Featured Technologies 1 Corporate Profile Earth Recycle CO., LTD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EARTH RECYCLE CO., LTD. Featured Technologies 1

Corporate Profile Earth Recycle CO., LTD  Office location: 726 Tonan Taishi-cho Ibo-gun Hyogo, 6711523, Japan  Tel/Fax: +81-792-76-6275  URL: http://www.earthrecycle.net/  Established: April 16, 1997  Capital: JPY 10,000,000  President: Takashi Tachibana  Contact: kengo-y@earthrecycle.net Kengo Yamada, Finance Manager 2

Featured Technologies Offered By Earth Recycle CO., LTD 1. T he r mal c r ac king fue l pr oduc tion fr om waste plastic (pr oc e ssable with PVC/ PVDC/ PE T / PUR) 2. F T PO (F r uit T o Pyr olysis Oil) pr oduc tion fr om palm / jatr opha / waste e dible oil 3. T otal r e c yc le syste m with se par ation of c ompound r aw mate r ials (e spe c ially with F RP/ Car bon F ibe r ) Applic able to ste r ilization and r e c yc ling tr e atme nt of infe c tious me dic al waste 4. Quality impr ove me nt of thr ough solve nt e xtr ac tion oc e ss 5. n-par affin pr oduc e d thr ough palm/ jatr opha F T PO pr 3

PATENT RIGHTS OWNED BY ER ER Patent List Application# Description Note ２００９－１２２７５１ Fuel production ２００８－３３５７２８ Fuel production from waste plastic ２００６－７２１００ Fuel production from waste disposals ２００１－１５１７４ Pyrolysis process applied to waste plastic # ４７６８９２０ １１－２３２１０６ Pyrolysis process applied to waste plastic # ４４８５６２１ * Also applied in ＰＣＴ／ＪＰ２００９／０６６３ Malaysia/Indonesia FTPO production ４７ ２０１０－１２９５９９ Pyrolysis furnace for waste plastic ２０１０－１８０９３８ Round lateral type pyrolysis furnace ２０１０－２００５２６ FTPO production system ２０１０－２００５２７ Dispersive FTPO production system Separation method of useful substance from ２００４－３２７０４７ compound plastic with PVC/PET and alminium # ４６３７５５１ compound film Separation method and such device of compound ２０１１－１４０１４１ plastic waste 4

Thermal Cracking Fuel Production From Waste Plastic 5

Advantages of Thermal Cracking Fuel Production from Waste Plastic etc. Product benefits • Used as supplementary fuel for heating oil, bunker A, heavy oil, fuel for in-house generator etc. without remodeling of existing facilities • Mainly PE/PP/PS processed with stable results, but plastic with other commingled extraneous substances can also be processed. (PVC/PVDC/PET/PUR/sand/paper/metals/water/seawater etc.) • Processed even with waste tire with non-plastic materials, waste edible oil, waste lubricant oil, solvent Cost benefits • Cost saving of waste disposal process such as simplified or omitted pre-process equipment (compression/packing) • Simple operation/maintenance, no coking Other benefits • Enhance corporate reputation contributing to green environment. (No dioxin emission, decrease in volume of landfill, etc.) • Safety with operation under ordinary pressure 6

Yield% and Usage of Product Materials <Thermal Cracking Oil Produced from Waste Plastic> Product uct materi rial Yield d (wt wt%) %) Usa sage ge 3P 3P Househo ehold p plastic Crack cked ed gas 5 〜 15 15 10 〜 25 10 25 Home e fuel uel Pyrolysis o oil 78 78 〜 85 85 55 〜 78 55 78 Burn urner fuel uel Ligh ght gr grade oil 30 〜 40 30 40 20 〜 40 20 40 Home e fuel uel Middle e grade e oil 40 40 〜 50 50 30 30 〜 40 40 Burner ner fuel/P /Power er genera rator Heavey oil Burn urner fuel uel Residue ue 5 〜 15 15 15 15 〜 25 25 Supplem ement entary ry fuel/B /Base e course e materi rials 7

Aspects of Thermal Cracking Oil from Waste Plastic Aspects o of Pyroly lysis is O Oil il <Befo fore Q Qlty Im Imp.> <Af After Ql Qlty Im Imp.> Mid idiu ium Gravi avity Oil il Pyrol rolysis Oil from rom Item It Units ts from rom Hou House Waste House e Waste e Plastic c Plastic ic Density at 15℃ g/cm /cm 0.82 0. 82 0. 0.86 86 Viscosity at 30℃ CST 1. 1.5 5 5.0 5. 0 Ni Nitrog rogen ppm ppm - 130. 130.0 Sulfu fur ppm ppm - 100. 100.0 Ch Chlo lorine ppm ppm 100.0 100. 30.0 30. 0 Reactio ion neut neutral neut neutral Resid idual l Carbon ％ 0.1 .1 0. 0.05 05 Heat Value cal/g /g 10, 10,20 200 10,30 10, 300 8

