FLOU OURISH RISH Governan ernance ce Struct cture re
El Elevat ator or Speech eech 2
Gu Guid idelines elines for or En Enga gagi ging ng • In Invitation ation to be prese sent nt • Co Confid identia entiality lity • Open-minded minded • St Streng engths ths-based based • List sten n to eac ach h ot other er 3
Mor ore e Gu Guid idelines elines for or En Enga gagi ging ng • Mutual ual Respect ct • In Intent nt vs. Im Impact act Aware warenes ess s of Persp specti ectives es & Bia iases es • • In Inquiry vs. . Ad Advocacy cacy • Honesty esty in in fe feedbac ack • Honesty esty of perspe specti ctives es • Encou ourage rage oth other ers s to engage ge & share re their r opin inions ions Assum ume goodw dwill ll • • Remem embe ber r why we we are here 4
ROADM DMAP AP 5
Roa oadmap map – What at Is Is It It? • Hypot othesi hesis, s, testi ting g in intuiti ition on, how ow to cause se change nge • Uncover ering ing assump sumption tions s • Flo low w chart t of activi viti ties, es, outcom come, e, activ iviti ties, es, outcome come, , end of the ro road 6
En End of of th the Roa oad • Big ig pic icture ture – not ot pro rogram rammat atic c leve level – help lp us prio iori riti tize ze and foc focus us – how ow to rall lly the communi unity ty in in wa ways s it it is is not ot now ow rall llying ing The he St. St. Lo Louis is re region ion wi will ll ac achie hieve e a a su subs bstantial tantial an and sus d sustained tained re redu duct ction ion in inf in infant ant mor ortality tality. 7
Precondit econditions ions for or the En End of of th the Roa oad • For us to achie ieve e the end of the ro road, what t has to happen en for for this is to occur? ur? What has to be in place and what’s different than now? 8
Precondit econditions ions for or the Big ig Boxes es 9
Hypothes pothesis is Rega garding rding the Order der 10
The Pat ath to P o Prog rogress ress Collaboration and Systems are changed Service delivery is leadership is to help families accessible and at established support their health max effectiveness Our region’s Physical and built challenges and environment Policies are changed needs are better supports healthy understood families Community-wide The region aligns understanding and around a path forward support increases 11
Roa oad Map ap Please answer the following questions for your portion of the Road Map: What at mi migh ght we se see e that at wou ould ld demons monstrat trate e this is? What at do o we need ed to k o know ab abou out t this is now? Please make notes on your flip chart paper. 12
Com ommunity munity Li List stenin ening g Session ession - Approa oach ch • Host series of mini listening sessions with partners • Host one general session - open to public • Reach 100 people to attend public sessions 13
Com ommunity munity Li List steni ening ng Sessions essions - Go Goal als 1. 1. Establish blish foundation ation of building ding commu munity nity own wnership hip 2. 2. Shape/inf /influ luenc ence e kn knowl wledg edge of relevant ant issues ues and priority ity-setting etting for Flour urish ish St. St. Louis is 3. Identify 3. ify emerging ging trends s and assets ts - increase ase common on underst stand anding ing of data and pertine nent nt community unity needs 4. 4. Draw w attention ion and build d public ic awareness ess of issu sues es 5. 5. In Incre rease ase pot otent ntial ial media ia cover erag age e of In Initiativ tiative 14
GOVE VERN RNANCE ANCE AND ND ST STRUC UCTURE URE 15
“In spite of current ads and slogans, the world doesn’t change one person at a time. It changes as networ etworks ks of of r relati ationsh onships ips for form amon ong peop ople le who ho d disco cover er the hey y sha hare e a co common on ca cause and vision of what’s possible.” - Marga gare ret t Whea eatl tley y and Debor orah ah Freize 16
Col olla laborativ borative e Go Governan vernance ce St Structur ructure • Defi finition nition of stru ructure cture • Unde derlying rlying assump umpti tions ns • Key attribut ributes 17
18
Col olla laborativ borative e St Structure ructure Next xt St Steps eps • Clarific rificati ation n of Cabi binet et stru ructur cture • Reinforce ce connecti nection on wi with ot other r initiati iatives s • Ide dentify fy wh when strat rategy gy and d ope pera rations ions teams s are re neede ded • MCFH FHC de devel velopi ping g pa pathways ys for for engaging aging new w community unity liaisons ns • Cre reate Thi hink nk Tank nk 19
Why y Thin ink k Tan ank? k? Condi ditions ions of collectiv ective impa pact ct hinge on be becoming ing da data dr driven ven Common on agenda da is is not ot a coll llec ecti tive e set et of solu luti tions ns stakeh ehol olde ders s can agree e upon, it is not about creating solutions at all, instead a common agenda is…. 1) common on underst standing nding of the pro roblem em 2) agree eeing ing to jo join int t goals ls to addre ress ss the pro roblem em 3) arrivi ving ng at common on in indic icat ator ors s to whic ich h the coll llec ecti tive e set et of in involved ed actor ors s wil ill l hold ld themselves es accoun ounta table e in in making ng pro rogre ress ss 20
Why y Thin ink k Tan ank? k? Opp pportunity unity to engage age more re pe peopl ple a and d di diver versity ity of thought, t, sector, , expe peri rience nce in FL FLOURISH RISH Opp pportunity unity to bu build d a sustainable ainable stru ructure cture for for sha hari ring ng and nd using ng da data 21
Thin ink k Tan ank k Dis iscus cussion ion 1. 1. Full Cabi binet et engage ged d in cre reati ation on of Think k Tank 2. 2. Ad Ad Ho Hoc grou roup p to en engage age in cre reati ation n of Think k Tank nk and d re repo port ba back to Cabi binet 3. 3. St Staff f to impl plement nt cre reati ation n of Think k Tank k and d re repo port ba back to Ca o Cabi binet net Pros ros and nd Con ons of of ea each? h? 22
Thin ink k Tan ank What’s important to us about the work of the Thin ink k Tan ank? k? 23
Next xt Meeting ing • Crea reating ing cr crit iteria eria for or go good od so solu lutio tions ns 24
Recommend
More recommend
