CMAS: PARCC New state assessment scores arriving by new year New - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CMAS: PARCC New state assessment scores arriving by new year • New assessment to measure mastery of new state academic standards. • The new test scores cannot be compared to old results. • Student test scores may be lower than previous state test scores – which can be seen across all levels, including other students, districts and states. • Lower scores don’t mean students aren’t progressing; they just mean we’ve raised the expectations for our students.

TCAP vs PARCC Gaps Gap between Adams 12 and State in % of students Meeting Expectations TCAP Math Reading Writing 2013 -1.2% -4.5% -6.3% 2014 -1.8% -3.7% -5.5% English Language PARCC* Math Arts/Literacy 2015 -2.2% -4.3% *Data only included where comparable assessments were given in Adams 12 and the State

New Score Sheets • Separate score sheet for English Language Arts and for Math • Overview performance rating and specific skillset breakdowns

Further Information www.adams12.org/cmas

How do you feel about the holiday season? 76% A. I love this time of A. year! 16% B. Still have too much B. shopping to do. 4% C. If I hear Jingle Bells C. one more time… 4% D. Bah humbug. D. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 6

What do you think about the new PARCC scores coming out? 52% A. I understand and am A. interested to see results. B. I’m still a bit confused on 26% B. what these scores mean. C. The whole deal is 17% C. overwhelming and confusing 4% D. What is PARCC? D. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 7

What i is the Tota tal Replacem emen ent Value o of Distri rict Facilities if w we d e do o no provi vide d deferr rred m maintenance? 0% A. $100 million A. 0% B. $250 million B. 35% C. $750 million C. 65% D. $1 Billion D. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 8

In 2004, Adams 12 had 136 mobile classrooms. How many do we have now? 81% A. 164 A. 8% B. 127 B. 8% C. 101 C. D. 88 4% D. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 9

District Planning Matt Schaefer

The 5-Year Planning Process

Goal Student Population Shifts Federal Heights Enrollment 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0

Purpose Space Constraints

Purpose Space Surplus

Timeline October Update new development data Anthem Neighborhood 3 (Filing no. 20) Units 392 Original filing called for 222 (revised in summer 2014) Estimated units built per month 5-6 Student Yield Estimates: Estimated build out (yrs) 6.5 ES 0.4 Estimated start date Summer 2016 MS 0.14 Estimated first delivery Fall 2017 HS 0.19 Estimated Student Yield Total Yield 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ES 157 20 50 70 89 89 89 89 89 89 MS 55 5 15 25 31 31 31 31 31 31 HS 74 10 20 30 42 42 42 42 42 42

Timeline October Update capacity data based on current space use

Timeline Mid-November October count finalized

Timeline Mid-November 5-year planning projections FEDERAL HEIGHTS ES 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 K 121 101 108 95 100 100 100 100 100 1 113 85 98 122 95 100 100 100 100 2 108 119 84 102 124 97 102 102 102 3 101 92 112 90 103 124 97 102 102 4 109 78 93 103 84 96 116 90 95 5 102 100 86 96 104 85 97 117 91 Total 654 575 581 608 610 602 611 611 590 Change From Previous 15 -79 6 27 2 -9 10 0 -21

Timeline January/February Internal Planning Committee School visits

Timeline January 31 1-year budget projections final

Timeline February 28 Programs and Modular Classrooms • expansions • closures • relocations

Build Out Planning

What is it? General guide to grow th in the district

What is it?

Purpose? Where w ill w e need new schools?

How often? Every 2-5 years?

Last plan? Summer 2014

Findings? Early Childhood Education Open 2-3 centers Goal: Serve 100% of at-risk students & offer tuition program

Findings? ES 29 current (+3 magnet) 32 @ build out (+3 magnet)

Findings? MS 7 current (+3 magnet) 7 build out (one w ith addition to increase capacity) (+3 magnet)

Findings? HS 5 current 5 at build out

Findings? K-8s as potential alternative to new elementary schools & middle school addition K-8 2 current (magnets) 4 at build out (2 magnet, 2 boundary)

Findings? Career Technical Ed. (CTE) Expand Offerings Open 2 nd Center

Findings? Charter Schools

Next plan’s focus Determine middle school space needs in north Do w e need two additional K-8s? One additional K-8? Or a new middle school?

