Demonstrating A Geophysics Strategy for Minimally Invasive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

demonstrating a geophysics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Demonstrating A Geophysics Strategy for Minimally Invasive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Demonstrating A Geophysics Strategy for Minimally Invasive Remediation Performance Assessment TIM C. JOHNSON 1 , FRED D. DAY-LEWIS 2 , LEE D. SLATER 3 , PAULINE KESSOURI 3 , STEVEN HAMMETT 4 , DIMITRIS NTARLAGIANNIS 3 , AND BRADY LEE 1 1 Pacific


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Demonstrating A Geophysics Strategy for Minimally Invasive Remediation Performance Assessment

October 27, 2016 1

TIM C. JOHNSON1, FRED D. DAY-LEWIS2, LEE D. SLATER3, PAULINE KESSOURI3, STEVEN HAMMETT4, DIMITRIS NTARLAGIANNIS3, AND BRADY LEE1

1 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 2 U.S. Geological Survey 3 Rutgers University 4 Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable, November 2, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

October 27, 2016 2

Outline

Basic Theory and Operation

Deployment, measurements, processing

Application Sampler

Characterization Imaging Time-lapse Imaging Real Time Imaging

Managing Expectations, Limitations and Pitfalls

Consequences of Limited Resolution Tools and Approaches for Reducing Risk

Case Study

Brandywine M.D. Defense Reutilization Marketing Office

slide-3
SLIDE 3

October 27, 2016 3

Electrical Imaging Step 1: Deploy Data Collection Hardware

Surface Electrode Array

electrode lines

Borehole Electrode Array Data Collection System

Step 1: Electrode arrays are installed in the field and connected to a data collection system.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

October 27, 2016 4

Step 2: Collect Tomographic Data

Current Source Current Sink

Subsurface Potential (Volts)

Current Injection and Potential Field

current flow lines

Step 2:

  • Current is inject between a pair of

electrodes

  • Voltage is measured across

another pair

  • Many such measurements are

collected to form a tomographic data set.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

October 27, 2016 5

Step 3: Convert measurements to images via tomographic inversion

October 27, 2016 D1 D2 D3 DN . . . Time-lapse data M0 . . . DM1 DM2 DM3 DM4 Tomographic Datasets Tomographic Inversion Tomographic Image(s)

Step 3:

  • Data sets are inverted to recover

“images” of electrical properties

  • Static images show absolute

properties

  • Time-lapse images show changes
  • ver time
  • Conductive and capacitive

properties

slide-6
SLIDE 6

October 27, 2016 6

What can electrical properties tell us about the subsurface?

6

Electrical conductivity

Moisture content (q) Groundwater composition Porosity (fint)

A geophysical property dependent on many subsurface properties….

Temperature (T)

 

 

T S S S T

w p surf n m w earth earth

w

, , , 1

int

  f      

Fluid conductivity (w) Saturation (S = q/f) Surface area (Sp) m and n are exponents related to pore space connectivity/tortuosity

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Detection Problem: Finding a plume

October 27, 2016 Electrical Resistivity Anomaly (plume) “The Needle” “The haystack + needle” “Blurry Haystack”  Plume is masked by geologic heterogeneity

  • hm-m
  • hm-m

Electrical Resistivity Cross section Electrical Resistivity Tomogram

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Time Lapse Difference Imaging

Plume is revealed by subtracting out pre-injection background, removing unrelated spatial contrasts; i.e., we removed the haystack Electrical Resistivity Absolute Tomograms BEFORE AFTER

  • hm-m
  • hm-m
  • Difference

Tomogram

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Implementation Example 1: Imaging Vadose Zone Contamination (Hanford)

October 27, 2016 October 27, 2016 High conductivity zones correspond to elevated saturation and high nitrate concentrations from past waste infiltration. 2006/2007 Surface ER Survey

Data courtesy HydroGeophysics, Inc.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Implementation Example 1: B-Complex 3D- ERT Fly around View

animation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Example 2: Time-lapse monitoring of stage-driven river water intrusion

Fluid conductivity (e.g. specific conductance) contrast between river water and groundwater enables river water to be imaged as it infiltrates into the aquifer during high stage.

