evolution and reionization of the universe the impact of
play

Evolution and Reionization of the Universe The Impact of the Hubble - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

VulcanoWorkshop-24May2010 VulcanoWorkshop-24May2010 Evolution and Reionization of the Universe The Impact of the Hubble Space Telescope Nino Panagia (STScI/INAF-CT/Supernova Ltd) Main Phases of the


  1. Vulcano
Workshop

-

24
May
2010 Vulcano
Workshop

-

24
May
2010 Evolution and Reionization of the Universe The Impact of the Hubble Space Telescope Nino Panagia (STScI/INAF-CT/Supernova Ltd)

  2. Main Phases of the BIG BANG Universe Evolution 14.5 14.5 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 2 Universe

  3. A concise history of the Universe Dark Ages Primordial stars Reionization 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 3 Universe

  4. We know that the Universe is not quite ionized at redshift z~6.3 Becker et al. (2001) 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 4 Universe

  5. Becker et al (2001): The full story 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 5 Universe

  6. Why do we care? • Reionization is the last global phase transition in the Universe • Reionization drastically changes the environment for galaxy formation and evolution • In a hierarchical clustering scenario, the galaxies responsible for reionization may be the seeds of the most massive galaxies in the local Universe. 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 6 Universe

  7. Basic processes (e.g., Barkana & Loeb, Phys. Reports , 2001) • Ionizing UV radiation origin: either fusion (pop III and II stars) or gravitational energy (QSO, AGN, BH) • If fusion, each hydrogen atom releases 7 MeV but requires 13.6 eV to be ionized  a mass fraction 0.2 × 10 -5 undergoing fusion is sufficient to re-ionize all hydrogen (in practice the required mass in stars is 10-100 times larger) • Different lines of sight may look very different (e.g. QSOs at 6.28 and 6.43). 24 May 2010 7

  8. Population III stars (Z=0) Even “normal” mass stars with zero- metallicity would be much hotter than their solar analogues. Tumlinson
&
Shull
(2000) 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 8 Universe

  9. Let’s estimate the luminosity of reionization sources from first principles Recombination lines HII region escape, ∝ ( 1-f ) Dense HI Some Lyman α escapes, ∝ Velocity width × (1-f) Escaping UV radiation Dense HI A fraction f ≤ 1 of UV Some photons ionize Dense HI radiation escapes and can dense hydrogen clouds ionize the Universe that recombine → C ≥ 1 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 9 Universe

  10. The Principles of Reionization (RI) • Reionization requires sources of Lyman continuum photons • Reionization depends primarily on the UV output of the RI sources integrated over time • Reionization is a function of the UV photon escape fraction, f, from the RI sources and the clumpiness of the IGM <Q> = <M HI > × f –1 × B(z 1 ,z 2 ,C) escape required
Ly-c
photons HI
mass
= photons
needed fraction ρ HI ×Volume per
ionization 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 10 Universe

  11. Recognizing the Reionization Agents • (Young Bright) Galaxies at z > 6.5 ⇒ are doing it • (Evolved Massive) Galaxies at z < 6.5 ⇒ have done it • Together they define ⇒ the process of Reionization 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 11 Universe

  12. Reionization constraints for identical sources Stia iavelli, lli, Pop III - Z=0 Pop II - Z<Z  /100 Fall
 ll
& Panagia ia (2004a) 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 12 Universe

  13. The effect of the IGM clumping on Effective number of photons to ionize an atom Reionization [Stiavelli,
Fall
&
Panagia
2004a] Clumping factor C = <n 2 H >/<n H > 2 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 13 Universe

  14. Can we detect the Sources of Reionization NOW? It is not easy… but it can be done! 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 14 Universe

  15. Let’s interrogate the sky: The H ubble U ltra- D eep F ield 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 15 Universe

  16. The Renaissance after the Dark Ages Hubble Ultra Deep Field “Dark Hubble Ages” e n Deep d o f Field r primordial e i o Big Bang n galaxy Here i z a S1 t i recombination Now o n normal galaxy H I ∞ H II 0 1 - ~ 6 z ~ 10 3 z ~ z T IGM ~ 4 z K T IGM ~ 10 4 K t z 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 16 Universe

  17. Location of the HUDF 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 17 Universe

  18. Ultra Deep Field • Deep enough to study “typical” z=6 galaxies <10 -34 W m -2 s -1 Hz -1 • • ~0.1 photon/s (Stiavelli, Fall, Panagia, 2004a) 1 8

  19. HUDF- z>5.5 objects • The great SB sensitivity of HUDF allows us to begin seeing substructure in z>5 objects. GOODS selected z=5.8 QSO at z=5.5 spectroscopically galaxy. In HUDF it has confirmed by GRAPES using S/N=100 . ACS/GRISM 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 19 Universe

  20. The large number of z>6 objects opens up the possibility of learning something about the reionization of the Universe. What do we learn?

