cool theorems proved by undergraduates
play

Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Ken Ono Emory University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Ken Ono Emory University Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Childs play... Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Childs play... Thanks to the , Cool


  1. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Recurrence sequences Lucas Sequences A Lucas sequence ( b , c ) has characteristic polynomial and roots √ b 2 + 4 c α, β = b ± g ( z ) = z 2 − bz − c , . 2 Fact 1. u n = α n − β n v n = α n + β n α − β 2. u 2 k = u k v k 3. ( b 2 + 4 c ) u 2 n = v 2 n − 4( − c ) n

  2. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Recurrence sequences Specific Examples Theorem (Silliman, Vogt) For the following values of b and c: ( b , c ) = (3 , − 2) , (5 , − 6) , (7 , − 12) , (17 , − 72) , (9 , − 20) the Lucas sequence u n has no nontrivial pth powers, except u 2 = 3 2 in (9 , − 20) .

  3. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Recurrence sequences General Bound Conjecture (Frey-Mazur) Let E , E ′ be two elliptic curves defined over Q . If E [ p ] ∼ = E ′ [ p ] for some p > 17 , then E and E ′ are isogenous.

  4. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Recurrence sequences General Bound Conjecture (Frey-Mazur) Let E , E ′ be two elliptic curves defined over Q . If E [ p ] ∼ = E ′ [ p ] for some p > 17 , then E and E ′ are isogenous. Theorem (Silliman, Vogt) Assume the Frey Mazur conjecture. Then a pth power u n = y p satisfies p ≤ Ψ( b , c ) . where Ψ( b , c ) is an explicit constant.

  5. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Recurrence sequences More Examples Example The sequence (3 , 1): 0 , 1 , 3 , 10 , 33 , 109 , 360 , 1189 , 3927 , 12970 , 42837 , 141481 , · · · We haven’t found any nontrivial perfect powers . . .

  6. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Recurrence sequences More Examples Example The sequence (3 , 1): 0 , 1 , 3 , 10 , 33 , 109 , 360 , 1189 , 3927 , 12970 , 42837 , 141481 , · · · We haven’t found any nontrivial perfect powers . . . Theorem (Silliman, Vogt) Assume the Frey-Mazur Conjecture. There are no nontrivial powers in the sequences ( b , c ) = (3 , 1) , (5 , 1) , and (7 , 1) .

  7. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Recurrence sequences

  8. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Partitions Beautiful identities

  9. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Partitions Beautiful identities Euler proved that ∞ (1 − q 24 n ) = q − q 25 − q 49 + q 121 + q 169 − q 289 · · · . � q n =1

  10. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Partitions Beautiful identities Euler proved that ∞ (1 − q 24 n ) = q − q 25 − q 49 + q 121 + q 169 − q 289 · · · . � q n =1 Jacobi proved that ∞ (1 − q 8 n ) 3 = q − 3 q 9 + 5 q 25 − 7 q 49 + 9 q 81 − 11 q 121 + · · · . � q n =1

  11. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Partitions Beautiful identities Euler proved that ∞ (1 − q 24 n ) = q − q 25 − q 49 + q 121 + q 169 − q 289 · · · . � q n =1 Jacobi proved that ∞ (1 − q 8 n ) 3 = q − 3 q 9 + 5 q 25 − 7 q 49 + 9 q 81 − 11 q 121 + · · · . � q n =1 Gauss proved that ∞ (1 − q 16 n ) 2 � (1 − q 8 n ) = q + q 9 + q 25 + q 49 + q 81 + q 121 + q 169 + q 225 + · · · q n =1

  12. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Partitions Such rare identities have been discovered by:

  13. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Partitions Such rare identities have been discovered by: Crazy combinatorial manipulation of power series. Higher identities such as Jacobi’s ∞ z 2 m q m 2 . � � (1 − q 2 n )(1 + z 2 q 2 n − 1 )(1 + z − 2 q 2 n − 1 ) = n =1 m ∈ Z Modular forms.

  14. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Partitions Nekrasov-Okounkov Theory

  15. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Partitions Nekrasov-Okounkov Theory Deeper structure for such identities.

