dr keith laubscher mr dean mistry
play

Dr Keith Laubscher Mr Dean Mistry Katy Street Pain Specialist - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dr Keith Laubscher Mr Dean Mistry Katy Street Pain Specialist Orthopaedic Spine Surgeon Physiotherapist Director, PainCare Auckland Auckland Physiotherapy Auckland Middlemore Hospital Auckland 8:15 - 9:10 WS #189: Managing Neck Pain


  1. Management Initial pain management Medication, exercise/manual therapy, education, vocational, lifestyle, psychological strategies Interventional Treatments • Joint injection • Radiologically guided interventions – Nerve blocks – Radiofrequency denervation • Surgery

  2. Non-interventional treatment • Exercise • Education / cognitive behavioural therapy • Ergonomics • Electrotherapy • McKenzie manual diagnosis and therapy • Manipulation/mobilisation • Massage • Cervical collar • Acupuncture • Traction

  3. Evidence… What works? • Exercise and Manual Therapies – Consistent strong evidence that exercise may be effective in preventing neck and back pain – Strong evidence for combining exercise and mobs/manips for subacute/chronic population at short & long term F/U – Manipulation should be preceded by examination for myelopathy and discussion of risks • McKenzie therapy – ↑ pain relief & reduction in disability vs comparison (NSAIDs, educational booklet, back massage & advice, strength training & spinal mobs and general exercise) at short term F/U

  4. Evidence..what doesn’t work? • Acupuncture – No good quality trails showing effect in cute or subacute populations – Moderate evidence that acupuncture is more effective for pain relief than sham treatment or wait list control at short term F/U • Massage – Massage alone showed inconsistent results – Other trials used massage as part of a multimodal intervention and the role of massage was unclear – 12/19 studies were low quality • Education alone – Strong evidence that education alone is not effective – Education, advice on stress coping skills or ‘ neck school ’ not better than no treatment • Mechanical traction – No evidence with low bias that supports or refutes the use of continuous or intermittent traction

  5. Evidence…what doesn’t work? • Ergonmics – Poor quality of evidence on effectiveness • Electrotherapy – Underpowered low quality trials – Conflicting/limited evidence for direct/modulated galvanic current, iontophoresis, TENS, EMS, PEMF & permanent magnets • MDT biopsychosocial rehab – Limited evidence • Cervical collar – Initially minimizing ROM can ↓ nerve irritation but limited evidence – Longer use may have adverse effects eg. Atrophy of paraspinal muscles

  6. Management of headaches • Treatment involves postural correction, assessment of workplace ergonomics, manual therapy (Watson, Mulligan) and home exercises for neck / scapular strengthening and exercises to relieve headaches – self traction or self mobilisation

  7. Take home message • Strong evidence to support multimodal therapy approach – exercise combined with mobilisation +/- manipulation if indicated • Strong evidence to support exercise • Limited evidence for massage, cervical collar, education alone.

  8. Management - Medication • Paracetamol - ?effectiveness • NSAID - more effective Side effects: 25 admissions, 5 deaths / 100 000 • Muscle relaxants: Orphenadrine- weak evidence in acute pain • Tramadol – variable response • Codeine - ?effectiveness • Opioids: for acute with usual precautions • Chronic pain – controversial (lack of efficacy, tolerance, dependence, addiction, hyperalgesia, immune, endocrine) An evidence base for WHO ”essential analgesics” Wiffen P. Pain Clinical Updates March 2000.

  9. Medication for neuropathic pain 1. Antidepressants: TCA – Amitriptyline, Nortriptyline, (Duloxetine) 2. Anti-epileptics: Gabapentin, (Pregabalin) 3. Diazepam: evidence more against (Cochrane) 4. Corticosteroid ~ placebo • Some are useful in neuropathic pain • May help sleep or spasm • Sedative effects

  10. Interventional

  11. Cervical facet joint • Facet joint single most common focus – axial pain • Somatic /referred pain pattern • No specific clinical or radiological feature • Easily tested - controlled double blind local anaesthetic nerve block (MBB)

  12. Cervical radiofrequency neurotomy Technical • Heating course of nerve to joint • Under fluoroscopy • Local anaesthetic • Specific electrode • 80 -85 0 C 2 – 6 lesions 90 sec each • 1-2 hours

  13. Cervical Radiofrequency Neurotomy

  14. Radiofrequency outcomes 65% Successful 80% pts experience 80% reduction in pain – Complete relief > 6 months, – Complete restoration of ADL – No need further health care – Return to work.

