existing greens evaluation
play

Existing Greens Evaluation and Proposed Changes October 15, 2018 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 21, 2023 •171 likes •710 views

Existing Greens Evaluation and Proposed Changes October 15, 2018 Existing Hole #1 le #1 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 3,983 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing

  1. Existing Greens Evaluation and Proposed Changes October 15, 2018

  2. Existing Hole #1 le #1 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 3,983 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,543 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 1,136 SF Percent of UA: 45%

  3. Proposed Hole #1 le #1 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,832 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 3,182 4.00 5.00 SF 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,847 SF Percent of UA: 89% Increase of UA: 45%

  4. Existing Hole #2 le #2 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 2,960 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 1,706 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 384 SF Percent of UA: 23%

  5. Proposed Hole #2 le #2 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,628 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 2,905 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,393 SF Percent of UA: 82% Increase of UA: 60%

  9. Existing Hole #3 le #3 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 3,853 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,305 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 1,286 SF Percent of UA: 56%

  10. Proposed Hole #3 le #3 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,651 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 2,901 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,350 SF Percent of UA: 81% Increase of UA: 25%

  11. Existing Hole #4 le #4 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 5,319 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 3,565 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 3,335 SF Percent of UA: 94%

  12. Proposed Hole #4 le #4 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 6,036 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 4,083 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 3,493 SF Percent of UA: 86% Increase of UA: -8%

  13. Existing Hole #5 le #5 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 3,870 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,396 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 1,728 SF Percent of UA: 72%

  14. Proposed Hole #5 le #5 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,478 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 2,846 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,601 SF Percent of UA: 91% Increase of UA: 19%

  15. Existing Hole #6 le #6 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 5,177 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 3,501 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 1,098 SF Percent of UA: 31%

  16. Proposed Hole #6 le #6 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 5,880 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 4,074 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,287 SF Percent of UA: 81% Increase of UA: 50%

  17. Existing Hole #7 le #7 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 4,587 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,723 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,170 SF Percent of UA: 80%

  18. Proposed Hole #7 le #7 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,875 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 3,018 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,660 SF Percent of UA: 88% Increase of UA: 8%

  19. Existing Hole #8 le #8 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 4,287 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,645 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,443 SF Percent of UA: 92%

  20. Proposed Hole #8 le #8 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 5,227 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 3,380 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 3,110 SF Percent of UA: 98% Increase of UA: 7%

  21. Existing Hole #9 le #9 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 5,423 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 3,630 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 848 SF Percent of UA: 23%

  22. Proposed Hole #9 le #9 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 5,938 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 4,017 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 3,601 SF Percent of UA: 90% Increase of UA: 67%

  23. Back Nine Nine

  24. Existing Hole #10 le #10 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 4,055 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,558 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 1,643 SF Percent of UA: 64%

  25. Proposed Hole #10 le #10 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,784 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 3,142 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,762 SF Percent of UA: 88% Increase of UA: 24%

  28. Existing Hole #11 le #11 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 3,111 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 1,567 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 806 SF Percent of UA: 51%

  29. Proposed Hole #11 le #11 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,411 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 2,267 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,294 SF Percent of UA: 86% Increase of UA: 35%

  30. 120’ 55’ 138’ 85’

  31. 11 Existing

  32. 11 Proposed

  33. Existing Hole #12 le #12 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 3,849 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,260 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 1,738 SF Percent of UA: 77%

  34. Proposed Hole #12 le #12 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,411 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 2,863 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,752 SF Percent of UA: 96% Increase of UA: 19%

  37. Existing Hole #13 le #13 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 3,544 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,036 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 1,040 SF Percent of UA: 51%

  38. Proposed Hole #13 le #13 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,084 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 2,458 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,315 SF Percent of UA: 94% Increase of UA: 43%

  39. Existing Hole #14 le #14 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 3,698 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,250 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 1,942 SF Percent of UA: 86%

  40. Proposed Hole #14 le #14 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,646 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 2,950 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,770 SF Percent of UA: 94% Increase of UA: 6%

