comp20121 the implementation and power of computer
play

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 12, 2023 •178 likes •1.34k views

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/ petera/2121/index.html . Peter Aczel room: CS2.52, tel: 56155 petera@cs.man.ac.uk email: School of Computer Science, University of

  1. Transition function Therefore the transition function will take • the current state from Q , • the content of the current cell from T , • and will return • a new state from Q , • a symbol to write onto the tape from T , • a direction from { L, R, N } . A move is one step in that direction. • Alternatively, the machine might stop. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.149/307

  2. Turing machine Definition 14 A Turing machine or TM over ∈ T ⊇ Σ consists of the tape alphabet • a finite set of states Q ; COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.150/307

  3. Turing machine Definition 14 A Turing machine or TM over ∈ T ⊇ Σ consists of the tape alphabet • a finite set of states Q ; • a start state q • ∈ Q ; COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.150/307

  4. Turing machine Definition 14 A Turing machine or TM over ∈ T ⊇ Σ consists of the tape alphabet • a finite set of states Q ; • a start state q • ∈ Q ; • a set F ⊆ Q of accepting states ; COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.150/307

  5. Turing machine Definition 14 A Turing machine or TM over ∈ T ⊇ Σ consists of the tape alphabet • a finite set of states Q ; • a start state q • ∈ Q ; • a set F ⊆ Q of accepting states ; • a transition function that maps Q × T to ( Q × T × { L, R, N } ) ∪ { stop } . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.150/307

  6. Comparison: TMs versus PDAs Unlike a pushdown automaton, a Turing machine can • manipulate the input string; COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.151/307

  7. Comparison: TMs versus PDAs Unlike a pushdown automaton, a Turing machine can • manipulate the input string; • process the input string several times; COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.151/307

  8. Comparison: TMs versus PDAs Unlike a pushdown automaton, a Turing machine can • manipulate the input string; • process the input string several times; • write to a random-access memory. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.151/307

  9. Comparison: TMs versus PDAs Unlike a pushdown automaton, a Turing machine can • manipulate the input string; • process the input string several times; • write to a random-access memory. Like a pushdown automaton, a Turing machine may run forever (on some input strings). COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.151/307

  10. Example We typically give a Turing machine via its transition table. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.152/307

  11. Example We typically give a Turing machine via its transition table. δ a b For example: 0 (0 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) stop 1 stop stop stop COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.152/307

  12. Example We typically give a Turing machine via its transition table. δ a b For example: 0 (0 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) stop 1 stop stop stop To see what this machine does with an input string, we first have to define what it means for a TM to accept an input string. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.152/307

  13. Acceptance of a string by a TM. Definition 15 We say that a string α is accepted by a Turing machine if, when • started in the initial state • with the head positioned on the first (left-most) character of α and • the tape otherwise empty the Turing machine halts and the state at that time is an accepting state. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.153/307

  14. Example–II Assume that the Turing machine given by the transition table δ a b 0 (0 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) stop 1 stop stop stop has only one accepting state, namely 0. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.154/307

  15. Example–II δ a b 0 (0 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) stop 1 stop stop stop Then the language accepted by the machine is COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.155/307

  16. Example–II δ a b 0 (0 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) stop 1 stop stop stop Then the language accepted by the machine is the language of all words consisting entirely of a s. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.155/307

  17. Example–II δ a b 0 (0 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) stop 1 stop stop stop Then the language accepted by the machine is the language of all words consisting entirely of a s. At the end of the calculation, the input string is untouched. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.155/307

  18. Example–III Assume that the Turing machine given by the transition table δ a b 0 (0 , , R ) (1 , , R ) stop 1 stop stop stop has only one accepting state, namely 0. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.156/307

  19. Example–III δ a b 0 (0 , , R ) (1 , , R ) stop 1 stop stop stop Then the language accepted by the machine is COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.157/307

  20. Example–III δ a b 0 (0 , , R ) (1 , , R ) stop 1 stop stop stop Then the language accepted by the machine is the language of all words consisting entirely of a s. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.157/307

