DESIGN OF 2014 EXPERIMENTS BO ILING W A TER Pa ve l K o pe le v - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DESIGN OF 2014 EXPERIMENTS BO ILING W A TER Pa ve l K o pe le v | Jo hnny Alfo nso

INTRODUCTION Intr oduc tion Outline • Who a re we ? • Ab o ut o ur pro g ra m B.T e c h • Ab o ut o ur c o urse Bo iling Wa te r DOE 2

JOHNNY ALFONSO • 4 th Ye a r B.T e c h Stude nt – Automotive Stre a m • Gra dua te in 646 Ho urs. • Coop • L ina ma r (Skyja c k), Gue lph • Prog ra m inte re sts • Auto mo b ile s & E ng ine s • De sig n • Ro b o tic s • Pro je c t Ma na g e me nt • E xtra c urric ula r • Sno wb o a rding , T ra ve lling • Pro duc t De ve lo pme nt & Busine ss

PAVEL KOPELEV • 4 th Ye a r B.T e c h Stude nt – Automotive Stre a m • Coop • Ma g na Se a ting , Mississa ug a • Prog ra m inte re sts • Alte rna tive Ve hic le Po we rtra in Syste ms • Me c ha tro nic s • CAD So ftwa re • Busine ss Ma na g e me nt • E xtra c urric ula r • Spo rts, Busine ss, T ra ve lling

BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY • Prog ra m Stre a ms • Auto mo tive & Ve hic le T e c hno lo g y • Bio te c hno lo g y • Pro c e ss Auto ma tio n T e c hno lo g y • Diploma s a nd Ce rtific a te s • Ba c he lo r o f T e c hno lo g y De g re e – Mc Maste r • Adva nc e d Me c h. E ng . T e c hno lo g y Diplo ma – Mo hawk Co lle g e • Busine ss Ma na g e me nt Ce rtific a te – Mo hawk Co lle g e • T ime line • 4 ye a r de g re e with 12 mo nth c o o p pla c e me nt Bo iling Wa te r DOE 5

BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY • F oc us • E ng ine e ring • Busine ss Ma na g e me nt • Ha nd-o n L a b E xpe rie nc e • Har • Soft Skills d Skills • Ma nufa c turing • T e a m Wo rk • CAD De sig n • Pro b le m So lving • Pro g ra mming • Co mmunic a tio n Skills http:/ / mybte c hde gr e e .c a/ vir tualtour Bo iling Wa te r DOE 6

STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL • Instruc tor “All e xpe rime nts a re de sig ne d e xpe rime nts, so me • K a re n L a wre nc e a re po o rly de sig ne d, so me a re we ll-de sig ne d” • Course • 4A c o urse fo c use d o n Sta tistic a l Pro c e ss Co ntro l & Da ta -Ba se d De c isio n-Ma king • Co ntinuo us impro ve me nt pro c e ss stra te g ie s • F oc us • Sta tistic a l to o ls • Co ntro l Cha rts • Ca pa b ility Ana lysis • De sig n o f E xpe rime nts (DOE ) • Pro c e ss Optimiza tio n Bo iling Wa te r DOE 7

PRESENTATION OUTLINE • De sig n o f E xpe rime nts Ove rvie w • Pro je c t Re q uire me nts • Co nc e ptua l Pro c e ss • F a c to rs Se le c te d • Re spo nse Va ria b le s • E xpe rime nta l Pro c e ss • Minita b Ana lysis • Pre se nta tio n o f Re sults • Co nc lusio ns a nd Co nside ra tio ns Bo iling Wa te r DOE 8

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS • What is it? • T he (sta tistic a l) de sig n o f e xpe rime nts (DOE ) is a n e ffic ie nt pro c e dure fo r pla nning e xpe rime nts so tha t the da ta o b ta ine d c a n b e a na lyze d to yie ld c e rta in g o a ls • DOE b e g ins with de te rmining the o b je c tive s o f a n e xpe rime nt a nd se le c ting the pro c e ss fa c to rs fo r the study • Why do it? • T e st a hypo the sis • De te rmine c o rre la tio n b e twe e n fa c to rs a nd re sults • Ma ke de c isio ns Bo iling Wa te r DOE 9

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS • Compone nts of DOE • Outc o me / Hypo the sis • T he hypo the sis va lida te s to purpo se o f the e xpe rime nt • I de ntify fa c to rs tha t a re pre se nt o r ma y ha ve a n e ffe c t o n the re sult • Co ntro lle d a nd unc o ntro lle d fa c to rs must b e a c c o unte d fo r. • I de ntify the se tting s/ sta te s o f the fa c to rs • On/ o ff, Pre se nt o r re mo ve d, hig h a nd lo w • Ra ndo miza tio n • Orde r o f e xpe rime nts Bo iling Wa te r DOE 10

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS • E xpe rime nts in E ng ine e ring world • Pro c e ss o ptimiza tio n • E va lua tio n o f ma te ria l pro pe rtie s • Pro duc t de sig n & de ve lo pme nt • Co mpo ne nt & syste m to le ra nc e de te rmina tio n • E xa mple s • Ma nufa c turing industry ne e ds to use DOE re g a rding pro duc tio n pro c e sse s to ide ntify so urc e s o f de fe c tive pa rts • E ng ine e ring de ve lo pme nt c a n use DOE to ide ntify stre ng the ning pro c e sse s with g re a te st impa c t Bo iling Wa te r DOE 11

