contaminated sites and long term stewardship meeting
play

Contaminated Sites and Long-Term Stewardship: Meeting Obligations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Contaminated Sites and Long-Term Stewardship: Meeting Obligations for Residual Contamination Best Practices for Counsel in Implementing, Maintaining and Enforcing LTS TUESDAY, MARCH


  1. Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Contaminated Sites and Long-Term Stewardship: Meeting Obligations for Residual Contamination Best Practices for Counsel in Implementing, Maintaining and Enforcing LTS TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2015 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific Today’s faculty features: David R. Gillay, Partner, Barnes & Thornburg , Indianapolis Dr. Henry Schuver , Environmental Scientist, U.S. EPA , Washington, D.C. Sheri L. Bianchin, Remedial Project Manager , U.S. EPA , Region 5, Superfund Division, Chicago Kyle Hoylman, Founding Partner, Protect Environmental , Louisville, Ky. The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10 .

  2. FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-755-4350 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

  3. FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of • attendees at your location Click the SEND button beside the box • If you have purchased Strafford CLE processing services, you must confirm your participation by completing and submitting an Official Record of Attendance (CLE Form). You may obtain your CLE form by going to the program page and selecting the appropriate form in the PROGRAM MATERIALS box at the top right corner. If you'd like to purchase CLE credit processing, it is available for a fee. For additional information about CLE credit processing, go to our website or call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.

  4. FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the ^ symbol next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left - • hand column on your screen. • Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. • Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon. •

  5. Contaminated Sites and Long Term Stewardship : Meeting Obligations for Residual Contamination Best Practices for Counsel to Implement, Maintain & Enforce LTS March 10, 2015 – Strafford National Webinar David R. Gillay, Esq. Partner, Environmental Department

  6. Overview • Intro and setting LTS stage (Gillay; 10 min) • Perspective on VI and LTS implications (Schuver; 20 min) • Overview of IC Guidance and Case Study (Bianchin; 20 min) • New Tools to manage potential LTS for VI pathway (Hoylman; 20 min) • Some Best Practices to Implement, Maintain, Enforce LTS (Gillay; 5-10 min) • Q&A Session (Panel; 10-15 min) 6

  7. Setting the Stage • Draconian Liability Schemes • Birth of new due diligence standard • VI Evolution • TCE Revolution • Re-opening of closed sites • Long Term Stewardship Revelation 7

  8. CERCLA Strict Liability • Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), persons may be held strictly liable for cleaning up hazardous substances at properties that they either currently own or operate or owned or operated at the time of disposal . • Each State has a counterpart • Petroleum excluded 8

  9. ASTM Phase I ESA • New Phase I ESA – effective October 6, 2015 • US EPA’s assertions on “vapor” in Phase I ESA • ASTM’s companion ‘ Vapor Encroachment Condition’ – Search distances – Regulatory scrutiny 9

  10. VI Pathway 10

  11. VI Evolution • Status Update on EPA’s National VI Policy • More sites with VOCs will likely “screen in” – Trigger investigation and assessment – Do I simply pre-emptively mitigate? – Potential platform to re-open sites 11

  12. Key Issues • Pre-emptive mitigation – Entire new chapter – Incorporates EPA’s new (2013) IC Policy – AARST-ANSI Standard for OM&M • Conservative IA screening levels – Critically important – drives soil gas & gw SLs – TCE RfC (non-cancer endpoint at 2.1ug/m3) is driving risk 12

  13. TCE Revolution • 2011 IRIS update • ATSDR update (new Toxicity Profile) • Risk Communication – history of TCE over past 10 years; (1 - 11 ug/m3); now 2.1 ug/m3 over a matter of hours or days? • Toxic Tort Suits – Bodily injury / property damage • TCE will drive groundwater screening levels below MCL; EPA policy on technical impracticability under review. 13

  14. Re-Opening Triggers • New National Guidance for 5-YR Reviews – Superfund Sites • State regulatory scrutiny on TCE and VI – CA, MN, NY, NJ, CT • Litigation trends and update – Transactional issues – Environmental Consulting Firms 14

