Comprehensive monitoring system – essential tool to show the results of the energy audit and voluntary energy agreement programmes Ulla Suomi eceee Summer Study 2007 4.6-8.6.2007
Contents of the presentation • the energy audit (EA) and voluntary agreement (VA) programmes, subsidies • monitoring – essential part of programmes • how the monitoring works in field • calculating savings • results • success factors and future plans eceee Summer Study 2007 2
Energy conservation agreement scheme covers approx. 60% of Finland’s total energy consumption Within agreement Maximum coverage of the agreement in Finland The missing 15 % of industrial energy consumption Industry 85% is unfortunately mainly within ESD scope Electricity generation of the electricity generation 91% District heating of district heating sales 68% Electricity transmission 81% of electricity transmission and distribution and distribution Municipalities of municipal sector public property stock 58% Property and of private sector and state 23% building sector owened property stock of the stock of residential apartment Housing properties 15% buildings and terraced houses In addition: •public transport energy conservation agreement – covers 45% of bus and coach stock and all of national railways local services, tram and the metro •energy conservation programme for truck and van transport – covers almost 70% of actual truck and van transport •Höylä II energy conservation programme for oil-heated properties – covers more than 15% of heating energy consumption of residential, service and agricultural buildings eceee Summer Study 2007 3
Coverage of energy audits during period 1992-2005 • Municipal sector : 54% of building volume 3 700 buildings – 62,5 million m 3 • Private services : 28% of building volume 1 600 buildings – 66,8 million m 3 • Industry : 65-70% of total energy use ~700 sites, 110 TWh (from where electricity ~33 TWh/a) • Power plants : 25% of electricity generation ~40 during the years 1998-2005 • DH plants : 70% of delivered heat 10% (~30) within the EAP during the years 1998-2005, 60% without the subsidies eceee Summer Study 2007 4
Cumulative subsidies for energy audits and investments for energy conservation measures granted by MTI to enterprises/communities participating energy conservation agreements 25 23,1 20 16,5 14,4 15 million � 13,2 12,1 10,6 9,2 10 7,7 7,0 6,0 5 4,2 4,1 2,4 2,0 1,0 0,8 0,5 0,2 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Audit subsidy Investment subsidy •Of the total audit subsidies granted by MTI 1998-2006 (13.2 million euros) the share of industry is 60%, municipal sector 19%, property and building sector 10%, power plant sector 8% and district heating sector 3%. •Of the total investment subsidies granted by MTI between 1998-2006 for energy conservation measures (23.1 million euros) the share of industry is 62%, power plant sector 27%, eceee Summer Study 2007 municipal sector 6%, district heating sector 4% and property and building sector 1%. 5
Different levels of monitoring Verified Level VI savings - Confirms the savings (a legal commitment fulfilled) Measured Level V savings at site level - Know how much is saved (measurement error) s t s Level IV o c Calculated savings of d -Know how much approx. will be saved n implemented measures a (based on engineering estimates and follow e u up data of implemented measures ) l a v n Saving Potentials based on Level III o i t - Understand how much could be saved a proposed measures m r o f n Level II i Energy Audit Volumes g - Know where the money is spent n i s a e r c Level I n Expenditure (e.g. subsidies for EAs) I - Just follow the money spent eceee Summer Study 2007 6
Monitoring – what should be considered when a system is planed • what kind of data that should be collected to compile the needed information • what is the target group for the data (e.g. ministries, feed back for clients, auditors, media etc.) • level of ambition should be decided upon as early as possible when planning the programme • the monitoring system should be designed at the same time as the programme • monitoring system should cope with an expansion of the programme • if follow-up data is needed, how to collect it? eceee Summer Study 2007 7
How is the data collection organised in Finland? ENERGY AUDITS Energy Audit Clients Resources: Subsidy Energy Audit - system development (1994) Follow-up applications reports approx. 50 000 euros questionnaire ~ 100/year ~ 400/year - monitoring and reporting under 1 1995, 1996, 1999 man year per year (total 2000 -> via VA administration 2.5 man years/year) 15 Regional EED Centres I II EA Database III Motiva since 1994 The Operating Agent ”Content” • 6 400 buildings • 32 000 EE measures • 350-400 000 individual numbers eceee Summer Study 2007 8