Easting (m) Northing (m)

Hanford 300 Area animation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Example 3: Real-Time monitoring of amendment delivery via surface infiltration

Photo at A facing A’ Plan view of 300 Area Treatment Site

  • ~ 10 m thick uranium contaminated vadose zone
  • saturated zone hydraulically connected to Columbia River
  • phosphate amendment binds uranium to sediments

Phosphate tanks

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Example 3: Results

October 27, 2016 13

animation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Example 3: Real Time Web Delivery

October 27, 2016 14 October 27, 2016

New image every 12 minutes

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Solute velocity and arrival time analysis

October 27, 2016 15 October 27, 2016

High K zone Low K zone

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Developing Realistic Expectations

Pros:

  • Minimally invasive
  • Relatively low cost
  • Can cover a large area
  • ‘Sees’ in between wells
  • Good at the “when and where”

Note: There is NO such thing as geophysical X-ray vision! No silver bullets!

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Developing Realistic Expectations

Pros:

  • Minimally invasive
  • Relatively low cost
  • Can cover a large area
  • ‘Sees’ in between wells
  • Good at the “when and where”

Cons:

  • Indirect – correlation or

interpretation requires

  • Limited resolution
  • Not good at the “what”

Not an either/or proposition! Geophysics is most powerful when used in combination with conventional measurements!

Note: There is NO such thing as geophysical X-ray vision! No silver bullets!

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Consequences of Limited Resolution

True Conductivity 3D Images

Increase level of prior information

Conductivity (S/m)

Consequences of limited resolution

  • Images are smeared versions of

reality

  • Averaging (high values are under-

predicted, low values are over- predicted)

  • Laboratory scale measurements do

not translate directly to field scale

  • Resolution decreases with distance

from electrodes

  • Prior information can improve

resolution (buyer beware)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Beware of Misuse/Overselling

  • Blatant overselling of

capabilities by service providers is common

  • Tools and approaches are

available to test feasibility and reduce risk

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Managing expectations and reducing risk through pre-modelling feasibility assessment

Note … represents best case scenario

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Example: Pre-modelling a DNAPL Spill

𝑫𝒑𝒐𝒅𝒇𝒒𝒖𝒗𝒃𝒎 𝒏𝒑𝒆𝒇𝒎

Borehole electrodes substantially improve resolution of the plume https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Tools- and-Training/Webinar-Series/07-28- 2016 https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Tools- and-Training/Webinar-Series/06-30- 2016 http://water.usgs.gov/ogw/frgt http://e4d.pnnl.gov More info at:

slide-22
SLIDE 22

October 27, 2016 22

Case Study: Brandywine M.D. DRMO

22

Wash. D.C. Andrews A.F.B Brandywine, MD Brandywine Defense Reutilization Marketing Office (DRMO)

  • Eight-acre former storage facility owned by

Andrews AFB

  • Contaminated with PCE (soil) and TCE

(groundwater), both onsite and offsite

  • Record Of Decision specified enhanced

bioremediation

  • Amendment injections occurred 2008-2010
  • Original ESTCP project: Optimized Enhanced

Bioremediation Through 4D Geophysical Monitoring and Autonomous Data Collection, Processing and Analysis (ER200717), Major et

  • al. (2014)
slide-23
SLIDE 23

ER 200717 Project Summary

Primary Objective: Demonstrate the capability to autonomously image 3D bio- amendment distribution with time. Test Site Configuration Baseline ERT Image

slide-24
SLIDE 24

ER 200717 Imaging Results

24

Summary

  • Successfully imaged the 3D

emplacement and migration of amendment.

  • Observed secondary increase in

conductivity within the treatment zone after about 1 year.

  • Validated the cause of the secondary

increase to be bio-induced solid-phase transformation (likely FeS precipitation).