  15. LTS Revelation • In most States, ICs are generally necessary unless the site meets unlimited use and unrestricted exposure (UU/UE) (i.e ., Generic Residential Clean-up). • Regulatory cleanup levels for UU/UE are virtually impracticable to achieve (TCE, cPNAs) – Off-site issues can complicate pathway to closure • The more contamination that is left, the longer your tail of post-closure obligations will be, which will potentially increase liability and “taint” real estate. 15

  16. What is the Evidence for L ong T erm S tewardship ( LTS ) ( vs. S topping A ll M onitoring ( SAM )) for the Vapor Intrusion Pathway ? For Strafford National LTS Webinar Mar. 10, 2015 by Henry J. Schuver, MS (Geology) DrPH (Epi) USEPA, ORCR, Wash. DC (schuver.henry@epa.gov) A Personal Public-Health Perspective - Does not Imply Agency Policy See: http://iavi.rti.org and http://epa.gov/oswer/vaporintrusion

  17. Agenda • Introduction • Definitions • Threshold criteria for LTS • Data/evidence from: – Chemical VI – Radon VI • Analogous (evidence-based) Polices • Conclusions 17

  18. Does this (simple) C onceptual S ite M odel [w/ variable categories 1-6 ] support LTS or Stopping All Monitoring (SAM)? 4 Stack effects Wind effects Mixing in indoor 3 air and inhalation Rn source Indoor Air Cracks Q soil 3 Advection Air Building zone of streamlines 2c Contamination influence Convection Vadose zone 2b ‘ Low ’ Diffusion L T Top of capillary Diffusion Contamination zone Chlorin. 2a Chem. Water Table Phase partitioning Vapor Dissolved Contamination C gw to C soil gas 1 Source Mod. from slide by M. Bolas, Ohio EPA, presented Jan. 2006 Term 5 Improving Assess. Methods & RE Sales 6 Changing Tox., Exposure Durations & Conc.

  19. What is Long-Term Stewardship ( LTS )? 1 • LTS “ applies to sites where long-term management of contaminated environmental media is necessary to protect human health” 1, 2 1 http://www.epa.gov/landrevitalization/ltstf_report/whatis_longterm_stewardship.htm 2 Long-Term Stewardship: Ensuring Environmental Site cleanup Remain Protective Over Time ” 19

  20. What is SAM? ‘ Stop All M onitoring’ * • Most ‘conventional’ VI monitoring is for an: – Anticipated Limited-duration ‘Assessment’ • i.e., That can be used to Predict the future VI – & if Predict < std – Screen out (& never look back) • Does evidence support the presumed goal of Stopping All* Monitoring (while VI-source remains) ? *All = across All buildings (space) and All time 20

  21. LTS ‘ Threshold’ Criteria # 1 1) Do VI sites have “ contamination remaining ” • YES – VI sites are defined by the extent of contamination • Buildings of concern for VI, are: – Overlying/proximate-to vapor-forming contamination • i.e., VI- Source Media Conc. > generic screening values* • So there is a Potential for inappropriate (VI) exposures *e.g., > USEPA Regional Screening Levels (aka PRGs) based on empirical atten. data 21

  22. Vapor Intrusion – Defined by Source Source definition is a challenge - most of this plume found by indoor air DCE – Dichloroethylene Growing Awareness of Subsurface Vapor Sources - Especially in Non Drinking Water Areas If you look for low enough concentrations (DCE is ‘unique tracer’ of Groundwater) Proximity to a source appears to ‘determine’ its presence in indoor air (‘complete’ VI pathway) 22

  23. LTS ‘ Threshold’ Criteria # 2 2 ) Is the “ management of contaminated environmental media necessary to protect human health”? • YES • Exposure factors (~10:1) • Levels measured (e.g., up to ~2,000 ug/m3) ; – Combined with: • Typical toxicology (lab-animal)-based estimates of Risks • C orrelations with human disease patterns 23

Recommend


More recommend