  15. Cervical facet joint – Intra-articular injection • Under Xray • LA and corticosteroid • Short term benefit • Maybe useful acute and failed medical mx

  16. Cervical epidural corticosteroid injection • For radicular pain • Under Xray • LA and corticosteroid

  17. Interlaminar epidural corticosteroid injection Poor Evidence available Effectiveness defined as 50% relief or more, +/- 50% improvement in function Disc Herniation -1-3 injection; 70% patients good or very good relief – for 1 year Manchikanti, L., Nampiaparampil, D. E., Candido, K. D., Bakshi, S., Grider, J. S., Falco, F. J., ... & Hirsch, J. A. (2015). Do cervical epidural injections provide long-term relief in neck and upper extremity pain? A systematic review.

  18. Transforaminal epidural corticosteroid injection Effectiveness: • 50% patients - 50% relief 1 month; 30% patients by 12 months • Surgery avoided approx 50% in 2 separate studies Controversies: • 23 reported serious side effects • Recent move away from particulate local anaesthetics Take Home Message • Useful pain relief for 50% of patients Second injection dependant on effect of 1 st injection • • Not a long term repeat therapy Engel, A., King, W., & MacVicar, J. (2014). The effectiveness and risks of fluoroscopically guided cervical transforaminal injections of steroids: A systematic review with comprehensive analysis of the published data. Pain Medicine, 15(3), 386-402

  19. Surgical Treatment

  20. T REATMENT – C ERVICAL D ISCECTOMY • Excellent for rapid relief of severe radicular pain, or symptoms not settling with conservative care • Trends towards better average resolution of neck and arm pain than conservative treatment • Gold Standard: ACDF

  21. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion • 90% success rate for relieving arm pain • Traditionally held to be less effective at relieving neck pain

  22. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion • 90% success rate for relieving arm pain • Traditionally held to be less effective at relieving neck pain, but…

  23. A NTERIOR C ERVICAL D ISCECTOMY AND F USION T ECHNIQUE • Goal is to remove disc and osteophyte impinging on the foraminal part of the nerve root • 4-6cm skin incision with dissection through a plane between the midline structures (airway, oesophagus) and the carotid vessels • Disc is removed and the PLL at the back of the disc space visualised

  24. C4 BODY C5 BODY POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT

  25. • PLL taken down • Dura visable

  26. • Dissection carried out laterally until nerve visualised and free of compression from bone or disc

  27. • Graft inserted • Plate inserted

  28. • Graft inserted • Plate inserted

  29. Outcomes • Rapid relief of radicular pain • Surgical pain/swelling usually settles quickly • No noticeable loss of movement for single level. • Robust procedure – can get back to sedentary work within 2-4 weeks

  30. When to call a patients surgeon • Wound – Redness extending further than the immediate wound line – Expressible Pus/clear fluid – Fever • Cauda Equina – call ambulance • Recurrent or progressive neurology – analgesia and call rooms

  31. C ASES

  32. KS Case 1 • 48 year old female – – 4 weeks ago at round about drove into the back of a car – left / central lower cervical pain with frontal headache that lasts all day – Type: constant pain, worse at night, aching, occasional sharp pains • Aggravated: gardening, digging, sitting using computer, rotation • Eases: heat, massage, analgesia – VAS 4-7/10 – Nausea with headaches • No other red flags • PMHx - Type 2 diabetes, depression/anxiety • Examination – Cervical ROM - minimal loss right rotation with end range stiffness, end range pain flex, full extension, minimal loss right lateral flexion - limited by tightness left side – Palpation right C2/3 reproduced nausea, also tender CT junction – Normal neurological examination

