FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller Timothy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller Timothy Mueller Senior Thesis, Spring 2006 Senior Thesis, Spring 2006 Structural Option Structural Option

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller Project Background General Architecture Existing Structure Depth Study Gravity Analysis Lateral Analysis Additional Considerations Breadth Study Construction Management Architectural Analysis Summary and Conclusions Acknowledgements

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller P P Navy Ordnance Site R R O O B B J J A A E E C C C C K K U.S. General Services Administration T T G G R R O O U U N N U.S. Food and Drug Administration D D

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller White Oak Campus White Oak Campus White Oak Campus White Oak Campus • • Silver Spring, MD Silver Spring, MD Silver Spring, MD Silver Spring, MD P P R R O O B B J J A A E E C C C C K K T T G G R R O O U U N N D D

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller Delivery Method: Design-Bid-Build P P Delivery Method: R R O O B B Major Building Code: IBC 2000 Major Building Code: J J A A E E C C C C Cost: $63 Million Cost: K K T T G G R R Start Date: March 22, 2005 Start Date: O O U U N N Finish Date: November 1, 2006 Finish Date: D D

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller Project Background General Architecture Existing Structure Depth Study Gravity Analysis Lateral Analysis Additional Considerations Breadth Study Construction Management Architectural Analysis Summary and Conclusions Acknowledgements

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller Size: G G •139,805 Sq Ft E E Height: N N A A •86’ above grade E E R R •Central core w/ 5 th floor penthouse R R C C •Four story main structure A A H H •One floor below grade L L I I Façade: T T •Many decorative aluminum & sheet E E metal panels C C •Ribbon windows T T U U •Full glazing curtain walls R R •Horizontal sunshields E E High Bay Laboratory: •Located on West Side •Decorative curved metal roof

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller Project Background General Architecture Existing Structure Depth Study Gravity Analysis Lateral Analysis Additional Considerations Breadth Study Construction Management Architectural Analysis Summary and Conclusions Acknowledgements

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller Roof: Roof: Unique protection: Unique protection: Foundation: Foundation: Typical concrete on metal •20”X30” progressive • 3’ deep step footing E E deck w/ steel frame of: collapse beams • 10’X10’spread footing X X •W14X122 below columns I I •W10X73 S S S S T T T T Superstructure: Superstructure: I I R R N N Typically one-way cast-in-place U U concrete w/ monolithic G G C C poured: T T •4.5” slab U U •10”X16” joist R R E E •16”X16” joist •20”X20.5” beams •18”X24” columns

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller Project Background General Architecture Existing Structure Depth Study Gravity Analysis Lateral Analysis Additional Considerations Breadth Study Construction Management Architectural Analysis Summary and Conclusions Acknowledgements

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller D D Considerations: Considerations: E E S S P P T T Concrete Pros: Concrete Pros: T T U U H H D • High Vibration Stability D Y Y Proposed Solution: Proposed Solution: • Integrated Fireproofing • Small Floor Sandwich • Construct the FDA CDRH Construct the FDA CDRH • Laboratory with Steel Laboratory with Steel Concrete Cons: Concrete Cons: • Labor Intensive • Large Total Mass • Steel Roof System

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller Loading: Loading: D D E E S S P P T T Dead load: Dead load: 73psf 73psf T T U U USF2X deck and Concrete: 48psf H H D D Superimposed: 25psf Y Y Snow load (Washington D.C.): 30psf Snow load (Washington D.C.): 30psf Live Load: 125psf Live Load: 125psf Light Manufacturing (Most Laboratory Spaces): 125psf Light Storage (Supplementary Laboratory Spaces): 125psf The controlling combination in both N/S and E/W direction is 1.2D +1.0E + 0.5L + 0.2S 1.2D +1.0E + 0.5L + 0.2S for all floors except the first floor which was controlled in both directions by 1.2D + 1.6W + 0.5L + 0.5S 1.2D + 1.6W + 0.5L + 0.5S

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller Project Background General Architecture Existing Structure Depth Study Gravity Analysis Lateral Analysis Additional Considerations Breadth Study Construction Management Architectural Analysis Summary and Conclusions Acknowledgements

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller D D E E S S P P T T T T U U H H D D Y Y • • G G R R A A A A N N V V A A I I L L T T Y Y Y Y S S Deflection Criteria: Deflection Criteria: I I S S Live: l/360, Total: l/240, & Vibration Criteria

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller D D Design A Design A Vibration velocity when a person is walking slowly: E E S S 6,214 6,214 μ μ in/sec in/sec P P 5” slab over 22 gage UF2X form deck with T T T T 44-W2.9XW2.9 welded wire fabric. U Criteria level: U H H D D 1 1 Y Y ≤ 8,000 μ in/sec: computer systems, operating rooms, surgery, and bench microscopes at up to 100x magnification • • Vibration velocity when a person is running: G G R R A A 141,086 μ μ in/sec in/sec 141,086 A A N N V V A A Criteria level: I I L L T T Y Y 0 0 Y Y S S I I S S

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller D D Design B Design B Vibration velocity when a person is walking slowly: E E S S 255 255 μ μ in/sec in/sec P P 5” slab over 20 gage UF2X form deck with T T T T 44-W2.9XW2.9 welded wire fabric. U Criteria level: U H H D D 5 5 Y Y ≤ 500 μ in/sec: electron microscopes at up to 30,000x magnification, microtomes, magnetic response imagers, and microelectronics • • manufacturing equipment class C G G Vibration velocity when a person is running: R R A A A A N N 5,794 μ μ in/sec in/sec 5,794 V V A A I I L L Criteria level: T T Y Y Y Y S S 1 1 I I S S ≤ 8,000 μ in/sec: computer systems, operating rooms, surgery, and bench microscopes at up to 100x magnification

FDA CDRH Laboratory FDA CDRH Laboratory Timothy Mueller • • Senior Thesis Senior Thesis • • Spring 2006 Spring 2006 • • Structural Option Structural Option Timothy Mueller Project Background General Architecture Existing Structure Depth Study Gravity Analysis Lateral Analysis Additional Considerations Breadth Study Construction Management Architectural Analysis Summary and Conclusions Acknowledgements