evaluating the impact of a
play

EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF A CANVAS TRAINING MODULE ON TEACHER - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF A CANVAS TRAINING MODULE ON TEACHER KNOWLEDGE OF INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES LTEC690 Spring 2016 Seamus Puette Familiarity with English Language Learners (ELLs)? How would you rate your familiarity with ELL


  1. EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF A CANVAS TRAINING MODULE ON TEACHER KNOWLEDGE OF INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES LTEC690 Spring 2016 Seamus Puette

  2. Familiarity with English Language Learners (ELLs)? How would you rate your familiarity with ELL instructional practices? Very familiar a) Moderately familiar b) Somewhat familiar c) Not at all familiar d)

  3. Rationale for the Project Why is ELL Instruction such an important topic for educators today?

  4. The Legal Basis for ELL Instruction Equal Educational Opportunities Lau v. Nichols (1974) Act of 1974 (EEOA)  A Chinese-American  Exhorts states to avoid: student with limited  “ the failure of an proficiency in English educational agency to sued school for lack of take appropriate action education to overcome language  US Dept. of Ed created barriers that impede the “Lau Remedies” equal participation by its students in its  Specified the proper instructional programs ” approaches, methods and procedures for ELL instruction

  5. ELL National Laws Every Student Succeeds Act No Child Left Behind (2001) (2015)  Required Limited  Replaces NCLB English Proficient  Uses multiple measures (LEP) students be beyond standardized placed in “ language tests instruction education  Increased state programs ” accountability for ELLs  Must teach English  Looks at ELLs and LT- proficiency ELLs  Must also teach  Newcomers excluded academic content from assessments

  6. ELLs in Hawaii Schools  Standard schools  Target public high school ( Inclusion )  Require all educators to have 6  A large, urban public credits in high school in ELL/Multicultural Hawaii education  ~250 ELL students  Inclusion schools (~16% of students)  Only 17% of over  Require 12 credits 100 educators had in ELL/Multicultural 12 credits (2015) education

  7. Project Development How can I deliver the needed Professional Development effectively and efficiently?

  8. An Online Learning Module  Nearly 100 instructors in need of professional development (PD)  use of a face-to-face training session = problematic.  Asynchronous PD  greatly advantageous  Less time  Less personnel.

  9. Using Constructivist Ideas Constructivism Use in the Learning Module  Humans create knowledge and  Participants tasked meaning with working with their own subject  via interacting with the area standards world and their ideas about the world.  Use those standards  When you learn by in exercises doing  Learn to appropriately  internalize knowledge scaffold and more differentiate for ELLs  enhance long-term  Relevant to own recall and mastery. practice

  10. Employing CASA Design Model Created by Dr. Menchaca (2014 ) Content Synchronous  Content is presented  Participants are gathered (f2f or online)  Presentation  tasked with  Video collaborative  Reading assignment Asynchronous Assessment  Participants asked to  Summative assessment reflect/comment  Learning gain  Discussion board  Change in affective posting belief  Respond to others

  11. Finding the Right Delivery Method  Open source  Canvas was chosen as the course LMS  Canvas  It’s free  Moodle  The designer had  Cloud-based familiarity with it  Google Classroom  It has a superior  Proprietary quiz creator  Blackboard  It integrates well  Edmodo with Google Apps for  Engrade Education

  12. Adapting the Instructional Materials  ELL instructional PD materials already available  Adapting existing materials to online- accessible formats was prime concern  Google Apps for Education ( GAFE ) were chosen  Ease of access, Free, Collaboration, Storage capacity, etc.

  13. Creating Presentations Prezi really stood out for its dynamic feel  Attention getting  Maintain focus  Great templates  Free  Ease of creation  Easy to embed  Accessible (audio voice-over possible)

  14. Project Description What will I be asking my participants to do?

  15. Canvas-Hosted Course  Consists of 5 Modules  1 – Introduction  Course consent  2 – What is WIDA?  Explaining the WIDA  3 – Scaffolding  How to scaffold  4 – Differentiation  How to differentiate  5 – Course Evaluation  How was the course?

  16. Module 1 – Course Introduction Course consent form List of Common ELL vocabulary Pre-course survey

  17. Module 1 – Course Introduction Course consent form List of Common ELL vocabulary Pre-course survey

  18. Module 1 – Course Introduction Course consent form List of Common ELL vocabulary Pre-course survey

  19. Module 2 – WIDA Introduction WIDA Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on the WIDA information

  20. Module 2 – WIDA Introduction WIDA Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on the WIDA information

  21. Module 3 – ELL Scaffolding Scaffolding Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on Scaffolding for ELLs Bulletin board posting Google Hangout session Assessment

  22. Module 3 – ELL Scaffolding Scaffolding Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on Scaffolding for ELLs Bulletin board posting Google Hangout session Assessment

  23. Module 3 – ELL Scaffolding Scaffolding Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on Scaffolding for ELLs Bulletin board posting Google Hangout session Assessment

  24. Module 3 – ELL Scaffolding Scaffolding Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on Scaffolding for ELLs Bulletin board posting Google Hangout session Assessment

  25. Module 3 – ELL Scaffolding Scaffolding Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on Scaffolding for ELLs Bulletin board posting Google Hangout session Assessment

  26. Module 4 – ELL Differentiation Differentiation Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on differentiation for ELLs Bulletin board posting Google Hangout session Assessment

  27. Module 4 – ELL Differentiation Differentiation Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on differentiation for ELLs Bulletin board posting Google Hangout session Assessment

  28. Module 4 – ELL Differentiation Differentiation Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on differentiation for ELLs Bulletin board posting Google Hangout session Assessment

  29. Module 4 – ELL Differentiation Differentiation Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on differentiation for ELLs Bulletin board posting Google Hangout session Assessment

  30. Module 4 – ELL Differentiation Differentiation Prezi presentation Canvas quiz on differentiation for ELLs Bulletin board posting Google Hangout session Assessment

  31. Module 5 – Course Evaluation Post-course survey Course effectiveness survey Additional materials

  32. Module 5 – Course Evaluation Post-course survey Course effectiveness survey Additional materials

  33. Module 5 – Course Evaluation Post-course survey Course effectiveness survey Additional materials

  34. Obstacles and Challenges What things proved to be difficult?

  35. Adapting Old Material for Online  Almost all of the basic materials used in this online course were preexisting  None of them were designed with online- users in mind.  All needed to be redone as GAFE documents

  36. Aligning Surveys to Questions  After creating the initial versions of all 3 surveys (pre, post, effectiveness) I noticed that many of the questions did not align to the initial research questions  All surveys had to be redone, almost from scratch

  37. Successes What things were done well?

  38. The Choice of Canvas  Integration with  Canvas proved to GAFE documents be an excellent LMS was essentially choice seamless  Embedded quizzes can be created with “just -in- time” feedback responses  Discussion board mechanics were excellent

  39. Google Apps for Education  GAFE documents are extremely useful and effective for online collaboration and education  Sharing documents  Adding comments  Submitting documents for grading

  40. Critical Friends  Probably the most effective tool for this course, my critical friends saved me time and again from making mistakes, both big and small  Always helps to have second (and third) opinion!

  41. Lessons Learned What would I do differently next time?

  42. Backwards Design  Working backwards from my research questions instead of forging ahead without regard to them would have saved me quite a bit of time.  Aligning the entire project to the research questions is highly advisable. Don’t deviate!

  43. Time Management  Dividing tasks into manageable chunks helped a great deal  Certain chunks should have been allocated more time  Presentations  Surveys  Canvas pages

  44. The End! Any questions that I might be able to answer for you?

Recommend


More recommend