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS • Cooking • F ac to rs – Ove n T e mpe ra ture , Numb e r o f E g g s, Ba king So da Amo unt • Re spo nse – Size o f b a ke d c o o kie • Gr owing se e ds • F ac to rs – T ype o f so il, type o f a dditive , a mo unt o f da ily wa te r • Re spo nse – Size o f g ro wn pla nt • Air Cannon Pr oje c tile • F ac to rs – Air pre ssure , size o f pro je c tile , we ig ht o f pro je c tile • Re spo nse – L e ng th o f pro je c tile tra ve l Bo iling Wa te r DOE 12

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS • We ll-pe rfo rme d e xpe rime nt ma y pro vide a nswe rs to q ue stio ns suc h a s: • Wha t a re the ke y fa c to rs in a pro c e ss? • At wha t se tting s wo uld the pro c e ss de live r a c c e pta b le pe rfo rma nc e ? • Wha t a re the ke y, ma in a nd inte ra c tio n e ffe c ts in the pro c e ss? • Wha t se tting s wo uld b ring a b o ut le ss va ria tio n in the o utput? Bo iling Wa te r DOE 13

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS Bo iling Wa te r DOE 14

PROJECT REQUIREMENTS • 2 le ve l full fa c to ria l e xpe rime nt with 3 o r mo re fa c to rs (2 3 F a c to ria l) • Da ta a na lysis using • Co nduc ting e xpe rime nt Minita b • F ull do c ume nta tio n a nd • ANOVA T a b le s Re po rt • E ffe c ts Plo ts • F ina l inte rpre ta tio ns a nd • Re sidua l Dia g no stic s c o nc lusio ns • Suppo rting o utputs/ g ra phs FACTOR 1 FACTOR 2 FACTOR 3 LEVEL 1 .1 LEVEL 1 .2 LEVEL 2.1 LEVEL 2.2 LEVEL 3.1 LEVEL 3.2 Bo iling Wa te r DOE 15

CONCEPTUAL PROCESS • Ide as • Bo wling , pla ying po o l, da rts • Pr os • I nte re sting a nd fun • Co mpa re two se ts o f re sults • Co uld c ha ng e b o wling fa c to rs • Cons • Use r de pe nde nt, sub je c tive • No t a pplic a b le to e ve ryda y life Bo iling Wa te r DOE 16

CONCEPTUAL PROCESS • Ide a s • Co unting c a rs: Wha t a nd whe n • Ove r a hig hwa y • Va rio us da y time s, we e k time s & we a the r c o nditio ns • Purpose • De te rmine flo w ra te s o f tra ffic a t va rio us time s in diffe re nt we a the r c o nditio ns • Pros • Cons • Ob je c tive • Sc he duling • Co lde r We a the r (Mid-Ma rc h) • I nte re sting • T o o ls • Ra ndo m Bo iling Wa te r DOE 17

CONCEPT: BOILING WATER • F inal pr oje c t ide a • De sig n a n e xpe rime nt to de te rmine the q uic ke st wa y to b o il wa te r • Why it was c hose n • Applie s to re a l-wo rld a pplic a tio ns a nd wo uld b e use ful info rma tio n fo r the pub lic • Co o king is a n e ve ryda y a c tivity tha t ma ny pe o ple pa rtic ipa te in • T e st a the o ry – po ssib ly b ust a myth • “Adding sa lt to wa te r wo uld ma ke it b o il fa ste r” Bo iling Wa te r DOE 18

CONCEPT: BOILING WATER • Pr os • Curio sity fa c to r • On-ha nd a va ila b le ma te ria ls to pe rfo rm e xpe rime nta tio n • L o w-le ve l te c hno lo g y with le sso r c o mple xity • Ove ra ll de sig n a llo we d to a pply a dditio na l a na lysis • Ce nte r po ints, Blo c ks, Re pe titio n • Cons • Re stric te d ma te ria ls • L o ng e r tria l runs Bo iling Wa te r DOE 19

EXPERIMENTAL FACTORS • Mate r ial T ype • Me ta l vs Gla ss • Mo st c o mmo n c ho ic e o f ma te ria l to b o il wa te r • Additive • 0ml sa lt vs 5ml sa lt • T e st the o ry a nd pro ve a myth • Use d c e nte r po ints a t 2.5ml sa lt • Wate r • T a p wa te r vs Distille d wa te r • Curio sity fa c to r o f “pure ” wa te r Bo iling Wa te r DOE 20

RESPONSE VARIABLES • T ime • Cruc ia l re spo nse va ria b le whe n de te rmining whic h fa c to rs e ffe c t b o iling wa te r to ha ppe n fa ste r, ve rsus the fa c to rs tha t slo w it do wn • E sse ntia l to c o rre c tly time sa mple s o f b o iling wa te r to de te rmine re sults • Da ta c o lle c te d in se c o nds • Ma in re spo nse va ria b le • T e mpe ra ture • Co nc lude if wa te r ha s a c tua lly hit b o iling po int • E a c h sa mple mo nito re d b y the rmo me te r • Onc e the wa te r ha s hit 100°C time is sto ppe d a nd re c o rde d Bo iling Wa te r DOE 21

EXPERIMENT PROCEDURE • An e xpe rime nt is a te st o r a se rie s o f te sts in whic h purpo se ful c ha ng e s a re ma de to input va ria b le s (x) to o b se rve c o rre spo nding c ha ng e s in the o utput re sults(y) • Ra ndo mly se le c te d o rde r (Minita b o utput) • E a c h pla te wa s c o o le d do wn to ro o m te mpe ra ture b e fo re b e ing use d a g a in • Wa te r wa s ke pt a t ro o m te mpe ra ture in la rg e r b a tc he s Bo iling Wa te r DOE 22