electric and magnetic dipole moments
play

Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments 1 Seminar Themis Bowcock - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Themis Bowcock Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments 1 Seminar Themis Bowcock Today: Electric and Magnetic Dipoles What are they? Why are we interested in looking at them? The frozen-spin technique magic momentum for moments


  1. Comments Moments … “ If you enjoy doing difficult experiments, you can do them, but it is a waste of time and effort because the result is already known ” : Pauli "No experiment is so dumb, that it 1968 QED alone wasn’t sufficient should not be tried” : Gerlach “ the Muon obeys QED. g-2 is correct to 0.5%. In my opinion, it will be right to any accuracy. So it’s not worth doing the experiment ” Head of CERN Theory at time of CERN EDMs “ would you like to predict the result ?” : F . Farley FRS 47 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  2. He has worked on wave energy since 1976 and has filed 14 patents in this area. He is the co-inventor of the Anaconda wave energy device. [7] He won the 1980 Hughes Medal of the Royal Society "for his ultra-precise measurements of the muon magnetic moment, a severe test of quantum electrodynamics and of the nature of the muon". [8] 1967-82 he was the academic head of the Royal Military College of Science, Shrivenham GB. He has been visiting professor at Yale, Reading University (of engineering), University of New South Wales (of theoretical physics) and currently at Southampton. Moving to France in 1986 he helped the cancer hospital Centre Antoine Lacassagne in Nice to instal a 65 MeV cyclotron for proton therapy. [9] He designed the beam transport which brings the beam to the patient. Operating unmodified for 23 years the system has treated over 3000 patients for ocular melanoma with a cure rate of 95% . His publications include the Methuen monograph "Elements of Pulse Circuits" (1955) [10] translated into French and Spanish and papers on particle physics, relativity, wave energy and cosmology. “Catalysed Fusion is a sizzling true -to- life fantasy, woven around particle physics in Geneva, the city where nations meet and particles collide. Love and adventure, discovery and intrigue, rivalry, skill and skulduggery at the frontiers of physics. How science works, how scientists operate around those big ” 48 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  3. Comments 49 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  4. Muon EDM 50 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  5. Purcell and Ramsey 51 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  6. Ele lectron Magnetic ic Dip ipole Moment Gabrie ielse • Most precisely measured property of an elementary particle • Most precise prediction of the standard model • Most precise confrontation of theory and experiment • Greatest triumph of the standard model 52 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  7. system under P and T is not symmetric with respect to the initial system, Having CPT symmetry, the combined symmetry CP is violated as well. 53 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  8. Technique Magnetic dipole Electric dipole h is a dimensionless moment moment constant, analogous to g Hamiltonian for a fermion in B and E Transformation field Properties μ B E d C - - - - P + - + + T - + - - If CPT valid  EDM would violate CP - + - - CP CPT + + + + 54 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  9. 10 billion matter/anti- matter pairs annihilated each other leaving behind 1 matter particle and 10 billion photons cosmic background radiation, the echo of the Big Bang we measure today. 55 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  10. “CP Symmetry Violation, C -Asymmetry, and Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe” e". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 5 : 24 – 27. 1967 56 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  11. 57 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  12. Any non-zero EDM for a muon = New Physics Better limits from electrons but 2 nd generation may be “special” (loops) 58 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  13. Technique Dependence on E field cancelled out by choosing  = 29.3 59 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  14. Technique  EDM tilts the precession plane of the muons by an angle d EDM tilts the muon precession plane towards the centre of the g-2 storage ring Ԧ 𝛾 Measured angle is reduced due to Lorentz contraction: 60 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  15. Technique Muon : EDM O(1M) events in trackers (few weeks) • Precession plane tilts --> sensitivity at 10 -19 towards center of ring [BNL] • Causes an increase in muon precession Expect several billion frequency events in the Oscillation is 90 o out of • trackers and so reach phase with the a  10 -21 oscillation 61 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  16. FNAL g-2 progressing well: data 2018. Results 2019. - Quad incident will be overcome Theory in good shape for reducing its contribution to the systematic error • if we could “just” resolve the g -2 discrepancy at FNAL, the benefits for constraining BSM scenarios would be enormous. Is there one last hurrah for this beautiful method & equipment? There IS a cross-check mu-e scatter 62 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  17. UPGRADE? ( &  -) 63 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  18. Click to edit Master title style Proton Electric Dipole Click to edit Master subtitle style Moment Themis Bowcock CERN Workshop 26 th March 2018 64 Seminar Themis Bowcock 21/03/2018 64