  21. Example–III δ a b 0 (0 , , R ) (1 , , R ) stop 1 stop stop stop Then the language accepted by the machine is the language of all words consisting entirely of a s. At the end of the calculation, the input string has been destroyed. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.157/307

  22. A more sophisticated example Consider the following Turing machine with only accepting state 0. δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.158/307

  23. A more sophisticated example Consider the following Turing machine with only accepting state 0. δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 What is the language accepted by this Turing machine? COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.158/307

  24. A more sophisticated example Consider the following Turing machine with only accepting state 0. δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 What is the language accepted by this Turing machine? Not so easy! COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.158/307

  25. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . a b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  26. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  27. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  28. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  29. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  30. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  31. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  32. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  33. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  34. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  35. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  36. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . b a b . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  37. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . a b . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  38. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . a b . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  39. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . a b . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  40. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . a b . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  41. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  42. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  43. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  44. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  45. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  46. Running a Turing machine δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 . . . . . . Hence the word ababa is accepted by the machine. COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.159/307

  47. Configurations We use a configuration x 1 x 2 · · · x i qx i +1 · · · x n to describe a situation where COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.160/307

  48. Configurations We use a configuration x 1 x 2 · · · x i qx i +1 · · · x n to describe a situation where • the content of the tape is x 1 · · · x n (where the x j are from T ), and all cells to the left of x 1 and to the right of x n are blank; COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.160/307

  49. Configurations We use a configuration x 1 x 2 · · · x i qx i +1 · · · x n to describe a situation where • the current state is q ; • the head currently points at the cell holding x i +1 . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.160/307

  50. Configurations We use a configuration x 1 x 2 · · · x i qx i +1 · · · x n to describe a situation where Control unit State: q · · · · · · · · · · · · x 1 x 2 x i x i +1 x n COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.160/307

  51. Running a Turing machine–II δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 0 ababa . . . a b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.161/307

  52. Running a Turing machine–II δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 1 baba . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.161/307

  53. Running a Turing machine–II δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 b 1 aba . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.161/307

  54. Running a Turing machine–II δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 ba 1 ba . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.161/307

  55. Running a Turing machine–II δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 bab 1 a . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.161/307

  56. Running a Turing machine–II δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 baba 1 . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.161/307

  57. Running a Turing machine–II δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 bab 3 a . . . b a b a . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.161/307

  58. Running a Turing machine–II δ a b (1 , , R ) (2 , , R ) 0 stop (1 , a, R ) (1 , b, R ) (3 , , L ) 1 (2 , a, R ) (2 , b, R ) (4 , , L ) 2 (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 3 stop (5 , , L ) (0 , , N ) 4 stop (5 , a, L ) (5 , b, L ) (0 , , R ) 5 ba 5 b . . . b a b . . . COMP20121 - Section 3 – p.161/307

Recommend

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/ petera/2121/index.html . Peter Aczel room: CS2.52, tel: 56155 petera@cs.man.ac.uk email: Department of Computer Science, University of

969 views • 94 slides
COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/ petera/2121/index.html . Peter Aczel room: CS2.52, tel: 56155 petera@cs.man.ac.uk email: School of Computer Science, University of

978 views • 95 slides
COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/ petera/2121/index.html . Peter Aczel room: CS2.52, tel: 56155 petera@cs.man.ac.uk email: School of Computer Science, University of

1.06k views • 101 slides
COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/ petera/2121/index.html . Peter Aczel room: CS2.52, tel: 56155 petera@cs.man.ac.uk email: Department of Computer Science, University of

632 views • 49 slides
COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part

COMP20121 The Implementation and Power of Computer Languages Power Part http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/ petera/2121/index.html . Peter Aczel room: CS2.52, tel: 56155 petera@cs.man.ac.uk email: School of Computer Science, University of

928 views • 78 slides
Motivation Physical implementation impacts power dissipation. Implementation Techniques for

