NSE Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT science : systems : society Computational Fluid Dynamics for Reactor Design and Safety-related Applications Emilio Baglietto emiliob@mit.edu Massachusetts web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/baglietto-better-reactors.htm l Institute of Technology
An Industrial/Research/Academic view Wearing multiple hats: Massachusetts Assistant Professor of Nuclear Science and Institute of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology Deputy Lead TH Methods Focus Area, CASL – a US Department of Energy HUB. Nuclear Industry Sector Specialist CD-adapco. Member of NQA-1 Software Subcommittee. Disclaimer: the following slides are intended for general discussion. They represent the personal view of the author and not that of MIT, CASL or the ASME NQA-1 Software Subcommittee. STAR Japanese Conference 2013 CFD for Reactor Design and Safety-related Applications
Contents Nuclear Industry Competitiveness CFD for Nuclear Reactor Design Leveraging the research/academia efforts Review - State of the art and current challenges Where and why CFD Multiscale Applications CFD as Multi-physics platform CFD for Safety Related Applications The US-NRC example Commercial Grade Dedication of Software Experience and Challenges STAR Japanese Conference 2013 CFD for Reactor Design and Safety-related Applications
Background 2011- present A ssistant Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering, MIT 2006-2011 Director Nuclear Application, CD-adapco 2004-2006 Research Associate, Tokyo Institute of Technology PBMR 2005 2012 2009 Emilio Baglietto - Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT
Nuclear Industry Competitiveness (since ICONE13 – 2005) Emilio Baglietto - Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT
CASL: The Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors A DOE Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling & Simulation of Nuclear Reactors Task 1: Develop computer models that simulate nuclear power plant operations, forming a “virtual reactor” for the predictive simulation of light water reactors. Task 2: Use computer models to reduce capital and operating costs per unit of energy, …… STAR Japanese Conference 2013 6 CFD for Reactor Design and Safety-related Applications
Licensing Time / O&M Cost 1 Core and core components 2 Upper Internals 3 Steam Generator Internals 4 Steam Lines 5 PRZ components 6 Pumps and seals Flow mixing, fatigue, 7 shedding Stratification, hydrogen 8 accumulation 7 STAR Japanese Conference 2013 CFD for Reactor Design and Safety-related Applications
A “Typical” Multi -Scale Problem Full-core performance is affected by localized phenomena Model 1 Model 2 • Local T&H conditions such as pressure, velocity, cross flow magnitude can be used to address challenge problems: o GTRF o FAD o Debris flow and blockage • The design TH questions under normal operating and accident conditions such as: o Lower plenum flow anomaly o Core inlet flow mal-distribution o Pressure drop o Turbulence mixing coefficients input to channel code o Lift force o Cross flow between fuel assemblies o Bypass flow • The local low information can be used as boundary conditions for micro scale models. Emilio Baglietto - Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT
STAR-CCM+ Platform for Multiphysics High Fidelity T-H / Neutronics / CRUD / Chemistry Modeling Petrov, V., Kendrick, B., Walter, D., Manera, A., Impact of fluid-dynamic 3D spatial effects on the prediction of crud deposition in a 4x4 PWR sub-assembly - NURETH15, 2013 Emilio Baglietto - Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT
STAR-CCM+ Platform for Multiphysics High Fidelity T-H / Neutronics / CRUD / Chemistry Modeling Petrov, V., Kendrick, B., Walter, D., Manera- NURETH15, 2013 Emilio Baglietto - Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT
11 Not only Fuel Related Applications Mature Applications Fuel Pressure Drops Crud (CIPS/CILC) Vibrations (GTRF) System and BOP Transient Mixing Hot Leg Streaming Thermal Striping SG performance Cooling Towers Interference Fuel Cycle and Beyond Design Basis Applications Spent fuel transportation and Storage STAR Japanese Conference 2013 CFD for Reactor Design and Safety-related Applications
boiling heat transfer void fraction DNB Multiphase CFD … better physical understanding Emilio Baglietto - Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT
CFD for Safety-Related Design and Analysis CFD is undoubtedly becoming a fundamental instrument in the Safety Analyst Toolbox. CFD offers a unique opportunity for improved physical understanding Leads to more general applicability Reduced need for empirical calibration, which means “lower costs!” Challenge: Provide a path for application of CFD in Safety Analysis. Assure that the process will capture all “critical characteristics” of the application. Make the process “Applicable”. 13 Emilio Baglietto - Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT
Can we apply CFD to Safety-Related Design and Analysis ? Let’s try to reformulate the question: Is there a process that is robust, flexible, and cost effective allowing application of CFD to Safety-Related Design and Analysis. Does the process guarantee confidence in the application of CFD. Corollary: Is the application of CFD completely different from that of system codes.. Is it more challenging. Is it more costly. 14 Emilio Baglietto - Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT
Commercial Off-The-Shelf ( COTS ) CFD is apt to rely on COTS General Purpose CFD… …reasons It has been heavily used by other industries with success. Requires very large investment for development. Inherits “experience” and verification practices. Allows leveraging a very large base of users for testing. What are the requirements for use of COTS? 15 Emilio Baglietto - Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT
The fear of change … Changes from NQA-1-2008 to NQA-1a-2009 Part II, Subpart 2.7 Section 302 require application of: Part I, Requirement 7, Control of Purchased Items and Services and Part II Subpart 2.14, Quality Assurance Requirements for Commercial Grade Items and Services For acquisition of software that has not been previously approved under a program consistent with NQA-1 for use in its intended application. Is it really that bad? Is it going to make it too costly to adopt COTS? Is adoption of COTS more challenging or more costly? 16 STAR Japanese Conference 2013 CFD for Reactor Design and Safety-related Applications
A realistic challenge Subpart 2.14 had not really been written for software, therefore not a straightforward interpretation for an applicant. There was a need to provide a guidance for CGD of software which would for example include. NQA-1-2012 Non-Mandatory Appendix (NMA) Focused on dedication of Design and Analysis Computer Programs Aligns with each of the Sections of SP 2.14 and provides information where the SP cannot be clearly interpreted as it applies to computer programs Unique Definitions that apply to computer programs Limits application of Like-for-Like Omits Equivalency unless complete evaluation is possible 17 STAR Japanese Conference 2013 CFD for Reactor Design and Safety-related Applications
The process: Commercial Grade Dedication U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.28 Rev. 4, June 2010 NQA-1-2008 with NQA- 1a-2009 addendum NQA-1-2012 Non-Mandatory Appendix (NMA) EPRI 2012 - CGD Guidance for Safety- Related Design and Analysis 18 Emilio Baglietto - Nuclear Science & Engineering at MIT
Recommend
More recommend