discussion of macroecononomic e ects of financial shocks
play

Discussion of "Macroecononomic Eects of Financial Shocks" - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Discussion of "Macroecononomic Eects of Financial Shocks" by Urban Jermann and Vincenzo Quadrini Monika Piazzesi Stanford & NBER Gary Stern Conference April 2010 Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 1


  1. Discussion of "Macroecononomic E¤ects of Financial Shocks" by Urban Jermann and Vincenzo Quadrini Monika Piazzesi Stanford & NBER Gary Stern Conference April 2010 Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 1 / 10

  2. Interesting paper studies RBC model with “…nancial shocks” and frictions: standard statistics (std of output, investment, consumption, hours, TFP) but also equity payouts (dividends + repurchases � equity issuance) debt repurchases ( � debt issuance) …nds that productivity shocks alone do not account for recently observed ‡uctuations, do in conjunction with “…nancial shocks” and frictions Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 2 / 10

  3. Main mechanism Single …rm, prefers debt because of tax advantage τ Firm pays factors before getting revenues, so mismatch Firm needs intra-period loans, on which it can default, faces enforcement constraint ξ t ( V t � d t ) � y t Negative …nancial shock ξ t lowers the amount that …rm can borrow I …rm cannot issue equity, lowers dividend d t but faces quadratic adjustment cost � � 2 ϕ ( d ) = d t + κ d t � d I less employment debt repurchases countercyclical, equity payouts d t are procyclical Key parameters for the importance of frictions: τ , κ Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 3 / 10

  4. Stylized facts from corporate …nance dividends, equity repurchases, equity issuance are all pro cylical Choe, Masulis, Nanda 1993, Korajcyzk & Levy 2003, Dittmar & Dittmar 2008 composition e¤ect: …rms that want to repurchase do so in booms, …rms that want to issue equity do so in booms here : equity payouts = dividends + repurchases � equity issuance are pro cyclical Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 4 / 10

  5. Theoretical explanations for procyclical equity issuance Levy & Hennessy 2007, JME RBC model with agency problem: managers can divert earnings managers need to hold equity stake in their company to be able to raise external equity negative productivity shock/recessions: lowers wealth of the managers, can raise less external equity, raise debt (less a¤ected by misreporting) positive productivity shock/booms: increases wealth of managers, raise more external equity, less debt Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 5 / 10

  6. Theoretical explanations for procyclical equity issuance Levy & Hennessy 2007 Choe, Masulis, Nanda 1993 Covas & Den Haan 2006 …rms choose equity over debt in booms here, opposite e¤ects: …rm chooses debt over equity in booms, debt easier to issue Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 6 / 10

  7. Theoretical explanations (Cont’d) Levy & Hennessy 2007: model with heterogeneous …rms have di¤erent diversion technologies, idiosyncratic productivity shocks face …nancing constraints that bind more or less less constrained …rms issue more equity in booms than more constrained …rms empirical evidence: Korajcek and Levy 2003 here: model with single …rm , always constrained Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 7 / 10

  8. Measurement of …nancial shocks Measure productivity shocks z t as Solow residuals. How about …nancial shocks ξ t ? For representative …rm, the borrowing constraint binds ξ t ( V t � d t ) = y t ! get time series of ξ t V t = value of the stocks issued by the …rm could use stock market data to measure V t however, in the model : V t � book value of equity = k t � b t / R t not like market value of equity so, instead use model implied value: y t + c k b k t + c b b ξ t = c z b z t + c y b b t Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 8 / 10

  9. Quadratic adjustment costs for equity � � 2 ϕ ( d ) = d t + κ d t � d reduced form for something else: costly to lower dividends, because of signalling symmetric?? calibration of κ : I key parameter for quantitative importance of frictions I match the volatillity of equity payouts/GDP I κ = 0 . 25 high?? low?? I lower κ : …nancial shocks are less important for output, hours more volatile equity payouts/GDP Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 9 / 10

  10. Conclusions Theoretical explanation based on single …rm: need preference for debt over equity in booms empirical patterns for individual …rms who raise external funds: preference for equity over debt in booms compositional e¤ects what happens if "…nancial shock" ξ t is measured from data? quadratic adjustment costs? calibration of κ ? Monika Piazzesi (Stanford) Discussion Gary Stern Conference 10 / 10

Recommend


More recommend