  19. Motivations CP sources/EDM Po spelov,Shaposnikov, PBC 16 • Required for Baryogenesis • Strong CP Problem • Beyond Colliders: “ The PeV scale allows a generic flavour structure and, with TeV gauginos, EDMs are one of the few observables able to probe this scale via log- enhanced quark CEDMs ” Ritz, Lepton Moments ‘14 65 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  20. Physics 𝑒 𝑜 ~ − 𝑒 𝑞 M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, Ann. Phys. 318 (2005) 119. 66 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  21. Physics J.M.Pendlebury and E.A. Hinds, NIMA 440 (2000) 471 neutron proton electron electron muon 2010 2020 SM value reached in Timmermans, LM 14 - 2075 for neutron - 2115 for electron pEDM = advancement & opportunity 67 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  22. Looking for an EDM above SM level 68 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  23. Physics Marciano, CM9/KAIST/Korea, Nov 2014 69 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  24. Pospelov,PBC,16 . 70 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  25. Technique 71 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  26. Technique More details Bei PBC 16 𝑒Ԧ 𝑡 𝜈 × 𝐶 + Ԧ 𝑒𝑢 = Ԧ 𝑒 × 𝐹 72 10 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  27. Technique Ԧ 𝜕 𝑏 = 𝑓 1 𝛾 × 𝐹 𝑛 𝐻𝐶 − 𝐻 − 𝛿 2 − 1 𝑑 𝜕 𝑓 = 𝜃𝑓 𝐹 𝑑 + Ԧ 𝛾 × 𝐶 2𝑛 1 + Τ 𝐶 = 0 & 𝛿 = 1 𝐻 73 10 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  28. Technique Counter-rotating beams No net flow of current 74 11 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  29. Technique 75 12 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  30. Technique = 2.5×10 -29 e-cm / year  p : 10 3 s Polarization Lifetime (Spin Coherence Time) A : 0.6 Left/right asymmetry observed by the polarimeter P : 0.8 Beam polarization N c : 5x10 10 p/cycle Total number of stored particles per cycle T Tot : 10 7 s Total running time per year f : 1% Useful event rate fraction (efficiency for EDM) E R : 8 MV/m Radial electric field strength 76 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  31. Elements What has been accomplished? • Polarimeter systematic errors KVI, COSY • Precision beam/spin dynamics tracking CAPP • Stable lattice, IBS lifetime: ~10 4 s Lebedev, FNAL • SCT 10 3 s; role of sextupoles understood COSY . • Feasibility of required electric field strength <8 MV/m, 3cm plate separation JLab, FNAL • Analytic estimation of electric fringe fields and precision beam/spin dynamics tracking. Stable! 77 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  32. Elements Feasibility all-electric ring • Two technical reviews have been performed BNL: Dec 2009, March 2011 • Fermilab review. Lebedev “concept sound” • First all-electric ring: AGS-analogue (‘53 - ’57) M. Plotkin ‘91 Ring radius 4.7m Proposed-built 1953-57 • Heidelberg Cryogenic Storage Ring: (expertise in collab.) 78 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  33. Elements B-field Shielding Requirements • No need for shielding: In principle, with counter-rotating beams. • However: BPMs are located only in straight sections  sampling finite. The B-field needs to be less than (10-100nT) everywhere to reduce its effect. We are building a prototype Selcuk Haciomeroglu, CAPP 79 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  34. Elements Polarimeter analyzing power 80 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  35. Elements pEDM polarimeter E. Stephenson Extraction: lowering the “defining aperture” vertical focusing strength polarimeter target Micro-Megas detector, GEMs, MRPC or Si. Brantjes et al., NIMA 2012.  L R   carries EDM signal  H L R increases slowly with time  D U carries in-plane (g-2)    V precession signal D U 81 Seminar Themis Bowcock 81

