disk formation in magnetized dense cores
play

Disk Formation in Magnetized Dense Cores with Turbulence and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Disk Formation in Magnetized Dense Cores with Turbulence and Ambipolar Diffusion March 21, 2019 Ka Ho (Andy) Lam (University of Virginia) Zhi-Yun Li (UVa) Che-Yu Chen (UVa) Kengo Tomida (OsakaU/Princeton) Bo Zhao (MPE) Credit: Bill Saxton


  1. Disk Formation in Magnetized Dense Cores with Turbulence and Ambipolar Diffusion March 21, 2019 Ka Ho (Andy) Lam (University of Virginia) Zhi-Yun Li (UVa) Che-Yu Chen (UVa) Kengo Tomida (OsakaU/Princeton) Bo Zhao (MPE) Credit: Bill Saxton (NRAO/AUI/NSF)

  2. DSHARP Motivation • Provide initial conditions for protoplanetary disk simulations • Large amount of telescope data • Young disks with polarization, e.g., Cox et al. (2018), Kwon et al. (2018) • Numerical simulations show that disks cannot form easily (Cox et al. 2018) 1000 AU March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 2

  3. Hydrodynamic Simulation March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 3

  4. Magnetic Braking Catastrophe • Dust emissions are polarized (on all scales) • Grains align to magnetic field lines • Hourglass-shaped magnetic field lines • Magnetic field interacts strongly with mass Planck BLAST-Pol Li et al. (2014) March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 4

  5. Magnetic Braking Catastrophe • Mass-to-flux ratio 𝑁 Troland & Crutcher (2008) • 𝜇 = 2𝜌 𝐻 Φ • 𝜇 < 1 → magnetically supported • Observationally, 𝜇 ∼ 2 (corrected for geometry) • 𝜇 = 2.63 in our simulations March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 5

  6. Magnetic Braking Catastrophe • Ideal MHD simulation • B field-induced flattened structure • Not rotationally supported • Pseudodisk • Pinched B field lines causes magnetic tension torque • No rotationally supported disk March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 6

  7. Resolutions • Magnetic field-rotation misalignment • Turbulence • Non-ideal MHD effects • Ohmic dissipation • Hall effect • Ambipolar diffusion • Non-ideal MHD effects have been studied alone in detail • Small disks at early phase, e.g., Vaytet et al. (2018), Tomida et al. (2015) • Long-term evolution requires sink particle treatment, e.g., Tomida et al. (2017) March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 7

  8. Sink Particle Treatment • Gong & Ostriker (2013) • Sink particles are created when conditions are fulfilled • Density threshold, minimum of potential, … • 3 × 3 × 3 sink regions • Excess mass and momentum are put onto sink particles • Magnetic field is untouched • Magnetic field decoupled from gas and accumulate in sink regions • Magnetic flux problem: 𝜇 ∗ = 10 3 − 10 4 March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 8

  9. Simulation Setup 5000 AU • Pseudo-Bonner-Ebert sphere ( 𝛽 = 0.4 ) 256 cells • Solid-body rotation ( 𝛾 rot = 0.03 ) • Isothermal EOS ( 𝑑 𝑡 = 0.2 km/s ) • Turbulence • Angular momentum removed globally Ω = 6 × 10 −13 s −1 • Mach 0, 0.5, 1 • Ambipolar diffusivity 0.5 M ☉ • Assume cosmic-ray ionization-recombination 𝐶 2 equilibrium, 𝜃 A = 𝑅 A 4𝜌𝜍 3/2 4000 AU • 𝑅 A = 0.1 ×, 0.3 ×, 1 ×, 3 ×, 10 × standard value (Shu 1992) • Evolve to at least 0.2 M ☉ , sometimes 0.3 M ☉ March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 9

  10. Ideal MHD – Turbulence Laminar Subsonic Transonic March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 10

  11. Ideal MHD – Turbulence 𝑠 cyl 𝜍 𝜍 = ෤ = 1 Σ • Confirm findings in Li et al. (2014) • Warped pseudodisk • Promote disk formation • Proposed mechanisms • Earlier leakage of magnetic flux • Self-sorting of angular momentum Density on cylindrical surface March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 11

  12. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Ideal MHD Very weak Weak Standard Strong Very strong March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 12

  13. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) B field line Ion Neutral March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 13

  14. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) B field line Ion Neutral March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 14

  15. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Magnetic tension B field line Ion Neutral March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 15

  16. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Magnetic tension B field line Ion Neutral March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 16

  17. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Magnetic tension B field line Ion Neutral March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 17

  18. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) B field line Ion Neutral March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 18

  19. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) B field line Ion Neutral March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 19

  20. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Accretion March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 20

  21. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Accretion Accretion-induced strong pinching March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 21

  22. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Accretion Ions experience strong magnetic forces March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 22

  23. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Less pinching → less drift Accretion March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 23

  24. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Accretion March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 24

  25. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Accretion March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 25

  26. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Accretion March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 26

  27. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) Accretion Magnetic field curvature March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 27

  28. Non-ideal MHD – Ambipolar Diffusion (AD) • As in other studies • AD shock (Li & Mckee 1996) or magnetic field plateau (Masson et al. 2016) • AD does not guarantee disk formation • Strong AD is needed ( ≥ standard level of AD) • Reduced magnetic field strength near the forming stars and in the disks • Reduced magnetic braking • But reduced magnetic field strength does not explain Vertical magnetic field strength reduced torque completely • Straighter B field lines Time March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 28

  29. Disk Formation with Turbulence and AD Turbulent Laminar Ideal MHD Very Weak Weak Ideal MHD Very Weak Weak Standard Strong Very strong Standard Strong Very strong March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 29

  30. Disk Formation with Turbulence and AD Turbulent Laminar AD level AD level Time Time Ideal MHD Very weak Weak Standard Strong Very strong Ideal MHD Very weak Weak Standard Strong Very strong March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 30

  31. Disk Formation with Turbulence and AD • Turbulence enables early (transient) disk formation • Earlier leakage of magnetic flux • Self-sorting of angular momentum • Strong AD allows disks to survive • Decoupling of magnetic flux • Less magnetic field line pinching • Turbulence suppresses fragmentation in the strong AD case • Asymmetry allow angular momentum transport • Strong magnetization • 𝛾 < 10 2 ≪ 10 5 used in protoplanetary disk simulations March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 31

  32. Disk Formation in Athena++ • Self-gravity with AMR • General EOS / radiative transfer • Sink particle treatment • Turbulence • Non-ideal MHD March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 32

  33. Summary • Implementation of sink particle treatment is needed • Turbulence shapes the accretion flow into a warped pseudodisk • Turbulence and ambipolar diffusion work in a complementary way • Turbulence allow early disk formation • Standard or stronger ambipolar diffusion allow disk to survive • Disks formed in this study are strongly magnetized March 21, 2019 Athena++ Workshop 2019 33

Recommend


More recommend