Overall Flow of Oil Production from Waste Plastic through Thermal Cracking Waste Plastic Cracked Gas Pyrolysis Compression / Light Gravity Oil Packing Residue Distillation Home Fuel Dehydration Medium Gravity Oil Quality Kerosene / Gas Oil Dechlorination Improvement 9

Waste Plastic Oil Production Plant 10

Projected Annual Plan Annua nnual Oper eration n Plan n Annua nnual Oper eration n Plan n <Waste Pla lastic ic Dis isposal l Pla lant> <Waste Pla lastic ic Dis isposal l Pla lant> 80 JPY/USD PROJ OJECTED A ANNUAL P PROF OFITS i in J JPY'000 Annua nnual O Oper erating ng P Plan i n in U n USD'000 000 Parameter Parameter 1 3 6 12 3 6 12 capacity (ton/day) capacity (ton/day) 1 Yearly capacity (ton) Yearly capacity (ton) 330 990 1,980 3,960 330 330 990 1,980 3,960 330 Plant cost 50,000 100,000 120,000 220,000 Plant cost 625 1,250 1,500 2,750 Oil produced (kl) 50% 165 495 990 1,980 Oil produced (kl) 50% 165 495 990 1,980 Ulitities (kw) 61 182 364 729 Ulitities (kw) 61 182 364 729 Operation Labor (person) 2 2 6 8 Operation Labor (person) 2 2 6 8 7.0% 7.0% Residue volume 23 69 139 277 Residue volume 23 69 139 277 REVEN EVENUE REVEN EVENUE Process cost per ton 20 6,600 19,800 39,600 79,200 Process cost per ton 0.25 83 248 495 990 Oil sold per kl 60 9,900 29,700 59,400 118,800 Oil sold per kl 1 124 371 743 1,485 Total r rev evenue enue 16,500 16, 500 49,500 49, 500 99, 99,000 000 198, 198,000 000 Total r rev evenue enue 206 206 619 619 1, 1,238 238 2, 2,475 475 VARIAB VAR ABLE C E COST VAR VARIAB ABLE C E COST Utilities per kw 18 1,093 3,280 6,560 13,120 Utilities per kw 0.23 14 41 82 164 Residue disposal per ton 20 462 1,386 2,772 5,544 Residue disposal per ton 0.25 6 17 35 69 Solvent per ton 10 231 693 1,386 2,772 Solvent per ton 0.13 3 9 17 35 Total v variable c cost 1, 1,786 786 5, 5,359 359 10,718 10, 718 21,436 21, 436 Total v variable c cost 22 22 67 67 134 134 268 268 10.8% 10.8% 10.8% 10.8% FIXE XED C COST ST FIXE XED C COST ST Repair & maintenance 3% 1,500 3,000 3,600 6,600 Repair & maintenance 3% 19 38 45 83 Labor wage per person 4,000 8,000 8,000 24,000 32,000 Labor wage per person 50 100 100 300 400 Interest 3% 1,500 3,000 3,600 6,600 Interest 3% 19 38 45 83 Depreciation 10 4,500 9,000 10,800 19,800 Depreciation 10 56 113 135 248 Tax 1.50% 750 1,500 1,800 3,300 Tax 1.50% 9 19 23 41 Admi (% of fixed cost) 10% 1,625 2,450 4,380 6,830 Admi (% of fixed cost) 10% 20 31 55 85 Tota tal f fixed c cost t 17,875 17, 875 26, 26,950 950 48, 48,180 180 75, 75,130 130 Tota tal f fixed c cost t 223 223 337 337 602 602 939 939 108.3% 54.4% 48.7% 37.9% Total production cost 19,661 32,309 58,898 96,566 Total production cost 246 404 736 1,207 Net p t profit t (3, 3,161) 161) 17, 17,191 191 40,102 40, 102 101,434 101, 434 Net p t profit t (40) 40) 215 215 501 501 1,268 1, 268 Net Profit % -19.2% 34.7% 40.5% 51.2% -19.2% 34.7% 40.5% 51.2% Payout Period years 3.8 2.4 1.8 3.8 2.4 1.8 11

Bio Diesel Fuel Production Through Pyrolysis Process <Palm/Jatropha/Waste Edible Oil> 12

Advantages of FTPO Process 1. Direct production without CPO production 2. Quality of final product (oil pouring point -17 ℃ ) 3. Productivity (Rotten fruit used / shells and bunches used for active carbon) 4. No wastes 13

Adv #1 : Direct Production Without CPO Process 14

Process Comparison <Conventional vs ER process> CONVENTIONAL NEW TECHNOLOGY ＦＦＢ ＦＦＢ SOLID WASTES WASTE WATERS DEHYD YDRATI TION ENERGY RECOVERY ＣＰＯ PYROL OLYSI SIS RESIDUES TRAN ANSES ESTER ERIF- IC ICATIO ION QU QUALITY ACTIVE CARBON OR FUEL IMPROVIN IM ING NEU EUTRAL ALIZAT ZATION & & REFINING WASTE WATER SEP EPAR ARAT ATION O OF BY- Y-PRODUCTS TS BDF DF (BIO-FT FTL) WASTE TE GLYCERIN ＢＤＦ 15