  41. Existing Hole #15 le #15 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 3,681 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,149 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 1,651 SF Percent of UA: 77%

  42. Proposed Hole #15 le #15 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 5,281 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 3,452 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 3,084 SF Percent of UA: 89% Increase of UA: 12%

  43. Existing Hole #16 le #16 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Existing Total SF: 4,023 SF 3.00 4.00 Existing Usable SF: 2,373 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 1,264 SF Percent of UA: 53%

  44. Proposed Hole #16 le #16 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range Beg. Range End 0.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 Proposed Total SF: 4,712 SF 3.00 4.00 Proposed Usable SF: 2,890 SF 4.00 5.00 5.00 100.00 Usable Hole Area: 2,647 SF Percent of UA: 92% Increase of UA: 39%

Recommend

Mens 9 Hole Golf Club Greens Reconstruction Update Howard Schulz Putting greens are to a

Mens 9 Hole Golf Club Greens Reconstruction Update Howard Schulz Putting greens are to a

Mens 9 Hole Golf Club Greens Reconstruction Update Howard Schulz Putting greens are to a golf course what a face is to a portrait. CB Macdonald Golf Architect Shinnecock Hills Existing Hole #1 le #1 COLOR % SLOPE Color Range

759 views • 24 slides
Gathering Greens A Low Cost Tractor-Powered Salad Greens

Gathering Greens A Low Cost Tractor-Powered Salad Greens

Gathering Greens A Low Cost Tractor-Powered Salad Greens Harvester Yellow A Collec0ng Greens is Laborious Verified by Farm School

430 views • 14 slides
Administration Building Needs Assessment JUNE 13, 2016 EXISTING BUILDING EVALUATION EXISTING

Administration Building Needs Assessment JUNE 13, 2016 EXISTING BUILDING EVALUATION EXISTING

Town Hall Meeting with the Habersham County Board of Commissioners Administration Building Needs Assessment JUNE 13, 2016 EXISTING BUILDING EVALUATION EXISTING BUILDING EVALUATION Detailed Evaluation Performed in 2015 Engineering

728 views • 41 slides
22. Greens Theorem Theorem 22.1 (Greens Theorem) . If C is a positively oriented closed curve

22. Greens Theorem Theorem 22.1 (Greens Theorem) . If C is a positively oriented closed curve

22. Greens Theorem Theorem 22.1 (Greens Theorem) . If C is a positively oriented closed curve enclosing a region R then curl F d r = F d A. C R The circle in the centre of the integral sign is simply to emphasize

355 views • 4 slides
The GREENS IN BIG CITIES Meeting and the 9 th CENTRAL EUROPEAN ROUND TABLE of Green Local

The GREENS IN BIG CITIES Meeting and the 9 th CENTRAL EUROPEAN ROUND TABLE of Green Local

The GREENS IN BIG CITIES Meeting and the 9 th CENTRAL EUROPEAN ROUND TABLE of Green Local Councillors 2013 Monika Vana and Gerhard Jordan Die Grnen Vienna 1 Greens in Big Cities Greens in Big Cities Network: Founded in 2001. MEETINGS:

477 views • 34 slides
Development of Bowling Greens First Roundabout Greg Meredith P.E., District 3 Chief District

Development of Bowling Greens First Roundabout Greg Meredith P.E., District 3 Chief District

Development of Bowling Greens First Roundabout Greg Meredith P.E., District 3 Chief District Engineer Arrell Thompson P.E., Burgess & Niple Sept. 9, 2014 Joe Plunk, P.E., District 3 Project Development Branch Mgr Outline 1. Existing

637 views • 40 slides
Clover Greens An Assetz Property LIVING DOESNT GET ANY BETTER THAN THIS 1 Presenting

Clover Greens An Assetz Property LIVING DOESNT GET ANY BETTER THAN THIS 1 Presenting

