Dark energy and the accelerating universe Grigoris Panotopoulos University of Valencia & IFIC Astroparticle seminar, 4 November 2010, MPI, Munich
Outline Outline Introduction/Motivation Introduction/Motivation Dynamical dark energy Dynamical dark energy Geometrical dark energy Geometrical dark energy Statefinder diagnostics Statefinder diagnostics Conclusions Conclusions G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 2
Evolution of the universe Evolution of the universe G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 3
1998: The accelerating universe 1998: The accelerating universe breakthrough of the year breakthrough of the year G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 4
Slow-roll inflation: A paradigm for the early universe Slow-roll inflation: A paradigm for the early universe V G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 5
Μagnitude versus red-shift Μagnitude versus red-shift Several theoretical Several theoretical curves curves Observational data Observational data Best fit when dark Best fit when dark energy ~3/4 energy ~3/4 G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 6
Age of the Universe and Hubble constant Age of the Universe and Hubble constant G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 7
Primordial Nucleosynthesis Primordial Nucleosynthesis G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 8
Today's picture of the universe Today's picture of the universe 3 independent 3 independent data sets coincide data sets coincide Concordance cosmological model! Concordance cosmological model! G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 9
Dark energy dominates in the (flat) universe Dark energy dominates in the (flat) universe Εnergy in the universe Εnergy in the universe = = Matter 27% Matter 27% (baryons 4% & cold dark matter 23%) (baryons 4% & cold dark matter 23%) + + Dark energy 73% Dark energy 73% G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 10
Dark energy equation of state w Dark energy equation of state w Theory : w < - 1/3 Theory : w < - 1/3 Observations : -1.2 < w < -0.8 Observations : -1.2 < w < -0.8 G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 11
What is dark energy? What is dark energy? Cosmological constant: the simplest case Cosmological constant: the simplest case Introduced by Einstein for a Introduced by Einstein for a static universe static universe Allowed by all symmetries Allowed by all symmetries ΛCDM agrees with data ΛCDM agrees with data The cosmological and The cosmological and coincidence problems coincidence problems G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 12
Cosmological constant Cosmological constant Fluid with w=-1 Fluid with w=-1 Very different evolution Very different evolution Value much lower than expected Value much lower than expected G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 13
Field equations for gravity Field equations for gravity Observation: accelerated expansion Observation: accelerated expansion → decelerated expansion Theory: with matter or radiation → decelerated expansion Theory: with matter or radiation Disagreement between theory and observation between theory and observation Disagreement G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 14
Two choices Two choices Geometrical Geometrical dark energy dark energy Modify Modify left left hand side hand side → → new gravitational theory new gravitational theory Dynamical Dynamical dark energy dark energy Modify → new dynamical component → Modify right right hand side hand side new dynamical component G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 15
A very active field A very active field S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and M. Sami, arXiv:hep-th/0605039; V. Sahni S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and M. Sami, arXiv:hep-th/0605039; V. Sahni and Y. Shtanov, arXiv:astro-ph/0202346; R. A. Brown, R. Maartens, E. and Y. Shtanov, arXiv:astro-ph/0202346; R. A. Brown, R. Maartens, E. Papantonopoulos and V. Zamarias, arXiv:gr-qc/0508116; P. S. Papantonopoulos and V. Zamarias, arXiv:gr-qc/0508116; P. S. Apostolopoulos and N. Tetradis, arXiv:hep-th/0604014; arXiv:astro- Apostolopoulos and N. Tetradis, arXiv:hep-th/0604014; arXiv:astro- ph/0605450; C. Wetterich, L. P. Chimento, R. Lazkoz, R. Maartens and ph/0605450; C. Wetterich, L. P. Chimento, R. Lazkoz, R. Maartens and I. Quiros, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 302 (1988) 668; B.Ratra and P.J.E.Peebles, I. Quiros, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 302 (1988) 668; B.Ratra and P.J.E.Peebles, Phys.\ Rev.\ D 37 (1988) 3406; Phys.\ Rev.\ D 37 (1988) 3406; R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt, arXiv:astro-ph/9708069]; R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt, arXiv:astro-ph/9708069]; G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 16
Q: Why Ωs of matter and dark energy are so similar in Q: Why Ωs of matter and dark energy are so similar in magnitude ? magnitude ? First answer First answer Special initial conditions Special initial conditions: current universe : current universe finite point in phase-space finite point in phase-space Second answer Second answer Because of Because of values of parameters values of parameters: current universe close to a : current universe close to a fixed fixed point point G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 17
Not so simple to realize ! Not so simple to realize ! Cosmology of type Cosmology of type Without Without energy exchange energy exchange With With energy exchange energy exchange G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 18
Superstring theory: basic idea Superstring theory: basic idea Really fundamental objects are one- Really fundamental objects are one- dimensional (strings) dimensional (strings) In low energies string looks like a In low energies string looks like a point-like particle point-like particle All known particles are different All known particles are different oscillatory modes of the string oscillatory modes of the string G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 19
Εxtended objects: Βranes Εxtended objects: Βranes String theory does not contain strings only String theory does not contain strings only Normally, open strings satisfy Neumann Normally, open strings satisfy Neumann boundary conditions boundary conditions End points move at speed of light End points move at speed of light Dirichlet boundary conditions also make sense Dirichlet boundary conditions also make sense End points are stuck on a hypersurface. End points are stuck on a hypersurface. This hyperurface is interpreted as a heavy solitonic This hyperurface is interpreted as a heavy solitonic object, a D-brane. object, a D-brane. Brane-world idea : We are confined on such an object. Brane-world idea : We are confined on such an object. G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 20
A simple brane model A simple brane model (Dvali, Gabadadze, Porrati, 2000) (Dvali, Gabadadze, Porrati, 2000) Action Action One extra dimension One extra dimension Gravity in 5D, our world in 4D Gravity in 5D, our world in 4D Reduced to known gravity and cosmology in the early universe Reduced to known gravity and cosmology in the early universe New gravity and cosmology in the recent times New gravity and cosmology in the recent times G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 21
Cosmology for DGP Cosmology for DGP (Deffayet, 2001) (Deffayet, 2001) Friedmann eqn Friedmann eqn Early times Early times 4D Friedmann 4D Friedmann Recent times Recent times Same number of parameters as LCDM Same number of parameters as LCDM G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 22
A more realistic model A more realistic model (G.Kofinas, G.P., T.N.Tomaras, 2005) (G.Kofinas, G.P., T.N.Tomaras, 2005) Matter Matter in 5 dimensions (undetermined) in 5 dimensions (undetermined) Fluid on the brane Fluid on the brane G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 23
Cosmological solution Cosmological solution G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 24
Cosmological equations Cosmological equations With new variables With new variables G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 25
Final form Final form New quantities for dynamical study New quantities for dynamical study G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 26
Critical points and their stability Critical points and their stability G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 27
Numerical results for brane model Numerical results for brane model Evolution in the ω ω m - Z plane plane Evolution in the m - Z for for k=0, w=0, A<0 k=0, w=0, A<0 G Panotopoulos MPI seminar, Munich 2010 28
Recommend
More recommend