  21. HIGH-z detections in the HUDF • Bouwens et al. (2004), from ACS+NICMOS imaging, find 4 candidate galaxies at redshifts 7-8 that “could play an important role in re-ionization at these redshifts” • Yan and Windorst (2004b), from ACS+NICMOS imaging, find one candidate at possible redshift 6.5-7. • Mobasher et al (2005), from combined HST, VLT- ISAAC, and Spitzer ST imaging up to 8.5 µ m , identify a galaxy at z ≈ 7 (HUDF-JD2) that could have re-ionized its region of Universe 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 21 Universe

  22. HUDF-JD2: A Distant Galaxy in the HUDF 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 22 Universe

  23. Combined Visible+Infrared HUDF-JD2 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 23 Universe

  24. The Balmer break is a prominent feature for stellar populations age t > 100 Myrs z = 7 no extinction t = 50 Myr t = 100 Myr t = 300 Myr t = 500 Myr t = 600 Myr t = 800 Myr 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 24 Universe

  25. HUDF-JD2, a Balmer Break Galaxy prototype A galaxy that did it in the past? [Mobasher
et
al.
2005] Rest-frame [ µ m] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 z = 6.5 M = 6 × 10 11 M  z=2.5-3.4 0.5 1 2 5 10 Observed λ [ µ m] 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 25 Universe

  26. 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 26 Universe

  27. Properties of HUDF-JD2 [Mobasher
et
al
2005,
Panagia
et
al
2005] Massive M/M  = 6 × 10 11 Bright L/L  = 10 12 Evolved Age > 350-650 Myr z form > 9 Ionizing Q ~ 4 × 10 72 Ly-c photons 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 27 Universe

  28. HUDF-JD2 Enough to re-ionize its region of Universe? By itself only if companions high escape fraction dereddened and low clumping Easily if undetectable companions with a reasonable LF are present Panagia et al. 2005 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 28 Universe

  29. HUDF-JD2: A summary • Massive, luminous, protypical Balmer-break galaxy • It has had an important impact (>20%) on the reionization of the IGM starting a z~15 • With the “help” of fainter companions distributed according to an α =1.6 Schechter LF it may account for the whole effect 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 29 Universe

  30. Is HUDF-JD2 unique? • Inspecting the GOODS Deep-Field South, Wiklind et al. (2006) answer this question: “not quite” • Actually, combining deep HST and Spitzer multi-band photometry they detect about one bright BBG at z>5 every 9 square-arcmin field 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 30 Universe

  31. From Observations to Physical Parameters • Fitting the SED: – Photometric redshift – Age & formation redshift – Total Luminosity – Average Metallicity • M/L ratio (from models) – Present mass in stars 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 31 Universe

  32. An example of BBG candidate 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 32 Universe

  33. BBGs in the GOODS Deep-Field South Insert table from Wikind et al 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 33 Universe

  34. Ionizing Properties of BBGs in the GOODS Deep-Field South [Wiklind et al 2006, Panagia et al 2010] 18 BBGs in 160 arcmin 2 <logL/L  > = 11.9 <logM 0 /M  > = 11.6 <logQ> = 72.5 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 34 Universe

  35. Re-Ionization Balance - I • UV output from BBGs in the Chandra Deep Field South Q obs = 5.1 × 10 73 f Lyman-continuum photons • Correcting for incompleteness (50%) Q tot = 10.3 × 10 73 f Lyman-continuum photons 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 35 Universe

  36. Lyman Continuum Photon Production History BBG ionization is most efficient in the interval z~7-15 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 36 Universe

  37. Re-Ionization Balance - I • UV output from BBGs in the Chandra Deep Field South Q obs = 5.1 × 10 73 f Lyman-continuum photons • Correcting for incompleteness (50%) Q tot = 10.3 × 10 73 f Lyman-continuum photons • H-atoms in a volume in the redshift interval 7-15 N H = 0.9 × 10 73 atoms 24 May 2010 HST and the Early Evolution of the 37 Universe

Recommend


More recommend