Clover Greens An Assetz Property LIVING DOESNT GET ANY BETTER THAN THIS 1 Presenting Clover Greens Shot on location Shot on location Clover Greens combines the finest elements of modern architecture and international standards &

240 views • 21 slides
INL Seismic 10 Year Re-evaluation Process for Existing Nuclear Facilities Following a

INL Seismic 10 Year Re-evaluation Process for Existing Nuclear Facilities Following a

INL Seismic 10 Year Re-evaluation Process for Existing Nuclear Facilities Following a Risk-Informed Methodology www.inl.gov Justin Coleman INL/MIS-14-33483 Department of Energy Order 420.1C for Reevaluation of Existing Facilities

276 views • 23 slides
From Math 2220 Class 37 Div and Curl Why Greens Greens Dr. Allen Back Problems Stokes and

From Math 2220 Class 37 Div and Curl Why Greens Greens Dr. Allen Back Problems Stokes and

From Math 2220 Class 37 V1c Symmetries Can Help Flow Lines From Math 2220 Class 37 Div and Curl Why Greens Greens Dr. Allen Back Problems Stokes and Gauss Surface of Nov. 21, 2014 Revolution Case Graph Case Surface Integrals

1.24k views • 98 slides
Hyland Greens Golf and Learning Center City Council July 27, 2015 Hyland Greens State of Golf

Hyland Greens Golf and Learning Center City Council July 27, 2015 Hyland Greens State of Golf

Hyland Greens Golf and Learning Center City Council July 27, 2015 Hyland Greens State of Golf 23 million golfers in 2013, down 24% from peak. U.S. golfers played 462 million rounds last year, the fewest number since 1995. Primary drivers

543 views • 35 slides
Correla'ons within Non-equilibrium Greens Func'ons method Hossein Mahzoon MSU Pawel

Correla'ons within Non-equilibrium Greens Func'ons method Hossein Mahzoon MSU Pawel

Correla'ons within Non-equilibrium Greens Func'ons method Hossein Mahzoon MSU Pawel Danielewicz Arnau Rios (University of surrey) Introduction to Non-Equilibrium Greens functions (NEGF) Applications of NEGF Infinite nuclear

610 views • 28 slides
From Math 2220 Class 36 Integrals Other Problems Dr. Allen Back Why Greens Greens

From Math 2220 Class 36 Integrals Other Problems Dr. Allen Back Why Greens Greens

From Math 2220 Class 36 V2c Surface Integrals Why Surface From Math 2220 Class 36 Integrals Other Problems Dr. Allen Back Why Greens Greens Problems Flow Lines Nov. 19, 2014 Div and Curl Surface of Revolution Case Graph Case

980 views • 86 slides
GRIN GReens function INtegrals Irek Szczesniak and Alexander Pletzer Princeton Plasma

GRIN GReens function INtegrals Irek Szczesniak and Alexander Pletzer Princeton Plasma

GRIN PART I 1 GRIN GReens function INtegrals Irek Szczesniak and Alexander Pletzer Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory September 2001 GRIN PART I 2 PART I Greens function method and the GRIN program Greens function method

827 views • 38 slides
Workload-Driven Architectural Evaluation Evaluation in Uniprocessors Decisions made only after

Workload-Driven Architectural Evaluation Evaluation in Uniprocessors Decisions made only after

Workload-Driven Architectural Evaluation Evaluation in Uniprocessors Decisions made only after quantitative evaluation For existing systems: comparison and procurement evaluation For future systems: careful extrapolation from known quantities

889 views • 76 slides
Evaluation of the behaviour of an arch-gravity dam featuring a pre-existing crack Dr Assa

Evaluation of the behaviour of an arch-gravity dam featuring a pre-existing crack Dr Assa

Evaluation of the behaviour of an arch-gravity dam featuring a pre-existing crack Dr Assa Mellal, Civil Engineer STUCKY SA, Switzerland NUMERICS IN GEOTECHNICS AND STRUCTURES - ZSoil Days - 1-2 September 2011, Lausanne Spitallamm Dam l =

