evaluating widening
play

Evaluating widening participation Key findings from CFEs reports to - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Evaluating widening participation Key findings from CFEs reports to HEFCE 2 nd September 2015 About CFE Research An independent not- for-profit company specialising in providing research and evaluation services in the fields of education,


  1. Evaluating widening participation Key findings from CFE’s reports to HEFCE 2 nd September 2015

  2. About CFE Research An independent not- for-profit company specialising in providing research and evaluation services in the fields of education, the economy and wellbeing.

  3. Working in partnership with... • Professor Liz Thomas • Economists from: • University of Sheffield • University of Sussex • University of Birmingham • London School of Economics

  4. Two reports for HEFCE Report on the piloting of a more detailed data return

  5. Two reports for HEFCE Report on the piloting of a more detailed data return In-depth study with case studies

  6. What we did

  7. Reviewed evidence

  8. Review of evidence Drafted frameworks

  9. Consulted with HE providers • Visits to 25 institutions • Interviews with key staff • 15 institutions also piloted the data return • Six case studies

  10. Designed & piloted a more detailed data return

  11. Key messages

  12. The purpose of an evaluation framework • Accountability • Benchmarking What works • • Impact assessment Return on investment •

  13. Different purposes require different approaches

  14. Accountability • Data return most appropriate for this purpose • Any new data or changes need to be requested in advance of reporting periods... • ...with plenty of time to put in place data collection

  15. Benchmarking UK Performance • Indicators meet this need • Measures should link back to the issue funding/activity is seeking to address • The role of measuring ‘distance travelled’

  16. What works and impact • Need to improve attribution • Stronger evaluation methods with good comparison groups including RCTs • More appropriate for new or innovative approaches • Longitudinal tracking of students • Better use of secondary data • Supported by qualitative research

  17. More evaluations with good comparison groups

  18. More longitudinal tracking

  19. Making better use of existing data For example, • National Pupil Database , HM Revenue & Customs Data Labs • • Small Business, Enterprise & Employment Act 2015

  20. A role for qualitative research How does it work? • • Does it matter? • Is this intervention right for this group of people? Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung CC BY-SA 2.0

  21. Return on investment Econometric analysis • of secondary data • Not all benefits of WP can or should be measured in financial terms Mattia Landoni CC BY-SA 2.0

  22. Make findings accessible

  23. Thank you Rachel Moreton rachel.moreton@cfe.org.uk 0116 229 3300 www.cfe.org.uk

Recommend


More recommend