Motivation Physical implementation impacts power dissipation. Implementation Techniques for

Motivation Physical implementation impacts power dissipation. Implementation Techniques for Reduced Power and Energy Professor Per Larsson-Edefors Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Implementation

228 views • 7 slides
1 B-MAC Implementation B-MAC Implementation Low Power Listening (LPL) B-MAC = Link Protocol

1 B-MAC Implementation B-MAC Implementation Low Power Listening (LPL) B-MAC = Link Protocol

Presentation Outline Introduction B-MAC Implementation Versatile Low Power Media Access for B-MAC Results Wireless Sensor Networks Critique Comparison Presented By: Eitan Marder-Eppstein 2 Why is B-MAC Needed? B-MAC's Idea of MAC for WSN

574 views • 3 slides
ECE260B CSE241A Winter 2010 Low power implementation A system perspective Website:

ECE260B CSE241A Winter 2010 Low power implementation A system perspective Website:

ECE260B CSE241A Winter 2010 Low power implementation A system perspective Website: http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/wi10/cse241a/ ECE240B/CSE241A Low power techniques 1 Sorin Dobre, Qualcomm Low power implementation : Metrics User

448 views • 31 slides
Efficient computation of ADF test: The need of big computer power in economics Athanassios

Efficient computation of ADF test: The need of big computer power in economics Athanassios

ADF test Recent works and applications Octave implementation Concluding remarks Efficient computation of ADF test: The need of big computer power in economics Athanassios Stavrakoudis Department of Economics University of Ioannina

176 views • 15 slides
Local Market Power Mitigation Enhancements Implementation Details George Angelidis, Ph.D.

Local Market Power Mitigation Enhancements Implementation Details George Angelidis, Ph.D.

Local Market Power Mitigation Enhancements Implementation Details George Angelidis, Ph.D. Principal, Power Systems Technology Development Draft Tariff Review Stakeholder Conference Call May 8, 2019 Current LMPM Bid Inheritance MPM h h +1 B1

217 views • 4 slides
Multicores for Performance and Low Power Power consumption is one of the biggest problems for

Multicores for Performance and Low Power Power consumption is one of the biggest problems for

Automatic Multigrain Parallelization, Memory Optimization and Power Reduction Compiler for Multicore Systems Hironori Kasahara, Ph.D., IEEE Fellow IEEE Computer Society President 2018 Professor, Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering

713 views • 53 slides
Standards in East Africa AFSEC WORKSHOP ON IMPLEMENTATION OF STANDARDS IN THE AFRICAN POWER

Standards in East Africa AFSEC WORKSHOP ON IMPLEMENTATION OF STANDARDS IN THE AFRICAN POWER

Power Interconnection Standards in East Africa AFSEC WORKSHOP ON IMPLEMENTATION OF STANDARDS IN THE AFRICAN POWER SECTOR SANDTON CONVENTION CENTRE, 27-03-2017 Eng. Jasper Oduor, Edson Engineers Contents Introduction Why standards for

198 views • 18 slides
Market Power Mitigation: Implementation Issues James Bushnell Member, California ISO Market

Market Power Mitigation: Implementation Issues James Bushnell Member, California ISO Market

Market Power Mitigation: Implementation Issues James Bushnell Member, California ISO Market Surveillance Committee Folsom, California May 15, 2020 Emerging Challenges in Market Power Mitigation Expansion of EIM means many vertically

322 views • 6 slides
SURGICAL SAFETY CHECKLISTS Power Play: Managing the Forces that Impact Implementation The

SURGICAL SAFETY CHECKLISTS Power Play: Managing the Forces that Impact Implementation The

1 SURGICAL SAFETY CHECKLISTS Power Play: Managing the Forces that Impact Implementation The Experience of a small isolated community hospital Presentation by: Mark Balcaen. March 8 -9 , 2010 2 Background Kenora (230 km from Winnipeg)

402 views • 15 slides
Implementation Workshop The Power of Procurement for Low-Carbon, Resilient Communities May 10,