"Table 2" – data filed from measures ENERGY AUDITS TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED MEASURES MEASURE TOTAL ROI INVEST- CO2 ENERGY SAVING WATER SAVING STATUS SAVING MENT reduction HEAT ELECTRICITY OF energy costs energy costs water costs IMPLEMEN- energy power energy power TATION € /a a € t/a MWh/a € /a € /a MWh/a € /a € /a m ³ /a € /a 0 DONE 1 Description of measure 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Description of measure 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DECIDED 3 Description of measure 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CONS. . NO . Normally approx. 4…10 measures/audit . TOTAL 0 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eceee Summer Study 2007 9
How is the data collection organised in Finland? VOLUNTARY AGREEMENTS ~400 Companies and Municipalities What measures have been implemented Accession phase Annual reporting How much energy saved data ~ 600/year and on what cost 6 Branch Associations Voluntary Agreement Database since 1999 approx. Resources: • 5.800 buildings Annual inputs approx. • 30.000 measures 30…200 figures per report - system development (1999-2000) • 350.000-400.000 total of 30.000 figures per year approx. 180 000 euros individual numbers - monitoring and reporting total stored in database approx. 2 man years per year Energy Audit Database eceee Summer Study 2007 10
Calculating savings from Energy Audits Voluntary Agreements The MOTICOP Database The Saving Follow up Data - 6 300 buildings divided into 31 bldg types Potential Implementation rate 32 000 measures, divided into 29 categories Private services 3 main sectors, industry in 8 sub-sectors 386 EA reports, 3100 measures Heat & fuels All submitted All Done 43 % 2000-2005 1992-1999 Total EA Reports Decided 29 % All 1/3 * Maybe 19 % EA Report submitted Mun. Private S. Ind. to Motiva 552 EAs No 8 % * 5 % in industry Measures proposed El. H&F to the client (EA Report, ROI < 10a) OK Engineer´s calculations Calculated on savings from savings individual measures ~ 1 TWh (2005) (does not include process industry ) eceee Summer Study 2007 11
Calculating savings from Voluntary Agreements Accounted 7,1 TWh (2005) Followed Reported Municipalities Private Services EA OEEM EA OEEM OM 100% EA measures 100% EA measures Residential Transportation Energy Industry Sector EA = EA measure eceee Summer Study 2007 OEEM = Other Energy Efficiency Measure 12 OM = Other Measure (saves energy but is not an EE investment)
Avoiding double-counting within the three instrument package 7,1 TWh/a Monitoring boundaries Voluntary agreements 1997-> Energy Subsidies Audits 1992 EAs 0,5 TWh/a 1992-> 1998 EEIs 1,5 TWh/a Total effect approx. 7,5 TWh/a in 2005 (not 9,1 TWh/a), preliminary eceee Summer Study 2007 13
Energy saving impact of conservation measures reported as implemented by industrial, energy, municipal and property and building sectors in years 1998-2005 6 5,6 Electricity Heat+fuels 5 5,0 Electricity, cumulative Energy conservation, TWh/a Heat+fuels, cumulative 4,1 4 3,6 3 2,7 2,0 2 1,3 1,5 1,0 1,2 1 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,5 0,1 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year of reporting the measures •Of the total energy conservation impact (7.1 TWh/a) the share of industry is 82% and power plant sector approx. 14%. •Over 310 million euros investments to carry out these measures •Cost savings approx. 135 million euros per year •Share of electricity of the total energy savings per year around 20% •Carbon dioxide emissions reduced over 2 million tonnes per year eceee Summer Study 2007 14 •About 2% of Finland's total energy consumption
Energy savings by energy audits • Service sectors and industry* Annual savings 1 TWh** and 30 M € in 2005 Cumulative savings 8,5 TWh and 270 M € (1992-2005) • Average realised savings in the municipal sector service buildings 9 % in heat and fuels 5 ½ % in electricity • Average realised savings in the private service sector buildings 12 % in heat and fuels 4 % in electricity • Average realised savings in industry* 6…9 % in heat and fuels 3…5 % in electricity * Process industry not included **Lifetime for savings in these calculations 6 years eceee Summer Study 2007 (ESD needs are under consideration) 15
Recommend
More recommend
