Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master title style - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master title style Regional Planimetric Data Project 2018 Presented by: Ashley Summers

Click to edit Master title style Agenda Click to edit Master title style • Product overview • Features & specs • Extents – grid layout • Value-adds If on the webinar, • Funding overview use chat to • Project partners ask ?s • Cost share breakdown • Payment options • QAQC procedure • Timeline • Maximizing ROI • OpenStreetMap import update • Upcoming data trial

Click to edit Master title style Features Click to edit Master title style • “Basic package” • Building roofprints (polys) • Edge of pavement (polys and lines) • Parking lots (polys) • Ramps (points) • Trails (lines) • Sidewalks (polys & lines)  DRCOG funded entire collection. • Buy-ups • Driveways • Impervious surface • Poles and signs • Pavement markings

Click to edit Master title style Capture specifications Click to edit Master title style No change to “basic package” feature specs EXCEPT sidewalks got more Type attributes and will now be collected at a 3ft minimum. • A "sidewalk" is a paved path for pedestrians; most often on the side of the road. • A “crosswalk" is a marked (painted) part of the paved road where pedestrians have right of way to cross. Crosswalks within parking lots are not included. • A “possible missing sidewalk” is an area on the side of a road where a sidewalk appears to be missing. An indication of a missing sidewalk would be existing sidewalks in the surrounding blocks. This feature should not be paved and should not cross the road. Segments with this attribution can be delineated up to 650 feet to maintain connectivity in the layer. • A “possible missing crosswalk” is a crossing of a major street that doesn’t currently have crosswalk paint markings. Major streets are indicated by road surface markings. Segments with this attribution can be delineated up to the width of the street to maintain connectivity in the layer. • An “other path” is a line segment that doesn’t meet criteria for the other types but needs to be included in the data set to maintain connectivity. An example would be a sidewalk or possible missing sidewalk that breaks at a parking apron. The section that covers the parking apron would be an “other path.” Segments with this attribution can be delineated up to 650 feet to maintain connectivity in the layer. • A “best - fit line” is a straight feature drawn through a decorative sidewalk pattern (e.g. on a school campus). It indicates that a sidewalk is there but does not trace all pedestrian possibilities.

Click to edit Master title style Capture specifications – new features Click to edit Master title style • Impervious surface • Contains all polygon impervious surface layers that are itemized above (e.g. building roofprints, parking lots, driveways etc) and all other impervious features that we have not yet collected (e.g. paved areas, pools etc). Minimum capture size is 100 sq ft. When including itemized layers, some attributed features are dropped (e.g. pervious from parking). Private property is included. • Poles and signs • Collect all visible poles/signs from the imagery within ROW and public lands. • Pavement markings • Collect pavement markings within right of way, including road lanes and crossings. Areas with pavement markings of different types will have a LineType attribute of what the predominant line type is. Lines will be broken for LineType attribute purposes only if greater than 100 feet in length. Faded paint lines will be captured as whatever the predominant LineType is. Dashed line markings will be captured as one line with a LineType of “Broken ”. Pedestrian crossings to be captured as a center line of each corner to corner crossing. Parking lines and hashed lines will not be collected. Temporary pavement markers (such as those present in construction zones) will not be captured.

Click to edit Master title style Extents Click to edit Master title style New grid layout • Faster to build the project area • More efficient for the vendor • Easier to communicate extents (most match now) • Corresponds to DRAPP imagery tiles • Increased cost  but DRCOG and the vendor absorbed the cost Extent for basic package: building roofprints, edge of pavement, parking, ramps, trails, sidewalks

Click to edit Master title style Extents Click to edit Master title style 2016 – poly and line sidewalk 2018 – poly and line sidewalk extents do not match extents match Why did DRCOG fund this expansion? To enable the calculation of sidewalk widths.

Click to edit Master title style Extents Click to edit Master title style Impervious surface Driveways Poles and signs Pavement markings

Click to edit Master title style Value-adds for funding partners Click to edit Master title style • Extra attribution • Sidewalk widths – provided by Felsburg, Holt, & Ullevig (FHU) • Building addresses – provided by BuildingFootprintsUSA • Deliveries in Q1 2019 (using 2016 data) and in Q1 2020 (using 2018 data) • Not public domain data – only for funding partners! • Sign the “Planimetric Value Add Data Agreement” to get access.

Click to edit Master title style Sustainable funding model (?) Click to edit Master title style Two product-types 1. Foundational, regional data Partners fund open data sets with detailed geometries and limited attribution (open to all) Added value is Open data is shared back only to consumed by 2. Value-added data sets with funding partners everyone additional attribution (restricted to funding Some users add partners) more value

Click to edit Master title style Project partners Click to edit Master title style • Funding (28): Arapahoe County, Denver, Douglas County, Jefferson County, Arvada, Aurora, Bennett, Boulder, Castle Rock, Centennial, Commerce City, Erie, Firestone, Frederick, Golden, Greenwood Village, Lakewood, Littleton, Lone Tree, Longmont, Louisville, Morrison, Thornton, Wheat Ridge, E470 Public Highway Authority, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver Water, and DRCOG. • Value-add (2): BuildingFootprintsUSA and Felsburg, Holt, & Ullevig • Many thanks to these partners whose contributions allow us to maintain high-quality, public domain data for the region.

Click to edit Master title style Cost share breakdown Click to edit Master title style Basic Package (minus sidewalks) DRCOG Funded Partner Funded Notes: DRCOG does not contribute funding to buy-ups. DRCOG purchased all sidewalk lines and polygons. All costs 2014 2016 2018 Partners $480,902 $248,931 $305,310 DRCOG $281,363 $78,010 $185,000 Grants $88,124 - -

Click to edit Master title style Comparison to past projects Click to edit Master title style • 2014 – 21 Cost $900,000 partners $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 • 2016 – 27 $400,000 $300,000 partners $200,000 $100,000 $0 2014 2016 2018 • 2018 – 28 Total costs went up in 2018 because we partners bought new features.

Click to edit Master title style QAQC procedure Click to edit Master title style who • project partners what • changes from previous project only how • custom services when • rolling deliveries from April January

Click to edit Master title style Timeline Click to edit Master title style Partner Initial Group Review Due to Final Delivery Delivery DRCOG Group 1 4/22/2019 5/16/2019 6/6/2019 Group 2 5/20/2019 6/13/2019 7/4/2019 Group 3 7/15/2019 8/8/2019 8/29/2019 Group 4 8/19/2019 9/12/2019 10/3/2019 Group 5 9/23/2019 10/17/2019 11/7/2019 Group 6 11/4/2019 11/28/2019 12/19/2019 Group 7 12/16/2019 1/9/2020 1/30/2020

Click to edit Master title style Delivery Click to edit Master title style Groups delivered to funding partners as they become available. • Initial deliveries as services for QC • Final group deliveries as shps on Dropbox Final regional delivery will be publicly distributed on the Regional Data Catalog.

Click to edit Master title style Maximizing ROI Click to edit Master title style • Distribute data to all potential users – tell your colleagues! • Share the use cases so the community can build on each other’s innovations • Publicize the project to managers and budget-approvers • How can quantify the value?

Click to edit Master title style Newsletter mentions Click to edit Master title style January data consortium newsletter highlights your contributions. Feel free to distribute to your colleagues to publicize this regional project.

Click to edit Master title style OpenStreetMap import update Click to edit Master title style Count of DRCOG objects that have been imported as of December 19, 2018: 18,707 Next Importathon meetup is today!