Johnson, T.C., Versteeg,R.J., Day-Lewis, F.D., Major, W., and Lane, J.W., 2015. “Time-Lapse Electrical Geophysical Monitoring of Amendment Emplacement for Biostimulation”, Ground Water53(6):920-932. doi:10.1111/gwat.12291

Injection points animation

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Post Remediation Assessment Objectives

25

1. Identify the long-term geophysical footprint of active bioremediation at a VOC contaminated site. 2. Determine the significance of the geophysical footprint with respect to solid phase mineral transformations and/or biofilms induced by the treatment process. 3. Demonstrate the use of 1 and 2 above to map gradients in the geophysical footprints of biostimulation along a transect crossing the boundary of the treatment area at an active remediation site, and interpret those gradients in terms of long-term biogeochemical impacts.

Brandywine DRMO Field Campaign: June 2016

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Crosshole Imaging/Fluid Sampling Arrays

untreated treated Eight vertical arrays installed via direct push

  • Each array includes 24

electrodes and 3 fluid sampling ports

  • Enables 3D crosshole imaging

directly in the ER0717 injection zone

  • Enables 2D crosshole imaging

inside and outside of the treatment area.

  • Enables depth-discrete pore

fluid sampling inside and

  • utside of treatment zone
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Core Sampling/Logging Holes

27

untreated treated Four continuous core boreholes completed with pvc

  • Enables direct lab measurement of electrical

geophysical properties with depth, inside and

  • utside of treatment zone
  • Enables assessment of microbial communities

and biogeochemical solid phase product inside and outside of treatment zone.

  • Enables 1D

geophysical logging profiles.

  • Critical to relate

field-scale images to long-term biogeochemical impacts

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Surface Imaging Arrays

28

untreated treated Surface ERT Arrays

  • Enables evaluation of larger scale, lower resolution, less

expensive surface based imaging for impact assessment.

  • Enables inspection of the treated-to-untreated

transition zone. 72 m long surface imaging arrays with electrodes at 1 m o.c.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Borehole Imaging Results

29 29 29

xi-1 xi-2 xi-3

  • High phase (polarization) in the treated zone relative to untreated
  • Highest polarization and conductivity occur in the vicinity of the injection well

(profile xi-2) xi-1 xi-2 xi-3 treated untreated

slide-30
SLIDE 30

October 27, 2016 30

Project Status

Total Fe (mg/L) SpC (uS/cm)

Fe Vs. SpC 5 micron SEM Image Lab Analysis Field Images  Long-term geophysics footprint of bioremediated site exists and is identified  Origin of geophysical signature in terms of solid phase mineral transformations and/or biofilms (in progress)  Interpretation of images in terms of long-term biogeochemical impacts

slide-31
SLIDE 31

October 27, 2016 31

Summary

Remediation performance assessment using geophysical imaging is advancing

Reduced monitoring costs, autonomous, continuous in space and time, minimally invasive, good at the “when and where”

Important to understand limitations, avoid overselling

Feasibility and expectations through pre-modelling

Quantitative interpretation requires coupling with laboratory analysis  site specific relationships between geophysical and geochemical parameters  mapping geochemical property estimates

slide-32
SLIDE 32

October 27, 2016 32

Supplementary Slides

slide-33
SLIDE 33

October 27, 2016 33

Engineered Vadose Zone Desiccation

Dry nitrogen injection system Instrument panels Extraction Blower

BC-Cribs Desiccation TT Field Site Pre-desiccation ERT Image

slide-34
SLIDE 34

October 27, 2016 34

Autonomous 3D Monitoring of Vadose Zone Desiccation

Time-lapse 3D imaging of engineered vadose zone desiccation

Truex et al. (2013), Vadose Zone Journal 12(2):, doi:10.2136/vzj2012.0147

animation

slide-35
SLIDE 35

October 27, 2016 35

Real Time Imaging of Flow in Fractured Rock

south to north view west to east view fly-around view animation

slide-36
SLIDE 36

October 27, 2016 36

Real-time Imaging

October 27, 2016

36

Challenges

  • Wireless communications
  • Secure supercomputer access
  • Coordination between supercomputer and field system
  • How do we set the inversion parameters before we see the data?
slide-37
SLIDE 37

October 27, 2016 37

http://e4d.pnl.gov