637 views • 46 slides
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) Existing Market and Conditions Evaluation Presented by:

Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) Existing Market and Conditions Evaluation Presented by:

Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) Existing Market and Conditions Evaluation Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. What is the COA? a detailed study of SolTrans current routes, customers and

584 views • 22 slides
Last time: Greens theorem Let D R 2 be such that D is formed of one or more simple

Last time: Greens theorem Let D R 2 be such that D is formed of one or more simple

Last time: Greens theorem Let D R 2 be such that D is formed of one or more simple closed curves. Suppose F = P , Q is a vector field such that P and Q have continuous first order partial derivatives. Then

461 views • 5 slides
Last time: Greens theorem Let D R 2 be such that D is formed of one or more simple

Last time: Greens theorem Let D R 2 be such that D is formed of one or more simple

Last time: Greens theorem Let D R 2 be such that D is formed of one or more simple closed curves. Suppose F = P , Q is a vector field such that P and Q have continuous first order partial derivatives. Then

596 views • 4 slides
31. Stokes Theorem Stokes theorem is to Greens theorem, for the work done, as the

31. Stokes Theorem Stokes theorem is to Greens theorem, for the work done, as the

31. Stokes Theorem Stokes theorem is to Greens theorem, for the work done, as the divergence theorem is to Greens theorem, for the flux. Both are 3D generalisations of 2D theorems. Theorem 31.1 (Stokes Theorem) . Let C be any closed

406 views • 3 slides
An Isabelle/HOL Formalisation of Greens Theorem Mohammad Abdulaziz Data61/ANU and Lawrence

An Isabelle/HOL Formalisation of Greens Theorem Mohammad Abdulaziz Data61/ANU and Lawrence

An Isabelle/HOL Formalisation of Greens Theorem Mohammad Abdulaziz Data61/ANU and Lawrence Paulson Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge August 25, 2016 Mohammad Abdulaziz An Isabelle/HOL Formalisation of Greens Theorem August

992 views • 46 slides
ABBEY QUARTER RIVERSIDE GARDEN PROPOSAL FOR A WATER SPORTS BUILDING AT GREENS BRIDGE PROPOSAL

ABBEY QUARTER RIVERSIDE GARDEN PROPOSAL FOR A WATER SPORTS BUILDING AT GREENS BRIDGE PROPOSAL

ABBEY QUARTER RIVERSIDE GARDEN PROPOSAL FOR A WATER SPORTS BUILDING AT GREENS BRIDGE PROPOSAL FOR A HOME FOR RIVER Kilkenny USERS WITH Water Users SUITABLE RIVER ACCESS AT GREENS BRIDGE OUR NEEDS! A PROPER SLIPWAY VEHICLE

510 views • 38 slides
Greens/EFA Conference Running out of time: Why the climate negotiations should be speeded up

Greens/EFA Conference Running out of time: Why the climate negotiations should be speeded up

Greens/EFA Conference Running out of time: Why the climate negotiations should be speeded up Sandrine Dixson-Declve, Director Prince of Waless EU Corporate Leaders Group on Climate Change We are our worst enemy! Making the Connections

249 views • 21 slides
Outline 1. Bridge damage to earthquake 2. Seismic analysis and evaluation of existing bridges

Outline 1. Bridge damage to earthquake 2. Seismic analysis and evaluation of existing bridges

6/22/2015 Outline 1. Bridge damage to earthquake 2. Seismic analysis and evaluation of existing bridges 3. Bridge strengthening methods 4. Cyclic load test of bridge using FRP strengthening technique 5. Strengthening of columns using FRP 6.

774 views • 61 slides
Greens function based approaches to the nonequilibrium problem on a lattice Jim Freericks

Greens function based approaches to the nonequilibrium problem on a lattice Jim Freericks

Greens function based approaches to the nonequilibrium problem on a lattice Jim Freericks Georgetown University Early days of nonequilibrium many- body physics (1960s) Work with quantities on the Keldysh-Kadanoff-Baym contour Analytic

666 views • 38 slides

More recommend