  16. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Partitions Nekrasov-Okounkov Theory Deeper structure for such identities. One doesn’t have to multiply out and combine terms.

  17. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Partitions Definition A nonincreasing sequence of positive integers summing to n is a partition of n .

  18. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Partitions Definition A nonincreasing sequence of positive integers summing to n is a partition of n . p ( n ) := # { partitions of n } .

  19. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Partitions Definition A nonincreasing sequence of positive integers summing to n is a partition of n . p ( n ) := # { partitions of n } . Example { Partitions of 4 } = { 4 , 3 + 1 , 2 + 2 , 2 + 1 + 1 , 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 }

  20. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Partitions Definition A nonincreasing sequence of positive integers summing to n is a partition of n . p ( n ) := # { partitions of n } . Example { Partitions of 4 } = { 4 , 3 + 1 , 2 + 2 , 2 + 1 + 1 , 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 } = ⇒ p (4) = 5 .

  21. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Generating function for p ( n )

  22. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Generating function for p ( n ) Lemma We have that ∞ ∞ 1 p ( n ) q n = � � 1 − q n . n =0 n =1

  23. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Wishful thinking

  24. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Wishful thinking Question Is there a “combinatorial theory” of infinite products where coefficient of q n = “formula in partitions of n ” ?

  25. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Hooklengths of partitions

  26. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Hooklengths of partitions Definition Hooks are the maximal ∗ ∗ ∗···∗ ∗ ∗ . . . ∗ in the Ferrers board of λ .

  27. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Hooklengths of partitions Definition Hooks are the maximal ∗ ∗ ∗···∗ ∗ ∗ . . . ∗ in the Ferrers board of λ . Hooklengths are their lengths, and H ( λ ) = { multiset of hooklengths of λ }

  28. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov An example Example ( λ = 5 + 3 + 2) 7 6 4 2 1 4 3 1 2 1

  29. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov An example Example ( λ = 5 + 3 + 2) 7 6 4 2 1 4 3 1 2 1 An so H ( λ ) = { 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 6 , 7 } .

  30. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Nekrasov-Okounkov q -series Definition For z ∈ C , let 1 − z q | λ | · � � � � O z ( q ) := . h 2 λ h ∈H ( λ )

  31. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Example ( λ = 5 + 3 + 2) 7 6 4 2 1 4 3 1 2 1

  32. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Example ( λ = 5 + 3 + 2) 7 6 4 2 1 4 3 1 2 1 The λ - contribution to O z ( q ) is 1 − z q 10 · � � � h 2 h ∈H ( λ ) 1 − z 1 − z 1 − z 1 − z 1 − z � 2 � � 2 � = q 10 (1 − z ) 3 � � � � � � 4 9 16 36 49

  33. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A famous identity revisited

  34. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A famous identity revisited Letting z = 4, we consider � 1 − 4 � q | λ | · � � O 4 ( q ) = . h 2 λ h ∈H ( λ )

  35. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A famous identity revisited Letting z = 4, we consider � 1 − 4 � q | λ | · � � O 4 ( q ) = . h 2 λ h ∈H ( λ ) We only need λ where every hook h � = 2.

  36. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A famous identity revisited Letting z = 4, we consider � 1 − 4 � q | λ | · � � O 4 ( q ) = . h 2 λ h ∈H ( λ ) We only need λ where every hook h � = 2. = ⇒ { Triangular partitions 1 + 2 + · · · + k }

  37. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A famous identity revisited.

