en enha hanci ncing ng the he qua uali lity ty of of pr
play

En Enha hanci ncing ng the he Qua uali lity ty of of Pr - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

E RASMU MUS + + T HEMA IC S EMI MATIC MINAR AR IN IN V OCA AL E DUCATION TION AND T RAIN CATION TIONAL AINING ING En Enha hanci ncing ng the he Qua uali lity ty of of Pr Proj ojects cts through ough Transna nsnational tional


  1. Grou oup p 2a: IMPACT At what levels do we need to consider impact (e.g. individual, • institutional, regional, national, political, sectoral, European, programme)? What tools or approaches do you use to measure impact? • When should you measure, record and report on impact… • and to whom should findings be reported? Is it important to have comparative data (i.e. gathering data • before and after)? What are the benefits of measuring and reporting impact? • What are the challenges and inhibitors associated with • impact measurement?

  2. Grou oup p 2b: DISSEMIN EMINATION ION At what levels do we need to disseminate (e.g. institutional, • regional, national, political, sectoral, European, global)? What tools or approaches do you use for dissemination… and • with which target audiences? How does the nature of dissemination change during the • lifetime of the (mobility or development) programme? How do you document your dissemination activity? • How do you judge the effectiveness of dissemination? • What are the benefits of dissemination? • What are the challenges and inhibitors associated with • dissemination?

  3. Lun Lunch h Br Brea eak 12:4 :45 - 14:1 :15 … then return to Plenary Room

  4. Thr hree ee St Step p Ple Plenary nary

  5. Whe Where ha e have e we be e been? en?

  6. Wha What d t did id we sa e say? y?

  7. Wor orksh shop op Fee eedbac dback S HORT S TATEMENTS PLUS P OSITIVE V ALIDATION BY P ARTICIPANTS

  8. In Inter teraction action is is Allo llowed ed Some Interaction Required!

  9. Testing sting, , Testing sting Du Dublin lin is is th the e Ca Capi pital tal of of Ir Ireland eland

  10. Testing sting, , Testing sting The he wea eath ther er in in Du Dublin lin ha has s bee been n in inter teresting! esting!

  11. Testing sting, , Testing sting The he fac acil ilita itator tor of of th this is even ent t is is excel cellent! lent!

  12. KA1: A1: Crea eating ting an and d Implementi plementing ng a a Quality ality Eu European opean Development elopment Pla lan Tore (Norway)

  13. Three ee Lit ittl tle e Words ds Why What How

  14. KA2: A2: Sh Sharing aring Exp xperience erience an and d Good od Pr Practice actice in in TT TTL Acti ctivit vities ies Siobhán (Ireland)

  15. Framing aming th the e Resu esults lts PREPARATION IMPLEMENTATION FOLLOW-UP Timing is Preparation is Obtain Everything Key Feedback Expand Your Capture and Review Your Ideas Document Results It’s Good to Think About Look to the Talk Your Delivery Future

  16. KA1: A1: Qual ality ity in in Mobili bility ty an and d th the e VE VET T Mobility bility Char arter ter Elva (Ireland)

  17. European opean Char arter ter ORGANISATIONAL ISSUES • Sustainability • Capturing Learning Outcomes (ECVET, MoU, Europass) • Building Capacity (review, evaluate, innovate… good tools) IMPACT • Framework (beginning-developing-embedding-leading) • Multi-level (learners, staff, organisation) EUROPEAN INTERNATIONALISATION STRATEGY • Elements of a Quality Charter • How to Ensure “Quality” Sustainable European Internationalisation • Operating Environment: How to Make the Charter Dynamic, Flexible and Responsive

  18. KA2: A2: Qual ality ity Man anagement ement in in Str trate tegic gic Par artner tnerships ships Paul (Scotland-UK)

  19. In Inno novation tion Il Illumina lumination tion Esc Escala alation tion

  20. Ne New Pr w Prog ogramme amme Ne New Be w Beas ast w Termi erminology nology Ne New

  21. Pr Prob oblem lem-Nee Need Qu Qual ality ity Ch Chec eck So Solution lution

  22. Tha hat t is is th the e Ques uestion! tion! Wh Why Too ools ls / R / Req equir uirements ements How ow Everybody rybody Who Who All ll of of th the e ti time me When Wh en Ev Everything erything Wh What

  23. KA1 A1 an and d KA2: A2: Developin eloping g an and d Id Ident entifying ifying Learn earning ing Outcom tcomes es Tuula (Finland)

  24. When planning geographical mobility do you prepare LOs or use existing units and modules? EXISTING MODULES  NEW MODULES 

  25. What is the Optimal Balance between Occupational LOs and Transversal LOs? This depends on the:  Country  Education System  Field of Study  Stage of Learning

  26. Are LOs Necessary for all Forms of Learning... irrespective of Learning Duration and Type? YES YES

  27. Who (in your opinion) should be involved in developing/identifying LOs?  Teachers  Guidance Counsellors  Workplace Supervisors  Employers  Business Experts  Quality Managers  Students (feedback)

  28. What is the State-of-Play in Your Country regarding LOs and VET?  Competence based grading is used  VET curricula reforms in process… new curricula will be based on LOs  VET already based on Units, LOs and individual learning paths  ECVET principles now being implemented

  29. KA1 A1 an and d KA2: A2: Ass ssessing essing an and d Recogni ecognising sing Lear earning ning Outco tcomes mes Siobhán (Ireland)

  30. Is there a difference between recognition and validation? If so, what? YE YES! S! Recognition = Acknowledgement Validation = Approval

  31. What assessment tools or methods could be included for those undertaking geographical mobility (KA1 or KA2)? All depends on targeted Learning Outcomes!

  32. What are the positive outcomes of assessment and recognition for students or learners? Achievement!

  33. What are the positive outcomes of assessment and recognition for teachers, trainers and other educators? Students versus Teachers!

  34. When learning outcomes are not achieved, how is this addressed? Acknowledge and Review!

  35. What are the alternatives to recognition and validation for staff mobility? Self-evaluation plus Professional and Institutional Development

  36. KA1 1 an and d KA2: 2: Impact pact Margrét (Iceland)

  37. At what levels do we need to consider impact (e.g. individual, institutional, regional, national, political, sectoral, European, programme)?  Depending on the project!  KA1  Individual and Institutional… although not everyone agreed  Important to target National / Sectoral Impact  Essential to have impact on a European Scale

  38. What tools or approaches do you use to measure impact? Talks with Surveys Participants Interviews Presentations Questionnaires Media Cover SWOT Analysis Reports Indicators

  39. When should you measure, record and report on impact… and to whom should findings be reported? All of the time!! Policy makers Mid-term Principles During Stakeholders After Politicians 5 years later Partners NA

  40. Is it important to have comparative data (i.e. gathering data before and after)? YES YES

  41. What are the benefits of measuring and reporting impact? SUSTAINABILITY!! External Internal Policy Makers Quality Stakeholders Adds Value Funding Motivation Possibilities

  42. What are the challenges and inhibitors associated with impact measurement?  Takes time  Responsiveness  What and how to measure  Lack of immediate visibility

Recommend


More recommend