en environmental j justice ce cam ampbellsvi ville b
play

En Environmental J Justice ce Cam ampbellsvi ville B Bypas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

En Environmental J Justice ce Cam ampbellsvi ville B Bypas ass Case S Study Tom S m Springe ger Qk4, In Inc. Pop Q Qui uiz #1 #1 Ho How M Many a y are e Low-Inco come? Campbells lsville le B Bypass 14.1 Da


  1. En Environmental J Justice ce Cam ampbellsvi ville B Bypas ass Case S Study Tom S m Springe ger – Qk4, In Inc.

  2. Pop Q Qui uiz #1 #1 – Ho How M Many a y are e Low-Inco come?

  3. Campbells lsville le B Bypass

  4. 14.1 – Da 14. Databa abase o of Relocations Survey Inferred EJ Inferred Name Address Received Status Adverse Effect Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY …TOTALS… 18

  5. 14. 14.1 – Ma Mail Let etter er & & Survey

  6. 14. 14.1 – Ma Mail Let etter er & & Survey 7. …would you be willing to relocate…

  7. 14. 14.1 – Ma Mail Let etter er & & Survey b. Please Identify any difficulties, hardships, problems or concerns that you may have if relocated…

  8. Populate ate S Surve vey R Results Inferred Survey Inferred EJ Name Address Adverse Received Status Effect Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Jan-4 None Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Feb-14 Low-Income No. Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Jan-14 None Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mar-3 None Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Jan-31 Low-Income “Hell No” Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Feb-28 None Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Mar-6 Low-Income “Concerned” Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY Apr-1 None Mr. & Mrs. Campbellsville, KY …TOTALS… 18 8 (<50%) 3 2

  9. Sum ummar ary T Tabl ble EJ Race EJ Low- Non- & Income & Total EJ Adverse Adverse 6 0 2 8 Number Who Completed Survey <50% Number Who Did Not Complete 10 Survey – Statistical Assumptions Totals 18 Percentage of Relocations that are EJ status Disproportionately High Impact Determination (i.e., >50%)

  10. 14. 14.4 – Minoriti ties

  11. Ce Census R Race D Data – Block G ock Group CAMPBELL LLSVILL LLE EA/FONSI KYT YTC/ C/FHWA PO POLICY http://transportation.ky.gov/Environmental-Analysis/Pages/Socioeconomics.aspx WHITE TOTAL % MINORITY ALONE BG 2, CT 9205, Taylor CO. 993 941 5.2% “Block Groups 2, 4 and 5 of Census Tract BG 4, CT 9205, Taylor CO. 1778 1536 13.6% 9205 have an average of 5.6% minority. The BG 5, CT 9205, Taylor CO. 1066 1046 1.9% TOTAL 3837 3523 8.7% 5.6% of the 10 who did not respond (i.e., Survey Not Completed x 10 0.056 / 10) is 0.56, which is rounded to 1 .” 0.87 = 1 EJ Race and Adverse (2014 FONSI)

  12. Sum ummar ary T Tabl ble EJ Race EJ Low- Non- & Income & Total EJ Adverse Adverse 6 0 2 8 Number Who Completed Survey Number Who Did Not Complete 1 10 Survey – Statistical Assumptions Totals Percentage of Relocations that are EJ status Disproportionately High Impact Determination (i.e., >50%)

  13. 14. 14.4 – Low-Inco come

  14. 14. 14.2 – Winds ndshield S d Survey

  15. Sum ummar ary T Tabl ble EJ Race EJ Low- Non-EJ & Income & Total Adverse Adverse 6 0 2 8 Number Who Completed Survey Number Who Did Not Complete Survey 4 1 5 10 – Statistical Assumptions Totals Percentage of Relocations that are EJ status Disproportionately High Impact Determination (i.e., >50%)

  16. Sum ummar ary T Tabl ble EJ Race EJ Low- Non-EJ & Income & Total Adverse Adverse 6 0 2 8 Number Who Completed Survey Number Who Did Not Complete Survey 4 1 5 10 – Statistical Assumptions 10 1 7 18 Totals Percentage of Relocations that are EJ status Disproportionately High Impact Determination (i.e., >50%)

  17. Sum ummar ary T Tabl ble EJ Race EJ Low- Non-EJ & Income & Total Adverse Adverse 6 0 2 8 Number Who Completed Survey Number Who Did Not Complete Survey 4 1 5 10 – Statistical Assumptions 10 1 7 18 Totals Percentage of Relocations that are EJ (1+7)/18 = 44% status Disproportionately High Impact Determination (i.e., >50%)

  18. Sum ummar ary T Tabl ble EJ Race EJ Low- Non-EJ & Income & Total Adverse Adverse 6 0 2 8 Number Who Completed Survey Number Who Did Not Complete Survey 4 1 5 10 – Statistical Assumptions 10 1 7 18 Totals Percentage of Relocations that are EJ (1+7)/18 = 44% status Disproportionately High Impact No Determination? (i.e., >50%)

  19. 14. 14.4 – <50% % Adver ersel ely Affec ected ed

  20. Cam ampbe pbellsville B Bypas ypass FONSI SI – EJ Te Text

Recommend


More recommend