Next plan’s focus Determine need and general location for elementary school #35 (the last new ES currently planned)

Current Capacity Stress Points

Elementary Schools

Elementary Schools Meridian Capacity: 576 (768) Enrollment: 770 Mobile Classrooms: 2008 (6)

Elementary Schools Coyote Ridge Capacity: 432 (552) Enrollment: 551 Mobile Classrooms: 2008 (4)

Elementary Schools Arapahoe Ridge Cotton Creek

Elementary Schools

Elementary Schools Arapahoe Ridge Capacity: 432 (600) Enrollment: 643 Mobile Classrooms: 1998 (6), 2008 (2)

Elementary Schools Cotton Creek Capacity: 576 (696) Enrollment: 610 Mobile Classrooms: 1984 (2), 1992 (4), 2007 (2)

Middle Schools

Middle Schools Rocky Top Capacity: 1,250 (1,400) Enrollment: 1,358 Mobile Classrooms: 2015 (4)

High Schools Legacy

High Schools Legacy Capacity: 2,000 (2,200) Enrollment: 2,220 Mobile Classrooms: 2014 (4)

Mobile Classrooms 136 72 88 2004 2013 2015

Facility Life-Cycle Needs Art Dawson

Facility Life-cycle Needs Adams 12 Overview: 36,000 students 31 – Elementary Schools 5 – High Schools 10 – Middle Schools / K-8 9 – Auxiliary Buildings 3 – Sports Complexes 1 - ECE 52

Facility Life-cycle Needs Adams 12 Overview: 800 Acres of Education Parking 104 Acres Play Fields 202 Acres School Buildings 81 Acres Playgrounds Driveways 44 Acres 31 Acres Landscaping 141 Acres Walkways Unused Land 54 Acres 141 Acres 53

Facility Life-cycle Needs Adams 12 Overview: 4.8 Million Sq. Ft. 1,165,618 1,069,815 Gross Square Feet 1,052,047 790,857 423,545 287,620 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 Age of Facilities (yr) 54

Facility Life-cycle Needs “Deferred Maintenance” • The cost of replacing all building components that have reached or exceeded their expected service life • The current Deferred Maintenance need for the district is $91 million • Total Replacement Value of District Facilities = $1.0B 55

Facility Life-cycle Needs How do we determine Deferred Maintenance? • Enterprise Application, MARS • Whitestone Research / CB Richard Ellis • Costing and Forecasting Support by Jacobs Engineering • ~250,000 Bldg. Components in the database • Each is assigned an expected Service Life • When Service Life is over, component becomes Deferred • If a component remains Deferred for too long, a Degradation Cost is added to its replacement cost • Building Components are categorized according to ASTM Standard E1557-09 - aka Uniformat II 56

Facility Life-cycle Needs Deferred Maintenance Examples Substructure Bldg. Shell Bldg. Interiors Bldg. Services Eqp & Furnish. Special Const. Bldg. Sitework • Foundations • Floors • Floor Finishes • HVAC • FF&E • Ext. Sheds • Paving • Basements • Ext. Walls • Int. Walls • Plumbing • Nutrition Eqp • Vaults • Sidewalks • Excavation • Ext. Windows • Partitions • Electrical • Library Eqp • Abatement • Playfields • Ext. Doors • Int. Doors • Fire Protect. • IT Equip. • Storg. Tanks • Landscaping • Roofs • Stairs • Conveying • Playgrounds • Site Water • Ceilings • Bleachers • Site Electricity • Fittings • Security 57

Facility Life-cycle Needs Adams 12 School District - Deferred Maintenance $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Substructure Bldg. Shell Bldg. Interiors Bldg. Services Equip. & Furnishings Special Const. Bldg. Sitework 58

If forced to rank a district priority for next year, which issue would you choose? 45% A. Capacity and new A. school needs B. Facility life-cycle and deferred 55% B. maintenance needs. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 60

What value drove your decision on the last question? 5% A. Equity A. 19% B. Safety B. C. Innovation 10% C. D. Fiscal Responsibility 24% D. E. Positive Learning 43% Environments E. 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 61