cost effective e government services
play

Cost-effective e-Government Services Export Control System phase 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 1 Cost-effective e-Government Services Export Control System phase 2 (ECS2) Vladimir Alexiev, PhD, PMP CTO Sirma Solutions Corp CTO, Sirma Solutions Corp


  1. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 1 Cost-effective e-Government Services Export Control System phase 2 (ECS2) Vladimir Alexiev, PhD, PMP CTO Sirma Solutions Corp CTO, Sirma Solutions Corp Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop Sofia, Bulgaria, 25.2.2010 fi l i

  2. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 2 Outline • Who We Are • What is ECS2 Wh t i ECS2 • Tools and Technologies • Data Model • Model-Driven Generation Model Driven Generation • System Architecture • Business Process Modeling and BPMS B i P M d li d BPMS • XPath-based DSL (Assignments, Rules and Conditions) • GUI Generation and Features • Deployment Model ep oy e t ode

  3. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 3 Wh t i ECS2 What is ECS2

  4. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 4 What is ECS2? What is ECS2? • Trans-European system involving 31 countries • Coordinated by DG Taxation and Customs Union (TAXUD) Coordinated by DG Taxation and Customs Union (TAXUD) • Client: Bulgarian Customs Administration (BCA) • Strict timeline. "Only" 6 countries were late. BG ECS2 was deployed on time on 1 July 2009 • 11 months from start to production (some national functionalities finished 3m later) • Including Conformance Testing with EC (and fixing bugs in the CT!), deployment and training with BCA • Used intensively: currently handles 80-100,000 export movements (500,000 messages) per month . • Users: 3500 customs officers, 200,000 potential traders • Bulgarian Industrial Association is teaching traders how to use Electronic Declaration (paid trainings) l i d i l i i i hi d h l i l i ( id i i ) • Large project: 45 message types averaging 100 fields each, 50 Elementary Business Processes (EBP), 30 man/years of effort. Subsystems: • • ECS2 Core : message processing (in/outflow) business process persistence ECS2 Core : message processing (in/outflow), business process, persistence • ECS2 Web: customs officers data view/entry • DTI B2B: Direct Trader Interface for system-to-system electronic declaration processing • DTI Web: trader portal for interactive entry of electronic declarations (manual or XML from file) p y ( ) • Messaging: EU (CCN/CSI communication, Redix), DTI (db/webservices), BICIS (webservices) • Routing between ECS1 and ECS2 (complex transition period!) • Processing Reference Data, Customs Office List, Unavailability (RD/COL/UNA) • External system integration (BICIS, CAS, RA, SDM, EORI/AEO, TARIC, other gov agencies) • Printing (Single Administrative Document), Reporting • Administration (Core and DTI)

  5. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 5 The Legacy: ECS1 The Legacy: ECS1 • Executed during 2006-2007, deployed in Jul 2007 • • Big problems with project organization and software architecture Big problems with project organization and software architecture • System development continued for 14 months after deployment, some parts never deployed • Big problems with stability, performance and bugs. • ITT ITT was subcontractor, so we knew the business and all problems first-hand b k h b i d ll bl fi h d • Problems with the tools used • Process Server: heavy XML munching leading to bad performance Therefore no long-running processes and human tasks used � used as a data flow engine, not a real • BPMS Message Broker: used only for XML-XML conversion � not worth the overhead • • Architecture is not modular • Disparate technologies used for Core and DTI, different GUI technologies • All message munching is left to Process Server (Websphere Integration Developer) g g ( p g p ) • Common steps such as validation, object construction, etc are not modularized • 50 disparate processes ("phases") of ~40 steps each: huge complexity, no reuse � Impossible to modify or extend p y � Together with the client made the hard decision to rewrite ECS1, instead of trying to build on a shaky foundation