  33. KS Case 1 • 48 year old female – – 4 weeks ago at round about drove into the back of a car – left / central lower cervical pain with frontal headache that lasts all day – Type: constant pain, worse at night, aching, occasional sharp pains • Aggravated: gardening, digging, sitting using computer, rotation • Eases: heat, massage, analgesia – VAS 4-7/10 – Nausea with headaches • No other red flags • PMHx - Type 2 diabetes, depression/anxiety • Examination – Cervical ROM - minimal loss right rotation with end range stiffness, end range pain flex, full extension, minimal loss right lateral flexion - limited by tightness left side – Palpation right C2/3 reproduced nausea, also tender CT junction – Normal neurological examination

  34. GROUP 1: GROUP 2: REFER IMMEDIATELY SPECIALIST REFERRAL GROUP 3: TRIAL OF GROUP 4: TREATMENT + INVESTIGATIONS TRIAL OF TREATMENT

  35. GROUP 1: GROUP 2: REFER IMMEDIATELY SPECIALIST REFERRAL GROUP 3: TRIAL OF GROUP 4: TREATMENT + INVESTIGATIONS TRIAL OF TREATMENT

  36. KS Case 1 • Impression: – Whiplash injury with referred head pain – mild loss of ROM but normal neurology • therefore okay to proceed with conservative management • Treatment • Education, reassurance • Home exercises – self mobilisation with movement, self traction – Assisted by mobilisation CT junction right rotation decreased pain / stiffness, mobilisation C2/3 with right rotation increased to full ROM • 1 week follow up – only one headache which resolved with exercises, ROM improved, only mild stiffness • 2 week follow up - headaches and stiffness completely resolved – Full ROM painfree – discharged

  37. KL Case 1 - Axial cervical pain and headache • 53 yr prison officer • Flexion/extension injury assault 2011 • Cervical pain and suboccipital headache • VAS 3 -10/10; ave 5/10 • Light duties, Poor sleep, ↓ Exercise, ↓Mood

  38. GROUP 1: GROUP 2: REFER IMMEDIATELY SPECIALIST REFERRAL GROUP 3: TRIAL OF GROUP 4: TREATMENT + INVESTIGATIONS TRIAL OF TREATMENT

  39. GROUP 1: GROUP 2: REFER IMMEDIATELY SPECIALIST REFERRAL GROUP 3: TRIAL OF GROUP 4: TREATMENT + INVESTIGATIONS TRIAL OF TREATMENT

  40. Axial cervical pain and headache • 53 yr prison officer • Flexion/extension injury assault 2011 • Cervical pain and suboccipital headache • VAS 3 -10/10; ave 5/10 • Light duties, Poor sleep, ↓ Exercise, ↓Mood • Physical therapies, Panadol, Ibuprofen, Tramadol • Imaging normal • Not Improving – Now what?

  41. GROUP 1: GROUP 2: REFER IMMEDIATELY SPECIALIST REFERRAL GROUP 3: TRIAL OF GROUP 4: TREATMENT + INVESTIGATIONS TRIAL OF TREATMENT

  42. Axial cervical pain and headache • Diagnostic blocks positive for right C2/3 and C3/4 combined • RFN Nov 2014

  43. Axial cervical pain and headache • Stop analgesics, return to full duties • Sustained 16 months; • Repeat RFN April 2016

  44. DM Case 1 • 44m IT worker • 2 months hx – Sudden flexion and rotation force across neck when drying back of head with a towel – Left neck/shoulder pain radiating to dorsum of hand. PN three middle fingers. VAS 4-7. – No red flags • Exam: – Mild sensory disturbance Left C7 distribution

  45. GROUP 1: GROUP 2: EXPIDITIOUS REFER IMMEDIATELY SPECIALIST REFERRAL GROUP 3: TRIAL OF GROUP 4: TREATMENT + INVESTIGATIONS TRIAL OF TREATMENT

Recommend


More recommend