  38. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A famous identity revisited. � (1 − 4 / h 2 ) λ 8 | λ | + 1 H ( λ ) 0 1 φ 1 1 9 { 1 } − 3 2 + 1 25 { 1 , 1 , 3 } 5 3 + 2 + 1 49 { 1 , . . . , 5 } − 7

  39. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A famous identity revisited. � (1 − 4 / h 2 ) λ 8 | λ | + 1 H ( λ ) 0 1 φ 1 1 9 { 1 } − 3 2 + 1 25 { 1 , 1 , 3 } 5 3 + 2 + 1 49 { 1 , . . . , 5 } − 7 And so we have ⇒ q O 4 ( q 8 ) = q − 3 q 9 + 5 q 25 − 7 q 49 + · · · =

  40. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A famous identity revisited. � (1 − 4 / h 2 ) λ 8 | λ | + 1 H ( λ ) 0 1 φ 1 1 9 { 1 } − 3 2 + 1 25 { 1 , 1 , 3 } 5 3 + 2 + 1 49 { 1 , . . . , 5 } − 7 And so we have ⇒ q O 4 ( q 8 ) = q − 3 q 9 + 5 q 25 − 7 q 49 + · · · = ∞ Jacobi ? � (1 − q 8 n ) 3 = q n =1

  41. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Big Identity

  42. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Big Identity Theorem (Nekrasov-Okounkov) If z is complex, then ∞ 1 − z q | λ | · � � � � � (1 − q n ) z − 1 . O z ( q ) := = h 2 n =1 λ h ∈H ( λ )

  43. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Big Identity Theorem (Nekrasov-Okounkov) If z is complex, then ∞ 1 − z q | λ | · � � � � � (1 − q n ) z − 1 . O z ( q ) := = h 2 n =1 λ h ∈H ( λ ) Remark Letting z = 0 gives the generating function for p ( n ) .

  44. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Euler, Gauss, and Jacobi-type identities

  45. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Euler, Gauss, and Jacobi-type identities Question 1 When do the sums below vanish? � 1 − ab � � � A ( a , b ; n ) := . h 2 | λ | = n h ∈H a ( λ )

  46. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Euler, Gauss, and Jacobi-type identities Question 1 When do the sums below vanish? � 1 − ab � � � A ( a , b ; n ) := . h 2 | λ | = n h ∈H a ( λ ) 2 Are there more identities of Euler, Gauss and Jacobi-type?

  47. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov Euler, Gauss, and Jacobi-type identities Question 1 When do the sums below vanish? � 1 − ab � � � A ( a , b ; n ) := . h 2 | λ | = n h ∈H a ( λ ) 2 Are there more identities of Euler, Gauss and Jacobi-type? 3 If so, find them all .

  48. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A cool theorem

  49. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A cool theorem Theorem (Clader, Kemper, Wage) The list of all pairs ( a , b ) for which “almost all” the A ( a , b ; n ) vanish are (1 , 2) , (1 , 3) , (1 , 4) , (1 , 5) , (1 , 7) , (1 , 9) , (1 , 11) , (1 , 15) , (1 , 27) , (2 , 2) , (2 , 3) , (2 , 5) , (2 , 7) , (3 , 3) , (3 , 5) , (3 , 9) , (4 , 5) , (4 , 7) , (7 , 9) , (7 , 15) .

  50. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov A cool theorem Theorem (Clader, Kemper, Wage) The list of all pairs ( a , b ) for which “almost all” the A ( a , b ; n ) vanish are (1 , 2) , (1 , 3) , (1 , 4) , (1 , 5) , (1 , 7) , (1 , 9) , (1 , 11) , (1 , 15) , (1 , 27) , (2 , 2) , (2 , 3) , (2 , 5) , (2 , 7) , (3 , 3) , (3 , 5) , (3 , 9) , (4 , 5) , (4 , 7) , (7 , 9) , (7 , 15) . Remark These pairs are the Euler, Gauss and Jacobi identities for ∞ (1 − q an ) b A ( a , b ; n ) q n := � � (1 − q n ) . n =1

  51. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Nekrasov-Okounkov

  52. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Number Fields Number fields Wrong Definition This is a number field .

  53. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Number Fields Number fields Wrong Definition This is a number field . .

  54. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Number Fields Number fields Wrong Definition This is a number field . . Definition A finite dimensional field extension of Q is called a number field .

  55. Cool theorems proved by undergraduates Number Fields An invariant Remark The discriminant ∆ K ∈ Z \ { 0 } of a number field K does:

Recommend


More recommend