  6. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 6 Our Approach Our Approach • Immediately (first 3 months) ran an architectural pilot • E Evaluated IBM vs open source l t d IBM • Picking tools was the "easy part": trust nothing, try everything, be modern but not bleeding edge • Finding the architectural approach was the hard part: Too complex data � generation of as many artifacts as possible is key to consistent • implementation. p Too much data � share sub-objects, copy/pass references only • • Share data beans (stateful Hibernate session) between all core components Too much processing � strict code modularization and factoring Too much processing � strict code modularization and factoring • • • All process-independent steps are done outside of the BPMS • Screens are reused between core and DTI systems as much as possible Too many Rules & Conditions (250, revised daily) � invented XPath based DSL, the d d il ) � i • T R l & C di i (250 i d XP h b d DSL h same R&C are used in offline and GUI interactive validation Complex processes (and some unclear/buggy TAXUD specs) � design processes • visually, clarify with client numerous times, implement in BPMS

  7. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 7 Tools and Technologies Technologies Selected Open Source or inexpensive tools instead of proprietary tools, instead of proprietary expensive ones

  8. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 8 Tools and Technologies g • Servers • Servers • Frameworks/libraries • JBoss AS 5.0.1: application server • JBoss Seam 2.1: application framework, • JBoss Messaging: message queuing IoC container IoC container • jBPM 3.3: business process execution • EJB 3.0: object model • Informix Dynamic Server 10 FC8: • JPA/Hibernate 3.3.2: persistence and database server (client requirement) ( q ) O/R mapping O/R i • Tools • JSF 1.2: web framework • JBoss Tools 3.0: development IDE • Facelets: JSF templating engine • H d Hudson: continuous integration ti i t ti • RichFaces 3.3: JSF AJAX library • CheckStyle: static analysis, coding • JiBX 1.1: XML/Java binding conventions (serialization/deserialization) ( ) • Subversion source control, EclipseSVN • Dozer 4.4.1: object graph cloning (deep • TestNG 5.8: unit testing copy), used sparingly • DBUnit: database testing DBUnit: database testing • • JXPath 1.2: DSL for message JXPath 1 2: DSL for message • MS Project: planning assignments, R&C validation • Jira: task tracking • Saxon 9: XSLT transformations • Vi i Visio: process modeling d li • J Jasper reports 3.1.3: reporting, printing 3 1 3 i i i Single Admin Doc • Word: specification writing • Log4J: structured logging • Wiki: engineering notes / collaboration

  9. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 9 Deployment Model Deployment Model • Open Source operating system: RedHat Enterprise p p g y p Linux • Database: Informix • Database: Informix, • Open Source Java Enterprise Edition stack: JBoss, JEE 6, EJB 3, JSF • Centralized (ECS1 was semi-distributed) • Centralized (ECS1 was semi-distributed) • Dedicated servers (ECS1 shares server with 4-5 other applications, sometimes crashed)

  10. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 10 Deployment Model p y Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Web Portal BTMS BCA Server Farm Check Server Linux Linux Application Server JBoss 4 Application Server Application Server Web applications JBoss 4 EORI/ Response TARIC AEO (Requested only) BTMS_ONLINE Web applications BICIS Request CS_BTMS SDM CAS RA DBMS Informix 10 JDBC Database: ECS2 Database: CWS Declarations Users Application Server JBoss 5 JDBC ECS2 Core Web Services Web Services Входящ JDBC Мениджър Интерп конвейр ретатор на на съобщени Application Server JMS Изходящ съобще ята Response конвейр JBoss 5 ECS2_B2B ния (Requested only) ECS2. Web applications Core JMS DB DB JMS JMS Redix MQ Request ED_to_ECS2Core jCSI / CSI JBPM JBPM DB ECS2_Online Мениджър на JMS JMS потребителския интерфейс MQ ECS2Core_to_ED All ports All ports Firewall Firewall Firewall HTTP HTTP(S) VPN Server VPN Server External Domain External Domain Common Domain EORI/AEO TARIC VPN Client B2B Application MQ MQ MQ MQ Trader System in out MQ MQ in out out in

  11. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 11 ECS2 System y Architecture Architecture

  12. ECS2 at Bulgaria-Korea IT Experts Workshop, 25.2.2010 (Sirma Solutions & Sirma ITT) 12 ECS2 Backend Architecture ECS2 Backend Architecture • All process-independent data munching, scrubbing and washing is done in one place, outside BPMS hi i d i l t id BPMS

Recommend


More recommend