  36. Conclusion Comments – CPEDM @ CERN • Costing: Full costing for BNL proposal Proposal here O(20MCHF) Electric has design “technically driven schedule” • Ideally pbars (but need plenty!) Superb CPT check • Phase-II proton increasing sensitivity by order of magnitude possible 82 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  37. Conclusion n,p and D W. Marciano “the programme ( 3 experiments together) with EDM sensitivity of better than 10 −28 e·cm can pin-point the CP-violating source should one of them discovers a non-zero value” 83 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  38. Conclusion Summary - CPEDM •  QCD & window to • All electric ring design well developed CP “do the simple things…” • NP into the PeV • Power of the method range High intensity beams • CP-violating Long beam lifetime Spin Coherence Time sources beyond Counter rotating beams the SM, e.g. SUSY cancel B-field effects • pEDM >10 • Experienced team/collaboration sensitive than the based on g-2 best nEDM plans 84 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  39. Super precise measurements Using magic momenta 85 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  40. Note • Huge worldwide effort on EDMs Electrons (new atom interferometer technique!) Neutrons • A fundamental way to look for NP and test the SM • Many techniques of which frozen spin is only one 86 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  41. Measure what is measureable and make measureable what is not so.” Galileo Galiliei 1564-1642 87 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  42. B-field / ω p systematics 0.17 ppm 0.07 ppm 88 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  43. Electron Magnetic Dipole Moment • Most precisely measured property of an elementary particle • Most precise prediction of the standard model • Most precise confrontation of theory and experiment • Greatest triumph of the standard model 89 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  44.  e - conversion operators R.Kitano, M.Koike and Y.Okada. 2002 have calculated the coherent  - e conversion branching ratios in various nuclei for general LFV interactions to see: Mu2e Project-X (1) which nucleus is the most sensitive to mu-e conversion searches, Mu2e (2) whether one can distinguish various theoretical models by the Z dependence. L (TeV) Relevant quark level interactions Sindrum II MEG Dipole MEGA Scalar κ (non-dipole term) Vector 90 Seminar Themis Bowcock (fig, from Andrew Norman) B. Lee Roberts, TRIUMF – 7 April 2010 - p. 90/57

  45. g-2 91 Seminar 21/03/2018 Themis Bowcock

  46. Technique Lattice Mei Bai PBC 16 92 14 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  47. Elements E-field plate module Beam position We are also producing new Q1 deflectors for g-2 experiment 93 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  48. Elements JLab results with TiN-coated Al No field emission at 225 kV;gaps > 40 mm, happy at high gradient Matt Poelker, JLab Bare Al TiN-coated Al the hard coating covers defects 15 MV/m 20 MV/m Md. A. Mamun and E. Forman 94 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  49. Elements Distortion of the closed orbit Clockwise beam The N=0 component is a first order effect! Counter-clockwise beam The beam vertical position tells the average radial B-field; the main systematic error source 95 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  50. Elements SQUID BPM to sense the vertical beam splitting at 1-10kHz commercially available SQUID gradiometers at KRISS 3.3 fT /  Hz @100 Hz CW B CCW D. Kawall UMASS/Amherst 96 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  51. Technique Spin Coherence Time: need ~10 3 s • Not all particles have same deviation from magic momentum, or same horizontal and vertical divergence (all second order effects) • They cause a spread in the g-2 frequencies: 2   dP w       2 2  d a b c a x y   P 97 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  52. Conclusion Systematic errors 98 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  53. ҧ ҧ Physics 10 -26 e cm EDMs Technique Arxiv 0901.2328 From 199 Hg proton |d p |< 79 1502.04317v1 < 10 -3 proposal srEDM (I) 1509.04411 neutron |d n |< 2.9 1201.5773 < 10 -3 deuteron srEDM(II) 𝜄 ≤ 2 × 10− 1 0 𝜄 ≤ 3 × 10 − 14 pEDM is more than an order of magnitude more sensitive than current nEDM plans 99 Seminar Themis Bowcock

  54. Physics Pospelov PBC 16 arXiv:hep-ph/0508135 Altmanshoffer et. al. 10 Seminar Themis Bowcock 0

Recommend


More recommend