Implementation Workshop The Power of Procurement for Low-Carbon, Resilient Communities May 10,

REGIONAL CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 2.0 Implementation Workshop The Power of Procurement for Low-Carbon, Resilient Communities May 10, 2019 1 2 Regional Climate Action Plan Body text Visit: www.RCAP2.org 3 The Power of Procurement

1.52k views • 95 slides
Comprehensive Design & Implementation Approach of Solar Power System in Subtropical Hong Kong

Comprehensive Design & Implementation Approach of Solar Power System in Subtropical Hong Kong

Comprehensive Design & Implementation Approach of Solar Power System in Subtropical Hong Kong Ir Dr Tony Lam Associate Director of Arup CEng, CPEng, MHKIE, WELL Faculty, LEED AP, BEAM Pro ND NB 13 December 2018 CIBSE One-day Seminar on

909 views • 61 slides
rP b c rP r P rP r P tx idle tx rx idle rx idle a s avg. power b s

rP b c rP r P rP r P tx idle tx rx idle rx idle a s avg. power b s

Announcement Start at 9am tomorrow. Short presentations on your research. Minimum Power Configuration Chenyang Lu Department of Computer Science and Engineering Washington University in St. Louis 1 Understanding Radio Power Cost

595 views • 3 slides
The Power of Implementation Science: Community-Based Provision of Injectable Contraceptives in

The Power of Implementation Science: Community-Based Provision of Injectable Contraceptives in

The Power of Implementation Science: Community-Based Provision of Injectable Contraceptives in Sub-Saharan Africa John Stanback, PhD FHI 360 January 18, 2017 What is community-based provision of injectables? Appropriately trained

455 views • 41 slides
Interagency and International Collaboration for Space Solar Power Implementation Christopher

Interagency and International Collaboration for Space Solar Power Implementation Christopher

Interagency and International Collaboration for Space Solar Power Implementation Christopher Dessert Interagency collaboration on SSP Would touch priorities other than space: environment, land use, energy regulation, air travel routes,

457 views • 17 slides
EEN320 - Power Systems I ( ) Part 6: Fundamentals of power

EEN320 - Power Systems I ( ) Part 6: Fundamentals of power

EEN320 - Power Systems I ( ) Part 6: Fundamentals of power system operation Dr Petros Aristidou Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering & Informatics Last updated: April 10, 2020

849 views • 43 slides
Graph Implementation Department of Computer Science University of Maryland, College Park Graph

Graph Implementation Department of Computer Science University of Maryland, College Park Graph

CMSC 132: Object-Oriented Programming II Graph Implementation Department of Computer Science University of Maryland, College Park Graph Implementation How do we represent nodes/edges? Adjacency matrix 2D array of neighbors

257 views • 8 slides
Pairings implementation in the PARI computer algebra system (explained by a mere programmer)

Pairings implementation in the PARI computer algebra system (explained by a mere programmer)

Pairings implementation in the PARI computer algebra system (explained by a mere programmer) jerome.milan (at) lix.polytechnique.fr Outline 1 Motivations and context 2 Pairings over elliptic curves 3 Pairing computation 4 Implementation in PARI

739 views • 51 slides
Topics ! Use of networks ! Network structure ! Implementation of networks Computer Networks

Topics ! Use of networks ! Network structure ! Implementation of networks Computer Networks

Topics ! Use of networks ! Network structure ! Implementation of networks Computer Networks Introduction Lets Get Started! Computer Networks: Our Definition ! Networking today: Where are they? An interconnected collection of

439 views • 8 slides
ARM FPUs: Low Latency is Low Energy David Lutz 1 Every computer has a power budget device

ARM FPUs: Low Latency is Low Energy David Lutz 1 Every computer has a power budget device

ARM FPUs: Low Latency is Low Energy David Lutz 1 Every computer has a power budget device simple phone smartphone tablet laptop supercomputer total power 3W 5W 15W 35W 20 megawatts budget screen size 3 4-5 10 13

116 views • 11 slides

More recommend