Your Dutch partner for innovation and sustainable development d t i bl d l t Energy Labels and LED solutions change public lighting change public lighting ECEEE 2009 La Colle sur Loup 2 June 2009 2 June 2009 Boudewijn Huenges Wajer Boudewijn Huenges Wajer
O er ie Overview presentation presentation • Introduction • The energy label for street lighting • The energy label for street lighting • Coordinated evaluation of Led pilots for p public lighting • Conclusions and recommendations C l i d d ti
Introd ction Introduction • Energy consumption for public gy p p lighting is limited • Improving energy efficiency to I i ffi i t compensate for investments: p driver for manufactures
Development of efficacy of lighting sources
Reasons not to save energy in public lighting • No attention of local administrations • No knowledge at decision makers N k l d t d i i k • No budget for investements No budget for investements • No advantages because of contracts with energy suppliers • Electricity boards reluctant to dimming Electricity boards reluctant to dimming
S Some initiatives on EU level i iti ti EU l l I In 2008 IEEproject“E-street”showed 2008 IEE j t“E t t” h d that with existing technology savings up g gy g p to 36 TWh can be achieved in the EU achieved in the EU E consumption E consumption 60% ↓ 60% ↓ Ecodesign requirem. g q for tertiary lighting
Some national initiati es Some national initiatives • Germany (Bavaria: recommendations Germany (Bavaria: recommendations &“Energieeffiziente Stadtbeleuchtung“) • Slovakia (ESCO approach) • Netherlands (GWW and Taskforce) N th l d (GWW d T kf ) • Norwegian municipalities • Norwegian municipalities • New York (EE Street lighting program) ( g g p g ) • US DOE (Solid state lighting→ CALiPER)
An energy label for gy street lighting installations • CEN/TC 169: “Light and lighting” • Street Lighting Energy Efficiency Criterion (SLEEC) Criterion (SLEEC) EN 13201-5 • In NL: EU format A G label based on A-G label based on SE = system power / (average S syste po e / (a e age horizontal illuminance x surface)
NL energy label for street lighting installations • Only valid for installations which meet quality requir which meet quality requir. EN 13202-1 EN 13202 1 • “Norm SLEEC” • A → SE < 0,01 W/lux/m2 • F → SE > 0,07 W/lux/m2 F SE 0 07 W/l / 2 • Rewards dimming Rewards dimming • Punishes overzising
NL EE program for public NL EE program for public lighting priorities • Carefully determine where public • Carefully determine where public lighting is needed • Apply EE installation design with EE lamps l minaires (E)ballasts lamps, luminaires, (E)ballasts • Apply dimming and smart switching Apply dimming and smart switching
Public Lighting and g SenterNovem g
Possible savings for the Possible savings for the . municipality when using existing . EE solutions? a. compact fluorescent lamps a. compact fluorescent lamps b. Electronic ballasts c. dimming c. dimming d. (keramic) halogene metal halide lamps
LED solutions for public lighting LED solutions for public lighting .
Coordinated evaluation of LED pilots in NL • In 2008 start with: • 40 pilots/30 municipalities; 10 manuf • 40 pilots/30 municipalities; 10 manuf. • Coordin. technical and appraisal info pp • Collecting info: Oct. 2008 - Nov. 2009 -------------------------------------------- • Now mid 2009: > 150 pilot • Now mid 2009: > 150 pilot municipalities with > 4000 luminaires • + Laboratory testing and LCA study
The lighting design process The lighting design process and data collection
LED Pilot website
example LED Pilot Pilot sites of one manuf. manuf.
Conclusions and recommendations • EE and cost effective public lighting important for CO2 reductions lighting important for CO2 reductions • Investigate EE potential and don’t look only to Ecodesign requirements • Govern programs targeting on support for • Govern. programs targeting on support for municipalities and start LED pilots • Introduce energy label for public lighting • Exchange info and label on EU level E h i f d l b l EU l l
Thank you for your attention
Recommend
More recommend
