technische Universitt Mnchen, Germany

Low-Level Code and High-Level Theorems Sascha Bhme Technische Universitt Mnchen, Germany

Low-Level Code and High-Level Theorems Sascha Bhme Technische Universitt Mnchen, Germany Joint work with Eyad Alkassar 1 , Ernie Cohen 2 , Kurt Mehlhorn 3 and Christine Rizkallah 3 1 Universitt des Saarlandes, Germany 2 European Microsoft

717 views • 58 slides
Security aid in producing vulnerability free code (bounds primary topic of the paper for today

Security aid in producing vulnerability free code (bounds primary topic of the paper for today

Security aid in producing vulnerability free code (bounds primary topic of the paper for today protect code from people with access to hardware checking, no-execute bit) aid in producing vulnerability free code (bounds secondary topic of the

193 views • 18 slides
From L owenheim to Pnueli, from Pnueli to PSL and SVA Moshe Y. Vardi Rice University Thread

From L owenheim to Pnueli, from Pnueli to PSL and SVA Moshe Y. Vardi Rice University Thread

From L owenheim to Pnueli, from Pnueli to PSL and SVA Moshe Y. Vardi Rice University Thread I: Monadic Logic Monadic Class : First-order logic with = and monadic predicates captures syllogisms . ( x ) P ( x ) , ( x )( P ( x )

470 views • 19 slides
Smoke-Free Forum Welcome! During the Smoke-Free Forum, an interactive survey will be

Smoke-Free Forum Welcome! During the Smoke-Free Forum, an interactive survey will be

Smoke-Free Forum Welcome! During the Smoke-Free Forum, an interactive survey will be conducted on a number of smoke-free issues. You can participate in person or remotely Sign in now at slido.com Event Code: smokefree 1 Smoke-Free

502 views • 33 slides
Monadic Reflection in Haskell Andrzej Filinski DIKU, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Monadic Reflection in Haskell Andrzej Filinski DIKU, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Monadic Reflection in Haskell Andrzej Filinski DIKU, University of Copenhagen, Denmark andrzej@diku.dk Mathematically Structured Functional Programming Kuressaare, Estonia, July 2006 A. Filinski Monadic Reflection in Haskell MSFP06 1

584 views • 34 slides
Context-Free Grammars 19 March 2019 OSU CSE 1 BL Compiler Structure Code Tokenizer Parser

Context-Free Grammars 19 March 2019 OSU CSE 1 BL Compiler Structure Code Tokenizer Parser

Context-Free Grammars 19 March 2019 OSU CSE 1 BL Compiler Structure Code Tokenizer Parser Generator string of string of abstract string of characters tokens program integers (source code) (words) (object code) The parser is

580 views • 47 slides
Modular rollback through free monads Conor McBride, Olin Shivers, Aaron Turon Tuesday, September

Modular rollback through free monads Conor McBride, Olin Shivers, Aaron Turon Tuesday, September

Modular rollback through free monads Conor McBride, Olin Shivers, Aaron Turon Tuesday, September 27, 2011 Goals for this talk Illustrate modular rollback with side-effects Brief tutorial on: free monads Filinskis monadic

892 views • 34 slides
Categorical Duality between Point-Free and Point-Set Spaces Yoshihiro Maruyama Kyoto University,

Categorical Duality between Point-Free and Point-Set Spaces Yoshihiro Maruyama Kyoto University,

Introduction Bool. Topo. Axioms in Functor-Structured Categories Dual Adjunction b/w Monadic and Topological Cats Categorical Duality between Point-Free and Point-Set Spaces Yoshihiro Maruyama Kyoto University, Japan

411 views • 19 slides
Topological spaces of monadic MV-algebras R. Grigolia (Tbilisi), A. Di Nola and G. Lenzi (Salerno)

Topological spaces of monadic MV-algebras R. Grigolia (Tbilisi), A. Di Nola and G. Lenzi (Salerno)

Topological spaces of monadic MV-algebras R. Grigolia (Tbilisi), A. Di Nola and G. Lenzi (Salerno) TACL 2017 Prague, 26-30 June 2017 Topological spaces of monadic MV-algebras G. Lenzi Summary We generalize Belluce functor from MV-algebras

1.24k views • 122 slides
Comprehending Monadic Queries Jeremy Gibbons (joint work with Fritz Henglein, Ralf Hinze, Nicolas

Comprehending Monadic Queries Jeremy Gibbons (joint work with Fritz Henglein, Ralf Hinze, Nicolas

Comprehending Monadic Queries Jeremy Gibbons (joint work with Fritz Henglein, Ralf Hinze, Nicolas Wu) WG2.11#15, November 2015 Comprehending Monadic Queries 2 1. Comprehensions ZF axiom schema of specification: { x 2 | x Nat x <

480 views • 14 slides
% Free Lunch by Zip Code 2009-10 (NCES Common Core of Data) LOCATION CHARTER TOTAL FREE LUNCH

% Free Lunch by Zip Code 2009-10 (NCES Common Core of Data) LOCATION CHARTER TOTAL FREE LUNCH

% Free Lunch by Zip Code 2009-10 (NCES Common Core of Data) LOCATION CHARTER TOTAL FREE LUNCH SCHOOL SCHOOL NAME- BY SURVEY YEAR ZIP SCHOOL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE LEVEL CODE LOW GRADE HIGH GRADE (SCHOOL) (SCHOOL) (SCHOOL) (SCHOOL) (SCHOOL)

267 views • 9 slides
Hierarchy theorems Evgenij Thorstensen V18 Evgenij Thorstensen Hierarchy theorems V18 1 / 18

Hierarchy theorems Evgenij Thorstensen V18 Evgenij Thorstensen Hierarchy theorems V18 1 / 18

Hierarchy theorems Evgenij Thorstensen V18 Evgenij Thorstensen Hierarchy theorems V18 1 / 18 Comparing functions To prove results like TIME ( f ( n )) TIME ( g ( n )) , we need a stronger notion of one function growing faster than

673 views • 21 slides
A Machine-Assisted Proof of Gdel's Incompleteness Theorems Lawrence C. Paulson, Computer

A Machine-Assisted Proof of Gdel's Incompleteness Theorems Lawrence C. Paulson, Computer

A Machine-Assisted Proof of Gdel's Incompleteness Theorems Lawrence C. Paulson, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge The most misunderstood theorems in mathematics Gdels theorems have highly For the first time, both of

319 views • 28 slides
Ramsey theorems for classes of structures with functions and relations Jan Hubi cka

Ramsey theorems for classes of structures with functions and relations Jan Hubi cka

Structural Ramsey Free amalgamation classes Amalgamation with closures General amalgamation Open problems Ramsey theorems for classes of structures with functions and relations Jan Hubi cka Department of Applied Mathematics Charles

1.02k views • 98 slides
SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES Singular Sentences (monadic) Paris is beautiful

SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES Singular Sentences (monadic) Paris is beautiful

SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES Singular Sentences (monadic) Paris is beautiful name predicate (monadic) individual Bp predicate letter constant Singular Sentences These are our new simple formulae, just Bp like the

1.1k views • 62 slides
Sylow Theorems Andrew Clarey Looking at the Structure of Arbitrary Groups Definitions/ Theorems

Sylow Theorems Andrew Clarey Looking at the Structure of Arbitrary Groups Definitions/ Theorems

Sylow Theorems Sylow Theorems Andrew Clarey Looking at the Structure of Arbitrary Groups Definitions/ Theorems Groups, Subgroups Lagranges, Normality Class Equation, Andrew Clarey Cauchys Theorem First Sylow Theorem Occidental

417 views • 26 slides

More recommend